TachycardiaNCT02328729
Incident and Extent of Pulse Alteration During Local Anesthesia in Children
An observational study of Tachycardia, run by Tel Aviv University.
Trial summary
Incident and extent of pulse alteration during administration of various modes of local anesthesia in children during routine dental treatment. Our aims are: (1) To estimate the percent of patients who receive mandibular block , C-CLAD-IL or infiltration injections and show increase in their pulse rate during the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 to 18 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Tachycardia
- What is being tested?
- mandibular block with Epinephrine, C-CLAD-IL with Epinephrine and Infiltration with Epinephrine
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2015to Jan 2016
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 to 18 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Study population: Children undergo routine dental treatment that require local anesthetic.
Who may be able to join
- All children that their parents signed the inform consent form and the children allow to put the pulse oximeter sensor on their finger/ear.
Who cannot join
- Children that does not allow to put the pulse oximeter sensor on their finger/ear.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Incident and Extent of Pulse Alteration During Administration of Various Modes of Local Anesthesia in Children During Routine Dental Treatment
Incident and extent of pulse alteration during administration of various modes of local anesthesia in children during routine dental treatment. Our aims are: (1) To estimate the percent of patients who receive mandibular block , C-CLAD-IL or infiltration injections and show increase in their pulse rate during the delivery of anesthesia (in spite of negative aspiration) as result of infiltration of adrenalin into their blood vessels. (2) To estimate the extent of pulse rate alteration in correlation with the velocity or volume of local anesthesia injected. (3) To examine the correlation between increase in the pulse rate and effectiveness of anesthesia. (4) To examine the correlation between the needle gauge (27 \& 30) and increase in pulse rate during mandibular block injection in spite of negative aspiration. We will recruit children that undergo routine dental treatment under local anesthesia (such as mandibular block, infiltration or C-CLAD-IL). Patients will be connected, immediately before and during the entire delivery of the local anesthetic, to pulse-oximeter that will be connected to a computer and continuously monitor pulse rate and saturation during the delivery of local anesthesia. Each aberrant event which may occur during alteration of the pulse rate such as gag reflex, coughing, or pain related disruptive behavior will be documented on the computer in real time by another person that is not the treating dentist. All types of local anesthesia delivery will be performed by the computerized-controlled local anesthesia delivery system - Single-Tooth-Anesthesia which connected to a computer and documents continuously the amount and velocity of the local anesthetic delivered to the patient. All injections will be performed by using a 29 gauge needle, except when children will be treated under general anesthesia, the injection will be performed also by 27 gauge needle. In case the pulse rate will increase to 150% of the baseline rate, or when the pulse will reach 150 beats/minute the injection will be stopped immediately. The continuation of the local anesthetic delivery will be continued in different location and only after the return of the pulse to its basic rate. A total of 100 patients will receive local anesthetic containing 1:100,000 adrenalin and 50 patients without adrenaline. Three modes of local anesthesia will be evaluated: C-CLAD-IL, infiltration and mandibular block= a total of 300 patients.
Read the detailed description
Parents to children (healthy and with systemic disease ) who need local anesthesia (such as mandibular block, infiltration or C-CLAD-IL) for routine dental treatment will be asked to sign an informed consent form to participate in the study. The parents will receive explanation that the aim of the study is to evaluate the alteration of the pulse rate during delivery of different modes of local anesthetic delivery (an indirect sign for penetration of local anesthetic solution into the blood vessels). All patients will be connected, immediately before and during the entire delivery of the local anesthetic, to pulse oximeter ( pulse oximeter ,Boston, USA Nellcor N550) . The probe will be attached to the patient's finger or big toe according to patient's age. The pulse oximeter will be connected to a computer that will document continuously the pulse rate and saturation during the delivery of local anesthesia. Each aberrant event which may occur during alteration of the pulse rate such as gag reflex, coughing, or pain related disruptive behavior (crying, grimace, body movements or verbal complains-CHEOPS, attachment 1) will be documented on the computer in real time by another person that is not the treating dentist. This documentation is feasible due to a new program that was developed especially for this study. All types of local anesthesia delivery will be performed by the computerized controlled local anesthesia delivery system - Single-Tooth-Anesthesia (C-CLAD, STA, Milestone Scientific, Inc. Deerfield, IL, USA) which connected to a computer and documents continuously the amount and velocity of the local anesthetic delivered to the patient. This program was kindly provided and developed by Dr. Mark Hochman from USA, as part of the collaboration in the present study.
