NeoplasmsNCT02324452
Safety, Feasibility and Cost-effectiveness of Genotype-directed Individualized Dosing of Fluoropyrimidines
A study testing Fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil) in people with Neoplasms, run by The Netherlands Cancer Institute at 17 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
In this study it will be determined whether the rate of severe toxicity associated with fluoropyrimidine treatment (capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil) can be significantly diminished by individualized dosing of fluoropyrimidines based on upfront genotypic assessment of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- Fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,103 participants
- Where
- 17 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- Mar 2015to Mar 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Pathologically confirmed malignancy for which treatment with a fluoropyrimidine is considered to be in the patient's best interest
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Able and willing to give written informed consent
- WHO performance status of 0, 1 or 2
- Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks
- Able to swallow and retain oral medication
Show all 12Show fewer
- Able and willing to undergo blood sampling for pharmacogenetic and phenotyping analysis
- Minimal acceptable safety laboratory values (ANC, platelet count, hepatic function, renal function)
- Additional inclusion criteria for patients in subgroup of study:
- Able and willing to undergo blood sampling and breath sampling at several time points
- Able and willing to receive uracil for the test dose assay
- Able and willing to receive [2-13C] -labeled uracil for the breath test
Who cannot join
- Prior treatment with fluoropyrimidines
- Patients with known substance abuse, psychotic disorders, and/or other diseases expected to interfere with study or the patient's safety
- Women who are pregnant or breast feeding
- Both men and women who refuse to use reliable contraceptive methods throughout the study (adequate contraceptive methods are: condom, sterilization, other barrier contraceptive measures preferably in combination with condoms)
- Patients with a homozygous polymorphic genotype or compound heterozygous genotype for DPYD
Trial locations and contacts
17 sites in 1 country.
17 sites in 1 country
Netherlands17 sites
Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
Amsterdam
Wilhelmina Hospital Assen
Assen
Amphia Hospital
Breda
Reinier de Graaf Hospital
Delft
Deventer Hospital
Deventer
Hospital Gelderse Vallei
Ede
Catharina Hospital
Eindhoven
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden
Maastricht University Medical Center
Maastricht
Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital
Nijmegen
Laurentius Hospital
Roermond
Bravis Hospital
Roosendaal
Erasmus MC
Rotterdam
Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland
Rotterdam
Haga Hospital
The Hague
Medical Center Haaglanden
The Hague
University Medical Center Utrecht
Utrecht
About this study
In this study it will be determined whether the rate of severe toxicity associated with fluoropyrimidine treatment (capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil) can be significantly diminished by individualized dosing of fluoropyrimidines based on upfront genotypic assessment of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency.
In addition to the genotyping, the DPD phenotype of all patients will be determined by measuring the baseline dihydrouracil/uracil (DHU/U) ratio, in order to investigate whether phenotype-guided treatment can further improve patient safety. In a subgroup of patients, other phenotyping methods will be tested: measuring the plasma levels of uracil after a uracil test dose and a uracil breath test after a dose of [2-13C] -labeled uracil. To validate these tests, these phenotyping results will be compared with the results of a DPD activity assay (which measures DPD enzyme activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells), which is considered the gold standard in measuring DPD phenotype.
- Conditions
- Neoplasms
- Being tested
- Fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil)
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil)Drug
Also called Xeloda, Capecitabine, 5-fluorouracil, fluorouracil
Patient that are a heterozygous carrier of a DPYD variant will receive a reduced dosage of capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil (25-50% reduction, depending on which SNP is identified). The dose will be titrated in subsequent cycles, to achieve maximal safe exposure. Patients that are wild type (not carrying any of the for DPYD variants) will receive a normal (full) dose.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| heterozygous carrier of DPYD variant | Experimental | Patients screened for four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in DPYD (DPYD*2A, c.2846A>T, c.1236G>A/HapB3 and DPYD*13) that are found to be heterozygous for one of these SNPs Receives: Drug: Fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil) |
| wild type for DPYD | Experimental | Patients screened for four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in DPYD (DPYD*2A, c.2846A>T, c.1236G>A/HapB3 and DPYD*13) that are found to be wild type for these SNPs Receives: Drug: Fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Safety: incidence of severe treatment-related toxicity (CTC grade 3 to 5)
The incidence of severe treatment-related toxicity (CTC grade 3 to 5) in patients carrying DPYD variants compared to wild type patients and compared to a historical cohort of DPYD heterozygous patients treated with a full dose of fluoropyrimidines
Measured: patients will be followed during fluoropyrimidine treatment, expected average of 1 year
Secondary outcomes (3)
Cost-effectiveness: medical costs that are made during fluoropyrimidine treatment seen from a health care perspective
Costs in the group where dose individualization of fluoropyrimidines based on upfront genotyping is performed is compared to a historic cohort without dose individualization. Costs include costs for genotyping, fluoropyrimidine drug therapy and costs related to adverse events.
