Ureteral CalculusPhase 4NCT02369744
Silodosin Versus Tamsulosin for Treatment of Ureteral Stones
A Phase 4 study testing Silodosin and Tamsulosin in people with Ureteral Calculus and Ureterolithiasis, run by Albert Einstein Healthcare Network at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Ureteral calculi, commonly known as kidney stones, are a frequent cause of Emergency Department (ED) visits. These stones can get caught in the ureter (the tube connecting the kidney to the bladder) and cause symptoms including pain, nausea, and vomiting. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Ureteral Calculus, Ureterolithiasis, Ureteral Stone
- What is being tested?
- Silodosin and Tamsulosin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2013to Oct 2013
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults age 18 to 70 years
- Non-diabetic
- Unilateral ureteral calculus 4 to 10 mm visible on CT scan within the ureter
- Serum creatinine level within normal range
- Ability to tolerate oral fluids and oral pain medication
- Ability to make informed medical decisions regarding consent
- Willingness to follow up in the ER in two weeks
Who cannot join
- Adults unable to consent
- Age <18
- Signs of infection including Temperature >38º C or Urinalysis with any of the following: Positive Leukocyte Esterase, Positive Nitrates, or White Blood Cell Count >5/hfp in the setting of a positive urine culture (defined as a single isolated bacterial species population of >100,000 CFU)
- Patients with chronic pain already undergoing treatment with narcotic medications
- Patients already taking an alpha adrenergic antagonist medication
- Pregnant women
- Prisoners
- No working phone number
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19141
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Silodosin vs. Tamsulosin on Spontaneous Passage of Acutely Obstructing Ureteral Calculi in Medical Expulsive Therapy
Ureteral calculi, commonly known as kidney stones, are a frequent cause of Emergency Department (ED) visits. These stones can get caught in the ureter (the tube connecting the kidney to the bladder) and cause symptoms including pain, nausea, and vomiting. As long as the obstructing stone meets certain conditions and the patient isn't too sick, the patient is usually sent home to try and pass the stone without surgery. This treatment is known as medical expulsive therapy (MET), and routinely involves the use of a drug called tamsulosin, which relaxes the smooth muscle of the urinary system to help the stone pass. Silodosin is a drug in the same class of tamsulosin, but which is thought to have a more selective action and a quicker onset, which would theoretically make it better for aiding in kidney stone passage. The purpose of this study is a head-to-head, blinded comparison of these two drugs to see how quickly they result in stone passage. Subjects are patients presenting to the ED with acute kidney stone shown by CT scan, and who are appropriate for MET. The main study intervention is randomization to receiving either tamsulosin or silodosin. The hypothesis is that silodosin will have decreased time to stone passage compared to tamsulosin.
Subjects who qualify and consent are randomized to a two-week course of either silodosin or tamsulosin. They are also given prescriptions for standard of care medications for pain and nausea, as well as a pain diary. They receive a follow-up phone call after one week to remind them of their follow-up appointment, ask about adverse events, and determine if their stone has passed. They have a follow-up visit with study staff at the end of their two week treatment to collect their pain diary, pill count, adverse events, and to determine if their stone has passed. Study participation ends after this follow-up visit.
Read the detailed description
Procedures Involved in the Research. This study is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, head-to-head trial comparing two medications. Patients with symptoms of renal colic who present to the emergency department will be evaluated by the ED staff as per usual routine. After a work-up (including routine chemistry, complete blood count, urine analysis, urine culture, and non-contrast CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis) has been completed, patients who meet inclusion criteria will be asked whether they are willing to enroll in the study. Those who are unsuitable for the study or unwilling to participate will continue to receive routine care for their ureteral calculus. Those who consent will be enrolled as subjects in the study, and given a 2-week supply of either tamsulosin or silodosin in blinded bottles with the appropriate dosing instructions. The prescriptions will be dispensed by the pharmacy; therefore the subjects and study staff will be blinded to which prescription the subject receives. Randomization will be done in advance and a key made to correlate subject enrollment number with which prescription they have received. Throughout the study, the study staff will make no efforts to ascertain which medication the subject has been given, unless an adverse event is suspected. Each participant will be given an information card that details the two possible medications they are taking, which can be presented to their physicians as needed.
