Tricuspid RegurgitationPhase 3HOVERNCT02339974
Heterotopic Implantation Of the Edwards-Sapien Transcatheter Aortic Valve in the Inferior VEna Cava for the Treatment of Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation (HOVER)
A Phase 3 study testing Heterotopic Implantation Of the Edwards-Sapien XT Transcatheter Valve in the Inferior VEna Cava in people with Tricuspid Regurgitation, run by Henry Ford Health System at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this study is to determine the short term safety (<30 days) and efficacy (6 months) of the heterotopic implantation of the Edwards-Sapien XT valve in the inferior vena cava for the treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation in patients who are inoperable or at a very high surgical risk for tricuspid valve… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 22 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Tricuspid Regurgitation
- What is being tested?
- Heterotopic Implantation Of the Edwards-Sapien XT Transcatheter Valve in the Inferior VEna Cava
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2015to Jun 2025
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 22 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients must be at least 21 years old.
- The patient must have severe, symptomatic (ACC/AHA Stage D symptoms) tricuspid regurgitation (TR) as assessed by 2D echocardiogram with evidence of peripheral and central venous congestion (specifically lower extremity edema and abdominal ascites requiring diuretics.)
- The patient must be evaluated by a "heart team" of physicians including an interventional cardiologist, cardiothoracic surgeon, heart failure specialist, and imaging specialist, and presented for review at a local multi-disciplinary conference. By consensus, the heart team must agree (and verify in the case review process) that valve implantation will likely benefit the patient.
- The heart team must agree that medical factors preclude operation, based on a conclusion that the probability of death or serious, irreversible morbidity exceeds the probability of meaningful improvement. Also, other factors which may increase the patients perceived surgical risk for inclusion in the trial will be clearly delineated if they are present. These include, but are not limited to the following as defined by VARC 2: Frailty, Hostile chest, porcelain aorta, IMA or other critical conduit crossing the midline or adherent to the posterior table of sternum, severe right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. The surgeons' consultation notes shall specify the medical or anatomic factors leading to that conclusion. At least one of the cardiac surgeon assessors must have interviewed and examined the patient.
- The study patient provides informed consent and agrees to comply with all required post-procedure follow-up visits, including annual visits up to 5 years.
Who cannot join
- Heart Team assessment of operability (the heart team considers the patient to be a good surgical candidate).
- Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 1 month (30 days) before the intended treatment [defined as: Q wave MI, or non-Q wave MI with total CK elevation of CK-MB ≥ twice normal in the presence of MB elevation and/or troponin level elevation (WHO definition)].
- Untreated, severe, left sided valvular heart disease including mitral regurgitation or stenosis, and aortic regurgitation or stenosis.
- Mean pulmonary artery pressures ≥40mmHG and PVR >4 woods units as assessed by right heart catheterization.
- Any therapeutic invasive cardiac procedure resulting in a permanent implant that is performed within 30 days of the index procedure. Examples of permanent implant would include any new heart valve. Implantation of a permanent pacemaker is excluded.
- Patients with planned concomitant surgical or transcatheter ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.
Show all 20Show fewer
- Leukopenia (WBC < 3000 cell/mL), acute anemia (Hgb < 9 g/dL), Thrombocytopenia (Plt < 50,000 cell/mL).
- Hemodynamic or respiratory instability requiring inotropic support, mechanical ventilation or mechanical heart assistance within 30 days of screening evaluation.
- Need for emergency surgery for any reason.
- Left ventricular ejection fraction <40%.
- Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation.
- Active upper GI bleeding within 3 months (90 days) prior to procedure.
- A known contraindication or hypersensitivity to all anticoagulation regimens, or inability to be anticoagulated for the study procedure.
- Recent CVA clinically confirmed (by neurologist) or neuroimaging confirmed stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 6 months (180 days) of the procedure.
- Estimated life expectancy < 1 year from conditions other than TR.
- Expectation that patient will not improve despite treatment of tricuspid regurgitation
- Currently participating in another investigational cardiac device study or any other clinical trial, including drugs or biologics. Note: Trials requiring extended follow-up for products that were investigational, but have since become commercially available, are not considered investigational trials.
- Active bacterial endocarditis within 6 months (180 days) of procedure.
- Patients with signs or symptoms of SVC syndrome, or hepatic cirrhosis not felt due to passive congestion from TR.