Measured: patients will be followed during fluoropyrimidine treatment, expected average of 1 year
DPD phenotype, defined as deficient or not deficient
Several phenotyping tests that assess DPD enzyme activity will be compared and clinical sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of each test will be determined
Measured: Prior to start of fluoropyrimidine treatment of the patient (pre dose)
Assessment of pharmacokinetics: Such profile parameters will include Cmax, Tmax, AUC and elimination half-life
In patients with heterozygous DPYD mutations the plasma levels of capecitabine, 5-FU and metabolites will be determined to assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile in these patients given reduced doses of capecitabine and 5-FU
Measured: At first week of start of fluoropyrimidine treatment of the patient
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2015
- Primary completionJan 2018
- Study completionMar 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The Netherlands Cancer InstituteThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,103 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- JHM Schellens, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, The Netherlands Cancer Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02324452
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- M14DPD
- Other IDs
- 2014-005064-15, 2014
- Status last verified
- May 2018
- First submitted
- 9 Dec 2014
- Last updated
- 11 May 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Knikman JE, Lopez-Yurda M, Meulendijks D, Deenen MJ, Schellens JHM, Beijnen J, Cats A, Guchelaar HJ. A Nomogram to Predict Severe Toxicity in DPYD Wild-Type Patients Treated With Capecitabine-Based Anticancer Regimens. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Feb;115(2):269-277. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3100. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
PubMed 37957132Knikman JE, Wilting TA, Lopez-Yurda M, Henricks LM, Lunenburg CATC, de Man FM, Meulendijks D, Nieboer P, Droogendijk HJ, Creemers GJ, Mandigers CMPW, Imholz ALT, Mathijssen RHJ, Portielje JEA, Valkenburg-van Iersel L, Vulink A, van der Poel MHW, Baars A, Swen JJ, Gelderblom H, Schellens JHM, Beijnen JH, Guchelaar HJ, Cats A. Survival of Patients With Cancer With DPYD Variant Alleles and Dose-Individualized Fluoropyrimidine Therapy-A Matched-Pair Analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Dec 10;41(35):5411-5421. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02780. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
PubMed 37639651Henricks LM, Lunenburg CATC, de Man FM, Meulendijks D, Frederix GWJ, Kienhuis E, Creemers GJ, Baars A, Dezentje VO, Imholz ALT, Jeurissen FJF, Portielje JEA, Jansen RLH, Hamberg P, Ten Tije AJ, Droogendijk HJ, Koopman M, Nieboer P, van de Poel MHW, Mandigers CMPW, Rosing H, Beijnen JH, Werkhoven EV, van Kuilenburg ABP, van Schaik RHN, Mathijssen RHJ, Swen JJ, Gelderblom H, Cats A, Guchelaar HJ, Schellens JHM. DPYD genotype-guided dose individualisation of fluoropyrimidine therapy in patients with cancer: a prospective safety analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Nov;19(11):1459-1467. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30686-7. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
PubMed 30348537Jacobs BA, Deenen MJ, Pluim D, van Hasselt JG, Krahenbuhl MD, van Geel RM, de Vries N, Rosing H, Meulendijks D, Burylo AM, Cats A, Beijnen JH, Huitema AD, Schellens JH. Pronounced between-subject and circadian variability in thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase enzyme activity in human volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Sep;82(3):706-16. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13007. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
PubMed 27161955
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 May 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Safety, Feasibility and Cost-effectiveness of Genotype-directed Individualized Dosing of Fluoropyrimidines
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02324452
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- M14DPD
- Conditions
- Neoplasms
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,103 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Netherlands Cancer InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2015
- Primary completion
- Jan 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In this study it will be determined whether the rate of severe toxicity associated with fluoropyrimidine treatment (capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil) can be significantly diminished by individualized dosing of fluoropyrimidines based on upfront genotypic assessment of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency.
