Lumbar Degenerative Disc DiseaseSCOUTNCT02347410
Spineology Clinical Outcomes Trial: An IDE Investigation
A study testing SIFS graft containment device in people with Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease, run by Spineology, Inc at 10 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the Spineology Interbody Fusion System (SIFS) in an instrumented interbody lumbar fusion in subjects presenting with symptomatic single-level lumbar degenerative disc disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease
- What is being tested?
- SIFS graft containment device
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 102 participants
- Where
- 10 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 22 Jan 2015to 4 Mar 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Skeletally mature;
- Confirmed symptomatic single-level lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) between L2 and S1;
- Minimum low back Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score of 40mm;
- Minimum Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of 40;
- Received at least 6-months of conservative care; and
- Willing and able to comply with protocol evaluations and provide informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Previous fusion or total disc replacement at the index level;
- Greater than Grade I spondylolisthesis;
- Has symptomatic multi-level lumbar DDD;
- Active systemic infection or infection at the local surgical site;
- Active or suspected malignancy;
- Body Mass Index of greater than or equal to 40;
Show all 15Show fewer
- Significant metabolic bone disease;
- Taking medication known to interfere with bone healing;
- Has a current substance abuse disorder;
- Has a somatoform, dissociative, eating or psychotic disorder;
- Waddell Signs of inorganic behavior;
- Current tobacco user;
- Is a prisoner;
- If female, pregnant or contemplating pregnancy during follow-up period; or
- Enrolled in a concurrent clinical investigation that may confound the findings of the current investigation
Trial locations and contacts
10 sites in 1 country.
10 sites in 1 country
United States10 sites
Brigham & Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
University at Buffalo/SUNY
Buffalo, New York, 14203
Georgetown University Hospital
Clinton, Maryland, 20735
Florida Orthopaedic Associates
DeLand, Florida, 32720
Bronson Healthcare Methodist Hospital - Neuroscience Center
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 39007
Sports Medicine North
Peabody, Massachusetts, 01960
Mayo Clinic Hospital - College of Medicine
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Spine Institute of Louisiana
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71101
University of Vermont Medical Center
South Burlington, Vermont, 05403
Thibodaux Regional Medical Center
Thibodaux, Louisiana, 70901
About this study
Official title: Spineology Clinical Outcomes Trial: An Investigation Device Exempt (IDE) Performance Goal Clinical Investigation
This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the Spineology Interbody Fusion System (SIFS) in an instrumented interbody lumbar fusion in subjects presenting with symptomatic single-level lumbar degenerative disc disease.
Read the detailed description
This regulated prospective, multi-center, Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved single-arm performance goal clinical investigation was conducted at 10 centers with 102 subjects being enrolled and treated.
Subjects were actively evaluated from pre-op to 24-months postoperative. Based on enrollment duration, some subjects were remotely assessed through self-administered surveys at 36- and/or 48-months.
The primary endpoint, assessed at 24-months postoperative, is a composite score that includes pain, function, fusion and safety assessments.
- Conditions
- Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease
- Being tested
- SIFS graft containment device
- Medical subject headings
- Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SIFS graft containment deviceDevice
Also called SIFS mesh
The SIFS mesh is a graft containment and reinforcement device. Following conventional thorough discectomy, the disc space is entered through a small portal in the annulus, the SIFS mesh is introduced, deployed and then filled with bone graft. Bilateral commercially available posterior lumbar fixation is applied.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Investigation Group | Other | This is a single-arm investigation. All subjects were treated with the SIFS device filled with bone graft. Posterior fixation required. Receives: Device: SIFS graft containment device |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Success
The primary endpoint of this trial is the rate of Patient Success at 24-months defined as a composite endpoint that includes:
- Pain -- Clinically meaningful reduction in low back pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score at 24-months post-operative. A clinically meaningful reduction is defined as a difference of at least 20 mm compared to pre-op (pre-op score minus post-op score).
- Function -- Clinically meaningful improvement in function at 24-months post-operative. A clinically meaningful improvement is defined as a reduction of at least 15 points compared to baseline (pre-op Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score minus the post-op ODI score).
- Fusion -- Defined as bridging bone demonstrated on computed tomography (CT) scan
- Safety -- No device-related serious adverse events (SAEs) from intra-op through the 24-month timepoint.