- 20: Subject unable to personally provide informed consent 21. FEV1<30% of predicted 22. Model for End State Liver Disease (MELD) score ≥21 (calculated per reference study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Heterotopic Implantation Of the Edwards-Sapien Transcatheter Aortic Valve in the Inferior VEna Cava for the Treatment of Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation HOVER Trial
The goal of this study is to determine the short term safety (<30 days) and efficacy (6 months) of the heterotopic implantation of the Edwards-Sapien XT valve in the inferior vena cava for the treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation in patients who are inoperable or at a very high surgical risk for tricuspid valve replacement.
Read the detailed description
This is a prospective multi-center, non-blinded (open label), non-randomized safety and feasibility study of the heterotopic implantation of the Edwards-Sapien XT or S3 valve in the inferior vena cava for the treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation in patients who are inoperable or at a very high surgical risk for tricuspid valve replacement.
- Conditions
- Tricuspid Regurgitation
- Being tested
- Heterotopic Implantation Of the Edwards-Sapien XT Transcatheter Valve in the Inferior VEna Cava
- Medical subject headings
- Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Heterotopic Implantation Of the Edwards-Sapien XT Transcatheter Valve in the Inferior VEna CavaDevice
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation | Experimental | This is a non-blinded (open label), non-randomized safety and feasibility study of the heterotopic implantation of the Edwards Sapien 3 valve. Receives: Device: Heterotopic Implantation Of the Edwards-Sapien XT Transcatheter Valve in the Inferior VEna Cava |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Procedural Success
Procedural success will include both device success and no device/procedure related SAE's including: all death, all stroke, MI, new AKI grade 3, life threatening bleeding, major vascular complications (arterial or venous-requiring unplanned intervention), pericardial effusion or tamponade requiring drainage, SVC syndrome.
Safety as defined by successful vascular access without unplanned major vascular complication as defined by VARC-2, delivery and retrieval of the transcatheter valve delivery system, correct position of both the vascular stent(s) and transcatheter valve in the IVC, a single valve placed within the IVC, and no need for additional surgery or re-intervention (including drainage of pericardial effusion) with the patient being alive at 30-days.
Measured: 30 days
Individual Patient Success
Individual patient success is defined by device success and the following: no re-hospitalizations for right sided heart failure or right sided heart failure equivalents including drainage of ascites or pleural effusions, new listing for heart transplant, VAD, or other mechanical support; improvement in one of three variables: KCCQ improvement>15 vs. baseline; 6MWT improvement> 70 meters vs. baseline; or VO2 peak improvement > 6% vs baseline..
Measured: 30 days
Secondary outcomes (6)
Lower Extremity Edema
Measure of improvement in lower extremity (LE) edema measured by the Villalta Scale. The Villalta Scale is used to assess patients with lower extremity signs and symptoms of swelling, discoloration, or ulceration. The scale evaluates 5 patient reported items (pain, cramps, heaviness, paresthesia, pruritus) and 6 clinician-observed items (pretibial edema, skin induration, hyperpigmentation, pain during calf compression, venous ectasia, redness). Each item is graded on a four-point scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). All points are added, resulting in an overall score from 0 to 33. The final Villalta score of 5-9 is mild disease, 10-14 is moderate, and ≥15 is severe disease. A 3.1 point reduction in this scale between time points is associated with improved quality of life.
Measured: 30 days, 6 months, 1 Year
Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA)
Occurrence of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) by Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-2) criteria. VARC-2 diagnostic criteria defines stroke as a duration of a focal or global neurological deficit ≥ 24 hours; OR <24 hours if available neuroimaging documents a new hemorrhage or infarct; OR the neurological deficit results in death. VARC-2 diagnostic criteria defines TIA as a duration of a focal or global neurological deficit <24 hours, any variable neuroimaging does not demonstrate a new hemorrhage or infarct.
