AzTrials
AzTrials

Psoriatic ArthritisPhase 3SPIRIT-P2NCT02349295

A Study of Ixekizumab (LY2439821) in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis

A Phase 3 study testing Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W and Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by Eli Lilly and Company at 109 sites in 10 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate how effective and safe the study drug known as ixekizumab is in participants with active psoriatic arthritis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Psoriatic Arthritis
What is being tested?
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W and Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
363 participants
Where
109 sitesin 10 countries
Study dates
31 Dec 2014to 26 Jun 2019
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Presents with established diagnosis of active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) for at least 6 months, and currently meets Classification for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria
  • Active PsA defined as the presence of at least 3 tender and at least 3 swollen joints
  • Presence of active psoriatic skin lesion or a history of plaque psoriasis (Ps)
  • Men must agree to use a reliable method of birth control or remain abstinent during the study
  • Women must agree to use reliable birth control or remain abstinent during the study and for at least 12 weeks after stopping treatment
  • Have been treated with 1 or more conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs)
  • Have had prior treatment with at least 1 and not more than 2 tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. The participant must have discontinued at least 1 TNF inhibitor due to either an inadequate response (based on a minimum of 12 weeks on therapy) or documented intolerance.

Who cannot join

  • Current use of biologic agents for treatment of Ps or PsA
  • Inadequate response to greater than 2 biologic DMARDs
  • Current use of more than one cDMARDs
  • Diagnosis of active inflammatory arthritic syndromes or spondyloarthropathies other than PsA
  • Have received treatment with interleukin (IL) -17 or IL12/23 targeted monoclonal antibody (MAb) therapy
  • Serious disorder or illness other than psoriatic arthritis
  • Serious infection within the last 3 months
  • Breastfeeding or nursing (lactating) women

Trial locations and contacts

109 sites in 10 countries.

109 sites in 10 countries

United States59 sites
  • The Center for Rheumatology

    Albany, New York, 12203

  • Albuquerque Rehabilitation & Rheumatology, PC

    Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102

  • Austin Rheumatology Research PA

    Austin, Texas, 78705

  • Austin Regional Clinic

    Austin, Texas, 78731

  • Johns Hopkins Arthritis Center

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21224

  • Rheumatology Associates PC

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35205

  • Rheumatology Associates of South Florida

    Boca Raton, Florida, 33486

  • Tufts Medical Center

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02111

  • Weill Cornell Medical College

    Brooklyn, New York, 11201

  • Physicians Clinic of Iowa

    Cedar Rapids, Iowa, 52403

  • Arthritis and Osteoporosis Consultants of the Carolinas

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207

  • DJL Clinical Research, PLLC

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210

  • New Jersey Physicians

    Clifton, New Jersey, 07012

  • Klein and Associates MD, PA

    Cumberland, Maryland, 21502

  • Arthritis Care & Diagnostic Center P.A.

