AzTrials
AzTrials

Age-Related Macular DegenerationPhase 2NCT02357342

Sirolimus Versus Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (antiVEGF) for Wet AMD

A Phase 2 study testing Sirolimus in people with Age-Related Macular Degeneration, run by Maturi, Raj K., M.D., P.C. at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Phase 2 clinical trial, single site, randomized, subject-masked study to determine safety and efficacy of intravitreal injections of Sirolimus in subjects with wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration (wet AMD) with persistent intraretinal or subretinal edema due to neovascular AMD despite previous AntiVEGF treatment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Age-Related Macular Degeneration
What is being tested?
Sirolimus
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2015to Jan 2017
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • best corrected visual acuity of 5-65, inclusive, in study eye
  • presence of choroid neovascularization secondary to AMD
  • persistent edema despite at least 3 previous intravitreal anti-VEGF injections in the past 5 months

Who cannot join

  • greater than 100 micron decrease in central subfield thickness on Optical Coherence Topography (OCT) since last standard of care visit
  • history of major ophthalmic surgery in the study eye in the past 3 months
  • history of significant ocular disease or condition other than exudative AMD that may confound results

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Raj K Maturi MD PC

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46290

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Sirolimus Versus AntiVEGF for Wet AMD

Phase 2 clinical trial, single site, randomized, subject-masked study to determine safety and efficacy of intravitreal injections of Sirolimus in subjects with wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration (wet AMD) with persistent intraretinal or subretinal edema due to neovascular AMD despite previous AntiVEGF treatment.

Read the detailed description

Forty subjects will be randomized to receive intravitreal Sirolimus or standard of care treatment in a 1:1 ratio. Over the course of the six month trial plus a 6 month optional extension, subjects will be evaluated monthly. Treatment with Sirolimus will be given at baseline, month 2 and month 4 with sham injections given at months 1, 3 and 5. For subjects in the extension Sirolimus will also be given at months 6, 8 and 10 with sham at month 7, 9, and 11. Subjects in the standard of care group will receive anti-VEGF injections or sham monthly. Retreatment criteria will be based upon continued subretinal edema, intraretinal edema or active chorioretinal neovascularization (CNV)

Being tested
Sirolimus, Standard of Care intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF
Medical subject headings
Macular Degeneration

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SirolimusDrug

    Also called DE-109

    intravitreal injection

  • Standard of Care intravitreal injections of anti-VEGFDrug

    Also called avastin,bevacizumab, eylea, aflibercept,

    intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF

Study groups in NCT02357342
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SirolimusExperimentalIntravitreal Sirolimus
Receives: Drug: Sirolimus
Standard of Care intravitreal anti-VEGFActive comparatoranti-VEGF intravitreal injections
Receives: Drug: Standard of Care intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Edema From Baseline to Month 6 Central Subfield Thickness ) on Heidelberg Optical Coherence Topography

    Change in edema from baseline to month 6 as measured by mean difference in microns of central subfield thickness on Heidelberg optical coherence topography in each treatment group

    Measured: Baseline to 6 months

  2. Visual Acuity

    number of subjects with gain of 0-4 letters of visual acuity

    Measured: Baseline to 6 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Visual Acuity (Best Corrected Visual Acuity)

    number of subjects with gain of 5 or more letters of visual acuity

    Measured: baseline to 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Feb 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2015
  3. Primary completionJan 2017
  4. Study completionJan 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02357342
Sponsor's protocol ID
RKM008
Status last verified
Jun 2017
First submitted
2 Feb 2015
Last updated
22 Jun 2017
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Minturn RJ, Bracha P, Klein MJ, Chhablani J, Harless AM, Maturi RK. Intravitreal sirolimus for persistent, exudative age-related macular degeneration: a Pilot Study. Int J Retina Vitreous. 2021 Feb 16;7(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40942-021-00281-0.

    PubMed 33593448

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Sirolimus in people with Age-Related Macular Degeneration, run by Maturi, Raj K., M.D., P.C. at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Jun 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Edema From Baseline to Month 6 Central Subfield Thickness ) on Heidelberg Optical Coherence Topography (time frame: Baseline to 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02357342, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jun 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in