Gingival RecessionNCT02393053
Non-Pedicled Buccal Fat Pad Graft in the Treatment of Gingival Recessions
A study testing Treatment with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) and Treatment with non-pedicled buccal fat pad graft (BFPG) in people with Gingival Recession, run by Universidade Positivo.
Trial summary
Background: This randomized controlled clinical study of split-mouth aimed to compare non-pedicled buccal fat pad graft (BFPG) with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) in the treatment of Miller Class I or II gingival recessions. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Gingival Recession
- What is being tested?
- Treatment with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) and Treatment with non-pedicled buccal fat pad graft (BFPG)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 12 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Nov 2010to Dec 2012
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with Miller Class I or II gingival recessions located bilaterally in the vestibular surface of upper premolars or canines ≥ to 2 mm
- Patients who had recessions with some differences between the right and the left sides ≤ to 3 mm
- Non-smokers
- Non-pregnant patients
- Systemically healthy patients
- Periodontally healthy patients with no contraindications for periodontal surgery
Show all 10Show fewer
- Patients who did not take any kind of medicine that could interfere with the health of gingival and periodontal tissue
- Teeth with probing depth (PD) <3 mm and without bleeding on probing (BOP)
- Teeth with no caries or restorations in the cervical region
- Region that had not been undergone any periodontal surgery before
Who cannot join
- 1. Patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria
About this study
Official title: Innovation Technique With Non-pedicled Buccal Fat Pad Graft in the Treatment of Gingival Recessions: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Background: This randomized controlled clinical study of split-mouth aimed to compare non-pedicled buccal fat pad graft (BFPG) with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) in the treatment of Miller Class I or II gingival recessions.
Methods: Twelve patients with Miller Class I or II (≥ 2 mm) bilateral recessions in maxillary premolars or canines were selected. The recessions were randomly assigned to receive SCTG (Control Group) or BFPG (Test Group). The clinical parameters of Gingival Index (GI), Plaque Index (PI), Probing Depth (PD), Gingival Recession (GR), Clinical Attachment Level (CAL), Width of Keratinized Tissue (WKT), Thickness of Keratinized Tissue (TKT) and Gingival Margin to the Acrylic Guide (GM-AG) were evaluated at baseline, and in the postoperative periods of 1, 3, and 6 months. The percentage of root coverage was also evaluated. Data were submitted to repeated measures ANOVA, Bonferroni method and t-test (p<0.05).
Read the detailed description
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study population This paper aims to report a randomized controlled clinical study of split-mouth. 12 patients were selected, 8 women and 4 men, aged between 21 and 65 (mean age 41 ± 11.9 years). They were informed about the risks and benefits of this clinical investigation as well as associated procedures, and signed a free and informed consent form. This study was approved by the Ethics and Research Committee of Positivo University (083/2010).
The inclusion criteria for the selection of patients were: 1) patients with Miller Class I or II gingival recessions located bilaterally in the vestibular surface of upper premolars or canines ≥ to 2 mm; 2) patients who had recessions with some differences between the right and the left sides ≤ to 3 mm; 3) non-smokers; 4) non-pregnant patients; 5) systemically healthy patients; 6) periodontally healthy patients with no contraindications for periodontal surgery; 7) patients who did not take any kind of medicine that could interfere with the health of gingival and periodontal tissue; 8) teeth with probing depth (PD) <3 mm and without bleeding on probing (BOP); 9) teeth with no caries or restorations in the cervical region; and 10) region that had not been undergone any periodontal surgery before.
Initial therapy The patients underwent a basic periodontal treatment including scaling, root planing, tooth polishing and oral hygiene instructions as required. Additionally, all patients were included in a pre-treatment program in order to eliminate possible etiological factors related to gingival recession. Patients were instructed to perform a non-traumatic brushing technique by using a toothbrush with soft bristles. The surgical procedure was performed only in patients who had adequate plaque control.
Clinical Parameters After 30 days of initial therapy, the clinical parameters were recorded by a single calibrated operator with professional experience in periodontics, at the beginning (baseline), and in the postoperative periods of 1, 3, and 6 months respectively. The periodontal probe used was North Carolina (UNC-15, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA).