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • STAT Research

    Dayton, Ohio, 45417

  • Altoona Center for Clinical Research

    Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635

  • Rheumatology and Immunotherapy Center

    Franklin, Wisconsin, 53132

  • Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Research

    Glendale, Arizona, 85304

  • Klein and Associates MD, PA

    Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740

  • PMG Research of Hickory, LLC

    Hickory, North Carolina, 28602

  • Pioneer Research Solutions

    Houston, Texas, 77008

  • Houston Institute for Clinical Research

    Houston, Texas, 77074

  • Accurate Clinical Research

    Houston, Texas, 77084

  • Diagnostic Rheumatology and Research

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46227

  • Glacier View Research Institute

    Kalispell, Montana, 59901

  • Kadlec Clinic Rheumatology

    Kennewick, Washington, 99336

  • University of California - San Diego

    La Jolla, California, 92093

  • Purushotham & Akther Kotha MD Inc

    La Mesa, California, 91942

  • Beals Institute PC

    Lansing, Michigan, 48917

  • Accurate Clinical Research

    League City, Texas, 77573

  • Bluegrass Community Research. Inc

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40504

  • PMA Medical Specialists, LLC

    Limerick, Pennsylvania, 19468

  • Physician Research Collaboration, LLC

    Lincoln, Nebraska, 68516

  • Little Rock Diagnostic Clinic

    Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205

  • Arthritis & Osteoporosis Associates LLP

    Lubbock, Texas, 79424

  • Methodist Healthcare

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38104-3499

  • Ramesh C. Gupta MD

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38119

  • Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Research, PLLC

    Mesa, Arizona, 85210

  • Jeffrey Alper MD Research

    Naples, Florida, 34102

  • Health Research Institute

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103

  • Arthritis & Osteoporosis Treatment Center, PA

    Orange Park, Florida, 32073

  • Stanford University Hospital

    Palo Alto, California, 94304

  • Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Research

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85032

  • Oregon Health and Science University

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

  • Allergy Asthma Immunology of Rochester, AAIR Research Ctr

    Rochester, New York, 14618

  • East Bay Rheumatology Medical Group

    San Leandro, California, 94578

  • Swedish Medical Center

    Seattle, Washington, 98122

  • Rheumatology Associates of Long Island

    Smithtown, New York, 11787

  • Arthritis Northwest PLLC

    Spokane, Washington, 99204

  • Washington University School of Medicine

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Atlantic Coastal Research

    Toms River, New Jersey, 08755

  • North MS Medical Clinics, Inc.

    Tupelo, Mississippi, 38801

  • Office: Dr Robin K Dore

    Tustin, California, 92780

  • Arthritis, Rheumatic & Back Disease Associates

    Voorhees Township, New Jersey, 08043

  • Heartland Research Associates

    Wichita, Kansas, 67207

  • Clinical Research Center of Reading, LLC

    Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, 19610

  • Pennsylvania Regional Center for Arthritis & Osteoarthritis

    Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, 19610

  • Florida Medical Clinic PA

    Zephyrhills, Florida, 33542-7505

Other trials in United States

Germany10 sites
  • Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin

    Berlin, 10117

  • Krankenhaus Dresden-Friedrichstadt Städtisches Klinikum

    Dresden, Saxony, 01067

  • Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus

    Dresden, Saxony, 01307

  • Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt

    Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60590

  • HRF Hamburger Rheuma Forschungszentrum

    Hamburg, 20095

  • Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg

    Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, 69120

  • Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet

    Herne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 44649

  • Universität Leipzig - Universitätsklinikum

    Leipzig, Saxony, 04103

  • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein

    Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, 23538

  • Universitätsklinikum Würzburg

    Würzburg, Bavaria, 97080

Other trials in Germany

Spain8 sites
  • Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, CHUAC

    A Coruña, 15006

  • Hospital De Basurto

    Bilbao, Vizcaya, 48013

  • Hospital De Fuenlabrada

    Fuenlabrada, Madrid, 28942

  • Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga

    Málaga, 29009

  • Centro de Salud Mental Parc Tauli

    Sabadell, Barcelona, 08208

  • Hospital Universitario Marques De Valdecilla

    Santander, Cantabria, 39008

  • Hospital Infanta Luisa

    Seville, Andalusia, 41007

  • Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Valme

    Seville, 46014

Other trials in Spain

Taiwan7 sites
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital - Kaohsiung

