Saphenous Nerve BlockNCT02382744
Saphenous Nerve Block for Foot and Ankle Surgery
A study testing Ultrasound Guidance and Ultrasound guidance + nerve stimulation in people with Saphenous Nerve Block, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery have the option of having a nerve block administered by their Anesthesiologist. The nerve block numbs the foot and results in less post-operative nausea and vomiting, and better pain control. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Saphenous Nerve Block
- What is being tested?
- Ultrasound Guidance and Ultrasound guidance + nerve stimulation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Feb 2015to Oct 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 to 80 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects undergoing foot and ankle surgery
- Aged 19-80
- Normal sensation in saphenous nerve distribution in both legs
- Provided written informed consent.
- Body Mass Index <38 kg/m2
Who cannot join
- Subject refusal
- A known history of allergy, sensitivity or any other form of reaction to local anesthetics of amide type
- Suspected inability to comply with study procedures, including language difficulties or medical history and/or concomitant disease (i.e. skin infection as the site of needle insertion), as judged by the investigator. Reason for exclusion will be recorded.
- A neurological and/or vascular condition, which may preclude eligibility for peripheral nerve blockade (i.e. peripheral neuropathy) as judged by the investigator. Reason for exclusion will be recorded.
- Subjects on therapeutic anticoagulation or coagulopathy at the time of nerve blockade.
- Previous inclusion in this study.
- Participation in other clinical studies during this study or in the 14 days prior to admission to this study.
- Surgeon refusal (e.g. the surgeon does not want a nerve block for the subject). Reason for exclusion will be recorded.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided and Ultrasound-Guided With Nerve Stimulation Saphenous Nerve Blockade Utilizing the Transsartorial Approach
Patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery have the option of having a nerve block administered by their Anesthesiologist. The nerve block numbs the foot and results in less post-operative nausea and vomiting, and better pain control. Two different techniques for blocking the saphenous nerve to the foot have been described and are both commonly used at St. Paul's hospital. The goal of this study is to compare the success rates of these two techniques.
Read the detailed description
Purpose / Hypothesis This clinical study is a prospective, controlled, randomized, single-blinded trial designed to investigate the hypothesis that ultrasound-guided blockade of the saphenous nerve in conjunction with nerve stimulation has a higher success rate when compared to ultrasound alone. These research interventions represent what is considered to be an improvement on the standard practice at St. Paul's, which is to block the saphenous nerve with one of any number of saphenous nerve blocks, using a number of different techniques (i.e. ultrasound-guided, nerve stimulation, blind field block); the effectiveness of which has been inconsistent. The purpose of this study is to identify if one technique has a great success rate over another, which would ultimately result in increased success rates of saphenous nerve blocks and patient care.
Study Design The study will be a randomized, single-blinded trial of 80 subjects who are undergoing foot and ankle surgery. Informed consent will be obtained from all study subjects. Subjects will be randomized to one of two saphenous nerve block techniques to be administered by an experienced regional anesthesiologist at St. Paul's Hospital. Once the nerve block is completed the success will be evaluated by an investigator blinded to the procedure. Once the 30min evaluation is completed anesthetic care will be provided according to regular institutional practice and at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. The subject will then be contacted at 2 and 7 days after block administration to assess for delayed complications.
Intravenous access will be gained and non-invasive blood pressure measurements will be recorded every five minutes. Continuous electrocardiography and oxygen saturation monitoring will be maintained throughout the procedure and for at least 60 minutes afterwards. Light sedation will be provided, with the goal of maintaining verbal contact with the subject throughout the procedure. Where clinically appropriate, the study block may be preceded by an ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist.
Saphenous nerve blockade will be preformed using a transsartorial approach. Subjects in both groups will be positioned prone. The ultrasound probe will be placed in the transverse plane on the medial aspect of the thigh 3-5cm cephalad to the superior border of the patella (area marked). An attempt will then be made to identify the saphenous nerve, which runs deep to the sartorius muscle within the subsartorial fascial plane. The nerve will appear hyperechoic, round or oval shaped. The anesthesiologist will have a maximum scan time of 3 minutes prior to needle entry. Up to 5 mL of 1% Lidocaine will be used for skin infiltration of the injection site. The block will then be preformed as to the protocols below depending on group allocation. A thirty minute evaluation of the saphenous nerve block will occur during the normal monitoring period after the placement of a block.
