Hypoxia, in Liveborn InfantINSPIRE-DNCT02347241
Infant Special Program for In Hospital Resuscitation Education in the Delivery Room
A study testing Educational intervention in people with Hypoxia, in Liveborn Infant and Neonatal Asphyxia, run by Oslo University Hospital at 1 site in Norway.
Trial summary
The overall objective is to determine whether a bundled In-hospital Newborn Resuscitation Edu-cation intervention (INSPIRE-D) improves process of care associated with improved newborn survival and neurologic outcomes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypoxia, in Liveborn Infant, Neonatal Asphyxia, Neonatal Bradycardia
- What is being tested?
- Educational intervention
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 435 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNorway
- Study dates
- Jan 2014to May 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Neonates that require stabilisation and/or resuscitation such as ventilatory support, medications and/or chest compressions.
Who cannot join
- Parent or health care provider reserved against study participation.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Infant Special Program for In Hospital Resuscitation Education in the Delivery Room - INSPIRE-D
The overall objective is to determine whether a bundled In-hospital Newborn Resuscitation Edu-cation intervention (INSPIRE-D) improves process of care associated with improved newborn survival and neurologic outcomes.
Read the detailed description
This prospective interventional trial will be conducted in the delivery unit at OUS. The planned studies consist of five distinct phases with step-wise interventions; 1) baseline data collection, 2) introducing educational debriefing, 3) intensive run-in/rolling-refresher phase, 4) INSPIRE-D phase and lastly 5) evaluation phase.
Phase 1: The baseline data collection phase
- Needs assessment/questionnaires from participating healthcare providers will be collected which include demographic data such as sex, age, education, and work experience, as well as exposure to resuscitation training, simulation, self-perceived confidence and suggestions for further training/educational topics.
- Observations of the newborn in the resuscitation bays will be done by video recordings and supplemented by resuscitation records, hospital quality improvement data and medical records. Data points to be collected of the newborn are demographics, gestational age, physiological parameters such as heart rate and respirations/oxygenation, Apgar score, interventions performed, and outcomes during and at discharge from hospital.
- The healthcare providers adherence to guidelines in neonatal resuscitation (both technical and non-technical skills like team collaboration) will be evaluated by examining the video recordings and scored by validated scoring systems formerly tested with good intra- and inter-rater reliability. The scoring systems is adapted to guidelines from the Norwegian Council of Resuscitation and retested for intra- and inter-rater reliability.
Phase 2: Intervention Phase with Educational Debriefings
- Educational debriefings of healthcare providers involved in clinical situations with newborn resuscitation: Selected resuscitation events will be debriefed facilitated by a study team member with special competence in facilitation and an instructor in neonatal resuscitation. The debriefing will be held depending on clinical schedule and availability, to discuss process of care, performance, and provide education to multidisciplinary staff with advocacy/inquiry debriefing techniques.
- For healthcare providers; cont¬inued needs assessment and prospective observations by video-recordings in resuscitation bays to document quality of care.
- Baseline skills assessment will be collected using a novel manikin, the Newborn Lung Simulator. Healthcare providers will be presented for a mini-simulation with a compromised newborn and asked to perform high quality resuscitation. The performance and adherence to guidelines will be evaluated and retested after the intervention.
Phase 3 - Intensive run-in of high frequency training and team reflection: "The rolling refresher phase"
- In this phase training triggers are identified at the start of each day shift. A careful consideration of perinatal factors of both mother and infant will identify "high risk" deliveries with babies who may need resuscitation. If no risk deliveries are identified, a random Healthcare Provider team among the present staff will be selected.
- "Just-in-time" and "just-in-place" training; the novel "Rolling refresher", will be introduced (target >80% of staff) at the beginning of day shifts. Health Care Providers caring for labouring mothers with training triggers will be identified and exposed to "low dose" simulation-based "just-in-time" and "just-in-place" skills training. The short training session (<10 minutes) will take place on-site in the resuscitation bay with relevant topics such as; timely assessment of need for intervention, effective assisted ventilations on a Newborn Lung Simulator. We will use observations from the video-films to target training with focus on rapid evaluation of respiratory distress, correct ventilation technique and use of pulse oximetry.
- Continued simulation training will be based on problem areas identified from baseline. Performance during simulation training will be evaluated and registered.
- Educational debriefings will continue, as in Phase 2
- Continued needs assessment and prospective observations in resuscitation bays to document provider confidence, simulation performance and quality of care during implementation of the INSPIRE-D bundle described above.
Phase 4: Continued INSPIRE-D bundle. After successful implementation defined as >80% of staff having been through at least one "just-in-time and just in place" training session, all interventions above (phase 2 and 3) will continue on routine basis. Continued needs assessment of confidence and performance are repeated as described above.
Phase 5: Evaluation. Evaluation of the INSPIRE-D bundle to identify and define key factors and processes that we prove necessary to ensure timely and effective neonatal resuscitation associated with improved newly born survival and neurologic outcomes.