In addition to the genotyping, the DPD phenotype of all patients will be determined by measuring the baseline dihydrouracil/uracil (DHU/U) ratio, in order to investigate whether phenotype-guided treatment can further improve patient safety. In a subgroup of patients, other phenotyping methods will be tested: measuring the plasma levels of uracil after a uracil test dose and a uracil breath test after a dose of [2-13C] -labeled uracil. To validate these tests, these phenotyping results will be compared with the results of a DPD activity assay (which measures DPD enzyme activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells), which is considered the gold standard in measuring DPD phenotype.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| heterozygous carrier of DPYD variant | Experimental | Drug: Fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil)Patients screened for four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in DPYD (DPYD*2A, c.2846A>T, c.1236G>A/HapB3 and DPYD*13) that are found to be heterozygous for one of these SNPs |
| wild type for DPYD | Experimental | Drug: Fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil)Patients screened for four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in DPYD (DPYD*2A, c.2846A>T, c.1236G>A/HapB3 and DPYD*13) that are found to be wild type for these SNPs |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Pathologically confirmed malignancy for which treatment with a fluoropyrimidine is considered to be in the patient's best interest
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Able and willing to give written informed consent
- WHO performance status of 0, 1 or 2
- Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Prior treatment with fluoropyrimidines
- Patients with known substance abuse, psychotic disorders, and/or other diseases expected to interfere with study or the patient's safety
- Women who are pregnant or breast feeding
- Both men and women who refuse to use reliable contraceptive methods throughout the study (adequate contraceptive methods are: condom, sterilization, other barrier contraceptive measures preferably in combination with condoms)
- Patients with a homozygous polymorphic genotype or compound heterozygous genotype for DPYD
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil)Also: Xeloda, Capecitabine, 5-fluorouracil, fluorouracilPatient that are a heterozygous carrier of a DPYD variant will receive a reduced dosage of capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil (25-50% reduction, depending on which SNP is identified). The dose will be titrated in subsequent cycles, to achieve maximal safe exposure. Patients that are wild type (not carrying any of the for DPYD variants) will receive a normal (full) dose. | Drug | heterozygous carrier of DPYD variant, wild type for DPYD |
Primary outcome
Safety: incidence of severe treatment-related toxicity (CTC grade 3 to 5)
Time frame: patients will be followed during fluoropyrimidine treatment, expected average of 1 year
The incidence of severe treatment-related toxicity (CTC grade 3 to 5) in patients carrying DPYD variants compared to wild type patients and compared to a historical cohort of DPYD heterozygous patients treated with a full dose of fluoropyrimidines
3 secondary outcomes
Cost-effectiveness: medical costs that are made during fluoropyrimidine treatment seen from a health care perspective
Time frame: patients will be followed during fluoropyrimidine treatment, expected average of 1 year
DPD phenotype, defined as deficient or not deficient
Time frame: Prior to start of fluoropyrimidine treatment of the patient (pre dose)
Assessment of pharmacokinetics: Such profile parameters will include Cmax, Tmax, AUC and elimination half-life
Time frame: At first week of start of fluoropyrimidine treatment of the patient
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 May 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37957132Knikman JE, Lopez-Yurda M, Meulendijks D, Deenen MJ, Schellens JHM, Beijnen J, Cats A, Guchelaar HJ. A Nomogram to Predict Severe Toxicity in DPYD Wild-Type Patients Treated With Capecitabine-Based Anticancer Regimens. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Feb;115(2):269-277. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3100. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37639651Knikman JE, Wilting TA, Lopez-Yurda M, Henricks LM, Lunenburg CATC, de Man FM, Meulendijks D, Nieboer P, Droogendijk HJ, Creemers GJ, Mandigers CMPW, Imholz ALT, Mathijssen RHJ, Portielje JEA, Valkenburg-van Iersel L, Vulink A, van der Poel MHW, Baars A, Swen JJ, Gelderblom H, Schellens JHM, Beijnen JH, Guchelaar HJ, Cats A. Survival of Patients With Cancer With DPYD Variant Alleles and Dose-Individualized Fluoropyrimidine Therapy-A Matched-Pair Analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Dec 10;41(35):5411-5421. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02780. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30348537Henricks LM, Lunenburg CATC, de Man FM, Meulendijks D, Frederix GWJ, Kienhuis E, Creemers GJ, Baars A, Dezentje VO, Imholz ALT, Jeurissen FJF, Portielje JEA, Jansen RLH, Hamberg P, Ten Tije AJ, Droogendijk HJ, Koopman M, Nieboer P, van de Poel MHW, Mandigers CMPW, Rosing H, Beijnen JH, Werkhoven EV, van Kuilenburg ABP, van Schaik RHN, Mathijssen RHJ, Swen JJ, Gelderblom H, Cats A, Guchelaar HJ, Schellens JHM. DPYD genotype-guided dose individualisation of fluoropyrimidine therapy in patients with cancer: a prospective safety analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Nov;19(11):1459-1467. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30686-7. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27161955Jacobs BA, Deenen MJ, Pluim D, van Hasselt JG, Krahenbuhl MD, van Geel RM, de Vries N, Rosing H, Meulendijks D, Burylo AM, Cats A, Beijnen JH, Huitema AD, Schellens JH. Pronounced between-subject and circadian variability in thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase enzyme activity in human volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Sep;82(3):706-16. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13007. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
Related trials for Neoplasms
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
JHM Schellens, MD, PhD principal investigator
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
17 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil) in people with Neoplasms, run by The Netherlands Cancer Institute at 17 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 17 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Safety: incidence of severe treatment-related toxicity (CTC grade 3 to 5) (time frame: patients will be followed during fluoropyrimidine treatment, expected average of 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02324452, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2018.