At baseline, an acrylic resin guide was made directly in the mouth of each patient and in each experimental tooth. A reference point (slot) was created in the most central vestibular portion of the guide in order to obtain a fixed reproduction of the periodontal probe position so that the measures of the clinical parameters could be standardized.
The clinical parameters evaluated were: Gingival Index (GI)16; Plaque Index (PI)17; Probing Depth (PD) - measure from the gingival margin (GM) up to the bottom of the gingival sulcus; Gingival Recession (GR) - measure from the Cemento-Enamel Junction (CEJ) up to the GM; Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) - measure from the CEJ up to the bottom of the gingival sulcus; Width of Keratinized Tissue (WKT) - measure from the Mucogingival Junction (MGJ) up to the GM; Thickness of Keratinized Tissue (TKT) - measure performed with the aid of a North Carolina periodontal probe (UNC-15, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) perpendicularly placed along the tooth axis in the most central portion of the keratinized tissue, between the GM and the MGJ. The probe was slightly pressured, under local anesthetic, towards the adjacent hard tissue. Then, the measure in millimeters was recorded and the last mean calculated referred to the Gingival Margin to the Acrylic Guide (GM-AG) - measure performed from the GM up to the most coronal point of the acrylic resin guide.
Surgical Procedure All surgical procedures were performed by the same operator, experienced and specialist in Periodontics. The bilateral gingival recessions were randomly assigned by lot (by a flip of coins) for both the side that received the SCTG (Control Group - C) and the side that received the BFPG (Test Group - T). The same operator performed both surgeries on the same day.
Before the surgical procedure, extra intra-oral antisepsis was performed with 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate. The clinical parameters GI and PI were evaluated. Then, measures of the clinical parameters PD, GR, CAL, WKT and GM-AG were performed with the aid of an acrylic guide.
Preparation of the recipient site After local infiltration anesthetic (mepivacaine HCL 2% + epinephrine 1:100,000) at the bottom of the vestibule in the region of the upper canine or upper premolar teeth, the measure TKT was performed. Then, an intrasulcular incision was made with a scalpel blade no 15c from the distal side of the upper canine tooth or the premolar tooth towards their mesial side, with great care so that the interdental papillae could be preserved. After that, two divergent vertical releasing incisions were made towards the bottom of the vestibule. A partial-thickness flap was raised releasing all muscle fibers so that the flap could be loose to be slid coronally. The roots were gently debrided and flattened with Gracey curettes 5-6 (Hu-Friedy - USA), and the area was rinsed with sterile saline solution for the total removal of dentine debris. Then, with the aid of an acrylic guide, the measure of the most coronal portion of the recipient site to the acrylic guide (CPRS-AG) was performed. The flap had to be raised so that the measure of the most coronal portion of bone tissue over the root to the acrylic guide could be made.
The standard surgical procedure was to start on the patient's right side regardless of the group that would undergo surgery, Group C or Group T. The preparation of the recipient site was conducted the same way for both groups.
Preparation of the donor site In order to obtain connective tissue graft, the patient was given infiltration anesthetic into the hard palate, on the same side of the recipient site randomly chosen by lot to receive the SCTG. The removal of the connective tissue was performed, followed by an L-shaped incision.
Once the graft was harvested, it was immediately positioned onto the recipient site at the level of the CEJ, and fixed through simple sutures in the mesial and distal sides, with a V-shaped compressive suture (Fig. 1A), from the periosteum to the palatine region of the tooth with absorbable suture thread. After the graft was sutured with the aid of an acrylic guide, the following measures were performed: 1) the measure of the most coronal portion of the graft to the acrylic guide (CPG-AG), and 2) the apico-coronal height of the graft (ACHG). The height of the graft ranged from 6.5 to 8.9 mm for all 12 patients.
The flap was positioned coronally in order to cover the connective tissue graft as a whole. Suspensory and simple sutures were made in the releasing incisions with silk thread (Fig. 1B). After the sutures were finished, the measure of the most coronal position of the flap to the acrylic guide (CPF-AG) was performed.