    Kaohsiung City (r.o.c), 83301

  • Chung Shan Medical University Hospital

    Taichung, 40201

  • China Medical University Hospital

    Taichung, 40447

  • Taichung Veterans General Hospital

    Taichung, 40705

  • Chi-Mei Hospital, Liouying

    Tainan, Yongkang Dist

  • National Taiwan University Hospital

    Taipei, 10002

  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital - Linkou

    Taoyuan City, 33305

Other trials in Taiwan

France6 sites
  • Hôpital Trousseau, CHRU de Tours

    Chambray-lès-Tours, 37170

  • CHU de Montpellier-Hopital Arnaud de Villeneuve

    Montpellier, 34295

  • Chru De Nantes Hotel-Dieu

    Nantes, 44093

  • Hopital Cochin

    Paris, 75679

  • Hopital Purpan

    Toulouse, 31059

  • CHU Brabois

    Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511

Other trials in France

United Kingdom6 sites
  • Basildon and Thurrock University Hospital

    Basildon, Essex, SS16 5NL

  • King George Hospital

    Goodmayes, Essex, IG7 4DY

  • Princess Alexandra Hospital

    Harlow, Essex, CM20 1QX

  • Chapel Allerton Hospital

    Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS7 4SA

  • Whipps Cross University Hospital

    London, Surrey, E11 1NR

  • New Cross Hospital

    Wolverhampton, West Midlands, WV10 0QP

Other trials in United Kingdom

Poland5 sites
  • Malopolskie Centrum Medyczne S.C.

    Krakow, 30-510

  • Medica pro Familia Sp z o.o. S.K.A

    Krakow, 30002

  • AI Centrum Medyczne

    Poznan, 61-113

  • Medica pro Familia Sp z o.o. S.K.A

    Warsaw, 01-868

  • Rheuma Medicus Zakład Opieki Zdrowotnej

    Warsaw, 02-118

Other trials in Poland

Australia3 sites
  • Emeritus Research

    Camberwell, Victoria, 3124

  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital

    Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050

  • Coast Joint Care

    Maroochydore, Queensland, 4558

Other trials in Australia

Czechia3 sites
  • CCBR Czech Prague, s.r.o.

    Prague, 13000

  • MEDICAL PLUS, s.r.o.

    Uherské Hradiště, 686 01

  • PV-MEDICAL s.r.o. Revmatologicka ambulance

    Zlín, 760 01

Other trials in Czechia

Italy2 sites
  • Istituto Ortopedico Gaetano Pini

    Milan, 20122

  • Azienda Ospedaliera - Universitaria Pisana

    Pisa, 56126

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled 24-Week Study Followed by Long Term Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Ixekizumab (LY2439821) in Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug-Experienced Patients With Active Psoriatic Arthritis

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate how effective and safe the study drug known as ixekizumab is in participants with active psoriatic arthritis.

Being tested
Placebo, Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W, Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Psoriatic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Administered SC

  • Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WDrug

    Also called LY2439821

    Administered SC

  • Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2WDrug

    Also called LY2439821

    Administered SC

Study groups in NCT02349295
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ixekizumab 80 milligram (mg) every 2 Weeks (Q2W)ExperimentalBlinded Treatment Period (Week(wk) 0-24): Participants (pts) received a starting dose of 160 mg of ixekizumab (ixe) given as 2 subcutaneous (SC) injections at Wk 0 followed by 1 SC injection of 80 mg of ixe Q2W given on Wks 2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22, and 24.Week 16 inadequate responders (IR) from the placebo treatment group who were re-randomized (1:1) to ixe 80 mg Q2W and IR from ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W who continued on ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W. Pts receive rescue therapy while receiving ixekizumab given as 1 injection of 80 mg Q2W given on Wks 16,18,20,22,24. Extension Period (Wk24-156):Pts who were randomized to ixe 80 mg Q2W at week 0 and continued on ixe 80 mg Q2W during the Extension Period. Pts who received ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W,who were either completed the study or discontinued the study early entered the post-treatment follow-up period (12-24 weeks).
Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W
Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4WExperimentalBlinded Treatment Period (Week 0-24): Participants (pts) received a starting dose of 160 mg of ixekizumab (ixe) given as 2 subcutaneous (SC) injections at Wk 0 followed by 1 SC injection of 80 mg of ixe Q4W given on Wks 4, 8 and 12 alternating with placebo for ixe injections Q4W given on Wks 2,6,10,14,18, and 22.Week 16 inadequate responders (IR) from the placebo treatment group who were re-randomized (1:1) to ixe 80 mg Q4W and IR from ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W who continued on ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W. Pts receive rescue therapy while receiving ixekizumab given as 1 injection of 80 mg Q4W given on Wks 16 and 20 alternating with placebo for ixe injections Q4W given on Wks 18 and 22.Extension Period (Wk24-156):Pts who were randomized to ixe 80 mg Q4W at week 0 and continued on ixe 80 mg Q4W during the Extension Period.Pts who received ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W,who were either completed the study or discontinued the study early entered the post-treatment follow-up period (12-24 weeks).
Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorBlinded Treatment Period (Wk 0-24): Pts received placebo for Ixe as 2 SC injections followed by 1 SC injection Q2W given on Wks 2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22 and 24. Pts initially randomized to placebo treatment group in the double blind treatment period,flagged as IR at Wk 16,re-randomized to ixe 80 mg Q2W/Q4W for the remainder of the current period and following period. Extended Treatment Period (Wk 24-156): Pts who were randomized to placebo at Week 0 then randomized to ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W/Q4W during the Extension Period.Pts who remained on placebo at the completion of the double blind treatment period received the first dose of ixe (160 mg starting dose) at Wk 24.Pts who were IRs at Wk 16 and were re-randomized to ixe at Wk 16 received the first dose of ixe (160 mg starting dose) at Wk 16. Pts who received placebo,who were either completed the study or discontinued the study early entered the post-treatment follow-up period (12-24 weeks).
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Index (ACR20)

