EpilepsyPhase 3ENALEPSYNCT02332447
Efficacy of Naloxone in Reducing Postictal Central Respiratory Dysfunction in Patients With Epilepsy
A Phase 3 study testing naloxone in people with Epilepsy, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) primarily affects young adults with drug-resistant epilepsy, with an incidence of about 0.4%/year. The diagnosis of SUDEP requires that anamnestic data and post-mortem examination do not reveal a structural or toxicological cause for death. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Epilepsy
- What is being tested?
- naloxone
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 485 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 26 Jun 2015to 30 Jul 2020
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- For inclusion
- Adult patient (≥ 18 years) suffering from drug-resistant partial epilepsy
- Patient undergoing long-term video-EEG monitoring in one of the participating centre to record and characterize its seizure
- Patient who gave its written informed consent to participate to the study For randomization
- Patient who suffers a secondary generalized tonic-clonic seizure during the long-term video-EEG monitoring while being supervised by a nurse or a physician
Who cannot join
- Age < 18 years
- Patient that has already been randomized in this study
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Hypersensitivity to naloxone
- History of severe heart disease (myocardial infarction, heart failure disorder, arrhythmia severe hypertension)
- Ongoing opioïd treatment, including both pure agonists and partial agonists
- Addiction to opioïds, heroin, or any similar substance
- Patient participating in another drug trial for less than 2 months
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
France1 site
Service de Neurologie Fonctionnelle et d'Epileptologie et Institut des Epilepsies Hôpital Neurologique
Lyon
About this study
Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) primarily affects young adults with drug-resistant epilepsy, with an incidence of about 0.4%/year. The diagnosis of SUDEP requires that anamnestic data and post-mortem examination do not reveal a structural or toxicological cause for death. Generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) are the main risk factor for SUDEP, which they appear to trigger in most instances. Indeed, experimental and clinical data strongly suggest that most SUDEP result from a postictal respiratory dysfunction progressing to terminal apnea, later followed by cardiac arrest.
Postictal apnea could partly derive from a seizure-induced massive release of endogenous opioids. Animal studies suggest that such seizure-related release of endogenous opioid peptides participate to termination of seizures. In patients with epilepsy, functional imaging studies have confirmed that seizures induce release of endogenous opioids. The brainstem respiratory centers contain the highest density in opioid receptors, accounting for respiratory depression being one of the cardinal symptoms of opioid overdose.
Read more
The investigators hypothesis is that SUDEP partly results from a post-ictal apnea promoted by a GTCS-induced massive release of endogenous opioids, and that an opioid antagonist could represent an effective preventive treatment of SUDEP. This could be achieved by chronic administration of Naltrexone, an opioid antagonist that has been used in a large population of patients with chronic alcoholism at high risk of seizures, without showing any pro-convulsant effect. This is a crucial feasibility issue since antagonising a mechanism thought to participate to seizure termination could theoretically aggravate seizures.
Before evaluating the efficacy of chronic administration of naltrexone, it is legitimate to perform a proof of concept study by testing the acute effect of an equivalent injectable treatment (Naloxone) in the immediate aftermath of GTCS recorded inhospital during video-EEG monitoring of patients with refractory epilepsy. One third of these patients develop postictal respiratory dysfunction and hypoxemia, which should be reduced by the investigators intervention if the investigators hypothesis is correct.
The main objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of 0.4 mg intravenous naloxone, versus placebo, administered in the immediate aftermath of a GTCS, in reducing the severity of the postictal central respiratory dysfunction occurring after the end of the seizure, as measured by pulse oximetry.
About 25% of patients with drug-resistant partial epilepsy who undergo long-term video-EEG monitoring develop at least one partial secondary generalized tonic-clonic seizure. However, these patients cannot be individualized a priori. Therefore, all adult patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who will undergo long-term video-EEG monitoring in one of the participating centres, will lack all exclusion criteria, and will give their written informed consent to participate to the study if they develop GTCS, will be included in the study. They will all benefit from continuous monitoring of pulse oximetry (together with video, EEG, and respiration recordings), and will be equipped with a peripheral venous catheter throughout the video-EEG. The modalities of the video-EEG monitoring will be consistent with the current practices and similar across the 8 centres (apart from the venous catheter which is not standard practice).