In order to harvest BFPG (Bichat's Ball), a terminal infiltration anesthetic was injected into the region of the upper first and second molars, on the same side of the recipient site that would receive BFPG. A horizontal incision measuring 1.5 cm was made with a blade no.15 at the bottom of the vestibule, in the region of the teeth 16 and 17 or 26 and 27, depending on which side the surgery would be performed in accordance with the random choice established by lot for the Test Group. A curved hemostat was used to divulse the muscles in the spot and to expose the adipose tissue. The Bichat's Ball was exposed as soon as the muscles were divulsed in the spot (Fig. 2A). Then, a small portion of adipose tissue (1.5 cm x 1.5 cm) was removed with the aid of Goldman Fox scissors. After this procedure, the patient's cheek was compressed in order for the wound edges to close, joining the tissue. The donor site was immediately sutured with silk thread 4.0 (Ethicon, Johnson \& Johnson A.G., Brazil) through simple stitches.
The BFPG was placed onto the recipient site at the level of the CEJ and fixed through "X"-shaped sutures over the graft (Fig. 2B) with absorbable suture thread (Vicryl 5-0). The same trans-surgical measures that had been performed in the Control Group were also performed in the Test Group. The height of the graft ranged from 7.70 to 10.3 mm for all 12 patients.
The flap was positioned coronally in order to cover the BFPG as a whole. Suspensory and simple sutures were made in the releasing incisions (Fig. 2C). After the sutures were finished, the measure of the most coronal position of the flap to the acrylic guide (CPF-AG) was performed.
Postoperative Protocol The patients were given postoperative instructions, such as: ice compress on the surgical site during the first 04 hours; liquid and/or soft diet for 3 days; the teeth in the surgical region should not be brushed; and the mouth should be rinsed with a mouthwash containing 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate during 1 minute, every 12 hours for 14 days.
The postoperative medications prescribed were: Amoxicillin 500 mg every 8 hours for 7 days or Clindamycin 300 mg every 8 hours for 7 days to patients allergic to penicillin, and Ibuprofen + arginine 600 mg every 12 hours for 5 days. The sutures were removed 14 days after surgery. After this period, the patients were recommended to gently brush their teeth with a soft-bristle toothbrush.
All patients were included in a monthly program of professional tooth cleaning and oral hygiene instructions, starting on the 30th day until the 180th day after the surgical procedures.
Statistical analysis Repeated Measures ANOVA associated with the Bonferroni method were used to detect inter- and intra-group differences for the clinical parameters PD, GR, CAL, WKT, TKT, and GM-AG. The t-test was used to detect inter-group differences versus time, for the clinical parameters PD, GR, CAL, WKT, TKT, and GM-AG. For the parameters CPRS-AG, CPG-AG, ACHG, and CPF-AG only the t-test was used. The level of significance was 5% for all statistical comparisons. All analyses were made with the aid of the software SPSS Statistics 18.
- Conditions
- Gingival Recession
- Being tested
- Treatment with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG), Treatment with non-pedicled buccal fat pad graft (BFPG)
- Keywords
- Gingival Recession, Case-Control Studies, Adipose Tissue
- Medical subject headings
- Gingival Recession
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Treatment with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG)Procedure or surgery
Miller Class I or II gingival recessions were treated with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG)
Treatment with non-pedicled buccal fat pad graft (BFPG)Procedure or surgery
Miller Class I or II gingival recessions were treated with non-pedicled buccal fat pad graft (BFPG)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| subepithelial connective tissue graft | Sham comparator | Surgery: Treatment with subepithelial connective tissue graft for gingival recession Receives: Procedure: Treatment with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) |
| non-pedicled buccal fat pad graft | Experimental | Surgery: Treatment with non-pedicled buccal fat pad graft for gingival recession Receives: Procedure: Treatment with non-pedicled buccal fat pad graft (BFPG) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Probing Depth (PD)
measure from the gingival margin (GM) up to the bottom of the gingival sulcus
Measured: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months respectively
Change in Gingival Recession (GR)
measure from the Cemento-Enamel Junction (CEJ) up to the GM
Measured: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months respectively
Change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)
measure from the CEJ up to the bottom of the gingival sulcus
Measured: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months respectively
Change in Width of Keratinized Tissue (WKT)
measure from the Mucogingival Junction (MGJ) up to the GM
Measured: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months respectively
Change in Thickness of Keratinized Tissue (TKT)
measure performed with the aid of a North Carolina periodontal probe (UNC-15, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) perpendicularly placed along the tooth axis in the most central portion of the keratinized tissue, between the GM and the MGJ
Measured: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months respectively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2010
- Primary completionFeb 2011
- Study completionDec 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Gingival RecessionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade Positivo
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Tatiana Miranda Deliberador, Universidade Positivo
- Investigators
- Flares Baratto Filho, PhD, Study chair, Universidade Positivo
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02393053
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PositivoU
- Status last verified
- Mar 2015
- First submitted
- 6 Mar 2015
- Last updated
- 19 Mar 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Kassab MM, Badawi H, Dentino AR. Treatment of gingival recession. Dent Clin North Am. 2010 Jan;54(1):129-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2009.08.009.