The local anesthesia will be performed by using Lidocaine 2% and Epinephrine 1:100,000, or Mepivacain HCl 3% without any vasoconstrictors as necessary. The use of local anesthetic without vasoconstrictor will serve as control for elevations of pulse rate which not resulted from penetration of adrenalin into the blood vessels.
When injecting mandibular block or infiltration, aspiration will be performed immediately before injecting the solution. In case a positive aspiration, the finding will be marked; the location of the needle will be changed until a negative aspiration will be received.
All injections will be performed by using a 29 gauge needle, except when children will be treated under general anesthesia, the injection will be performed also by 27 gauge needle.
In case the pulse rate will increase to 150% of the baseline rate, or when the pulse will reach 150 beats per minute the injection will be stopped immediately. The continuation of the local anesthetic delivery will be continued in different location and only after the return of the pulse to its basic rate.
When performing mandibular block injection, the lingual and buccal nerves will be anesthetized as well. The total injected volume during mandibular block delivery will be 1.8 ml. In case full anesthesia is not achieved (after waiting 5 minutes) additional injection will be performed. In any case the amount of local anesthetic injected will not exceed the amount of 4.4 mg/kg body weight.
When a participating child will be scheduled to two consecutive appointments for similar treatments, the child will receive in one appointment local anesthesia without adrenalin and in the other with adrenalin or vice versa.
Anesthesia effectiveness. The dentist will assess the effectiveness of anesthesia through the presence or absence (non-contiguous) of pain-disruptive behavior during treatment as described by Oulis et al. (6). Each single sign of discomfort (even mild) was rated as a positive presence of pain. Signs of discomfort included visual or acoustic changes, such as hand or body tension or movements, eye movements, verbal complaints, or tears. Anesthesia will be rated adequate only when the child will be completely relaxed during treatment.
Each patient will have a computerized file in which his details will be filled The name of the treating dentist Name of the patient Systemic disease Type of management: behavior management, nitrous oxide, sedation , general anesthesia Type of local anesthesia Number of tooth Type of local anesthetic solution: Lidocaine 2% and 1:100,000 Epinephrine, Mepivacaine HCl 3% without Epinephrine Gauge of the needle 30 gauge or 27 gauge Side of injection Number of positive aspiration Number of negative aspirations Type of treatment provided Effective of local anesthesia during treatment Basic pulse rate before injection Maximum pulse during injection The reason for the increasing pulse rate: gag reflex, coughing, pain, bitter test, nothing
All details will be completed before during or immediately after completing the injection.
Number of patients 100 patients for each mode of anesthesia 50 patients will receive local anesthetic containing 1:100,000 Epinephrine and 50 patients without Epinephrine Three modes of local anesthesia will be evaluated: C-CLAD-IL, infiltration and mandibular block= 300 patients Each patient will participate maximum twice in each mode of anesthesia ( once will receive local anesthetic containing 1:100,000 Epinephrine and 50 patients without Epinephrine). The type of local anesthesia solution will be selected by the dentist according to the patient's need and will not be affected by the study. Children who do not fully cooperate during treatment will be excluded from the present study.