Following completion of the thirty-minute evaluation, anesthetic care will be provided according to regular institutional practice and at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. This may include spinal or general anesthesia.
All subjects will be contacted by telephone at two and seven days post procedure for a follow up interview to assess for delayed complications associated with the procedure.
The medications used for the nerve blocks in the study will include only ropivacaine 0.5% and lidocaine 1%. For subject sedation, midazolam and fentanyl will be used. None of these medications are considered study drugs; rather they are commonly used anesthetic medications. While used in the study, these drugs themselves are not being investigated. The same medications will be used on subjects not enrolled in the study.
Study Treatment Group 1 - Saphenous nerve block using ultrasound guidance The needle will be placed with the needle tip in close proximity (1-2 mm) of the target structures (the saphenous nerve if visible or in the subsartorial facial plane of the sartorius muscle if the nerve is not visible). A total of 10 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine will be used for the block. Before injection of any local anesthetic a gentle aspiration will be preformed, with a second aspiration after 5 mL of ropivacaine has been injected. Once injection of local anesthetic has commenced small needle adjustments are allowed to enhance spread. This will be done at the discretion of the regional anesthesiologist performing the block.
Study Treatment Group 2 - Saphenous nerve blockade using ultrasound guidance and nerve stimulation The needle will be place with the needle tip in close proximity (1-2 mm) of the target structure (the saphenous nerve if visible or in the subsartorial fascial plane if the nerve is not visible). The Pajunk MultiStim SENSOR nerve stimulator will then be turned on, starting at 1.0 milliamp (mA) until a tapping sensation is elicited in the medial or anterior aspect of the ankle. The amplitude of the nerve stimulator will then be gradually decreased with maintenance of the tapping sensation by making small adjustments in needle location. The end-point for nerve localization will be a tapping sensation in the area of the medial malleolus at ≤ 0.6 mA. The anesthesiologist will have a maximum search time of 5 minutes from needle entry to elicitation of the tapping sensation. Once a tapping sensation is elicited in the ≤ 0.6 mA range, 10 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine will be injected at the site. If a tapping sensation is elicited but not ≤ 0.6 mA within 5 minutes then 10 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine will be injected at the site where the lowest amplitude tapping sensation was elicited. If no tapping sensation is elicited from the subject after 5 minutes, an injection of 10 mL of ropivacaine will be made below the Sartorius muscle in the subsartorial fascial plane. Before injection of any local anesthetic a gentle aspiration will be preformed, with a second aspiration after 5 mL of ropivacaine has been injected. Once injection of local anesthetic has commenced small needle adjustments are allowed to enhance spread. This will be done at the discretion of the regional anesthesiologist performing the block.
- Conditions
- Saphenous Nerve Block
- Being tested
- Ultrasound Guidance, Ultrasound guidance + nerve stimulation
- Keywords
- Saphenous Nerve, Nerve Block, Ultrasound guided, Neurostimulation, Regional Anesthesia, Ropivacaine, Foot Surgery, Nerve Stimulation, Ankle Surgery
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ultrasound GuidanceDevice
Ultrasound guidance will be used to place a saphenous nerve block
Ultrasound guidance + nerve stimulationDevice
Ultrasound guidance and nerve stimulation will be used to place a saphenous nerve block
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound Guidance | Experimental | Saphenous nerve block placed using ultrasound guidance alone Receives: Device: Ultrasound Guidance |
| Ultrasound Guidance + nerve stimulation | Experimental | Saphenous nerve block placed using ultrasound guidance and nerve stimulation Receives: Device: Ultrasound guidance + nerve stimulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Block Success
Complete absence of sensation to pinprick at two different anatomic areas of the saphenous nerve at thirty minutes
Measured: 30 minutes post nerve block
Secondary outcomes (10)
Block Failure Rate
Persistent sensation in the saphenous nerve distribution at 30 minutes (i.e., absence of any evidence of blockade [decreased or complete absence of sensation] at both areas: normal sensation.