PubMed 20103476Zucchelli G, Testori T, De Sanctis M. Clinical and anatomical factors limiting treatment outcomes of gingival recession: a new method to predetermine the line of root coverage. J Periodontol. 2006 Apr;77(4):714-21. doi: 10.1902/jop.2006.050038.
PubMed 16584355Cairo F, Nieri M, Pagliaro U. Efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures in the treatment of localized facial gingival recessions. A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Apr;41 Suppl 15:S44-62. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12182.
PubMed 24641000de Sanctis M, Baldini N, Goracci C, Zucchelli G. Coronally advanced flap associated with a connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple recession defects in mandibular posterior teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011 Nov-Dec;31(6):623-30.
PubMed 22140664Bittencourt S, Ribeiro Edel P, Sallum EA, Sallum AW, Nociti FH, Casati MZ. Semilunar coronally positioned flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession: a 30-month follow-up study. J Periodontol. 2009 Jul;80(7):1076-82. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080498.
PubMed 19563287El Haddad SA, Abd El Razzak MY, El Shall M. Use of pedicled buccal fat pad in root coverage of severe gingival recession defect. J Periodontol. 2008 Jul;79(7):1271-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070176.
PubMed 18597611
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Mar 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Innovation Technique With Non-pedicled Buccal Fat Pad Graft in the Treatment of Gingival Recessions: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02393053
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PositivoU
- Conditions
- Gingival Recession
- Keywords
- Gingival Recession, Case-Control Studies, Adipose Tissue
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade PositivoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2010
- Primary completion
- Feb 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background: This randomized controlled clinical study of split-mouth aimed to compare non-pedicled buccal fat pad graft (BFPG) with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) in the treatment of Miller Class I or II gingival recessions.
Methods: Twelve patients with Miller Class I or II (≥ 2 mm) bilateral recessions in maxillary premolars or canines were selected. The recessions were randomly assigned to receive SCTG (Control Group) or BFPG (Test Group). The clinical parameters of Gingival Index (GI), Plaque Index (PI), Probing Depth (PD), Gingival Recession (GR), Clinical Attachment Level (CAL), Width of Keratinized Tissue (WKT), Thickness of Keratinized Tissue (TKT) and Gingival Margin to the Acrylic Guide (GM-AG) were evaluated at baseline, and in the postoperative periods of 1, 3, and 6 months. The percentage of root coverage was also evaluated. Data were submitted to repeated measures ANOVA, Bonferroni method and t-test (p<0.05).
Detailed description
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study population This paper aims to report a randomized controlled clinical study of split-mouth. 12 patients were selected, 8 women and 4 men, aged between 21 and 65 (mean age 41 ± 11.9 years). They were informed about the risks and benefits of this clinical investigation as well as associated procedures, and signed a free and informed consent form. This study was approved by the Ethics and Research Committee of Positivo University (083/2010).
