AzTrials
AzTrials

Anxiety DisordersNCT02340351

Auricular Acupuncture vs. Progressive Muscle Relaxation in Patients With Anxiety Disorders or Major Depressive Disorder.

A study testing Auricular acupuncture and Progressive muscle relaxation in people with Anxiety Disorders and Depressive Disorder, Major, run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether auricular acupuncture (AA) according to the NADA protocol and progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) differ in their effectiveness of treating people with anxiety disorders or major depressive disorder. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Major
What is being tested?
Auricular acupuncture and Progressive muscle relaxation
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
136 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jul 2007to Aug 2013
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • patient at our psychiatric ward or day-hospital
  • meeting the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for the primary diagnosis of an anxiety disorder oder major depressive disorder

Who cannot join

  • ear infection
  • anamnestic substance abuse or positive drug screening
  • taking opioid analgesics
  • suffering from schizophrenic or organic cerebral psychosis

About this study

Official title: Auricular Acupuncture Versus Progressive Muscle Relaxation in Patients With Anxiety Disorders or Major Depressive Disorder.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether auricular acupuncture (AA) according to the NADA protocol and progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) differ in their effectiveness of treating people with anxiety disorders or major depressive disorder. We hypothesized, that both treatments show significant effects in alleviating the examined items (tension, anxiety, anger/aggression and state ofr mood) and that there is no significant difference between these two treatments.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to determine whether auricular acupuncture according to the NADA protocol and progressive muscle relaxation differ in their effectiveness of treating people with anxiety disorders (AD) or major depressive disorder (MDD).

In this study, acupuncture was executed according to the NADA protocol: a standardized and comparable method of auricular acupuncture (AA) with ease of application and limited adverse reactions, which seems to have high acceptance among psychiatric patients. The NADA (National Acupuncture Detoxification Association) protocol includes the needling of five specific acupuncture points on both ears.

As a comparative relaxation treatment, progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) was applied in our study. It has been well established for many decades, especially for the treatment of severe states of physical and mental tension, which is a common symptom of anxiety disorders and depression. Many studies also suggest its potential utility in the treatment program of many other illnesses, which are associated with conditions of anxiety and depression, such as schizophrenia, sleeping disorders, endometriosis, atopic dermatitis or cancer.

The main aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of AA according to the NADA protocol versus PMR in patients with AD or MDD. We hypothesized, that both treatments show significant effects in alleviating the examined items (tension, anxiety, anger/aggression and state ofr mood) and that there is no significant difference between these two treatments. In order to increase the patients´ treatment acceptance and compliance, this study was set up in an open design in which each patient was freely able to choose between both treatments.

Being tested
Auricular acupuncture, Progressive muscle relaxation
Keywords
acupuncture, auricular acupuncture, NADA, anxiety, depression
Medical subject headings
Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Major, Depression

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Auricular acupunctureDevice

    Auricular acupuncture according to the the NADA protocol includes the needling of five specific acupuncture points on both ears: point 51 (= Sympathetic point), point 55 (= Shen Men), point 95 (= Kidney point), point 97 (= Liver point) and point 101 (= Lung point). All points were acupunctured with fine sterile single use steel needles with the size of 0.25 x 20 millimetres. The needles were inserted about 2-3 millimetres, so that the needle point pierces the skin and is just positioned in the cartilage of the ear. They remained in position for 30 minutes.

  • Progressive muscle relaxationProcedure or surgery

    Progressive muscle relaxation was carried out by the method of Bernstein and Borkovec. All participants were asked to close eyes while sitting comfortably. Each group session included 16 main exercises of consciously tensing and relaxing specific groups of muscles.

Study groups in NCT02340351
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Auricular acupunctureActive comparatorWithin this arm, patients were treated with auricular acupuncture according to the NADA protocol. Each setting involved not more than eight patients at a time and was performed in a sitting position. Each session lasted 30 minutes and took place twice a week over a period of 4 weeks.
Receives: Device: Auricular acupuncture
Progressive muscle relaxationActive comparatorWithin this arm, patients were treated with who chose treatment with progressive muscle relaxation. Each setting involved not more than eight patients at a time and was performed in a sitting position. Each session lasted 30 minutes, took place twice a week over a period of 4 weeks.
Receives: Procedure: Progressive muscle relaxation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean VAS scores of anxiety, tension, anger/aggression and mood before and after treatment within each treatment group at week 1.

    VAS are rated as follows: ´tension´, ´anxiety´, ´anger/aggression´: VAS 0 = none, 100 = most imaginable; ´mood´: VAS 0 = bad, 100 = good.

    Measured: 1 week

  2. Mean VAS scores of anxiety, tension, anger/aggression and mood before and after treatment within each treatment group at week 2.

    VAS are rated as follows: ´tension´, ´anxiety´, ´anger/aggression´: VAS 0 = none, 100 = most imaginable; ´mood´: VAS 0 = bad, 100 = good.

    Measured: week 2

  3. Mean VAS scores of anxiety, tension, anger/aggression and mood before and after treatment within each treatment group at week 3.

    VAS are rated as follows: ´tension´, ´anxiety´, ´anger/aggression´: VAS 0 = none, 100 = most imaginable; ´mood´: VAS 0 = bad, 100 = good.

    Measured: week 3

  4. Mean VAS scores of anxiety, tension, anger/aggression and mood before and after treatment within each treatment group at week 4.

    VAS are rated as follows: ´tension´, ´anxiety´, ´anger/aggression´: VAS 0 = none, 100 = most imaginable; ´mood´: VAS 0 = bad, 100 = good.

    Measured: week 4

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jan 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2007
  3. Primary completionMar 2009
  4. Study completionAug 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
136 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02340351
Sponsor's protocol ID
UKE-Psych-Aku-08-14
Status last verified
Jan 2015
First submitted
13 Jan 2015
Last updated
16 Jan 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Auricular acupuncture and Progressive muscle relaxation in people with Anxiety Disorders and Depressive Disorder, Major, run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jan 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean VAS scores of anxiety, tension, anger/aggression and mood before and after treatment within each treatment group at week 1. (time frame: 1 week). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jan 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in