Pregnant WomenNCT02323711
Dressing Versus Glue (2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate) for Coverage of the Skin Incision After Closure During Cesarean Delivery
A study testing 2-octyl cyanoacrylate in people with Pregnant Women and Cesarean Section, run by Danbury Hospital.
Trial summary
This study is investigating the relative risks and benefits of using two common materials for coverage of the skin incision at cesarean delivery. We will perform the first prospective and the first randomized controlled trial examining the use of a standard postoperative dressing versus skin glue for coverage of the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pregnant Women, Cesarean Section
- What is being tested?
- 2-octyl cyanoacrylate
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2015to Mar 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Pregnant women admitted to Labor and Delivery for scheduled cesarean section, for labor, or for induction of labor
- Age >/= 18 years
- All gestational ages
- All numbers of gestations
- All fetal presentations
- All maternal and fetal medical or surgical comorbidities are included except as listed in the exclusion criteria
Who cannot join
- Patient is under 18 years of age.
- Intrauterine fetal death, excluded simply for social reasons concerning consenting the patient for the study during upsetting circumstances.
- Patient is NOT fluent in English, Spanish, or Portuguese.
- Urgent or emergent cesarean delivery for fetal distress that develops before the patient is approached for consent
- Patient incompetent to provide independent informed consent.
- Patient has a known allergy to Glue, Tape, Cyanoacrylate, and/or Formaldehyde.
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Dressing Versus Glue (2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate) for Coverage of the Skin Incision After Closure During Cesarean Delivery
This study is investigating the relative risks and benefits of using two common materials for coverage of the skin incision at cesarean delivery. We will perform the first prospective and the first randomized controlled trial examining the use of a standard postoperative dressing versus skin glue for coverage of the closed skin incision after cesarean delivery. The hypothesis is that using skin glue for coverage of the incision will be associated with decreased wound complications and increased patient satisfaction.
Read the detailed description
Given the plethora of literature regarding technical aspects of performing cesarean delivery, and given the large number of procedures performed each year and available for prospective trials (approximately 700 cesarean deliveries per year at Danbury Hospital), only quality level I evidence is broadly considered influential in this area of research. Therefore we propose a RCT for incision coverage with dressing versus glue at cesarean delivery.
On admission to L\&D for schedule cesarean section, or on admission to L\&D for labor, patients will be asked to participate by a Trial Coordinator or the admitting Obstetrics and Gynecology resident physician. Patients admitted for labor will be asked to participate given the possibility that they may ultimately require cesarean delivery, and because using only patients admitted for scheduled cesarean delivery would eliminate urgent and emergent cesarean deliveries from the trial, and therefore decrease the generalizability of the trial results to general obstetrics practice.
When consented and the patient undergoes cesarean delivery, the patient's surgeon will decide if skin closure will be performed by placement of staples or suture. The circulating nurse in the OR will open one of a set of sequentially numbered, opaque sealed envelopes (SNOSE) to indicate the patient's allocation for coverage of the incision with a dressing or glue. The circulating nurse will then tell the surgeon to which group the patient has been allocated.
Before closure of the incision, care is taken to ensure hemostasis of the subcutaneous tissues and skin edges. If the subcutaneous tissues are > 2 cm thick, this tissue layer should be approximated before closure of the skin as is currently a level I evidence-based recommendation based on multiple RCTs and promoted by current clinical guidelines. Choice of suture material and needle for the running subcuticular closure, or use of staples for closure, are per the surgeon's preference.
If allocated to coverage with dressing, the standard dressing will be applied by a member of the surgical team in the standard fashion as follows: The closed incision will be covered first with a primary dressing consisting of a nonadherent, composite dressing (Telfa), which is covered with a secondary dressing consisting of an Army Battle Dressing (ABD), before removal of the sterile surgical drapes. This dressing is then held in place with an adhesive fabric tape, currently Mefix tape, which is typically applied by the surgical scrub tech.
If allocated to coverage with glue, no dressing is placed. After closure of the incision with suture or staples, the incision is patted dry under sterile conditions. The incision is then covered longitudinally by a member of the surgical team with a thick layer of skin glue dispensed from 1 tube of surgical skin glue (2-octyl cyanoacrylate, currently using brand: Derma+Flex QS). The glue is then allowed to dry before the sterile surgical drapes are removed.
Staples placed for incision closure are routinely removed on the day of discharge. Sutures placed for skin closure are absorbable and are therefore not removed.
