Follicular Lymphoma (FL)Phase 1/2KEYNOTE145NCT02362035
ACP-196 (Acalabrutinib) in Combination With Pembrolizumab, for Treatment of Hematologic Malignancies
A Phase 1/2 study testing Acalabrutinib and Pembrolizumab in people with Follicular Lymphoma (FL) and CLL, run by Acerta Pharma BV at 19 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study is evaluating the safety, pharmacodynamics (PD), and efficacy of acalabrutinib and pembrolizumab in hematologic malignancies. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Follicular Lymphoma (FL), CLL, Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (SLL)
- What is being tested?
- Acalabrutinib and Pembrolizumab
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 161 participants
- Where
- 19 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 20 Feb 2015to 27 Oct 2025
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Main Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of a hematologic malignancy as documented by medical records and with histology based on criteria established by the World Health Organization (WHO).
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of ≤ 1.
- Agreement to use contraception during the study and for 90 days after the last dose of ACP-196 or 120 days after the last dose of pembrolizumab, if sexually active and able to bear or beget children.
- Completion of all therapy (including surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or investigational therapy) for the treatment of cancer ≥ 4 weeks before the start of study therapy.
- ANC ≥ 0.5 x 10^9/L or platelet count ≥ 50 x 10^9/L unless due to disease involvement in the bone marrow.
Main Exclusion Criteria:
- A life-threatening illness, medical condition or organ system dysfunction which, in the investigator's opinion, could compromise the subject's safety, interfere with the absorption or metabolism of study drugs, or put the study outcomes at undue risk.
- Central nervous system (CNS) involvement by lymphoma/leukemia
- Any therapeutic antibody within 4 weeks of first dose of study drugs.
- Total bilirubin > 1.5 x ULN; and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 3.0 x ULN.
- Estimated creatinine clearance of < 30 mL/min, calculated using the formula of Cockcroft and Gault (140-Age) • Mass (kg)/(72 • creatinine mg/dL); multiply by 0.85 if female.
Trial locations and contacts
19 sites in 1 country.
19 sites in 1 country
United States19 sites
Research Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 2215
Research Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Research Site
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Research Site
Denver, Colorado, 80218
Research Site
Fairfax, Virginia, 22031
Research Site
Greenville, South Carolina, 29605
Research Site
Houston, Texas, 77030
Research Site
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Research Site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Research Site
Niles, Illinois, 60714
Research Site
Omaha, Nebraska, 68198-7680
Research Site
Roanoke, Virginia, 24014
Research Site
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905-0001
Research Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78217
Research Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85704
Research Site
Tyler, Texas, 75702
Research Site
Vancouver, Washington, 98684
Research Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007
Research Site
Yakima, Washington, 98902
About this study
Official title: A Phase 1b/2 Proof-of-Concept Study of the Combination of ACP-196 (Acalabrutinib) and Pembrolizumab in Subjects With Hematologic Malignancies
This study is evaluating the safety, pharmacodynamics (PD), and efficacy of acalabrutinib and pembrolizumab in hematologic malignancies.
Read the detailed description
This is a Phase 1b/2, open-label, nonrandomized study that will be conducted in 2 stages. In the first stage, Part 1 of the study will determine the safety and preliminary efficacy of acalabrutinib and pembrolizumab in a limited group of B-cell malignancies. In the second stage, Part 2 allows for possible expansion cohorts into a wider range of B-cell malignancies, and Part 3 will evaluate the combination in subjects with myelofibrosis (MF).
- Conditions
- Follicular Lymphoma (FL), CLL, Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (SLL), Richter's Syndrome, Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL), Indolent Non Hodgkin Lymphoma
- Being tested
- Acalabrutinib, Pembrolizumab
- Keywords
- Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, Btk, B-Cell Malignancies, Mantle Cell, Multiple Myeloma, CLL, SLL, DLBCL, Follicular, Waldenstrom, Burkitt lymphoma, marginal zone lymphomas, hairy cell leukemia, B cell acute lymphoid leukemia, Acalabrutinib, ACP-196
- Medical subject headings
- Lymphoma, Follicular, Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell, Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell, Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia, Multiple Myeloma, Hodgkin Disease, Burkitt Lymphoma, Leukemia, Hairy Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AcalabrutinibDrug
Also called ACP-196
Orally Administered (PO)
PembrolizumabDrug
Also called KEYTRUDA
Intravenous Administered (IV)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Acalabrutinib plus Pembrolizumab | Experimental | A nonrandomized study that will be conducted in 2 stages. In the first stage, (Safety), subjects will receive Acalabrutinib Dose A orally administered (PO) twice daily (BID) in combination with Pembrolizumab Dose B administered every 3 weeks (Q3W).