Measured: 30 days, 6 months, 1 year
Mortality
Mortality by Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-2) criteria. VARC-2 criteria separate All-cause mortality into 'Cardiovascular mortality' and 'Noncardiovascular mortality'. Cardiovascular mortality is defined as any of the following criteria: Death due to proximate cardiac cause (eg, myocardial infarction, cardiac tamponade, worsening heart failure); Death caused by noncoronary vascular conditions such as neurological events, pulmonary embolism, ruptured aortic aneurysm, dissecting aneurysm, or other vascular disease; All procedure-related deaths, including those related to a complication of the procedure or treatment for a complication of the procedure; All valve-related deaths including structural or nonstructural valve dysfunction or other valve-related adverse events; Sudden or unwitnessed death; Death of unknown cause. Noncardiovascular mortality is defined as any death in which the primary cause of death is clearly related to another condition (eg, trauma, cancer, suicide)
Measured: 30 days, 6 months, 1 year
Myocardial Infarction
Myocardial Infarction (MI) by Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-2) criteria. VARC-2 defines MI as either periprocedural MI (new ischemic symptoms or signs AND elevated cardiac biomarkers within 72 hours after the index procedure), or spontaneous MI (>72hours after the index procedure, any 1 of the following: detection of rise and/or fall of cardiac biomarkers with at least 1 value above the 99th percentile, together with the evidence of myocardial ischemia with either symptoms of ischemia, ECG changes indicative of new ischemia, new pathological Q-waves in at least two contiguous leads, or imaging evidence of a new loss of viable myocardium or new wall motion abnormality; Sudden, unexpected cardiac death involving cardiac arrest, accompanied by new ST elevation or new LBBB, and/or evidence of fresh thrombus by coronary angiogram or at autopsy, or at a time before the appearance of cardiac biomarker in the blood; or Pathological findings of an acute MI).
Measured: 30 days, 6 months, 1 Year
Acute Kidney Injury
Occurrence of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) by Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-2) criteria. VARC-2 criteria defines AKI as any of the following: [Stage 1] Increase in serum creatinine to 150-199% OR Urine output <0.5mL/kg/h for >6 but <12hours; [Stage 2] Increase in serum creatinine to 200-299% OR Urine output <0.5 mL/kg/h for >6 but <12hours; or [Stage 3] Increase in serum creatinine to ≥300% OR Urine output <0.3mL/kg/h for ≥24hours OR Anuria for ≥12hours.
Measured: 30 days, 6 months, 1 Year
Major Vascular Complications
Major Vascular Complications by Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-2) criteria. VARC-2 defines major vascular complications as: any aortic dissection aortic rupture, annulus rupture, left ventricle perforation, or new apical aneurysm/pseudoaneurysm; Access site or access-related vascular injury leading to death, life threatening or major bleeding, visceral ischemia, or neurological impairment; Distal embolization from a vascular source requiring surgery or resulting in amputation or irreversible end-organ damage; The use of unplanned endovascular or surgical intervention associated with death, major bleeding, visceral ischemia or neurological impairment; Any new ipsilateral lower extremity ischemia documented by patient symptoms, physical exam, and/or decreased or absent blood flow on lower extremity angiogram; surgery for access site-related nerve injury; or Permanent access site-related nerve injury.
Measured: 30 days, 6 months, 1 Year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2015
- Primary completionDec 2024
- Study completionJun 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Tricuspid RegurgitationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Henry Ford Health SystemThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Henry Ford Health System
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Brian O'Neill MD, Temple University
- Investigators
- Brian P O'Neill, MD, Principal investigator, Henry Ford Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02339974
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- G140131
- Acronym
- HOVER
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 13 Jan 2015
- Last updated
- 18 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Heterotopic Implantation Of the Edwards-Sapien Transcatheter Aortic Valve in the Inferior VEna Cava for the Treatment of Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation HOVER Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02339974
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HOVER / G140131
- Conditions
- Tricuspid Regurgitation
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Henry Ford Health SystemUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 10 Jun 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this study is to determine the short term safety (<30 days) and efficacy (6 months) of the heterotopic implantation of the Edwards-Sapien XT valve in the inferior vena cava for the treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation in patients who are inoperable or at a very high surgical risk for tricuspid valve replacement.
Detailed description
This is a prospective multi-center, non-blinded (open label), non-randomized safety and feasibility study of the heterotopic implantation of the Edwards-Sapien XT or S3 valve in the inferior vena cava for the treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation in patients who are inoperable or at a very high surgical risk for tricuspid valve replacement.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation | Experimental | Device: Heterotopic Implantation Of the Edwards-Sapien XT Transcatheter Valve in the Inferior VEna CavaThis is a non-blinded (open label), non-randomized safety and feasibility study of the heterotopic implantation of the Edwards Sapien 3 valve. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 22 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients must be at least 21 years old.
- The patient must have severe, symptomatic (ACC/AHA Stage D symptoms) tricuspid regurgitation (TR) as assessed by 2D echocardiogram with evidence of peripheral and central venous congestion (specifically lower extremity edema and abdominal ascites requiring diuretics.)