    ACR20 response is defined as a greater than or equal to (≥) 20% improvement from baseline for tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain visual analog scale (VAS), Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS (PatGA), Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS (PGA), Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), or Acute Phase Reactant as measured by high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP).

    Measured: Week 24

Secondary outcomes (25)
  1. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score

    HAQ-DI is a participant reported questionnaire that measures disease-associated disability(physical function).It consists of 24 questions with 8 domains: dressing/grooming,arising,eating,walking,hygiene,reach,grip and other daily activities. The disability section scores the participant's self-perception on degree of difficulty (0=without any difficulty,1=with some difficulty,2=with much difficulty,3=unable to do)covering the 8 domains.The HAQ-DI is a composite ranging from 0-3 with lower scores indicating less functional disability.The reported use of special aids/devices and/or the need for assistance of another person to perform these activities is assessed.Least Square (LS) mean calculated using Mixed Model Repeated Measurements (MMRM) analysis with treatment,baseline score,geographic region, TNFi experience,visit, treatment-by-visit interaction(itcn), geographic region-by-visit itcn,TNFi experience-by-visit itcn and baseline score-by-visit itcn.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20

    ACR20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.

    Measured: Week 12

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 Index (ACR50)

    ACR50 response is defined as a ≥50% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.

    Measured: Week 24

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70 Index (ACR70)

    ACR70 response is defined as a ≥70% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.

    Measured: Week 24

  5. Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75

    The PASI is an index that combines assessments of the extent of body-surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of desquamation, erythema, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis to 72 for the most severe disease. Participants achieving PASI 75 were defined as having an improvement of at least 75% in the PASI compared to their baseline measures.

    Measured: Week 12

  6. Percentage of Patients Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA)

    It uses a composite of 7 key outcome measures (includes PASI) used in PsA to encompass all of the domains of the disease to measure the overall state of a patients' disease. The LEI is used to assess tender entheseal points. Patients are classified as achieving MDA if they fulfill 5 of 7 outcome measures: 1. TJC ≤1, 2. SJC ≤1, 3. PASI total score ≤1 or BSA ≤3, 4. patient pain VAS score of ≤15, 5. patient global VAS score of ≤20, 6. HAQ-DI score ≤0.5, 7. tender entheseal points (6 entheseal points) ≤1.

    Measured: Week 24

  7. Percentage of Patients Achieving Complete Resolution in Enthesitis as Assessed by the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI)

    The LEI was developed specifically for use in PsA. It measures enthesitis at 6 sites (lateral epicondyle, left and right; medial femoral condyle, left and right; Achilles tendon insertion, left and right). Each site was assigned a score of 0 (absent) or 1 (present); the results from each site were then added to produce a total score (range 0 to 6). So, "0" indicates good score here.