Measured: 30 minutes post nerve block
Any Evidence of Blockade (Decreased or Complete Absence of Sensation)
Participants with any evidence of blockade (decreased or complete absence of sensation) at the two different anatomic areas in the distribution of the saphenous nerve (2 cm proximal to the medial malleolus and 10 cm distal to the medial tibial condyle)
Measured: 30 min
Incomplete Block Rate
incomplete [decreased only] loss of sensation in the saphenous nerve distribution at 30 minutes at both areas of assessment
Measured: 30 minutes post nerve block
Speed of Onset for Nerve Block (Complete Blockade)
Median (Kaplan-Meier curve "survival") time required to reach complete absence of sensation to pinprick at the two different anatomic areas of assessment in the distribution of the saphenous nerve (2 cm proximal to the medial malleolus and 10 cm distal to the medial condyle of the tibia).
Measured: 30 minutes post nerve block
Rate of Success of Elicitation of a Tapping Sensation
successful elicitation of any "tapping" sensation in the saphenous nerve distribution within the 5 min stimulation time limit
Measured: 5 minutes
Mean Minimum Stimulation Current
the mean minimum stimulation current magnitude to elicit "tapping" sensation in the saphenous nerve distribution (cf. 3.2.3 below)
Measured: 5 minutes
Rate of Success of Elicitation of a Tapping Sensation at < 0.6 Milliampere (mA)
Successful elicitation of "tapping" sensation in the saphenous nerve distribution at ≤ 0.6 mA
Measured: 5 minutes
Time Required to Administer Block
The time required for the block to be completed (from scanning to removal of needle)
Measured: 10 minutes
Immediate Complications
Any complications as a result of block placement (e.g. local anesthetic toxicity, hematoma, pain etc.)
Measured: 60 minutes post block completion
Delayed Complications
Any complication as a results of nerve block placement (e.g. persistent paresthesia, nerve injury)
Measured: 7 days post operative
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2015
- Primary completionOct 2015
- Study completionOct 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Saphenous Nerve BlockStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of British ColumbiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of British Columbia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Scott Bell, University of British Columbia
- Investigators
- Scott Bell, MD, Principal investigator, University of British Columbia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02382744
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H14-02912
- Status last verified
- Sep 2017
- First submitted
- 18 Feb 2015
- Last updated
- 2 Apr 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Tsui BC, Ozelsel T. Ultrasound-guided transsartorial perifemoral artery approach for saphenous nerve block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Mar-Apr;34(2):177-8; author reply 178. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31819a273e. No abstract available.
PubMed 19282716Horn JL, Pitsch T, Salinas F, Benninger B. Anatomic basis to the ultrasound-guided approach for saphenous nerve blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Sep-Oct;34(5):486-9. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181ae11af.
PubMed 19920424Lopez AM, Sala-Blanch X, Magaldi M, Poggio D, Asuncion J, Franco CD. Ultrasound-guided ankle block for forefoot surgery: the contribution of the saphenous nerve. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;37(5):554-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182611483.
PubMed 22854395Chen J, Lesser J, Hadzic A, Resta-Flarer F. The importance of the proximal saphenous nerve block for foot and ankle surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;38(4):372. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318295596a. No abstract available.
PubMed 23788076Head SJ, Leung RC, Hackman GP, Seib R, Rondi K, Schwarz SK. Ultrasound-guided saphenous nerve block--within versus distal to the adductor canal: a proof-of-principle randomized trial. Can J Anaesth. 2015 Jan;62(1):37-44. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0255-1. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
PubMed 25337966Benzon HT, Sharma S, Calimaran A. Comparison of the different approaches to saphenous nerve block. Anesthesiology. 2005 Mar;102(3):633-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200503000-00023.
PubMed 15731603Chi J, Greensmith JE. Saphenous nerve block technique with neurostimulation. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007 Nov-Dec;32(6):548-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.08.007. No abstract available.