In case of occurrence of a generalized tonic-clonic seizure, patients will be randomized (1:1) to receive intravenous naloxone (0.4 mg) or placebo. Placebo will be isotonic sodium chloride which preparation and packaging will be centralized to ensure its indistinguishability from naloxone. Randomization will be centralized and stratified by centre. The evolution from a partial seizure to a GTCS being gradual, and the total duration of the seizure ranging from 2 to 3 minutes, the injection will be prepared during the course of the seizure. Given the assumptions about the role of endogenous opioids release in the spontaneous termination of seizures, naloxone will be administrated immediately after the end of the GTCS and not before.
All digital data (video, EEG, respiration, SpO2) will be centralized and evaluated blind to other data by the PI of the study who will not be involved in the video-EEG monitoring of the included patients. The same automatic and objective analysis of SpO2 data than the one already developed in the PHRC REPOMSE will be performed.
Read the detailed description
Sample size was revised using a log rank test with a two-sided alternative hypothesis. For a significance level of 5% (two-tailed), assuming a hazard ratio of 2.414 calculated, i.e based on an effect size similar to the effect size of oxygenotherapy in a delay of 60 seconds (Rheims et al., 2019), 40 events should be observed to reject the null hypothesis in 80% of cases,. A proportion of 89% of patients being expected to recover SpO2 ≥ 90% 120 seconds after the end of the seizure and considering a proportion of unusauble records for technical reasons of 20%, at least 54 patients should be randomized.
Assuming that about 10% of patients with drug-resistant partial epilepsy who undergo long-term video-EEG monitoring develop at least one partial secondary generalized tonic-clonic seizure, a total of 554 patients will be included in the study.
- Conditions
- Epilepsy
- Being tested
- naloxone, Placebo
- Keywords
- Tonic-clonic seizures, Naloxone, SUDEP
- Medical subject headings
- Epilepsy, Seizures, Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
naloxoneDrug
A single dose of 1 ml of naloxone (i.e 0.4 mg) or placebo will be administered by the supervising nurse or physician, using direct intravenous injection with a 5 ml syringe through peripheral venous catheter of which all patients will be equipped throughout the video-EEG.
The evolution from a partial seizure to a GTCS being gradual, and the total duration of the seizure ranging from 2 to 3 minutes, the injection will be prepared during the course of the seizure. Given the assumptions about the role of endogenous opioids release in the spontaneous termination of seizures, naloxone will be administrated immediately after the end of the GTCS and not before. Specifically, treatment administration will be performed within the 2 minutes following the end of the GTCS.
PlaceboDrug
Placebo will be isotonic sodium chloride which preparation in 1 ml vials will be centralized by the pharmaceutical department of Edouard Herriot Hospital to ensure its indistinguishability from naloxone A single dose of 1 ml of naloxone (i.e 0.4 mg) or placebo will be administered by the supervising nurse or physician, using direct intravenous injection with a 5 ml syringe through peripheral venous catheter of which all patients will be equipped throughout the video-EEG.
The evolution from a partial seizure to a GTCS being gradual, and the total duration of the seizure ranging from 2 to 3 minutes, the injection will be prepared during the course of the seizure. Given the assumptions about the role of endogenous opioids release in the spontaneous termination of seizures, naloxone will be administrated immediately after the end of the GTCS and not before. Specifically, treatment administration will be performed within the 2 minutes following the end of the GTCS.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| NALOXONE | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: naloxone |
| PLACEBO | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Delay between the end of the seizure and recovery of oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≥ 90%
Measured: during at least 5 seconds between 30 seconds and 5 minutes after the end of the GTCS
Secondary outcomes (1)
Delay between the end of the GTCS and recovery of oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≥ 90%
Measured: during at least 5 seconds between 30 seconds and 5 minutes after the end of the GTCS.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Study start26 Jun 2015
- Primary completion30 Jul 2020
- Study completion30 Jul 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for EpilepsyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hospices Civils de LyonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 485 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospices Civils de Lyon
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sylvain RHEIMS, Doctor, Study director, Hospices Civils de Lyon
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02332447
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2014-853
- Other IDs
- 2014-003003-30, 2014
- Acronym
- ENALEPSY
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 5 Jan 2015
- Last updated
- 26 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Rheims S, Valton L, Michel V, Maillard L, Navarro V, Convers P, Bartolomei F, Biraben A, Crespel A, Derambure P, de Toffol B, Hirsch E, Kahane P, Martin ML, Tourniaire D, Boulogne S, Mercier C, Roy P, Ryvlin P; ENALEPSY study group. Efficacy of naloxone in reducing postictal central respiratory dysfunction in patients with epilepsy: study protocol for a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Nov 3;17(1):529. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1653-1.