    Measured: Week 24

  8. Change From Baseline in Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    The Itch NRS is a participant-administered, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing "no itch" and 10 representing "worst itch imaginable." Overall severity of a participants itching from psoriasis was indicated by circling the number that best described the worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  9. Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC)

    TJC is the number of tender and painful joints determined for each participant by examination of 68 joints. Joints were assessed by pressure and joint manipulation on physical examination. Participants were asked for pain sensations on these manipulations and watched for spontaneous pain reactions. Any positive response on pressure, movement, or both was translated into a single tender-versus-nontender dichotomy. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  10. Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC)

    SJC is the number of swollen joints determined for each participant by examination of 66 joints. Joints were classified as either swollen or not swollen. Swelling was defined as palpable fluctuating synovitis of the joint. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  11. Change From Baseline in Participants Assessment of Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The pain VAS is a participant-administered single-item scale designed to measure current joint pain from Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) using a 100-millimeter(mm) horizontal VAS. Overall severity of participant's joint pain from PsA is indicated by marking a vertical tick on the horizontal 100-mm scale, where the left end from 0 mm (no pain) to right end 100 mm (worst possible joint pain). LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  12. Change From Baseline in Patients Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS

    The patient's overall assessment of his or her PsA activity will be recorded using a 100-mm horizontal VAS, where 0 represents no disease activity and 100 represents extremely active disease. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  13. Change From Baseline in Physicians Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS

    The investigator will be asked to give an overall assessment of the severity of the participant's current PsA activity using a 100-mm horizontal VAS, where 0 represents no disease activity and 100 represents extremely active disease. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  14. Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

    C-reactive protein (CRP) is a disease related biomarker and measured in milligrams per liter. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  15. Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-CRP (DAS28-CRP)

    The DAS28-CRP is a measure of disease activity in 28 joints that consists of a composite numerical score with the following variables: TJC28, SJC28, hs-CRP (measured in mg/L), and Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity recorded by participants on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) VAS. For DAS28-CRP, the Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC28) are a subset of TJC and SJC, and include 14 joints on each side of the body: 2 shoulders, 2 elbows, 2 wrists, 10 metacarpophalangeal joints, the 2 interphalangeal joints of the thumb, the 8 proximal interphalangeal joints, and the 2 knees. DAS28 values range from 0 to 9.4. Higher values indicate more severe symptoms and greater functional impairment. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  16. Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Score

    The BASDAI is a self-administered measure used to answer 6 questions with a 0 to 10 centimeter (cm) VAS pertaining to the 5 major symptoms of axial activity. To give each symptom equal weighting, the mean of the 2 scores relating to morning stiffness was taken. The resulting 0 to 50 score was divided by 5 to give a final 0 to 10 BASDAI Score. BASDAI ranges from 0-10. Higher scores represent greater disease activity. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  17. Change From Baseline in Fatigue Severity Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score

    The Fatigue Severity NRS is a participant-administered single-item 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing "no fatigue" and 10 representing "as bad as you can imagine." Participants rated their fatigue (feeling tired or worn out) by circling the 1 number that described their worst level of fatigue during the past 24 hours. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  18. Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scores: Physical Component Summary (PCS)

    The SF-36 is a participant-reported outcome measure evaluating participant's health status. It comprises 36 items covering 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. Items are answered on Likert scales of varying lengths. The 8 domains are regrouped into the PCS and MCS scores. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. In this study, the SF-36 acute version was used, which has a 1 week recall period. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  19. Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scores: Mental Component Summary (MCS)

    The SF-36 is a participant-reported outcome measure evaluating participant's health status. It comprises 36 items covering 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. Items are answered on Likert scales of varying lengths. The 8 domains are regrouped into the PCS and MCS scores. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. In this study, the SF-36 acute version was used, which has a 1 week recall period. LS mean was calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, baseline score, geographic region, TNFi experience, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, geographic region-by-visit interaction, TNFi experience-by-visit interaction, and baseline score-by-visit interaction.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  20. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (TE-ADA)

    Number of participants with positive treatment emergent anti-ixekizumab antibodies was summarized by treatment group.

    Measured: Week 24

  21. Pharmacokinetics (PK):Minimum Observed Serum Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough,ss) of Ixekizumab

    The Ctrough is the minimum observed serum concentration at steady state of Ixekizumab. The Ctrough at Week 24 was reported.