- Being tested
- Educational intervention
- Medical subject headings
- Asphyxia Neonatorum
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Educational interventionOther
Educational Debriefings and High frequency training and team reflection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control period | No intervention | Assessment of resuscitation quality and clinical outcomes prior to educational intervention |
| Educational intervention | Experimental | Assessment of resuscitation quality and clinical outcomes after educational intervention consisting of debriefing and rolling refreshers. Receives: Other: Educational intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Quality of neonatal resuscitation (Validated performance score assessed by video analysis)
Validated performance score assessed by video analysis
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Clinical outcome - Time to effective respiration
Measured: 12 months
Clinical outcome - Time to heart rate > 100
Measured: 12 months
Clinical outcome - Admission to intensive care
Measured: 12 months
Health care providers adherence to guidelines and behaviour markers - Self-reported score
Measured: 12 months
Health care providers adherence to guidelines and behaviour markers - Simulation score
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2014
- Primary completionJan 2015
- Study completionMay 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hypoxia, in Liveborn InfantStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Oslo University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 435 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Oslo University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Theresa Mariero Olasveengen, Oslo University Hospital
- Investigators
- Theresa M Olasveengen, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Oslo University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02347241
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2013/12769
- Acronym
- INSPIRE-D
- Status last verified
- Sep 2016
- First submitted
- 12 Jan 2015
- Last updated
- 3 Oct 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Niles DE, Skare C, Foglia EE, Insley E, Cines C, Olasveengen T, Ballester LS, Ades A, Posencheg M, Nadkarni VM, Kramer-Johansen J. Effect of a positive pressure ventilation-refresher program on ventilation skill performance during simulated newborn resuscitation. Resusc Plus. 2021 Feb 16;5:100091. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100091. eCollection 2021 Mar.
PubMed 34223356Skare C, Boldingh AM, Kramer-Johansen J, Calisch TE, Nakstad B, Nadkarni V, Olasveengen TM, Niles DE. Video performance-debriefings and ventilation-refreshers improve quality of neonatal resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2018 Nov;132:140-146. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
PubMed 30009926Skare C, Boldingh AM, Nakstad B, Calisch TE, Niles DE, Nadkarni VM, Kramer-Johansen J, Olasveengen TM. Ventilation fraction during the first 30s of neonatal resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2016 Oct;107:25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.07.231. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
PubMed 27496260
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Oct 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Infant Special Program for In Hospital Resuscitation Education in the Delivery Room - INSPIRE-D
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02347241
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INSPIRE-D / 2013/12769
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 435 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Oslo University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2014
- Primary completion
- Jan 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The overall objective is to determine whether a bundled In-hospital Newborn Resuscitation Edu-cation intervention (INSPIRE-D) improves process of care associated with improved newborn survival and neurologic outcomes.
Detailed description
This prospective interventional trial will be conducted in the delivery unit at OUS. The planned studies consist of five distinct phases with step-wise interventions; 1) baseline data collection, 2) introducing educational debriefing, 3) intensive run-in/rolling-refresher phase, 4) INSPIRE-D phase and lastly 5) evaluation phase.
Phase 1: The baseline data collection phase
- Needs assessment/questionnaires from participating healthcare providers will be collected which include demographic data such as sex, age, education, and work experience, as well as exposure to resuscitation training, simulation, self-perceived confidence and suggestions for further training/educational topics.
- Observations of the newborn in the resuscitation bays will be done by video recordings and supplemented by resuscitation records, hospital quality improvement data and medical records. Data points to be collected of the newborn are demographics, gestational age, physiological parameters such as heart rate and respirations/oxygenation, Apgar score, interventions performed, and outcomes during and at discharge from hospital.
- The healthcare providers adherence to guidelines in neonatal resuscitation (both technical and non-technical skills like team collaboration) will be evaluated by examining the video recordings and scored by validated scoring systems formerly tested with good intra- and inter-rater reliability. The scoring systems is adapted to guidelines from the Norwegian Council of Resuscitation and retested for intra- and inter-rater reliability.
Phase 2: Intervention Phase with Educational Debriefings
- Educational debriefings of healthcare providers involved in clinical situations with newborn resuscitation: Selected resuscitation events will be debriefed facilitated by a study team member with special competence in facilitation and an instructor in neonatal resuscitation. The debriefing will be held depending on clinical schedule and availability, to discuss process of care, performance, and provide education to multidisciplinary staff with advocacy/inquiry debriefing techniques.
- For healthcare providers; cont¬inued needs assessment and prospective observations by video-recordings in resuscitation bays to document quality of care.
- Baseline skills assessment will be collected using a novel manikin, the Newborn Lung Simulator. Healthcare providers will be presented for a mini-simulation with a compromised newborn and asked to perform high quality resuscitation. The performance and adherence to guidelines will be evaluated and retested after the intervention.