The inclusion criteria for the selection of patients were: 1) patients with Miller Class I or II gingival recessions located bilaterally in the vestibular surface of upper premolars or canines ≥ to 2 mm; 2) patients who had recessions with some differences between the right and the left sides ≤ to 3 mm; 3) non-smokers; 4) non-pregnant patients; 5) systemically healthy patients; 6) periodontally healthy patients with no contraindications for periodontal surgery; 7) patients who did not take any kind of medicine that could interfere with the health of gingival and periodontal tissue; 8) teeth with probing depth (PD) <3 mm and without bleeding on probing (BOP); 9) teeth with no caries or restorations in the cervical region; and 10) region that had not been undergone any periodontal surgery before.
Initial therapy The patients underwent a basic periodontal treatment including scaling, root planing, tooth polishing and oral hygiene instructions as required. Additionally, all patients were included in a pre-treatment program in order to eliminate possible etiological factors related to gingival recession. Patients were instructed to perform a non-traumatic brushing technique by using a toothbrush with soft bristles. The surgical procedure was performed only in patients who had adequate plaque control.
Clinical Parameters After 30 days of initial therapy, the clinical parameters were recorded by a single calibrated operator with professional experience in periodontics, at the beginning (baseline), and in the postoperative periods of 1, 3, and 6 months respectively. The periodontal probe used was North Carolina (UNC-15, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA).
At baseline, an acrylic resin guide was made directly in the mouth of each patient and in each experimental tooth. A reference point (slot) was created in the most central vestibular portion of the guide in order to obtain a fixed reproduction of the periodontal probe position so that the measures of the clinical parameters could be standardized.
The clinical parameters evaluated were: Gingival Index (GI)16; Plaque Index (PI)17; Probing Depth (PD) - measure from the gingival margin (GM) up to the bottom of the gingival sulcus; Gingival Recession (GR) - measure from the Cemento-Enamel Junction (CEJ) up to the GM; Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) - measure from the CEJ up to the bottom of the gingival sulcus; Width of Keratinized Tissue (WKT) - measure from the Mucogingival Junction (MGJ) up to the GM; Thickness of Keratinized Tissue (TKT) - measure performed with the aid of a North Carolina periodontal probe (UNC-15, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) perpendicularly placed along the tooth axis in the most central portion of the keratinized tissue, between the GM and the MGJ. The probe was slightly pressured, under local anesthetic, towards the adjacent hard tissue. Then, the measure in millimeters was recorded and the last mean calculated referred to the Gingival Margin to the Acrylic Guide (GM-AG) - measure performed from the GM up to the most coronal point of the acrylic resin guide.
Surgical Procedure All surgical procedures were performed by the same operator, experienced and specialist in Periodontics. The bilateral gingival recessions were randomly assigned by lot (by a flip of coins) for both the side that received the SCTG (Control Group - C) and the side that received the BFPG (Test Group - T). The same operator performed both surgeries on the same day.
Before the surgical procedure, extra intra-oral antisepsis was performed with 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate. The clinical parameters GI and PI were evaluated. Then, measures of the clinical parameters PD, GR, CAL, WKT and GM-AG were performed with the aid of an acrylic guide.
Preparation of the recipient site After local infiltration anesthetic (mepivacaine HCL 2% + epinephrine 1:100,000) at the bottom of the vestibule in the region of the upper canine or upper premolar teeth, the measure TKT was performed. Then, an intrasulcular incision was made with a scalpel blade no 15c from the distal side of the upper canine tooth or the premolar tooth towards their mesial side, with great care so that the interdental papillae could be preserved. After that, two divergent vertical releasing incisions were made towards the bottom of the vestibule. A partial-thickness flap was raised releasing all muscle fibers so that the flap could be loose to be slid coronally. The roots were gently debrided and flattened with Gracey curettes 5-6 (Hu-Friedy - USA), and the area was rinsed with sterile saline solution for the total removal of dentine debris. Then, with the aid of an acrylic guide, the measure of the most coronal portion of the recipient site to the acrylic guide (CPRS-AG) was performed. The flap had to be raised so that the measure of the most coronal portion of bone tissue over the root to the acrylic guide could be made.
The standard surgical procedure was to start on the patient's right side regardless of the group that would undergo surgery, Group C or Group T. The preparation of the recipient site was conducted the same way for both groups.
Preparation of the donor site In order to obtain connective tissue graft, the patient was given infiltration anesthetic into the hard palate, on the same side of the recipient site randomly chosen by lot to receive the SCTG. The removal of the connective tissue was performed, followed by an L-shaped incision.