PubMed 18035315Comfort VK, Lang SA, Yip RW. Saphenous nerve anaesthesia--a nerve stimulator technique. Can J Anaesth. 1996 Aug;43(8):852-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03013038.
PubMed 8840065van der Wal M, Lang SA, Yip RW. Transsartorial approach for saphenous nerve block. Can J Anaesth. 1993 Jun;40(6):542-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03009739.
PubMed 8403121Montgomery SH, Shamji CM, Yi GS, Yarnold CH, Head SJ, Bell SC, Schwarz SK. Effect of Nerve Stimulation Use on the Success Rate of Ultrasound-Guided Subsartorial Saphenous Nerve Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Jan/Feb;42(1):25-31. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000522.
PubMed 27902645
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Apr 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided and Ultrasound-Guided With Nerve Stimulation Saphenous Nerve Blockade Utilizing the Transsartorial Approach
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02382744
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H14-02912
- Conditions
- Saphenous Nerve Block
- Keywords
- Saphenous Nerve, Nerve Block, Ultrasound guided, Neurostimulation, Regional Anesthesia, Ropivacaine, Foot Surgery, Nerve Stimulation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of British ColumbiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2015
- Primary completion
- Oct 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 2 Apr 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery have the option of having a nerve block administered by their Anesthesiologist. The nerve block numbs the foot and results in less post-operative nausea and vomiting, and better pain control. Two different techniques for blocking the saphenous nerve to the foot have been described and are both commonly used at St. Paul's hospital. The goal of this study is to compare the success rates of these two techniques.
Detailed description
Purpose / Hypothesis This clinical study is a prospective, controlled, randomized, single-blinded trial designed to investigate the hypothesis that ultrasound-guided blockade of the saphenous nerve in conjunction with nerve stimulation has a higher success rate when compared to ultrasound alone. These research interventions represent what is considered to be an improvement on the standard practice at St. Paul's, which is to block the saphenous nerve with one of any number of saphenous nerve blocks, using a number of different techniques (i.e. ultrasound-guided, nerve stimulation, blind field block); the effectiveness of which has been inconsistent. The purpose of this study is to identify if one technique has a great success rate over another, which would ultimately result in increased success rates of saphenous nerve blocks and patient care.
Study Design The study will be a randomized, single-blinded trial of 80 subjects who are undergoing foot and ankle surgery. Informed consent will be obtained from all study subjects. Subjects will be randomized to one of two saphenous nerve block techniques to be administered by an experienced regional anesthesiologist at St. Paul's Hospital. Once the nerve block is completed the success will be evaluated by an investigator blinded to the procedure. Once the 30min evaluation is completed anesthetic care will be provided according to regular institutional practice and at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. The subject will then be contacted at 2 and 7 days after block administration to assess for delayed complications.
Intravenous access will be gained and non-invasive blood pressure measurements will be recorded every five minutes. Continuous electrocardiography and oxygen saturation monitoring will be maintained throughout the procedure and for at least 60 minutes afterwards. Light sedation will be provided, with the goal of maintaining verbal contact with the subject throughout the procedure. Where clinically appropriate, the study block may be preceded by an ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist.
Saphenous nerve blockade will be preformed using a transsartorial approach. Subjects in both groups will be positioned prone. The ultrasound probe will be placed in the transverse plane on the medial aspect of the thigh 3-5cm cephalad to the superior border of the patella (area marked). An attempt will then be made to identify the saphenous nerve, which runs deep to the sartorius muscle within the subsartorial fascial plane. The nerve will appear hyperechoic, round or oval shaped. The anesthesiologist will have a maximum scan time of 3 minutes prior to needle entry. Up to 5 mL of 1% Lidocaine will be used for skin infiltration of the injection site. The block will then be preformed as to the protocols below depending on group allocation. A thirty minute evaluation of the saphenous nerve block will occur during the normal monitoring period after the placement of a block.
Following completion of the thirty-minute evaluation, anesthetic care will be provided according to regular institutional practice and at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. This may include spinal or general anesthesia.
All subjects will be contacted by telephone at two and seven days post procedure for a follow up interview to assess for delayed complications associated with the procedure.