The second stage was an expansion of Cohorts with the same dose regimen as the first stage. An additional expansion in subjects with Myelofibrosis was planned but not conducted. Receives: Drug: Acalabrutinib; Drug: Pembrolizumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)
Treatment-emergent AEs were defined as those events that occurred on or after the first dose of study drug, through the treatment phase, and within 30 days following the last dose of study drug.
Measured: 104 weeks
Number of Participants With Grade 3-4 Adverse Events
Severity of AEs was graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.03
Measured: 104 weeks
Number of Participants With Grade 5 Adverse Events
Number of participants with CTCAE Grade 5 (fatal) adverse events
Measured: 104 weeks
Number of Participants With Any Study-Drug Related AE
Study drug-related AEs were those assessed by investigator as related to study treatment.
Measured: 104 weeks
Number of Participants With Grade 3-4 Study-Drug Related AE
The severity of the AEs was assessed by NCI CTCAE Version 4.03 or higher. Drug-related AEs were those assessed by investigator as related to study treatment.
Measured: 104 weeks
Number of Participants With Grade 5 Study-Drug Related AE
Grade 5 (fatal) AEs assessed by investigator as related to study treatment.
Measured: 104 weeks
Number of Participants With Any SAE
Serious AEs were those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect in a neonate/infant born to a mother exposed to the investigational product, or were considered a significant medical event by the investigator based on medical judgment.
Measured: 104 weeks
Number of Participants With Grade 3-4 Any SAE
Serious AEs were those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect in a neonate/infant born to a mother exposed to the investigational product, or were considered a significant medical event by the investigator based on medical judgment. The severity of the AEs was assessed by NCI CTCAE Version 4.03 or higher.
Measured: 104 weeks
Number of Participants With Grade 5 Any SAE
Grade 5 events were fatal events. Serious AEs were those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect in a neonate/infant born to a mother exposed to the investigational product, or were considered a significant medical event by the investigator based on medical judgment.
Measured: 104 weeks
Number of Participants With Any Study Drug-Related SAE
Serious AEs were those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect in a neonate/infant born to a mother exposed to the investigational product, or were considered a significant medical event by the investigator based on medical judgment. Drug-related AEs were those assessed by investigator as related to study treatment.
Measured: 104 weeks
Number of Participants With Any Grade 3-4 Study Drug-Related SAE
Serious AEs were those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect in a neonate/infant born to a mother exposed to the investigational product, or were considered a significant medical event by the investigator based on medical judgment. The severity of the AEs was assessed by NCI CTCAE Version 4.03 or higher. Drug-related AEs were those assessed by investigator as related to study treatment.
Measured: 104 weeks
Number of Participants With Any Grade 5 Study Drug-Related SAE
Grade 5 AEs were fatal events. Serious AEs were those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect in a neonate/infant born to a mother exposed to the investigational product, or were considered a significant medical event by the investigator based on medical judgment. Drug-related AEs were those assessed by investigator as related to study treatment.
Measured: 104 weeks
Number of Participants With AE Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation, Modification or Delay
AEs that discontinuation of study treatment, or a reduction in dosage, or a delay (temporary withholding) in treatment.
Measured: 104 weeks
Number of Participants With AE Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation
An adverse event that resulted in the permanent discontinuation of study treatment in the study.
Measured: 104 weeks
Number of Participants With AE Leading to Study Drug Delay
An adverse event that caused a temporary withholding of study treatment.
Measured: 104 weeks
Number of Participants With AE Leading to Study Drug Modification
An adverse event that resulted in a reduction in the dosage of study treatment for that participant.