Once the graft was harvested, it was immediately positioned onto the recipient site at the level of the CEJ, and fixed through simple sutures in the mesial and distal sides, with a V-shaped compressive suture (Fig. 1A), from the periosteum to the palatine region of the tooth with absorbable suture thread. After the graft was sutured with the aid of an acrylic guide, the following measures were performed: 1) the measure of the most coronal portion of the graft to the acrylic guide (CPG-AG), and 2) the apico-coronal height of the graft (ACHG). The height of the graft ranged from 6.5 to 8.9 mm for all 12 patients.
The flap was positioned coronally in order to cover the connective tissue graft as a whole. Suspensory and simple sutures were made in the releasing incisions with silk thread (Fig. 1B). After the sutures were finished, the measure of the most coronal position of the flap to the acrylic guide (CPF-AG) was performed.
In order to harvest BFPG (Bichat's Ball), a terminal infiltration anesthetic was injected into the region of the upper first and second molars, on the same side of the recipient site that would receive BFPG. A horizontal incision measuring 1.5 cm was made with a blade no.15 at the bottom of the vestibule, in the region of the teeth 16 and 17 or 26 and 27, depending on which side the surgery would be performed in accordance with the random choice established by lot for the Test Group. A curved hemostat was used to divulse the muscles in the spot and to expose the adipose tissue. The Bichat's Ball was exposed as soon as the muscles were divulsed in the spot (Fig. 2A). Then, a small portion of adipose tissue (1.5 cm x 1.5 cm) was removed with the aid of Goldman Fox scissors. After this procedure, the patient's cheek was compressed in order for the wound edges to close, joining the tissue. The donor site was immediately sutured with silk thread 4.0 (Ethicon, Johnson \& Johnson A.G., Brazil) through simple stitches.
The BFPG was placed onto the recipient site at the level of the CEJ and fixed through "X"-shaped sutures over the graft (Fig. 2B) with absorbable suture thread (Vicryl 5-0). The same trans-surgical measures that had been performed in the Control Group were also performed in the Test Group. The height of the graft ranged from 7.70 to 10.3 mm for all 12 patients.
The flap was positioned coronally in order to cover the BFPG as a whole. Suspensory and simple sutures were made in the releasing incisions (Fig. 2C). After the sutures were finished, the measure of the most coronal position of the flap to the acrylic guide (CPF-AG) was performed.
Postoperative Protocol The patients were given postoperative instructions, such as: ice compress on the surgical site during the first 04 hours; liquid and/or soft diet for 3 days; the teeth in the surgical region should not be brushed; and the mouth should be rinsed with a mouthwash containing 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate during 1 minute, every 12 hours for 14 days.
The postoperative medications prescribed were: Amoxicillin 500 mg every 8 hours for 7 days or Clindamycin 300 mg every 8 hours for 7 days to patients allergic to penicillin, and Ibuprofen + arginine 600 mg every 12 hours for 5 days. The sutures were removed 14 days after surgery. After this period, the patients were recommended to gently brush their teeth with a soft-bristle toothbrush.
All patients were included in a monthly program of professional tooth cleaning and oral hygiene instructions, starting on the 30th day until the 180th day after the surgical procedures.