PubMed 27809868
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of Naloxone in Reducing Postictal Central Respiratory Dysfunction in Patients With Epilepsy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02332447
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ENALEPSY / 2014-853
- Conditions
- Epilepsy
- Keywords
- Tonic-clonic seizures, Naloxone, SUDEP
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 485 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospices Civils de LyonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 26 Jun 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jul 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Jan 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) primarily affects young adults with drug-resistant epilepsy, with an incidence of about 0.4%/year. The diagnosis of SUDEP requires that anamnestic data and post-mortem examination do not reveal a structural or toxicological cause for death. Generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) are the main risk factor for SUDEP, which they appear to trigger in most instances. Indeed, experimental and clinical data strongly suggest that most SUDEP result from a postictal respiratory dysfunction progressing to terminal apnea, later followed by cardiac arrest.
Postictal apnea could partly derive from a seizure-induced massive release of endogenous opioids. Animal studies suggest that such seizure-related release of endogenous opioid peptides participate to termination of seizures. In patients with epilepsy, functional imaging studies have confirmed that seizures induce release of endogenous opioids. The brainstem respiratory centers contain the highest density in opioid receptors, accounting for respiratory depression being one of the cardinal symptoms of opioid overdose.
The investigators hypothesis is that SUDEP partly results from a post-ictal apnea promoted by a GTCS-induced massive release of endogenous opioids, and that an opioid antagonist could represent an effective preventive treatment of SUDEP. This could be achieved by chronic administration of Naltrexone, an opioid antagonist that has been used in a large population of patients with chronic alcoholism at high risk of seizures, without showing any pro-convulsant effect. This is a crucial feasibility issue since antagonising a mechanism thought to participate to seizure termination could theoretically aggravate seizures.
Before evaluating the efficacy of chronic administration of naltrexone, it is legitimate to perform a proof of concept study by testing the acute effect of an equivalent injectable treatment (Naloxone) in the immediate aftermath of GTCS recorded inhospital during video-EEG monitoring of patients with refractory epilepsy. One third of these patients develop postictal respiratory dysfunction and hypoxemia, which should be reduced by the investigators intervention if the investigators hypothesis is correct.
The main objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of 0.4 mg intravenous naloxone, versus placebo, administered in the immediate aftermath of a GTCS, in reducing the severity of the postictal central respiratory dysfunction occurring after the end of the seizure, as measured by pulse oximetry.
About 25% of patients with drug-resistant partial epilepsy who undergo long-term video-EEG monitoring develop at least one partial secondary generalized tonic-clonic seizure. However, these patients cannot be individualized a priori. Therefore, all adult patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who will undergo long-term video-EEG monitoring in one of the participating centres, will lack all exclusion criteria, and will give their written informed consent to participate to the study if they develop GTCS, will be included in the study. They will all benefit from continuous monitoring of pulse oximetry (together with video, EEG, and respiration recordings), and will be equipped with a peripheral venous catheter throughout the video-EEG. The modalities of the video-EEG monitoring will be consistent with the current practices and similar across the 8 centres (apart from the venous catheter which is not standard practice).
In case of occurrence of a generalized tonic-clonic seizure, patients will be randomized (1:1) to receive intravenous naloxone (0.4 mg) or placebo. Placebo will be isotonic sodium chloride which preparation and packaging will be centralized to ensure its indistinguishability from naloxone. Randomization will be centralized and stratified by centre. The evolution from a partial seizure to a GTCS being gradual, and the total duration of the seizure ranging from 2 to 3 minutes, the injection will be prepared during the course of the seizure. Given the assumptions about the role of endogenous opioids release in the spontaneous termination of seizures, naloxone will be administrated immediately after the end of the GTCS and not before.
All digital data (video, EEG, respiration, SpO2) will be centralized and evaluated blind to other data by the PI of the study who will not be involved in the video-EEG monitoring of the included patients. The same automatic and objective analysis of SpO2 data than the one already developed in the PHRC REPOMSE will be performed.
Detailed description
Sample size was revised using a log rank test with a two-sided alternative hypothesis. For a significance level of 5% (two-tailed), assuming a hazard ratio of 2.414 calculated, i.e based on an effect size similar to the effect size of oxygenotherapy in a delay of 60 seconds (Rheims et al., 2019), 40 events should be observed to reject the null hypothesis in 80% of cases,. A proportion of 89% of patients being expected to recover SpO2 ≥ 90% 120 seconds after the end of the seizure and considering a proportion of unusauble records for technical reasons of 20%, at least 54 patients should be randomized.
