Food SelectionNCT02334540
Satiety Effects of Pulses Compared to Matched Protein Smoothie
A study testing purses and a calorie/protein matched smoothie in people with Food Selection, run by University of Minnesota at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The satiety effects of pulses compared to a matched smoothie will be measured. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Food Selection
- What is being tested?
- purses and a calorie/protein matched smoothie
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2015to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- healthy, normal body weight,
Who cannot join
- smoker, restrained eating habits, recent weight change, history of disease, vegetarian, do not normally eat breakfast or lunch, are pregnant or lactating, have irregular menstrual cycles
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Department of Food Science and Nutrition
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55108
About this study
The satiety effects of pulses compared to a matched smoothie will be measured.
Read the detailed description
The investigators will compare satiety and food intake after consumption of purses or a calorie/protein matched smoothie
- Conditions
- Food Selection
- Being tested
- purses, a calorie/protein matched smoothie
- Medical subject headings
- Food Preferences
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
pursesDietary supplement
food intake
a calorie/protein matched smoothieDietary supplement
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| purses or a calorie/protein matched smoothie | Other | Not described Receives: Dietary Supplement: purses; Dietary Supplement: a calorie/protein matched smoothie |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
satiety
Measured: 120 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2015
- Primary completionDec 2015
- Study completionDec 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Food SelectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of MinnesotaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Minnesota
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02334540
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1412M57002
- Status last verified
- May 2016
- First submitted
- 6 Jan 2015
- Last updated
- 16 May 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 May 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Satiety Effects of Pulses Compared to Matched Protein Smoothie
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02334540
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1412M57002
- Conditions
- Food Selection
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MinnesotaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2015
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The satiety effects of pulses compared to a matched smoothie will be measured.
Detailed description
The investigators will compare satiety and food intake after consumption of purses or a calorie/protein matched smoothie
Study design
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| purses or a calorie/protein matched smoothie | Other | Dietary Supplement: purses, Dietary Supplement: a calorie/protein matched smoothie |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- healthy, normal body weight,
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- smoker, restrained eating habits, recent weight change, history of disease, vegetarian, do not normally eat breakfast or lunch, are pregnant or lactating, have irregular menstrual cycles
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| pursesfood intake | Dietary supplement | purses or a calorie/protein matched smoothie |
| a calorie/protein matched smoothie | Dietary supplement | purses or a calorie/protein matched smoothie |
Primary outcome
satiety
Time frame: 120 minutes
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 May 2016.
Related trials for Food Selection
Not yet recruiting
Exploring the Influence of Glucagon-like Peptide -1 (GLP-1) Medications on Food Cravings, Food Selection, and Food Intake Following Exposure to Food Advertisements
GLP - 1
Recruiting
Influence of Social Media Ads on Food Choice - Master Protocol
Food Selection, Food Choices
Not yet recruiting
Optimization Trial to Empower sElection of Nutritious Foods
Food Insecurity, Healthy Eating
Not yet recruiting
Food Menu Labelling Effects on Individuals With Eating Disorders and Other Mental Health Conditions.
Food Labelling, Eating Behaviour
RecruitingObservational study
Fostering Self-Empowerment in CKD Patients Through Food Choice Mapping
CKD, Chronic Kidney Disease (Stages 3b-5)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing purses and a calorie/protein matched smoothie in people with Food Selection, run by University of Minnesota at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
satiety (time frame: 120 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 May 2016.