Measured: 104 weeks
Secondary outcomes (5)
Overall Response Rate
The percentage of subjects who achieve a partial response or complete response
Measured: 104 weeks
Duration of Response
The interval from the first documentation of response to the earlier of the first documentation of definitive disease progression or death from any cause
Measured: 104 weeks
Progression-free Survival
The interval from the first dose date of acalabrutinib or pembrolizumab to the earlier of the first documentation of objective disease progression or death from any cause
Measured: 104 weeks
Overall Survival
The time from the first dose date of acalabrutinib or pembrolizumab until date of death due to any cause
Measured: 104 weeks
Time to Next Treatment
The time from the first dose date of acalabrutinib or pembrolizumab to the start of the next treatment other than the study treatment
Measured: 104 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Study start20 Feb 2015
- Primary completion14 Jul 2020
- Study completion27 Oct 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Follicular Lymphoma (FL)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Acerta Pharma BVThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 161 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Acerta Pharma BV
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- AstraZeneca Clinical Study Information Center, Study director, 1-877-240-9479 - information.center@astrazeneca.com
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02362035
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ACE-LY-005
- Acronym
- KEYNOTE145
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 7 Feb 2015
- Last updated
- 13 May 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal. All request will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment: https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure. Yes, indicates that AZ are accepting requests for IPD, but this does not mean all requests will be shared.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 1b/2 Proof-of-Concept Study of the Combination of ACP-196 (Acalabrutinib) and Pembrolizumab in Subjects With Hematologic Malignancies
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02362035
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KEYNOTE145 / ACE-LY-005
- Conditions
- Follicular Lymphoma (FL), CLL, Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (SLL), Richter's Syndrome, Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL), Indolent Non Hodgkin Lymphoma
- Keywords
- Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, Btk, B-Cell Malignancies, Mantle Cell, Multiple Myeloma, CLL, SLL, DLBCL
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 161 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Acerta Pharma BVIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Study start
- 20 Feb 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Oct 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 6 May 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is evaluating the safety, pharmacodynamics (PD), and efficacy of acalabrutinib and pembrolizumab in hematologic malignancies.
Detailed description
This is a Phase 1b/2, open-label, nonrandomized study that will be conducted in 2 stages. In the first stage, Part 1 of the study will determine the safety and preliminary efficacy of acalabrutinib and pembrolizumab in a limited group of B-cell malignancies. In the second stage, Part 2 allows for possible expansion cohorts into a wider range of B-cell malignancies, and Part 3 will evaluate the combination in subjects with myelofibrosis (MF).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Acalabrutinib plus Pembrolizumab | Experimental | Drug: Acalabrutinib, Drug: PembrolizumabA nonrandomized study that will be conducted in 2 stages. In the first stage, (Safety), subjects will receive Acalabrutinib Dose A orally administered (PO) twice daily (BID) in combination with Pembrolizumab Dose B administered every 3 weeks (Q3W). The second stage was an expansion of Cohorts with the same dose regimen as the first stage. An additional expansion in subjects with Myelofibrosis was planned but not conducted. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AcalabrutinibAlso: ACP-196Orally Administered (PO) | Drug | Acalabrutinib plus Pembrolizumab |
| PembrolizumabAlso: KEYTRUDAIntravenous Administered (IV) | Drug | Acalabrutinib plus Pembrolizumab |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame: 104 weeks
Treatment-emergent AEs were defined as those events that occurred on or after the first dose of study drug, through the treatment phase, and within 30 days following the last dose of study drug.
Number of Participants With Grade 3-4 Adverse Events
Time frame: 104 weeks
Severity of AEs was graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.03
Number of Participants With Grade 5 Adverse Events
Time frame: 104 weeks
Number of participants with CTCAE Grade 5 (fatal) adverse events
Number of Participants With Any Study-Drug Related AE
Time frame: 104 weeks
Study drug-related AEs were those assessed by investigator as related to study treatment.
Number of Participants With Grade 3-4 Study-Drug Related AE
Time frame: 104 weeks
The severity of the AEs was assessed by NCI CTCAE Version 4.03 or higher. Drug-related AEs were those assessed by investigator as related to study treatment.