Assuming that about 10% of patients with drug-resistant partial epilepsy who undergo long-term video-EEG monitoring develop at least one partial secondary generalized tonic-clonic seizure, a total of 554 patients will be included in the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| NALOXONE | Experimental | Drug: naloxone |
| PLACEBO | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- For inclusion
- Adult patient (≥ 18 years) suffering from drug-resistant partial epilepsy
- Patient undergoing long-term video-EEG monitoring in one of the participating centre to record and characterize its seizure
- Patient who gave its written informed consent to participate to the study For randomization
- Patient who suffers a secondary generalized tonic-clonic seizure during the long-term video-EEG monitoring while being supervised by a nurse or a physician
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Age < 18 years
- Patient that has already been randomized in this study
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Hypersensitivity to naloxone
- History of severe heart disease (myocardial infarction, heart failure disorder, arrhythmia severe hypertension)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| naloxoneA single dose of 1 ml of naloxone (i.e 0.4 mg) or placebo will be administered by the supervising nurse or physician, using direct intravenous injection with a 5 ml syringe through peripheral venous catheter of which all patients will be equipped throughout the video-EEG. The evolution from a partial seizure to a GTCS being gradual, and the total duration of the seizure ranging from 2 to 3 minutes, the injection will be prepared during the course of the seizure. Given the assumptions about the role of endogenous opioids release in the spontaneous termination of seizures, naloxone will be administrated immediately after the end of the GTCS and not before. Specifically, treatment administration will be performed within the 2 minutes following the end of the GTCS. | Drug | NALOXONE |
| PlaceboPlacebo will be isotonic sodium chloride which preparation in 1 ml vials will be centralized by the pharmaceutical department of Edouard Herriot Hospital to ensure its indistinguishability from naloxone A single dose of 1 ml of naloxone (i.e 0.4 mg) or placebo will be administered by the supervising nurse or physician, using direct intravenous injection with a 5 ml syringe through peripheral venous catheter of which all patients will be equipped throughout the video-EEG. The evolution from a partial seizure to a GTCS being gradual, and the total duration of the seizure ranging from 2 to 3 minutes, the injection will be prepared during the course of the seizure. Given the assumptions about the role of endogenous opioids release in the spontaneous termination of seizures, naloxone will be administrated immediately after the end of the GTCS and not before. Specifically, treatment administration will be performed within the 2 minutes following the end of the GTCS. | Drug | PLACEBO |
Primary outcome
Delay between the end of the seizure and recovery of oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≥ 90%
Time frame: during at least 5 seconds between 30 seconds and 5 minutes after the end of the GTCS
1 secondary outcome
Delay between the end of the GTCS and recovery of oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≥ 90%
Time frame: during at least 5 seconds between 30 seconds and 5 minutes after the end of the GTCS.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Sep 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 27809868Rheims S, Valton L, Michel V, Maillard L, Navarro V, Convers P, Bartolomei F, Biraben A, Crespel A, Derambure P, de Toffol B, Hirsch E, Kahane P, Martin ML, Tourniaire D, Boulogne S, Mercier C, Roy P, Ryvlin P; ENALEPSY study group. Efficacy of naloxone in reducing postictal central respiratory dysfunction in patients with epilepsy: study protocol for a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Nov 3;17(1):529. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1653-1.
Related trials for Epilepsy
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Trial of SEEG for Drug-resistant Epilepsy
Drug-Resistant Epilepsy
RecruitingPhase 3
Investigate Efficacy and Safety of Carisbamate as Adjunctive Treatment for Seizures Associated With LGS in Children and Adults
Seizures, Lennox Gastaut Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 3
Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of RAP-219 in Adult Participants With Focal Seizures
Focal Seizure, Epilepsy
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Epileptogenesis Project (TRACK-TBI EPI)
Traumatic Brain Injury, Post-traumatic Epilepsy
RecruitingPhase 3
Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of RAP-219 in Adult Participants With Focal Seizures FOCUS-1
Focal Seizure, Epilepsy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sylvain RHEIMS, Doctor study director
Hospices Civils de Lyon
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing naloxone in people with Epilepsy, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Delay between the end of the seizure and recovery of oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≥ 90% (time frame: during at least 5 seconds between 30 seconds and 5 minutes after the end of the GTCS). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02332447, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Sep 2025.