Subjects will then be discharged to home as per routine care with instructions to drink plenty of fluids, and will be given a strainer and asked to attempt to catch their ureteral calculus. They will also be given a standardized prescription analgesic package (Percocet 5/325mg #20, Motrin 600mg #60, Zofran OD 4mg #20 with standard dosing instructions) and a Visual Analog Pain Scale diary to be filled out daily. Subjects will be given standardized discharge instructions as per standard of care that will include indications for immediate ED return for signs and symptoms of infection or MET failure (fever, worsening pain, vomiting, lethargy, unsteadiness, syncope or inability to tolerate oral pain medications). As per standard of care, they will be instructed to return to the ER immediately if they develop any of these symptoms. Finally, the subject's contact information will be collected at the time of enrollment and a follow-up appointment will be scheduled for them with Urology in 4 weeks to ensure they get appropriate and timely specialty follow-up. This follow-up is also standard of care, and will occur after the subject's participation in the study ends.
Each subject will be scheduled to return to the ER in 2 weeks to be seen by the research staff for data collection. They will be asked to bring their pill bottle and visual analog pain scale diary to this visit. If the subject reports having passed a stone consistent with their initial imaging, or have resolution of their pain to suggest they passed the stone unseen, this will conclude their participation in the study. However, if they are still having symptoms, their case will be categorized as an outpatient treatment failure and the subject will be registered to be seen by an ER Physician and a Urology consult will be ordered, concluding their participation in the study. This is current standard of care, and will be covered by insurance. Any subject that has an unscheduled visit to an ER for a ureterolithiasis-related complaint will also be considered an outpatient treatment failure. This will also conclude their participation in this study.
To ensure follow-up, subjects will be called one week after enrollment. They will be reminded of their 2-week follow-up appointment and the need to bring in their pill bottles. Each subject will also be asked if they have passed the stone or had resolution of the pain. The will be reminded that they must follow-up even if they are no longer having symptoms.
- Conditions
- Ureteral Calculus, Ureterolithiasis, Ureteral Stone
- Being tested
- Silodosin, Tamsulosin
- Keywords
- Ureteral calculus, Ureterolithiasis, Ureteral stone, Kidney stone, Medical expulsive therapy, tamsulosin, silodosin, rapaflo, flomax
- Medical subject headings
- Ureteral Calculi, Ureterolithiasis, Kidney Calculi
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SilodosinDrug
Also called Rapaflo
8mg tablet, 1 tab PO daily for 2 weeks
TamsulosinDrug
Also called Flomax
0.4 mg Tab, 1 tab PO daily for 2 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Silodosin | Active comparator | Subjects in the Silodosin Group will be given silodosin 8 mg tablets, one tablet to be taken PO each day for two weeks. Receives: Drug: Silodosin |
| Tamsulosin | Active comparator | Subjects in the Tamsulosin Group will be given tamsulosin 0.4 mg tablets, one tablet to be taken PO each day for two weeks. Receives: Drug: Tamsulosin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to Stone Passage
The primary outcome measure will be the time it takes for the stone to pass. Stone passage will be defined as the subject self-reporting passage of a stone that is consistent with their imaging, or resolution of their pain to suggest unseen passage of their stone. This outcome will be measured from the initial emergency department visit, and gathered at the one-week follow-up call as well as the two-week follow-up visit.
Measured: at 2 weeks
Secondary outcomes (3)
Use of Pain Medication
The subject will be given a standardized pain medication prescription at their initial visit, and will be asked to keep track of how much pain medication they used each day, as well as to bring their pill bottle with them to the two-week follow-up appointment for a pill count. This information will be collected at the two-week follow-up appointment.
Measured: at 2 weeks
Outpatient Treatment Failure
Subjects will be given instructions at the initial visit to return to the emergency department immediately for signs and symptoms of infection or MET failure (fever, worsening pain, vomiting, lethargy, unsteadiness, syncope or inability to tolerate oral pain medications). These subjects will be considered to have failed outpatient treatment and will be removed from the study.
Subjects who do not experience these issues but who still report having symptoms at the two-week follow-up visit will also be considered to have failed outpatient treatment.
Measured: at 2 weeks
Adverse Hemodynamic Reaction
Both tamsulosin and silodosin carry the possibility of causing orthostatic hypotension, which can manifest as unsteadiness, syncope, headache, and/or dizziness, especially when changing position from sitting/laying to standing. Subjects will be asked to assess themselves for these symptoms continuously from the initial visit, with serious reactions resulting in cessation of study medication. For reactions which are not serious, the information will be collected at the one-week follow-up call as well as the two-week follow-up visit.