Attachent 1: CHOPES items Item Behavior Score Definition Cry no cry 1 Child is not crying moaning 2 Child is moaning or quickly crying 2 Child is crying but the cry is gentle or whimpering scream 3 Child is in a full-lunged cry; sobbing may be scored with complaint or without complaint: Facial composed 1 Neutral facial expression grimace 2 Score only if definite negative facial expression smiling 0 Score only if definite negative facial expression Child verbal none 1 Child is not talking. other complains 1 Child complains but not about pain, e.g., I want to see my mommy," or "I am Thirsty " pain complaints 2 Child complains about pain both complaints 2 Child complains about pain and about other things, e.g., "It hurts; I want mommy" positive 0 Child makes any positive statement or talks about other things without complaint. Torso neutral 1 Body (not limbs) is at rest; torso is inactive. shifting 2 Body is in motion in a shining or serpentine tense 2 Body is arched or rigid. shivering 2 Body is shuddering or shaking involuntarily. upright 2 Child is in vertical or upright position. restrained 2 Body is restrained. Touch not touching 1 Child is not touching or grabbing at wound reach 2 Child is reaching for but not touching wound. touch 2 Child is gently touching wound or wound area. grab 2 Child is grubbing vigorously at wound. restrained 2 Child's arms are restrained. Legs neutral 1 Legs may be in any position but are relaxed included gentle swimming or serpentine- like movements. Squirming\ kicking\ drawn up 2 Definitive uneasy or restless movements in the legs and/or striking out with foot or feet.
tense 2 Legs tensed and/or pulled up tightly to body and kept there standing 2 Standing. crouching. or kneeling restrained 2 Child's legs are being held down.
- Conditions
- Tachycardia
- Being tested
- mandibular block with Epinephrine, C-CLAD-IL with Epinephrine, Infiltration with Epinephrine, Mandibular block without Epinephrine, C-CLAD-IL without Epinephrine
- Medical subject headings
- Tachycardia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
mandibular block with EpinephrineProcedure or surgery
Delivery of mandibular block anesthesia for dental treatment with Lidocaine HCl 2% with 1:100,000 Epineprine
C-CLAD-IL with EpinephrineProcedure or surgery
Delivery of C-CLAD-ILanesthesia for dental treatment with Lidocaine HCl 2% with 1:100,000 Epineprine
Infiltration with EpinephrineProcedure or surgery
Delivery of infiltration anesthesia for dental treatment with Lidocaine HCl 2% with 1:100,000 Epineprine
Mandibular block without EpinephrineProcedure or surgery
Delivery of mandibular block anesthesia for dental treatment with Mepivacaine 3% without Epineprine
C-CLAD-IL without EpinephrineProcedure or surgery
Delivery of C-CLAD-ILanesthesia for dental treatment with Mepivacaine 3% without Epineprine
nfiltration without EpinephrineProcedure or surgery
Delivery of infiltration anesthesia for dental treatment with Mepivacaine 3% without Epineprine
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Mandibular block with Epinephrine | Lidocaine 2% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine Receives: Procedure: mandibular block with Epinephrine | |
| C-CLAD-IL with Epinephrine | Lidocaine 2% and 1:100,000 Epinephrine Receives: Procedure: C-CLAD-IL with Epinephrine | |
| Infiltration with Epinephrine | Lidocaine 2% and 1:100,000 Epinephrine Receives: Procedure: Infiltration with Epinephrine | |
| Mandibular block without Epinephrine | Mepivacain HCl 3% without Epinephrine Receives: Procedure: Mandibular block without Epinephrine | |
| Infiltration without Epinephrine | Mepivacain 3% without Epinephrine Receives: Procedure: nfiltration without Epinephrine | |
| CCLAD-IL without Epinephrine | Mepivacain HCl 3% without Epinephrine Receives: Procedure: C-CLAD-IL without Epinephrine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pulse rate alteration (1-90 beates)
increase pulse rate above 50% of the baseline rate, or when the pulse will reach 150 beats/minute the injection will be stopped immediately.
