AzTrials
AzTrials

BlepharospasmNCT02327728

Comparison of Different Botulinum Toxin A Injection Patterns in the Treatment of Blepharospasm

A study testing Botulinum toxin A injection (5 sites: 12.5U), Botulinum toxin A injection (4 sites: 10U) and Botulinum toxin A 12.5U in people with Blepharospasm, run by YangHui at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate the efficacy of different botulinum toxin A injection patterns in treating benign essential blepharospasm and to compare their influence on condition of eye surface . Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Blepharospasm
What is being tested?
Botulinum toxin A injection (5 sites: 12.5U), Botulinum toxin A injection (4 sites: 10U) and Botulinum toxin A 12.5U
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Feb 2013to Dec 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • had a confirmed diagnosis of bilateral BEB
  • a minimum of 24-week period since the last injection was required for all patients who had previously received multiple injections of BoNT-A.

Who cannot join

  • blepharospasm of known etiology (caused by medication, injury, etc.)
  • history of surgical intervention for BEB (myectomy or neurectomy)
  • current ophthalmologic infection
  • apraxia of eyelid opening associated with levator palpebrae dysfunction

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Hui Yang, MD, PhD contact

+86 13710584767

yanghui9@hotmail.com

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, SunYat-senU

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060

    Hui Yang, MD, PhD, +86 13710584767, yanghui9@hotmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

To evaluate the efficacy of different botulinum toxin A injection patterns in treating benign essential blepharospasm and to compare their influence on condition of eye surface .

Read the detailed description

The authors performed a prospective double-blinded randomised clinical trial of 60 patients with an established diagnosis of benign essential blepharospasm from February 2013 to December 2015. Patients received a full injection pattern of 5 sites on one eye and a medial lower eyelid waived injection pattern of 4 sites on the other eye randomly. They were surveyed on ocular surface disease index (OSDI), Jankovic rating scale (JRS), blepharospasm disability index (BSDI) prior to injection and 1week, 1month and 3 months after injection. At these time points, closure of the eyelid, tear break up time (BUT), Schirmer test I, and lower lid tear meniscus height (TMH) were also measured.

Conditions
Blepharospasm
Being tested
Botulinum toxin A injection (5 sites: 12.5U), Botulinum toxin A injection (4 sites: 10U), Botulinum toxin A 12.5U, Botulinum toxin A 10U
Keywords
blepharospasm, botulinum A, injection pattern, tear
Medical subject headings
Blepharospasm, Lacerations

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Botulinum toxin A injection (5 sites: 12.5U)Procedure or surgery

  • Botulinum toxin A injection (4 sites: 10U)Procedure or surgery

  • Botulinum toxin A 12.5UDrug

  • Botulinum toxin A 10UDrug

Study groups in NCT02327728
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
medial lower eyelid waivedExperimentalBotulinum toxin A 10U per eye subcutaneous injection at orbicularis oculi
Receives: Procedure: Botulinum toxin A injection (4 sites: 10U); Drug: Botulinum toxin A 10U
full injection patternActive comparatorBotulinum toxin A 12.5U per eye subcutaneous injection at orbicularis oculi
Receives: Procedure: Botulinum toxin A injection (5 sites: 12.5U); Drug: Botulinum toxin A 12.5U

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Changes of Jankovic rating scale (JRS) from baseline at 1week, 1month and 3 months

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Changes of lower lid tear meniscus height (TMH) from baseline at 1week, 1month and 3 months

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Changes of blepharospasm disability index (BSDI) from baseline at 1week, 1month and 3 months

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Changes of ocular surface disease index (OSDI) from baseline at 1week, 1month and 3 months

    Measured: 3 months

  3. Changes of tear break up time (BUT) from baseline at 1week, 1month and 3 months

    Measured: 3 months

  4. Changes of closure of the eyelid from baseline at 1week, 1month and 3 months

    Measured: 3 months

  5. Changes of Schirmer test I from baseline at 1week, 1month and 3 months

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Dec 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2013
  3. Primary completionDec 2015 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2015 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02327728
Sponsor's protocol ID
ZOC00173
Status last verified
Dec 2014
First submitted
18 Dec 2014
Last updated
30 Dec 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Yang H, Lu J, Zhao X, Ding X, Wang Z, Cai X, Luo Y, Lu L. Comparison of Two Botulinum Neurotoxin A Injection Patterns with or without the Medial Lower Eyelid in the Treatment of Blepharospasm. J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:5957812. doi: 10.1155/2016/5957812. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

    PubMed 26885381

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Botulinum toxin A injection (5 sites: 12.5U), Botulinum toxin A injection (4 sites: 10U) and Botulinum toxin A 12.5U in people with Blepharospasm, run by YangHui at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Dec 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Hui Yang, MD, PhD (+86 13710584767, yanghui9@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Changes of Jankovic rating scale (JRS) from baseline at 1week, 1month and 3 months (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02327728, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Dec 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in