Measured: at 2 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2013
- Primary completionOct 2013
- Study completionOct 2013
Why it stopped: due to lack of suitable patient population
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ureteral CalculusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Albert Einstein Healthcare Network
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- William Boroughf, DO, Principal investigator, Einstein Healthcare NetworkJames Gardner, MD, Principal investigator, Einstein Healthcare Network
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02369744
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HN 4441
- Status last verified
- May 2017
- First submitted
- 19 Jun 2014
- Last updated
- 23 Jun 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Hollingsworth JM, Rogers MA, Kaufman SR, Bradford TJ, Saint S, Wei JT, Hollenbeck BK. Medical therapy to facilitate urinary stone passage: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2006 Sep 30;368(9542):1171-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69474-9.
PubMed 17011944Parsons JK, Hergan LA, Sakamoto K, Lakin C. Efficacy of alpha-blockers for the treatment of ureteral stones. J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):983-7; discussion 987. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.023.
PubMed 17296392Pedro RN, Hinck B, Hendlin K, Feia K, Canales BK, Monga M. Alfuzosin stone expulsion therapy for distal ureteral calculi: a double-blind, placebo controlled study. J Urol. 2008 Jun;179(6):2244-7; discussion 2247. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.141. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
PubMed 18423747Steinberg PL. Re: Karim Bensalah, Margaret Pearle and Yair Lotan. Cost-effectiveness of medical expulsive therapy using alpha-blockers for the treatment of distal ureteral stones. Eur urol 2008;53:411-9. Eur Urol. 2008 Aug;54(2):469; author reply 469. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.077. Epub 2008 Feb 4. No abstract available.
PubMed 18281146Hermanns T, Sauermann P, Rufibach K, Frauenfelder T, Sulser T, Strebel RT. Is there a role for tamsulosin in the treatment of distal ureteral stones of 7 mm or less? Results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2009 Sep;56(3):407-12. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.076. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
PubMed 19375849Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, Alken P, Buck AC, Gallucci M, Knoll T, Lingeman JE, Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Sarica K, Turk C, Wolf JS Jr; American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc; European Association of Urology. 2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol. 2007 Dec;52(6):1610-31. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.039. No abstract available.
PubMed 18074433Kobayashi S, Tomiyama Y, Hoyano Y, Yamazaki Y, Sasaki S, Kohri K. Effects of silodosin and naftopidil on the distal ureter and cardiovascular system in anesthetized dogs: comparison of potential medications for distal ureteral stone passage. J Urol. 2010 Jan;183(1):357-61. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.106.
PubMed 19914658H Lepor et al. Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study To Define Electrocardiographic Effects Of Silodosin. Journal of Urology 179(4), May 2008
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jun 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Silodosin vs. Tamsulosin on Spontaneous Passage of Acutely Obstructing Ureteral Calculi in Medical Expulsive Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02369744
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HN 4441
- Conditions
- Ureteral Calculus, Ureterolithiasis, Ureteral Stone
- Keywords
- Ureteral calculus, Ureterolithiasis, Ureteral stone, Kidney stone, Medical expulsive therapy, tamsulosin, silodosin, rapaflo
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: due to lack of suitable patient population
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Albert Einstein Healthcare NetworkUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2013
- Primary completion
- Oct 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 19 Mar 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Ureteral calculi, commonly known as kidney stones, are a frequent cause of Emergency Department (ED) visits. These stones can get caught in the ureter (the tube connecting the kidney to the bladder) and cause symptoms including pain, nausea, and vomiting. As long as the obstructing stone meets certain conditions and the patient isn't too sick, the patient is usually sent home to try and pass the stone without surgery. This treatment is known as medical expulsive therapy (MET), and routinely involves the use of a drug called tamsulosin, which relaxes the smooth muscle of the urinary system to help the stone pass. Silodosin is a drug in the same class of tamsulosin, but which is thought to have a more selective action and a quicker onset, which would theoretically make it better for aiding in kidney stone passage. The purpose of this study is a head-to-head, blinded comparison of these two drugs to see how quickly they result in stone passage. Subjects are patients presenting to the ED with acute kidney stone shown by CT scan, and who are appropriate for MET. The main study intervention is randomization to receiving either tamsulosin or silodosin. The hypothesis is that silodosin will have decreased time to stone passage compared to tamsulosin.