For the study to be a success, 68% of subjects need to meet the above success criteria.
Measured: 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Study start22 Jan 2015
- Primary completion22 Jan 2020
- Study completion4 Mar 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Lumbar Degenerative Disc DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Spineology, Inc
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Donald Erickson, M.D., Study chair, Retired
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02347410
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 62-180
- Acronym
- SCOUT
- Status last verified
- Oct 2021
- First submitted
- 13 Jan 2015
- Last updated
- 20 Oct 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Oct 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Spineology Clinical Outcomes Trial: An Investigation Device Exempt (IDE) Performance Goal Clinical Investigation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02347410
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SCOUT / 62-180
- Conditions
- Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Spineology, IncIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 22 Jan 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Mar 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 20 Oct 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the Spineology Interbody Fusion System (SIFS) in an instrumented interbody lumbar fusion in subjects presenting with symptomatic single-level lumbar degenerative disc disease.
Detailed description
This regulated prospective, multi-center, Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved single-arm performance goal clinical investigation was conducted at 10 centers with 102 subjects being enrolled and treated.
Subjects were actively evaluated from pre-op to 24-months postoperative. Based on enrollment duration, some subjects were remotely assessed through self-administered surveys at 36- and/or 48-months.
The primary endpoint, assessed at 24-months postoperative, is a composite score that includes pain, function, fusion and safety assessments.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Investigation Group | Other | Device: SIFS graft containment deviceThis is a single-arm investigation. All subjects were treated with the SIFS device filled with bone graft. Posterior fixation required. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Skeletally mature;
- Confirmed symptomatic single-level lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) between L2 and S1;
- Minimum low back Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score of 40mm;
- Minimum Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of 40;
- Received at least 6-months of conservative care; and
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Previous fusion or total disc replacement at the index level;
- Greater than Grade I spondylolisthesis;
- Has symptomatic multi-level lumbar DDD;
- Active systemic infection or infection at the local surgical site;
- Active or suspected malignancy;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SIFS graft containment deviceAlso: SIFS meshThe SIFS mesh is a graft containment and reinforcement device. Following conventional thorough discectomy, the disc space is entered through a small portal in the annulus, the SIFS mesh is introduced, deployed and then filled with bone graft. Bilateral commercially available posterior lumbar fixation is applied. | Device | Investigation Group |
Primary outcome
Overall Success
Time frame: 24 months
The primary endpoint of this trial is the rate of Patient Success at 24-months defined as a composite endpoint that includes: 1. Pain -- Clinically meaningful reduction in low back pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score at 24-months post-operative. A clinically meaningful reduction is defined as a difference of at least 20 mm compared to pre-op (pre-op score minus post-op score). 2. Function -- Clinically meaningful improvement in function at 24-months post-operative. A clinically meaningful improvement is defined as a reduction of at least 15 points compared to baseline (pre-op Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score minus the post-op ODI score). 3. Fusion -- Defined as bridging bone demonstrated on computed tomography (CT) scan 4. Safety -- No device-related serious adverse events (SAEs) from intra-op through the 24-month timepoint. For the study to be a success, 68% of subjects need to meet the above success criteria.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Oct 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease
Active, not recruiting
Post Marketing Study of MagnetOs Easypack Putty Standalone Compared to Demineralized Bone Matrix or Fibers Mixed With Autograft in Patients Undergoing Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion
Degenerative Disc Disease, Spine Fusion
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Relationship Between Disability, Flexibility, Back Muscles, and Thoracolumbar Fascia in Patients With Lumbar Disc Degeneration
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
Active, not recruiting
ASCEND: A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of VIA Disc NP, a Supplement for Degenerated Intervertebral Discs
Degenerative Disc Disease, Disc Degeneration
Not yet recruiting
Kore Fiber PLF Study
Degenerative Lumbar Spine Diseases, Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease
Recruiting
MagnetOs Flex Matrix Compared to Trinity Elite Mixed With Local Autograft in Patients Undergoing up to Four-level Instrumented Posterolateral Fusion
Degenerative Disc Disease, Spine Fusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Donald Erickson, M.D. study chair
Retired
10 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SIFS graft containment device in people with Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease, run by Spineology, Inc at 10 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 10 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Oct 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Success (time frame: 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2021.