    Measured: All immunogenicity samples post the first Ixekizumab dose (Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52) and PK samples collected per dedicated sparse sampling plan (4-5 samples per patient) across Weeks 1 through 24 and Early termination visit (ETV)

  22. Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve for Dosing Interval (Tau) at Steady State [AUC(Tau,Steady State)] of Ixekizumab

    The AUC(Tau,Steady State) is the area under the concentration-time curve for dosing interval (Tau) at steady state of ixekizumab (Tau is 28 days for 80 mg Q4W cohort, and is 14 days for 80mg Q2W cohort, respectively).

    Measured: All immunogenicity samples post the first Ixekizumab dose (Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52) and PK samples collected per dedicated sparse sampling plan (4-5 samples per patient) across Weeks 1 through 24 and Early termination visit (ETV)

  23. Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20

    ACR20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.

    Measured: Week 52 and Week 156

  24. Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 50

    ACR50 response is defined as a ≥50% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.

    Measured: Week 52 and Week 156

  25. Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 70

    ACR70 response is defined as a ≥70% improvement from baseline for TJC and SJC and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Participant's assessment of Joint Pain VAS, Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, Physician's Global Assessment of the Disease Activity VAS, Participant's Assessment of Physical Function using the HAQ-DI, or hs-CRP.

    Measured: Week 52 and Week 156

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jan 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start31 Dec 2014
  3. Primary completion9 Sep 2016
  4. Study completion26 Jun 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
363 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02349295
Sponsor's protocol ID
14310
Other IDs
I1F-MC-RHBE, 2011-002328-42
Acronym
SPIRIT-P2
Status last verified
1 Sep 2019
First submitted
10 Oct 2014
Last updated
1 Jul 2020
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: Anonymized individual patient level data will be provided in a secure access environment upon approval of a research proposal and a signed data sharing agreement.

Publications

  • Kristensen LE, McGonagle D, Rudwaleit M, Kameda H, Wurtzen PA, Ngantcha M, Holzkamper T, Smolen J. Synergistic Improvements in Synovitis, Enthesitis, and Patient-Reported Outcomes for Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Treated with Ixekizumab in SPIRIT Trials. Rheumatol Ther. 2025 Apr;12(2):381-395. doi: 10.1007/s40744-025-00748-8. Epub 2025 Feb 27.

    PubMed 40014255
  • Tillett W, Birt J, Vadhariya A, Ross S, Ngantcha M, Ng KJ. Filling the "GAP" in Real-World Assessment of Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity: Performance Characteristics of a Global/Pain Composite Endpoint. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Oct;11(5):1101-1114. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00690-1. Epub 2024 Jul 2.

    PubMed 38955921
  • Armstrong AW, Jaleel T, Merola JF, Gottlieb AB, Khattri S, Helt CC, Malatestinic WN, Ross SE, Ngantcha ME, de Vlam K. Ixekizumab Demonstrates Rapid and Consistent Efficacy for Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis, Regardless of Psoriasis Severity. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Jun;14(6):1615-1631. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01188-y. Epub 2024 May 30.

    PubMed 38814433
  • Kirkham BW, Egeberg A, Behrens F, Pinter A, Merola JF, Holzkamper T, Gallo G, Ng KJ, Bolce R, Schuster C, Nash P, Puig L. A Comprehensive Review of Ixekizumab Efficacy in Nail Psoriasis from Clinical Trials for Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis. Rheumatol Ther. 2023 Oct;10(5):1127-1146. doi: 10.1007/s40744-023-00553-1. Epub 2023 Jul 3.

    PubMed 37400681
  • Eder L, Tony HP, Odhav S, Agirregoikoa EG, Korkosz M, Schwartzman S, Sprabery AT, Gellett AM, Park SY, Bertram CC, Ogdie A. Responses to Ixekizumab in Male and Female Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: Results from Two Randomized, Phase 3 Clinical Trials. Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Jun;9(3):919-933. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00445-w. Epub 2022 Apr 9.

