AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Coronary SyndromeEMERALDNCT02374775

Exploring the MEchanism of Plaque Rupture in Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Coronary CT Angiography and computationaL Fluid Dynamic

An observational study of Acute Coronary Syndrome and Myocardial Infarction, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 2 sites in South Korea.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The EMERALD trial is a multinational, multicenter study. The patients presented with AMI/definite evidence of plaque rupture and had underwent coronary CT angiography from 1 month to 2 year prior to the event will be retrospectively searched. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
How many people
77 participants
Where
2 sitesSouth Korea
Study dates
Sep 2014to Dec 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients who experienced acute myocardial infarction from 2010-2014 whose diagnosis have confirmed by invasive coronary angiography with or without IVUS or OCT evaluation, and who underwent coronary CT angiography from 1 month to 2 year prior to the acute myocardial infarction event. Acute coronary syndrome without cardiac enzyme elevation (unstable angina) will be excluded. The time limit of the coronary CT angiography prior to the event is from 1 month to 2 year. Participating center will perform abovementioned search process.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who experienced acute myocardial infarction from 2010-2014 whose diagnosis have confirmed by invasive coronary angiography with or without IVUS or OCT evaluation, and who underwent coronary CT angiography from 1 month to 2 year prior to the acute myocardial infarction event.

Who cannot join

  • Acute coronary syndrome without cardiac enzyme elevation (unstable angina)
  • Patients who did not underwent coronary CT angiography, 1 month to 2 years prior to the acute myocardial infarction
  • Poor CT images (unable to reconstruct 3 dimensional coronary artery model)
  • The time period between coronary CT angiography and acute myocardial infarction exceed more than 2 years

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

South Korea2 sites
  • Seoul national university hospital

    Seoul, 110-744

  • Samsung Medical Center

    Seoul, 135-710

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Exploring the MEchanism of Plaque Rupture in Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Coronary CT Angiography and computationaL Fluid Dynamics (EMERALD)

The EMERALD trial is a multinational, multicenter study. The patients presented with AMI/definite evidence of plaque rupture and had underwent coronary CT angiography from 1 month to 2 year prior to the event will be retrospectively searched. Plaques in the non-culprit vessels will be regarded as internal control to the ruptured plaque in the culprit vessel.

Read the detailed description

The mechanisms of plaque rupture have not been fully understood. Hemodynamic forces acting on the plaque, plaque vulnerability, and the interaction between two factors might be the most important mechanism to explain various feature and location of plaque rupture.

The objectives of the study are

  1. To explore the interaction between hemodynamic forces measured by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis and plaque vulnerability in culprit lesion of subsequent clinical events.
  2. To build rupture risk scoring system, incorporating independent predictor for plaque rupture.

The EMERALD trial is a multinational and multicenter study. The patients presented with AMI/plaque rupture and had underwent coronary CT angiography from 1 month to 2 year prior to the event will be retrospectively searched. Plaques in the non-culprit vessels will be regarded as internal control to the ruptured plaque in the culprit vessel.

The enrollment criteria will be

  1. Patients who presented with acute coronary syndrome with cardiac enzyme elevation (AMI)/plaque rupture.
  2. Among those patients, the patients who underwent coronary CT angiography, regardless of the reason prior to the acute event will be searched. The time limit of coronary CT angiography will be 1 month ~ 2 year prior to the event.

The Computational Fluids Dynamics (CFD) and Fluid-Structural Interaction (FSI) simulation will be performed to comprehensively evaluate the total plaque forces and their interaction with the plaque.

The comparison groups will be defined as follows; The plaque in the culprit vessel of AMI will be defined the Group A. The plaque in the non-culprit vessel of AMI will be defined as internal control, Group B.

Keywords
axial plaque stress, pressure, pressure gradient, coronary plaque, plaque rupture, acute coronary syndrome, acute myocardial infarction, computational fluid dynamics, coronary computed tomography angiography, wall shear stress
Medical subject headings
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Myocardial Infarction, Plaque, Atherosclerotic, Rupture, Spontaneous

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02374775
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group A (Culprit lesion)The plaque in the culprit vessel of acute myocardial infarction will be defined the Group A.
Group B (Non-culprit lesion)The plaque in the non-culprit vessel of acute myocardial infarction will be defined as internal control, Group B.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The difference of area under curve between prediction model with adverse plaque characteristics and model with adverse plaque characteristics and hemodynamic forces

    Model 1 : percent diameter stenosis + adverse plaque characteristics defined by CT angiography Model 2 : percent diameter stenosis + adverse plaque characteristics defined by CT angiography + Hemodynamic forces defined by computational fluid dynamics

    Measured: from 1 month - 2 year

  2. The difference of net reclassification index between prediction model with adverse plaque characteristics and model with adverse plaque characteristics and hemodynamic forces

    Model 1 : percent diameter stenosis + adverse plaque characteristics defined by CT angiography Model 2 : percent diameter stenosis + adverse plaque characteristics defined by CT angiography + Hemodynamic forces defined by computational fluid dynamics

    Measured: from 1 month - 2 year

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. The best cut-off value of axial plaque stress to induce plaque rupture.

    Measured: from 1 month - 2 year

  2. The threshold of the plaque vulnerability (Housefiled unit of the plaque on CT) to induce rupture.

    Measured: from 1 month - 2 year

  3. The independent predictors for the plaque rupture using generalized estimating equation, and the c-index of the predicting models.

    Measured: from 1 month - 2 year

  4. The validity of rupture risk score which constructed from the predicting model.

    Measured: from 1 month - 2 year

  5. The differences in other hemodynamic parameters for example, pressure gradient, delta pressure, FFRCT, average and peak wall shear stress between Group A and Group B.

    Measured: from 1 month - 2 year

  6. The association between axial plaque stress and the parameter reflecting plaque geometry (radius gradient).

    Measured: from 1 month - 2 year

  7. The differences in axial plaque stress between Group A and Group B

    Measured: from 1 month - 2 year

  8. The differences in plaque vulnerability (Housefiled unit of the plaque on CT) between Group A and Group B

    Measured: from 1 month - 2 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Mar 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2014
  3. Primary completionSep 2017 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2017 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
77 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02374775
Sponsor's protocol ID
NCT02374775
Acronym
EMERALD
Status last verified
Apr 2017
First submitted
22 Sep 2014
Last updated
4 Apr 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: After acceptance of first manuscript, the data will be shared upon request and permission of principal investigator and participants of the study

Publications

  • Lee JM, Choi G, Koo BK, Hwang D, Park J, Zhang J, Kim KJ, Tong Y, Kim HJ, Grady L, Doh JH, Nam CW, Shin ES, Cho YS, Choi SY, Chun EJ, Choi JH, Norgaard BL, Christiansen EH, Niemen K, Otake H, Penicka M, de Bruyne B, Kubo T, Akasaka T, Narula J, Douglas PS, Taylor CA, Kim HS. Identification of High-Risk Plaques Destined to Cause Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography and Computational Fluid Dynamics. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jun;12(6):1032-1043. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.01.023. Epub 2018 Mar 14.

    PubMed 29550316

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Acute Coronary Syndrome and Myocardial Infarction, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 2 sites in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The difference of area under curve between prediction model with adverse plaque characteristics and model with adverse plaque characteristics and hemodynamic forces (time frame: from 1 month - 2 year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02374775, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Apr 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in