- The patient must be evaluated by a "heart team" of physicians including an interventional cardiologist, cardiothoracic surgeon, heart failure specialist, and imaging specialist, and presented for review at a local multi-disciplinary conference. By consensus, the heart team must agree (and verify in the case review process) that valve implantation will likely benefit the patient.
- The heart team must agree that medical factors preclude operation, based on a conclusion that the probability of death or serious, irreversible morbidity exceeds the probability of meaningful improvement. Also, other factors which may increase the patients perceived surgical risk for inclusion in the trial will be clearly delineated if they are present. These include, but are not limited to the following as defined by VARC 2: Frailty, Hostile chest, porcelain aorta, IMA or other critical conduit crossing the midline or adherent to the posterior table of sternum, severe right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. The surgeons' consultation notes shall specify the medical or anatomic factors leading to that conclusion. At least one of the cardiac surgeon assessors must have interviewed and examined the patient.
- The study patient provides informed consent and agrees to comply with all required post-procedure follow-up visits, including annual visits up to 5 years.
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Heart Team assessment of operability (the heart team considers the patient to be a good surgical candidate).
- Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 1 month (30 days) before the intended treatment [defined as: Q wave MI, or non-Q wave MI with total CK elevation of CK-MB ≥ twice normal in the presence of MB elevation and/or troponin level elevation (WHO definition)].
- Untreated, severe, left sided valvular heart disease including mitral regurgitation or stenosis, and aortic regurgitation or stenosis.
- Mean pulmonary artery pressures ≥40mmHG and PVR >4 woods units as assessed by right heart catheterization.
- Any therapeutic invasive cardiac procedure resulting in a permanent implant that is performed within 30 days of the index procedure. Examples of permanent implant would include any new heart valve. Implantation of a permanent pacemaker is excluded.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Heterotopic Implantation Of the Edwards-Sapien XT Transcatheter Valve in the Inferior VEna Cava | Device | Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation |
Primary outcome
Procedural Success
Time frame: 30 days
Procedural success will include both device success and no device/procedure related SAE's including: all death, all stroke, MI, new AKI grade 3, life threatening bleeding, major vascular complications (arterial or venous-requiring unplanned intervention), pericardial effusion or tamponade requiring drainage, SVC syndrome. Safety as defined by successful vascular access without unplanned major vascular complication as defined by VARC-2, delivery and retrieval of the transcatheter valve delivery system, correct position of both the vascular stent(s) and transcatheter valve in the IVC, a single valve placed within the IVC, and no need for additional surgery or re-intervention (including drainage of pericardial effusion) with the patient being alive at 30-days.
Individual Patient Success
Time frame: 30 days
Individual patient success is defined by device success and the following: no re-hospitalizations for right sided heart failure or right sided heart failure equivalents including drainage of ascites or pleural effusions, new listing for heart transplant, VAD, or other mechanical support; improvement in one of three variables: KCCQ improvement>15 vs. baseline; 6MWT improvement> 70 meters vs. baseline; or VO2 peak improvement > 6% vs baseline..
6 secondary outcomes
Lower Extremity Edema
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 1 Year
Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA)
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 1 year
Mortality
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 1 year
Myocardial Infarction
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 1 Year
Acute Kidney Injury
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 1 Year
Major Vascular Complications
Time frame: 30 days, 6 months, 1 Year
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jun 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Tricuspid Regurgitation
RecruitingObservational study
A Post-Market Assessment of the Safety and Performance of the TriClip™ System
Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR)
Not yet recruiting
TRI-SUCCESS - Tricuspid Regurgitation Study of the Unica™ Cross-Caval System for the Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety in Significant TR Subjects
Tricuspid Regurgitation, Tricuspid Regurgitation Functional
Recruiting
Innoventric Trillium™ Stent Graft Early Feasibility Study (EFS)
Tricuspid Regurgitation, Tricuspid Regurgitation Functional
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Evaluation of a Management Algorithm for TAVI Patients With Concomitant Mitral or Tricuspid Regurgitation
Aortic Stenosis, Mitral Regurgitation
Recruiting
Tricuspid Regurgitation Treatment With LAPLACE Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement System
Severe Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation, Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Brian P O'Neill, MD principal investigator
Henry Ford Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Heterotopic Implantation Of the Edwards-Sapien XT Transcatheter Valve in the Inferior VEna Cava in people with Tricuspid Regurgitation, run by Henry Ford Health System at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Jun 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Procedural Success (time frame: 30 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jun 2025.