AzTrials
AzTrials

Benign Prostate HyperplasiaNCT02332538

HoLEP vs. Greenlight 532nm-laser PVEP vs. Bipolar TURP in Management of Moderate/ Large BPH

A study testing 532nm-laser photoselective vapo-enucleation of the prostate), Holmium laser enucleation of prostate and Bipolar TURP in people with Benign Prostate Hyperplasia and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Most guidelines are not strict for recommending single treatment approach for Moderate to large prostate. In this study the investigators planned to test the Greenlight (532-nm) laser Photoselective Vapo-Enucleation of the Prostate (PVEP) using (XPS) 180W system compared to bipolar transurethral resection of the… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older, men only
What is being tested?
532nm-laser photoselective vapo-enucleation of the prostate), Holmium laser enucleation of prostate and Bipolar TURP
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
182 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
Mar 2014to Jul 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients' age ≥50 years
  • LUTS secondary to BOO due to BPH who failed medical treatment
  • International prostate symptom scores 8 (IPSS) >15 and bother score 8 (QOL) ≥ 3 (according to IPSS question 8)
  • Peak urinary flow rate (Qmax) <15 ml/sec with at least 125 ml voided volume or Patients with acute urine retention secondary to BPH who failed trial of voiding on medical treatment.
  • ASA (American society of anaesthesiologists) score ≤3.
  • TRUS prostate size (>/=80ml)

Who cannot join

  • Patient with neurological disorder which might affect bladder function as cerebrovascular stroke, Parkinson disease
  • Active urinary tract infection,
  • Presence of active bladder cancer (within the last 2 years)
  • Known prostate cancer patients will be excluded preoperatively on the basis of digital rectal examination, prostate specific antigen level, and TRUS imaging followed by prostate biopsies if necessary.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Urology and Nephrology Center

    Al Mansurah, Aldakahlia, 35516

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Randomized Trial Comparing Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate vs. Greenlight 532nm-laser Vapo-Enucleation of the Prostate vs. Bipolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in Management of Moderate/Large Benign Prostate Hyperplasia

Most guidelines are not strict for recommending single treatment approach for Moderate to large prostate.

In this study the investigators planned to test the Greenlight (532-nm) laser Photoselective Vapo-Enucleation of the Prostate (PVEP) using (XPS) 180W system compared to bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURis) and Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HOLEP) in reduction of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to BPH in a prospective randomized trial.

Read the detailed description

With a growing body of knowledge on the promising advancements and recent clinical data of the third generations of the Greenlight XPS, it seems to be a real contender in the world of MIS. Contenders of Greenlight laser technology includes bipolar as well as Holmium laser technology.

In this study the investigators planned to test the Greenlight (532-nm) laser Photoselective Vapo-Enucleation of the Prostate (PVEP) using (XPS) 180W system compared to bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURis) and Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HOLEP) in reduction of LUTS secondary to BPH in a prospective randomized trial.

Furthermore, all peri-operative parameters, urinary flow parameters, prostate size changes and complications associated with the procedures were compared. The prostate size limitations will be assessed in relation to the outcome measures.

Moderate to large size prostate (80-120 ml TRUS estimated volume) will be randomized to PVEP vs. Bipolar TURP vs. HoLEP.

Being tested
532nm-laser photoselective vapo-enucleation of the prostate), Holmium laser enucleation of prostate, Bipolar TURP
Keywords
LASER, PROSTATE, BIPOLAR, HYPERPLASIA, VAPORIZATION
Medical subject headings
Prostatic Hyperplasia, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Hyperplasia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 532nm-laser photoselective vapo-enucleation of the prostate)Procedure or surgery

    using Greenlight (532nm-laser) modified vaporization technique, PVEP (photoselective vapo-enucleation of the prostate)

  • Holmium laser enucleation of prostateProcedure or surgery

    Holmium-Yag laser enucleation of the prsotate

  • Bipolar TURPProcedure or surgery

    Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate in saline

Study groups in NCT02332538
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Greenlight (532nm-laser) PVEPActive comparator532nm-laser photoselective vapo-enucleation of the prostate)
Receives: Procedure: 532nm-laser photoselective vapo-enucleation of the prostate)
Holmium laser enucleation of prostateActive comparatorHolmium-Yag laser enucleation of the prostate
Receives: Procedure: Holmium laser enucleation of prostate
Bipolar TURPActive comparatorBipolar transurethral resection of the prostate in saline
Receives: Procedure: Bipolar TURP

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Re treatment

    need for retreatment for recurrent infravesical obstruction following primary surgery

    Measured: 3 YEARs

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. change in symptoms score

    degree of improvement in the lower urinary tract symptoms

    Measured: 3 year

  2. Urine Flow rate (ml/sec)

    degree of improvement in the rate of urine flow

    Measured: 3 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jan 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2014
  3. Primary completionJul 2016
  4. Study completionJul 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
182 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02332538
Sponsor's protocol ID
MS/16.04.79
Status last verified
Oct 2019
First submitted
27 Dec 2014
Last updated
16 Oct 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing 532nm-laser photoselective vapo-enucleation of the prostate), Holmium laser enucleation of prostate and Bipolar TURP in people with Benign Prostate Hyperplasia and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Re treatment (time frame: 3 YEARs). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Oct 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in