Number of Participants With Grade 5 Study-Drug Related AE
Time frame: 104 weeks
Grade 5 (fatal) AEs assessed by investigator as related to study treatment.
Number of Participants With Any SAE
Time frame: 104 weeks
Serious AEs were those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect in a neonate/infant born to a mother exposed to the investigational product, or were considered a significant medical event by the investigator based on medical judgment.
Number of Participants With Grade 3-4 Any SAE
Time frame: 104 weeks
Serious AEs were those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect in a neonate/infant born to a mother exposed to the investigational product, or were considered a significant medical event by the investigator based on medical judgment. The severity of the AEs was assessed by NCI CTCAE Version 4.03 or higher.
Number of Participants With Grade 5 Any SAE
Time frame: 104 weeks
Grade 5 events were fatal events. Serious AEs were those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect in a neonate/infant born to a mother exposed to the investigational product, or were considered a significant medical event by the investigator based on medical judgment.
Number of Participants With Any Study Drug-Related SAE
Time frame: 104 weeks
Serious AEs were those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect in a neonate/infant born to a mother exposed to the investigational product, or were considered a significant medical event by the investigator based on medical judgment. Drug-related AEs were those assessed by investigator as related to study treatment.
Number of Participants With Any Grade 3-4 Study Drug-Related SAE
Time frame: 104 weeks
Serious AEs were those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect in a neonate/infant born to a mother exposed to the investigational product, or were considered a significant medical event by the investigator based on medical judgment. The severity of the AEs was assessed by NCI CTCAE Version 4.03 or higher. Drug-related AEs were those assessed by investigator as related to study treatment.
Number of Participants With Any Grade 5 Study Drug-Related SAE
Time frame: 104 weeks
Grade 5 AEs were fatal events. Serious AEs were those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect in a neonate/infant born to a mother exposed to the investigational product, or were considered a significant medical event by the investigator based on medical judgment. Drug-related AEs were those assessed by investigator as related to study treatment.
Number of Participants With AE Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation, Modification or Delay
Time frame: 104 weeks
AEs that discontinuation of study treatment, or a reduction in dosage, or a delay (temporary withholding) in treatment.
Number of Participants With AE Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation
Time frame: 104 weeks
An adverse event that resulted in the permanent discontinuation of study treatment in the study.
Number of Participants With AE Leading to Study Drug Delay
Time frame: 104 weeks
An adverse event that caused a temporary withholding of study treatment.
Number of Participants With AE Leading to Study Drug Modification
Time frame: 104 weeks
An adverse event that resulted in a reduction in the dosage of study treatment for that participant.
5 secondary outcomes
Overall Response Rate
Time frame: 104 weeks
Duration of Response
Time frame: 104 weeks
Progression-free Survival
Time frame: 104 weeks
Overall Survival
Time frame: 104 weeks
Time to Next Treatment
Time frame: 104 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 May 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Redacted CSPLink provided by the sponsor.
- Redacted SAPLink provided by the sponsor.
- Redacted CSR SynopsisLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal. All request will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment: https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure. Yes, indicates that AZ are accepting requests for IPD, but this does not mean all requests will be shared.
Related trials for Follicular Lymphoma (FL)
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Dose Escalation and Dose Expansion Study of MDX2003 in Patients With Different Types of Lymphoma
Lymphoma, Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM)
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Study to Evaluate Adverse Events, Change in Disease Activity, and How Oral ABBV-101 Moves Through the Body in Adult Participants With B-Cell Malignancies
Hematologic Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of ARC-02 in B-cell NHL
B-cell Non Hodgkin Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Treatment of Chinese Participants With B-Cell Malignancies With BGB-16673, a Bruton Tyrosine Kinase-Targeted Protein-Degrader
B-cell Malignancy, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab and Rituximab for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Follicular Lymphoma
Classic Follicular Lymphoma, Grade 1 Follicular Lymphoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
AstraZeneca Clinical Study Information Center study director
1-877-240-9479 - information.center@astrazeneca.com
19 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Acalabrutinib and Pembrolizumab in people with Follicular Lymphoma (FL) and CLL, run by Acerta Pharma BV at 19 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 19 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 May 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) (time frame: 104 weeks). The study lists 16 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 May 2026.