Phase 3 - Intensive run-in of high frequency training and team reflection: "The rolling refresher phase"
- In this phase training triggers are identified at the start of each day shift. A careful consideration of perinatal factors of both mother and infant will identify "high risk" deliveries with babies who may need resuscitation. If no risk deliveries are identified, a random Healthcare Provider team among the present staff will be selected.
- "Just-in-time" and "just-in-place" training; the novel "Rolling refresher", will be introduced (target >80% of staff) at the beginning of day shifts. Health Care Providers caring for labouring mothers with training triggers will be identified and exposed to "low dose" simulation-based "just-in-time" and "just-in-place" skills training. The short training session (<10 minutes) will take place on-site in the resuscitation bay with relevant topics such as; timely assessment of need for intervention, effective assisted ventilations on a Newborn Lung Simulator. We will use observations from the video-films to target training with focus on rapid evaluation of respiratory distress, correct ventilation technique and use of pulse oximetry.
- Continued simulation training will be based on problem areas identified from baseline. Performance during simulation training will be evaluated and registered.
- Educational debriefings will continue, as in Phase 2
- Continued needs assessment and prospective observations in resuscitation bays to document provider confidence, simulation performance and quality of care during implementation of the INSPIRE-D bundle described above.
Phase 4: Continued INSPIRE-D bundle. After successful implementation defined as >80% of staff having been through at least one "just-in-time and just in place" training session, all interventions above (phase 2 and 3) will continue on routine basis. Continued needs assessment of confidence and performance are repeated as described above.
Phase 5: Evaluation. Evaluation of the INSPIRE-D bundle to identify and define key factors and processes that we prove necessary to ensure timely and effective neonatal resuscitation associated with improved newly born survival and neurologic outcomes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control period | No intervention | –Assessment of resuscitation quality and clinical outcomes prior to educational intervention |
| Educational intervention | Experimental | Other: Educational interventionAssessment of resuscitation quality and clinical outcomes after educational intervention consisting of debriefing and rolling refreshers. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Neonates that require stabilisation and/or resuscitation such as ventilatory support, medications and/or chest compressions.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Parent or health care provider reserved against study participation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Educational interventionEducational Debriefings and High frequency training and team reflection | Other | Educational intervention |
Primary outcome
Quality of neonatal resuscitation (Validated performance score assessed by video analysis)
Time frame: 12 months
Validated performance score assessed by video analysis
5 secondary outcomes
Clinical outcome - Time to effective respiration
Time frame: 12 months
Clinical outcome - Time to heart rate > 100
Time frame: 12 months
Clinical outcome - Admission to intensive care
Time frame: 12 months
Health care providers adherence to guidelines and behaviour markers - Self-reported score
Time frame: 12 months
Health care providers adherence to guidelines and behaviour markers - Simulation score
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Oct 2016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34223356Niles DE, Skare C, Foglia EE, Insley E, Cines C, Olasveengen T, Ballester LS, Ades A, Posencheg M, Nadkarni VM, Kramer-Johansen J. Effect of a positive pressure ventilation-refresher program on ventilation skill performance during simulated newborn resuscitation. Resusc Plus. 2021 Feb 16;5:100091. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100091. eCollection 2021 Mar.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30009926Skare C, Boldingh AM, Kramer-Johansen J, Calisch TE, Nakstad B, Nadkarni V, Olasveengen TM, Niles DE. Video performance-debriefings and ventilation-refreshers improve quality of neonatal resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2018 Nov;132:140-146. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27496260Skare C, Boldingh AM, Nakstad B, Calisch TE, Niles DE, Nadkarni VM, Kramer-Johansen J, Olasveengen TM. Ventilation fraction during the first 30s of neonatal resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2016 Oct;107:25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.07.231. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
Related trials for Hypoxia, in Liveborn Infant
Active, not recruiting
Delayed Cord Clamping With Oxygen In Extremely Low Gestation Infants
IVH- Intraventricular Hemorrhage, Extreme Prematurity
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Neonatal Acute Hypoxia at Delivery Using Fetal Physiology and Eucapnic pH Assessment
Neonatal Acidemia and Hypoxia
RecruitingObservational study
Hypoxia Profiles Identified in Term Newborns With Cord pH <7.00
Neonatal Acidemia and Hypoxia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Impact of Maternal Body Mass Index on Infant Hypoxic Events at Time of Delivery ,Cross-sectional Study.
Maternal Obesity, Hypoxia Neonatal
RecruitingPhase 3
Citicoline as Neuroprotector in Neonates Exposed to Hypoxia
Neonatal Hypoxia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Theresa M Olasveengen, MD PhD principal investigator
Oslo University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Educational intervention in people with Hypoxia, in Liveborn Infant and Neonatal Asphyxia, run by Oslo University Hospital at 1 site in Norway.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Quality of neonatal resuscitation (Validated performance score assessed by video analysis) (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02347241, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Oct 2016.