Measured: 10 minutes, during entire delivery of local anesthesia
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2015
- Primary completionDec 2015 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2016 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for TachycardiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tel Aviv University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sheba Medical Center, Private practice, Dr. Malka Ashkenazi
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mickey Scheinowitz, PhD, Tel Aviv University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02328729
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 9995-12
- Status last verified
- Dec 2014
- First submitted
- 25 Dec 2014
- Last updated
- 31 Dec 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Dec 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Incident and Extent of Pulse Alteration During Administration of Various Modes of Local Anesthesia in Children During Routine Dental Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02328729
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 9995-12
- Conditions
- Tachycardia
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Tel Aviv UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sheba Medical Center, Private practice, Dr. Malka Ashkenazi
- Study start
- Jan 2015
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2016 (estimated)
- First posted
- 31 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Incident and extent of pulse alteration during administration of various modes of local anesthesia in children during routine dental treatment. Our aims are: (1) To estimate the percent of patients who receive mandibular block , C-CLAD-IL or infiltration injections and show increase in their pulse rate during the delivery of anesthesia (in spite of negative aspiration) as result of infiltration of adrenalin into their blood vessels. (2) To estimate the extent of pulse rate alteration in correlation with the velocity or volume of local anesthesia injected. (3) To examine the correlation between increase in the pulse rate and effectiveness of anesthesia. (4) To examine the correlation between the needle gauge (27 \& 30) and increase in pulse rate during mandibular block injection in spite of negative aspiration. We will recruit children that undergo routine dental treatment under local anesthesia (such as mandibular block, infiltration or C-CLAD-IL). Patients will be connected, immediately before and during the entire delivery of the local anesthetic, to pulse-oximeter that will be connected to a computer and continuously monitor pulse rate and saturation during the delivery of local anesthesia. Each aberrant event which may occur during alteration of the pulse rate such as gag reflex, coughing, or pain related disruptive behavior will be documented on the computer in real time by another person that is not the treating dentist. All types of local anesthesia delivery will be performed by the computerized-controlled local anesthesia delivery system - Single-Tooth-Anesthesia which connected to a computer and documents continuously the amount and velocity of the local anesthetic delivered to the patient. All injections will be performed by using a 29 gauge needle, except when children will be treated under general anesthesia, the injection will be performed also by 27 gauge needle. In case the pulse rate will increase to 150% of the baseline rate, or when the pulse will reach 150 beats/minute the injection will be stopped immediately. The continuation of the local anesthetic delivery will be continued in different location and only after the return of the pulse to its basic rate. A total of 100 patients will receive local anesthetic containing 1:100,000 adrenalin and 50 patients without adrenaline. Three modes of local anesthesia will be evaluated: C-CLAD-IL, infiltration and mandibular block= a total of 300 patients.
Detailed description
Parents to children (healthy and with systemic disease ) who need local anesthesia (such as mandibular block, infiltration or C-CLAD-IL) for routine dental treatment will be asked to sign an informed consent form to participate in the study. The parents will receive explanation that the aim of the study is to evaluate the alteration of the pulse rate during delivery of different modes of local anesthetic delivery (an indirect sign for penetration of local anesthetic solution into the blood vessels). All patients will be connected, immediately before and during the entire delivery of the local anesthetic, to pulse oximeter ( pulse oximeter ,Boston, USA Nellcor N550) . The probe will be attached to the patient's finger or big toe according to patient's age. The pulse oximeter will be connected to a computer that will document continuously the pulse rate and saturation during the delivery of local anesthesia. Each aberrant event which may occur during alteration of the pulse rate such as gag reflex, coughing, or pain related disruptive behavior (crying, grimace, body movements or verbal complains-CHEOPS, attachment 1) will be documented on the computer in real time by another person that is not the treating dentist. This documentation is feasible due to a new program that was developed especially for this study. All types of local anesthesia delivery will be performed by the computerized controlled local anesthesia delivery system - Single-Tooth-Anesthesia (C-CLAD, STA, Milestone Scientific, Inc. Deerfield, IL, USA) which connected to a computer and documents continuously the amount and velocity of the local anesthetic delivered to the patient. This program was kindly provided and developed by Dr. Mark Hochman from USA, as part of the collaboration in the present study.
The local anesthesia will be performed by using Lidocaine 2% and Epinephrine 1:100,000, or Mepivacain HCl 3% without any vasoconstrictors as necessary. The use of local anesthetic without vasoconstrictor will serve as control for elevations of pulse rate which not resulted from penetration of adrenalin into the blood vessels.