The medications used for the nerve blocks in the study will include only ropivacaine 0.5% and lidocaine 1%. For subject sedation, midazolam and fentanyl will be used. None of these medications are considered study drugs; rather they are commonly used anesthetic medications. While used in the study, these drugs themselves are not being investigated. The same medications will be used on subjects not enrolled in the study.
Study Treatment Group 1 - Saphenous nerve block using ultrasound guidance The needle will be placed with the needle tip in close proximity (1-2 mm) of the target structures (the saphenous nerve if visible or in the subsartorial facial plane of the sartorius muscle if the nerve is not visible). A total of 10 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine will be used for the block. Before injection of any local anesthetic a gentle aspiration will be preformed, with a second aspiration after 5 mL of ropivacaine has been injected. Once injection of local anesthetic has commenced small needle adjustments are allowed to enhance spread. This will be done at the discretion of the regional anesthesiologist performing the block.
Study Treatment Group 2 - Saphenous nerve blockade using ultrasound guidance and nerve stimulation The needle will be place with the needle tip in close proximity (1-2 mm) of the target structure (the saphenous nerve if visible or in the subsartorial fascial plane if the nerve is not visible). The Pajunk MultiStim SENSOR nerve stimulator will then be turned on, starting at 1.0 milliamp (mA) until a tapping sensation is elicited in the medial or anterior aspect of the ankle. The amplitude of the nerve stimulator will then be gradually decreased with maintenance of the tapping sensation by making small adjustments in needle location. The end-point for nerve localization will be a tapping sensation in the area of the medial malleolus at ≤ 0.6 mA. The anesthesiologist will have a maximum search time of 5 minutes from needle entry to elicitation of the tapping sensation. Once a tapping sensation is elicited in the ≤ 0.6 mA range, 10 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine will be injected at the site. If a tapping sensation is elicited but not ≤ 0.6 mA within 5 minutes then 10 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine will be injected at the site where the lowest amplitude tapping sensation was elicited. If no tapping sensation is elicited from the subject after 5 minutes, an injection of 10 mL of ropivacaine will be made below the Sartorius muscle in the subsartorial fascial plane. Before injection of any local anesthetic a gentle aspiration will be preformed, with a second aspiration after 5 mL of ropivacaine has been injected. Once injection of local anesthetic has commenced small needle adjustments are allowed to enhance spread. This will be done at the discretion of the regional anesthesiologist performing the block.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound Guidance | Experimental | Device: Ultrasound GuidanceSaphenous nerve block placed using ultrasound guidance alone |
| Ultrasound Guidance + nerve stimulation | Experimental | Device: Ultrasound guidance + nerve stimulationSaphenous nerve block placed using ultrasound guidance and nerve stimulation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Subjects undergoing foot and ankle surgery
- Aged 19-80
- Normal sensation in saphenous nerve distribution in both legs
- Provided written informed consent.
- Body Mass Index <38 kg/m2
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Subject refusal
- A known history of allergy, sensitivity or any other form of reaction to local anesthetics of amide type
- Suspected inability to comply with study procedures, including language difficulties or medical history and/or concomitant disease (i.e. skin infection as the site of needle insertion), as judged by the investigator. Reason for exclusion will be recorded.
- A neurological and/or vascular condition, which may preclude eligibility for peripheral nerve blockade (i.e. peripheral neuropathy) as judged by the investigator. Reason for exclusion will be recorded.