Subjects who qualify and consent are randomized to a two-week course of either silodosin or tamsulosin. They are also given prescriptions for standard of care medications for pain and nausea, as well as a pain diary. They receive a follow-up phone call after one week to remind them of their follow-up appointment, ask about adverse events, and determine if their stone has passed. They have a follow-up visit with study staff at the end of their two week treatment to collect their pain diary, pill count, adverse events, and to determine if their stone has passed. Study participation ends after this follow-up visit.
Detailed description
Procedures Involved in the Research. This study is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, head-to-head trial comparing two medications. Patients with symptoms of renal colic who present to the emergency department will be evaluated by the ED staff as per usual routine. After a work-up (including routine chemistry, complete blood count, urine analysis, urine culture, and non-contrast CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis) has been completed, patients who meet inclusion criteria will be asked whether they are willing to enroll in the study. Those who are unsuitable for the study or unwilling to participate will continue to receive routine care for their ureteral calculus. Those who consent will be enrolled as subjects in the study, and given a 2-week supply of either tamsulosin or silodosin in blinded bottles with the appropriate dosing instructions. The prescriptions will be dispensed by the pharmacy; therefore the subjects and study staff will be blinded to which prescription the subject receives. Randomization will be done in advance and a key made to correlate subject enrollment number with which prescription they have received. Throughout the study, the study staff will make no efforts to ascertain which medication the subject has been given, unless an adverse event is suspected. Each participant will be given an information card that details the two possible medications they are taking, which can be presented to their physicians as needed.
Subjects will then be discharged to home as per routine care with instructions to drink plenty of fluids, and will be given a strainer and asked to attempt to catch their ureteral calculus. They will also be given a standardized prescription analgesic package (Percocet 5/325mg #20, Motrin 600mg #60, Zofran OD 4mg #20 with standard dosing instructions) and a Visual Analog Pain Scale diary to be filled out daily. Subjects will be given standardized discharge instructions as per standard of care that will include indications for immediate ED return for signs and symptoms of infection or MET failure (fever, worsening pain, vomiting, lethargy, unsteadiness, syncope or inability to tolerate oral pain medications). As per standard of care, they will be instructed to return to the ER immediately if they develop any of these symptoms. Finally, the subject's contact information will be collected at the time of enrollment and a follow-up appointment will be scheduled for them with Urology in 4 weeks to ensure they get appropriate and timely specialty follow-up. This follow-up is also standard of care, and will occur after the subject's participation in the study ends.
Each subject will be scheduled to return to the ER in 2 weeks to be seen by the research staff for data collection. They will be asked to bring their pill bottle and visual analog pain scale diary to this visit. If the subject reports having passed a stone consistent with their initial imaging, or have resolution of their pain to suggest they passed the stone unseen, this will conclude their participation in the study. However, if they are still having symptoms, their case will be categorized as an outpatient treatment failure and the subject will be registered to be seen by an ER Physician and a Urology consult will be ordered, concluding their participation in the study. This is current standard of care, and will be covered by insurance. Any subject that has an unscheduled visit to an ER for a ureterolithiasis-related complaint will also be considered an outpatient treatment failure. This will also conclude their participation in this study.
To ensure follow-up, subjects will be called one week after enrollment. They will be reminded of their 2-week follow-up appointment and the need to bring in their pill bottles. Each subject will also be asked if they have passed the stone or had resolution of the pain. The will be reminded that they must follow-up even if they are no longer having symptoms.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Silodosin | Active comparator | Drug: SilodosinSubjects in the Silodosin Group will be given silodosin 8 mg tablets, one tablet to be taken PO each day for two weeks. |
| Tamsulosin | Active comparator | Drug: TamsulosinSubjects in the Tamsulosin Group will be given tamsulosin 0.4 mg tablets, one tablet to be taken PO each day for two weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Adults age 18 to 70 years
- Non-diabetic
- Unilateral ureteral calculus 4 to 10 mm visible on CT scan within the ureter
- Serum creatinine level within normal range
- Ability to tolerate oral fluids and oral pain medication
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Adults unable to consent
- Age <18
- Signs of infection including Temperature >38º C or Urinalysis with any of the following: Positive Leukocyte Esterase, Positive Nitrates, or White Blood Cell Count >5/hfp in the setting of a positive urine culture (defined as a single isolated bacterial species population of >100,000 CFU)
- Patients with chronic pain already undergoing treatment with narcotic medications
- Patients already taking an alpha adrenergic antagonist medication
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SilodosinAlso: Rapaflo8mg tablet, 1 tab PO daily for 2 weeks | Drug | Silodosin |
| TamsulosinAlso: Flomax0.4 mg Tab, 1 tab PO daily for 2 weeks | Drug | Tamsulosin |
Primary outcome
Time to Stone Passage
Time frame: at 2 weeks
The primary outcome measure will be the time it takes for the stone to pass. Stone passage will be defined as the subject self-reporting passage of a stone that is consistent with their imaging, or resolution of their pain to suggest unseen passage of their stone. This outcome will be measured from the initial emergency department visit, and gathered at the one-week follow-up call as well as the two-week follow-up visit.