Statistical analysis Repeated Measures ANOVA associated with the Bonferroni method were used to detect inter- and intra-group differences for the clinical parameters PD, GR, CAL, WKT, TKT, and GM-AG. The t-test was used to detect inter-group differences versus time, for the clinical parameters PD, GR, CAL, WKT, TKT, and GM-AG. For the parameters CPRS-AG, CPG-AG, ACHG, and CPF-AG only the t-test was used. The level of significance was 5% for all statistical comparisons. All analyses were made with the aid of the software SPSS Statistics 18.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| subepithelial connective tissue graft | Sham comparator | Procedure: Treatment with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG)Surgery: Treatment with subepithelial connective tissue graft for gingival recession |
| non-pedicled buccal fat pad graft | Experimental | Procedure: Treatment with non-pedicled buccal fat pad graft (BFPG)Surgery: Treatment with non-pedicled buccal fat pad graft for gingival recession |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Patients with Miller Class I or II gingival recessions located bilaterally in the vestibular surface of upper premolars or canines ≥ to 2 mm
- Patients who had recessions with some differences between the right and the left sides ≤ to 3 mm
- Non-smokers
- Non-pregnant patients
- Systemically healthy patients
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1. Patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG)Miller Class I or II gingival recessions were treated with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) | Procedure or surgery | subepithelial connective tissue graft |
| Treatment with non-pedicled buccal fat pad graft (BFPG)Miller Class I or II gingival recessions were treated with non-pedicled buccal fat pad graft (BFPG) | Procedure or surgery | non-pedicled buccal fat pad graft |
Primary outcome
Change in Probing Depth (PD)
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months respectively
measure from the gingival margin (GM) up to the bottom of the gingival sulcus
Change in Gingival Recession (GR)
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months respectively
measure from the Cemento-Enamel Junction (CEJ) up to the GM
Change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months respectively
measure from the CEJ up to the bottom of the gingival sulcus
Change in Width of Keratinized Tissue (WKT)
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months respectively
measure from the Mucogingival Junction (MGJ) up to the GM
Change in Thickness of Keratinized Tissue (TKT)
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months respectively
measure performed with the aid of a North Carolina periodontal probe (UNC-15, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) perpendicularly placed along the tooth axis in the most central portion of the keratinized tissue, between the GM and the MGJ
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Mar 2015.
- Background: PubMed 20103476Kassab MM, Badawi H, Dentino AR. Treatment of gingival recession. Dent Clin North Am. 2010 Jan;54(1):129-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2009.08.009.
- Background: PubMed 16584355Zucchelli G, Testori T, De Sanctis M. Clinical and anatomical factors limiting treatment outcomes of gingival recession: a new method to predetermine the line of root coverage. J Periodontol. 2006 Apr;77(4):714-21. doi: 10.1902/jop.2006.050038.
- Background: PubMed 24641000Cairo F, Nieri M, Pagliaro U. Efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures in the treatment of localized facial gingival recessions. A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Apr;41 Suppl 15:S44-62. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12182.
- Background: PubMed 22140664de Sanctis M, Baldini N, Goracci C, Zucchelli G. Coronally advanced flap associated with a connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple recession defects in mandibular posterior teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011 Nov-Dec;31(6):623-30.
- Background: PubMed 19563287Bittencourt S, Ribeiro Edel P, Sallum EA, Sallum AW, Nociti FH, Casati MZ. Semilunar coronally positioned flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession: a 30-month follow-up study. J Periodontol. 2009 Jul;80(7):1076-82. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080498.
- Background: PubMed 18597611El Haddad SA, Abd El Razzak MY, El Shall M. Use of pedicled buccal fat pad in root coverage of severe gingival recession defect. J Periodontol. 2008 Jul;79(7):1271-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070176.
Related trials for Gingival Recession
Not yet recruiting
Free Soft Tissue Grafts (FSTG) Using Autograft Palatal Donor Tissue vs. Xenograft Collagen Matrix (Zderm™)
Gingival Recession Localized Moderate, Dental Implant
Recruiting
i-PRF-Based Bioactive Matrix vs. Connective Tissue Graft in the Treatment of Gingival Recessions
Gingival Graft, Recession, Gingival
Recruiting
Palatal Wound Healing After Free Gingival Graft Harvest in Diabetic Patients: A Clinical Trial
Diabetes Mellitus, Gingival Recession, Generalized
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of the Effect of Smoking on Palatal Donor Site Tissue Profile in the Success of Connective Tissue Grafts
Soft Tissue Augmentation, Gingival Recession Localized Moderate
Active, not recruiting
Vertically Coronally Advanced Flap Versus Coronally Advanced Flap for Miller Class I Gingival Recession
Gingival Recession
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Flares Baratto Filho, PhD study chair
Universidade Positivo
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Treatment with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) and Treatment with non-pedicled buccal fat pad graft (BFPG) in people with Gingival Recession, run by Universidade Positivo.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Mar 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Probing Depth (PD) (time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months respectively). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02393053, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Mar 2015.