- Subjects on therapeutic anticoagulation or coagulopathy at the time of nerve blockade.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound GuidanceUltrasound guidance will be used to place a saphenous nerve block | Device | Ultrasound Guidance |
| Ultrasound guidance + nerve stimulationUltrasound guidance and nerve stimulation will be used to place a saphenous nerve block | Device | Ultrasound Guidance + nerve stimulation |
Primary outcome
Block Success
Time frame: 30 minutes post nerve block
Complete absence of sensation to pinprick at two different anatomic areas of the saphenous nerve at thirty minutes
10 secondary outcomes
Block Failure Rate
Time frame: 30 minutes post nerve block
Any Evidence of Blockade (Decreased or Complete Absence of Sensation)
Time frame: 30 min
Incomplete Block Rate
Time frame: 30 minutes post nerve block
Speed of Onset for Nerve Block (Complete Blockade)
Time frame: 30 minutes post nerve block
Rate of Success of Elicitation of a Tapping Sensation
Time frame: 5 minutes
Mean Minimum Stimulation Current
Time frame: 5 minutes
Rate of Success of Elicitation of a Tapping Sensation at < 0.6 Milliampere (mA)
Time frame: 5 minutes
Time Required to Administer Block
Time frame: 10 minutes
Immediate Complications
Time frame: 60 minutes post block completion
Delayed Complications
Time frame: 7 days post operative
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Apr 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 19282716Tsui BC, Ozelsel T. Ultrasound-guided transsartorial perifemoral artery approach for saphenous nerve block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Mar-Apr;34(2):177-8; author reply 178. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31819a273e. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 19920424Horn JL, Pitsch T, Salinas F, Benninger B. Anatomic basis to the ultrasound-guided approach for saphenous nerve blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Sep-Oct;34(5):486-9. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181ae11af.
- Background: PubMed 22854395Lopez AM, Sala-Blanch X, Magaldi M, Poggio D, Asuncion J, Franco CD. Ultrasound-guided ankle block for forefoot surgery: the contribution of the saphenous nerve. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;37(5):554-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182611483.
- Background: PubMed 23788076Chen J, Lesser J, Hadzic A, Resta-Flarer F. The importance of the proximal saphenous nerve block for foot and ankle surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;38(4):372. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318295596a. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 25337966Head SJ, Leung RC, Hackman GP, Seib R, Rondi K, Schwarz SK. Ultrasound-guided saphenous nerve block--within versus distal to the adductor canal: a proof-of-principle randomized trial. Can J Anaesth. 2015 Jan;62(1):37-44. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0255-1. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
- Background: PubMed 15731603Benzon HT, Sharma S, Calimaran A. Comparison of the different approaches to saphenous nerve block. Anesthesiology. 2005 Mar;102(3):633-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200503000-00023.
- Background: PubMed 18035315Chi J, Greensmith JE. Saphenous nerve block technique with neurostimulation. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007 Nov-Dec;32(6):548-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.08.007. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 8840065Comfort VK, Lang SA, Yip RW. Saphenous nerve anaesthesia--a nerve stimulator technique. Can J Anaesth. 1996 Aug;43(8):852-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03013038.
- Background: PubMed 8403121van der Wal M, Lang SA, Yip RW. Transsartorial approach for saphenous nerve block. Can J Anaesth. 1993 Jun;40(6):542-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03009739.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27902645Montgomery SH, Shamji CM, Yi GS, Yarnold CH, Head SJ, Bell SC, Schwarz SK. Effect of Nerve Stimulation Use on the Success Rate of Ultrasound-Guided Subsartorial Saphenous Nerve Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Jan/Feb;42(1):25-31. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000522.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Saphenous Nerve Block
Not yet recruiting
US-Guided Saphenous Block in Knee OA
Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Knee
Recruiting
Combined Distal Femoral Nerve Block for Pain Control After Knee Replacement
Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty, Pain Management
Not yet recruiting
Migration Rate for Continuous Adductor Canal Block Catheters After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgery: a Comparison Between Two Insertion Techniques
Arthroplasty Replacement, Knee, Anesthesia Conduction
Recruiting
Preop US-Guided Nerve Blocks for Pain & Recovery After Ankle Arthroscopy
Ankle Ligament Injury,Chronic Ankle Instability,Ankle Arthroscopy
RecruitingPhase 3
Efficacy of EXPAREL vs. Bupivacaine
Total Ankle Arthroplasty, Postsurgical Analgesia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Scott Bell, MD principal investigator
University of British Columbia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Ultrasound Guidance and Ultrasound guidance + nerve stimulation in people with Saphenous Nerve Block, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Apr 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Block Success (time frame: 30 minutes post nerve block). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02382744, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Apr 2018.