When injecting mandibular block or infiltration, aspiration will be performed immediately before injecting the solution. In case a positive aspiration, the finding will be marked; the location of the needle will be changed until a negative aspiration will be received.
All injections will be performed by using a 29 gauge needle, except when children will be treated under general anesthesia, the injection will be performed also by 27 gauge needle.
In case the pulse rate will increase to 150% of the baseline rate, or when the pulse will reach 150 beats per minute the injection will be stopped immediately. The continuation of the local anesthetic delivery will be continued in different location and only after the return of the pulse to its basic rate.
When performing mandibular block injection, the lingual and buccal nerves will be anesthetized as well. The total injected volume during mandibular block delivery will be 1.8 ml. In case full anesthesia is not achieved (after waiting 5 minutes) additional injection will be performed. In any case the amount of local anesthetic injected will not exceed the amount of 4.4 mg/kg body weight.
When a participating child will be scheduled to two consecutive appointments for similar treatments, the child will receive in one appointment local anesthesia without adrenalin and in the other with adrenalin or vice versa.
Anesthesia effectiveness. The dentist will assess the effectiveness of anesthesia through the presence or absence (non-contiguous) of pain-disruptive behavior during treatment as described by Oulis et al. (6). Each single sign of discomfort (even mild) was rated as a positive presence of pain. Signs of discomfort included visual or acoustic changes, such as hand or body tension or movements, eye movements, verbal complaints, or tears. Anesthesia will be rated adequate only when the child will be completely relaxed during treatment.
Each patient will have a computerized file in which his details will be filled The name of the treating dentist Name of the patient Systemic disease Type of management: behavior management, nitrous oxide, sedation , general anesthesia Type of local anesthesia Number of tooth Type of local anesthetic solution: Lidocaine 2% and 1:100,000 Epinephrine, Mepivacaine HCl 3% without Epinephrine Gauge of the needle 30 gauge or 27 gauge Side of injection Number of positive aspiration Number of negative aspirations Type of treatment provided Effective of local anesthesia during treatment Basic pulse rate before injection Maximum pulse during injection The reason for the increasing pulse rate: gag reflex, coughing, pain, bitter test, nothing
All details will be completed before during or immediately after completing the injection.
Number of patients 100 patients for each mode of anesthesia 50 patients will receive local anesthetic containing 1:100,000 Epinephrine and 50 patients without Epinephrine Three modes of local anesthesia will be evaluated: C-CLAD-IL, infiltration and mandibular block= 300 patients Each patient will participate maximum twice in each mode of anesthesia ( once will receive local anesthetic containing 1:100,000 Epinephrine and 50 patients without Epinephrine). The type of local anesthesia solution will be selected by the dentist according to the patient's need and will not be affected by the study. Children who do not fully cooperate during treatment will be excluded from the present study.
Attachent 1: CHOPES items Item Behavior Score Definition Cry no cry 1 Child is not crying moaning 2 Child is moaning or quickly crying 2 Child is crying but the cry is gentle or whimpering scream 3 Child is in a full-lunged cry; sobbing may be scored with complaint or without complaint: Facial composed 1 Neutral facial expression grimace 2 Score only if definite negative facial expression smiling 0 Score only if definite negative facial expression Child verbal none 1 Child is not talking. other complains 1 Child complains but not about pain, e.g., I want to see my mommy," or "I am Thirsty " pain complaints 2 Child complains about pain both complaints 2 Child complains about pain and about other things, e.g., "It hurts; I want mommy" positive 0 Child makes any positive statement or talks about other things without complaint. Torso neutral 1 Body (not limbs) is at rest; torso is inactive. shifting 2 Body is in motion in a shining or serpentine tense 2 Body is arched or rigid. shivering 2 Body is shuddering or shaking involuntarily. upright 2 Child is in vertical or upright position. restrained 2 Body is restrained. Touch not touching 1 Child is not touching or grabbing at wound reach 2 Child is reaching for but not touching wound. touch 2 Child is gently touching wound or wound area. grab 2 Child is grubbing vigorously at wound. restrained 2 Child's arms are restrained. Legs neutral 1 Legs may be in any position but are relaxed included gentle swimming or serpentine- like movements. Squirming\ kicking\ drawn up 2 Definitive uneasy or restless movements in the legs and/or striking out with foot or feet.