    PubMed 35397092
  • Deodhar AA, Combe B, Accioly AP, Bolce R, Zhu D, Gellett AM, Sprabery AT, Burmester GR. Safety of ixekizumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis: data from four clinical trials with over 2000 patient-years of exposure. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Jul;81(7):944-950. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-222027. Epub 2022 Apr 7.

    PubMed 35393269
  • Combe B, Tsai TF, Huffstutter JE, Sprabery AT, Lin CY, Park SY, Kronbergs A, Hufford MM, Nash P. Ixekizumab, with or without concomitant methotrexate, improves signs and symptoms of PsA: week 52 results from Spirit-P1 and Spirit-P2 studies. Arthritis Res Ther. 2021 Jan 27;23(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02388-5.

    PubMed 33499913
  • Orbai AM, Gratacos J, Turkiewicz A, Hall S, Dokoupilova E, Combe B, Nash P, Gallo G, Bertram CC, Gellett AM, Sprabery AT, Birt J, Macpherson L, Geneus VJ, Constantin A. Efficacy and Safety of Ixekizumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis and Inadequate Response to TNF Inhibitors: 3-Year Follow-Up (SPIRIT-P2). Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Mar;8(1):199-217. doi: 10.1007/s40744-020-00261-0. Epub 2020 Dec 5.

    PubMed 33278016
  • Schweikert B, Malmberg C, Nunez M, Dilla T, Sapin C, Hartz S. Cost-effectiveness analysis of ixekizumab versus secukinumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis and concomitant moderate-to-severe psoriasis in Spain. BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 13;10(8):e032552. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032552.

    PubMed 32792421
  • Combe B, Rahman P, Kameda H, Canete JD, Gallo G, Agada N, Xu W, Genovese MC. Safety results of ixekizumab with 1822.2 patient-years of exposure: an integrated analysis of 3 clinical trials in adult patients with psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Jan 21;22(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-2099-0.

    PubMed 31964419
  • Tillett W, Lin CY, Zbrozek A, Sprabery AT, Birt J. A Threshold of Meaning for Work Disability Improvement in Psoriatic Arthritis Measured by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire. Rheumatol Ther. 2019 Sep;6(3):379-391. doi: 10.1007/s40744-019-0155-5. Epub 2019 Jun 1.

    PubMed 31154634
  • Coates LC, Orbai AM, Morita A, Benichou O, Kerr L, Adams DH, Shuler CL, Birt J, Helliwell PS. Achieving minimal disease activity in psoriatic arthritis predicts meaningful improvements in patients' health-related quality of life and productivity. BMC Rheumatol. 2018 Aug 13;2:24. doi: 10.1186/s41927-018-0030-y. eCollection 2018.

    PubMed 30886974
  • Gladman DD, Orbai AM, Klitz U, Wei JC, Gallo G, Birt J, Rathmann S, Shrom D, Marzo-Ortega H. Ixekizumab and complete resolution of enthesitis and dactylitis: integrated analysis of two phase 3 randomized trials in psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Jan 29;21(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1831-0.

    PubMed 30696483
  • Genovese MC, Combe B, Kremer JM, Tsai TF, Behrens F, Adams DH, Lee C, Kerr L, Nash P. Safety and efficacy of ixekizumab in patients with PsA and previous inadequate response to TNF inhibitors: week 52 results from SPIRIT-P2. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Nov 1;57(11):2001-2011. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key182.

    PubMed 30053162
  • Nash P, Kirkham B, Okada M, Rahman P, Combe B, Burmester GR, Adams DH, Kerr L, Lee C, Shuler CL, Genovese M; SPIRIT-P2 Study Group. Ixekizumab for the treatment of patients with active psoriatic arthritis and an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: results from the 24-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled period of the SPIRIT-P2 phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017 Jun 10;389(10086):2317-2327. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31429-0. Epub 2017 May 24.

    PubMed 28551073

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W and Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by Eli Lilly and Company at 109 sites in 10 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 109 sites in United States, Germany, Spain, Taiwan, France and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Dec 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Index (ACR20) (time frame: Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02349295, which also lists 15 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jul 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in