3 secondary outcomes
Use of Pain Medication
Time frame: at 2 weeks
Outpatient Treatment Failure
Time frame: at 2 weeks
Adverse Hemodynamic Reaction
Time frame: at 2 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jun 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 17011944Hollingsworth JM, Rogers MA, Kaufman SR, Bradford TJ, Saint S, Wei JT, Hollenbeck BK. Medical therapy to facilitate urinary stone passage: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2006 Sep 30;368(9542):1171-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69474-9.
- Background: PubMed 17296392Parsons JK, Hergan LA, Sakamoto K, Lakin C. Efficacy of alpha-blockers for the treatment of ureteral stones. J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):983-7; discussion 987. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.023.
- Background: PubMed 18423747Pedro RN, Hinck B, Hendlin K, Feia K, Canales BK, Monga M. Alfuzosin stone expulsion therapy for distal ureteral calculi: a double-blind, placebo controlled study. J Urol. 2008 Jun;179(6):2244-7; discussion 2247. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.141. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
- Background: PubMed 18281146Steinberg PL. Re: Karim Bensalah, Margaret Pearle and Yair Lotan. Cost-effectiveness of medical expulsive therapy using alpha-blockers for the treatment of distal ureteral stones. Eur urol 2008;53:411-9. Eur Urol. 2008 Aug;54(2):469; author reply 469. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.077. Epub 2008 Feb 4. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 19375849Hermanns T, Sauermann P, Rufibach K, Frauenfelder T, Sulser T, Strebel RT. Is there a role for tamsulosin in the treatment of distal ureteral stones of 7 mm or less? Results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2009 Sep;56(3):407-12. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.076. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
- Background: PubMed 18074433Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, Alken P, Buck AC, Gallucci M, Knoll T, Lingeman JE, Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Sarica K, Turk C, Wolf JS Jr; American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc; European Association of Urology. 2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol. 2007 Dec;52(6):1610-31. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.039. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 19914658Kobayashi S, Tomiyama Y, Hoyano Y, Yamazaki Y, Sasaki S, Kohri K. Effects of silodosin and naftopidil on the distal ureter and cardiovascular system in anesthetized dogs: comparison of potential medications for distal ureteral stone passage. J Urol. 2010 Jan;183(1):357-61. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.106.
- BackgroundH Lepor et al. Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study To Define Electrocardiographic Effects Of Silodosin. Journal of Urology 179(4), May 2008
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Ureteral Calculus
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Smart Pressure-Controlled Flexible Ureteroscopy and Flexible Suction Ureteral Access Sheath-Assisted Flexible Ureteroscopy for 2-3 cm Renal Stones
Kidney Stones
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Suction and Conventional Ureteral Access Sheaths in Kidney Stone Surgery
Kidney Calculi, Nephrolithiasis
Not yet recruiting
Ureteral Access Strategies in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
Nephrolithiasis, Kidney Calculi
Recruiting
The Effect of Acupuncture on Passing Ureteral Stones
Ureter Calculi
RecruitingObservational study
Renal Stone Treatment Global Registry
Urolithiasis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
William Boroughf, DO principal investigator
Einstein Healthcare Network
James Gardner, MD principal investigator
Einstein Healthcare Network
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Silodosin and Tamsulosin in people with Ureteral Calculus and Ureterolithiasis, run by Albert Einstein Healthcare Network at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Mar 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to Stone Passage (time frame: at 2 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02369744, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jun 2020.