tense 2 Legs tensed and/or pulled up tightly to body and kept there standing 2 Standing. crouching. or kneeling restrained 2 Child's legs are being held down.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 6
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Mandibular block with Epinephrine | – | Procedure: mandibular block with EpinephrineLidocaine 2% with 1:100,000 Epinephrine |
| C-CLAD-IL with Epinephrine | – | Procedure: C-CLAD-IL with EpinephrineLidocaine 2% and 1:100,000 Epinephrine |
| Infiltration with Epinephrine | – | Procedure: Infiltration with EpinephrineLidocaine 2% and 1:100,000 Epinephrine |
| Mandibular block without Epinephrine | – | Procedure: Mandibular block without EpinephrineMepivacain HCl 3% without Epinephrine |
| Infiltration without Epinephrine | – | Procedure: nfiltration without EpinephrineMepivacain 3% without Epinephrine |
| CCLAD-IL without Epinephrine | – | Procedure: C-CLAD-IL without EpinephrineMepivacain HCl 3% without Epinephrine |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
- Study population
- Children undergo routine dental treatment that require local anesthetic.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All children that their parents signed the inform consent form and the children allow to put the pulse oximeter sensor on their finger/ear.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Children that does not allow to put the pulse oximeter sensor on their finger/ear.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| mandibular block with EpinephrineDelivery of mandibular block anesthesia for dental treatment with Lidocaine HCl 2% with 1:100,000 Epineprine | Procedure or surgery | Mandibular block with Epinephrine |
| C-CLAD-IL with EpinephrineDelivery of C-CLAD-ILanesthesia for dental treatment with Lidocaine HCl 2% with 1:100,000 Epineprine | Procedure or surgery | C-CLAD-IL with Epinephrine |
| Infiltration with EpinephrineDelivery of infiltration anesthesia for dental treatment with Lidocaine HCl 2% with 1:100,000 Epineprine | Procedure or surgery | Infiltration with Epinephrine |
| Mandibular block without EpinephrineDelivery of mandibular block anesthesia for dental treatment with Mepivacaine 3% without Epineprine | Procedure or surgery | Mandibular block without Epinephrine |
| C-CLAD-IL without EpinephrineDelivery of C-CLAD-ILanesthesia for dental treatment with Mepivacaine 3% without Epineprine | Procedure or surgery | CCLAD-IL without Epinephrine |
| nfiltration without EpinephrineDelivery of infiltration anesthesia for dental treatment with Mepivacaine 3% without Epineprine | Procedure or surgery | Infiltration without Epinephrine |
Primary outcome
Pulse rate alteration (1-90 beates)
Time frame: 10 minutes, during entire delivery of local anesthesia
increase pulse rate above 50% of the baseline rate, or when the pulse will reach 150 beats/minute the injection will be stopped immediately.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Dec 2014.
Related trials for Tachycardia
Enrolling by invitation
VINTAGE (Ventricular Intramyocardial Navigation for Tachycardia Ablation Guided by Electrograms) Using Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Catheters
Ventricular Arrhythmia
Active, not recruiting
Assessment of Combined CCM and ICD Device in HFrEF
Heart Failure, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Active, not recruiting
Effects of Whole-body Electrical Muscle Stimulation Exercise on Adults With Neuromuscular Disease
Neuromuscular Diseases (NMD), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Active, not recruiting
HEAL-IST IDE Trial
Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia
Recruiting
A Study Assessing Arrhythmia Mapping With a Multi-Electrode Mapping Catheter
Scar-related Atrial Tachycardia, Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Tachycardia, run by Tel Aviv University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Dec 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Meir Rakocz, DDM (97235302850, meir.rakocz@sheba.health.gov.il), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pulse rate alteration (1-90 beates) (time frame: 10 minutes, during entire delivery of local anesthesia). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Dec 2014.