- Conditions
- Pregnant Women, Cesarean Section
- Being tested
- 2-octyl cyanoacrylate
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
2-octyl cyanoacrylateDevice
Also called Derma+flex QS
If the subject is allocated to the experimental group, they would receive 2-octyl cyanoacrylate in place of a primary dressing consisting of their non-adherent composite dressing (Tefla) and a secondary dressing of Army Battle Dressing (ABD).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | This group would be receiving the standard of care. The subject would receive the standard dressing applied by a member of the surgical team in the standard fashion as follows: The closed incision will be covered first with a primary dressing consisting of a nonadherent, composite dressing (Telfa), which is covered with a secondary dressing consisting of an Army Battle Dressing (ABD), before removal of the sterile surgical drapes. This dressing is then held in place with an adhesive fabric tape, currently Mefix tape, which is typically applied by the surgical scrub tech. |
| 2-octyl cyanoacrylate | Experimental | This group would receive the experimental treatment. If allocated to coverage with glue, no dressing is placed. After closure of the incision with suture or staples, the incision is patted dry under sterile conditions. The incision is then covered longitudinally by a member of the surgical team with a thick layer of skin glue dispensed from 1 tube of surgical skin glue (2-octyl cyanoacrylate, currently using brand: Derma+Flex QS). The glue is then allowed to dry before the sterile surgical drapes are removed. Receives: Device: 2-octyl cyanoacrylate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Any Significant complications
the primary outcome of the study will be a composite outcome of any significant complications including wound separation, wound infection, symptomatic seroma or hematoma, or readmission for a wound complication within 30 days postoperatively. This data is gathered from the subject's medical record and from the Discharging Resident Questionnaire.
Measured: 30 Days following cesarean delivery.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Minor Complications and/or Patient Dissatisfaction
Secondary outcomes will include problems with the periwound skin including blistering or skin tears, as well as pain or itching of the wound and periwound skin, narcotic use during the hospitalization, and overall patient satisfaction with the incision at the time of discharge. This data is gathered from the subject's medical record and the Patient Discharge Questionnaire, the Patient Follow-Up Questionnaire, and the Physician Follow-Up Questionnaire(if applicable).
Measured: 30 Days following cesarean delivery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2015
- Primary completionMar 2015
- Study completionMar 2015
Why it stopped: Investigator Preference.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pregnant WomenStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Danbury Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Matthew Kim, Danbury Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02323711
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- WCHN/IRB 13-56
- Status last verified
- Mar 2015
- First submitted
- 18 Dec 2014
- Last updated
- 10 Mar 2015
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Romero P, Frongia G, Wingerter S, Holland-Cunz S. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing a tissue adhesive (Dermabond) with adhesive strips (Steri-Strips) for the closure of laparoscopic trocar wounds in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2011 May;21(3):159-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1270458. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
PubMed 21283958Ong CC, Jacobsen AS, Joseph VT. Comparing wound closure using tissue glue versus subcuticular suture for pediatric surgical incisions: a prospective, randomised trial. Pediatr Surg Int. 2002 Sep;18(5-6):553-5. doi: 10.1007/s00383-002-0728-0. Epub 2002 Jun 14.
PubMed 12415411Cho J, Harrop J, Veznadaroglu E, Andrews DW. Concomitant use of computer image guidance, linear or sigmoid incisions after minimal shave, and liquid wound dressing with 2-octyl cyanoacrylate for tumor craniotomy or craniectomy: analysis of 225 consecutive surgical cases with antecedent historical control at one institution. Neurosurgery. 2003 Apr;52(4):832-40; discussion 840-1. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000054219.35102.b4.
PubMed 12657178Rajimwale A, Golden BK, Oottomasathien S, Krishnamurthy M, Ullrich NO, Koyle MA. Octyl-2-cyanoacrylate as a routine dressing after open pediatric urological procedures. J Urol. 2004 Jun;171(6 Pt 1):2407-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000125221.50141.33.
PubMed 15126862van de Kar AL, Corion LU, Smeulders MJ, Draaijers LJ, van der Horst CM, van Zuijlen PP. Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Aug;116(2):514-22. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000172982.43599.d6.
PubMed 16079683Singer AJ, Hollander JE, Valentine SM, Turque TW, McCuskey CF, Quinn JV. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of tissue adhesive (2-octylcyanoacrylate) vs standard wound closure techniques for laceration repair. Stony Brook Octylcyanoacrylate Study Group. Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Feb;5(2):94-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02590.x.
PubMed 9492126Siddiqui DS, Lacuna EM, Chen HY, Chauhan SP. Skin closure of pfannenstiel incision with dermabond, staples, or suture during cesarean delivery: experience of a single attending. Am J Perinatol. 2013 Mar;30(3):219-24. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1323583. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
PubMed 22875661Aabakke AJM, Krebs L, Pipper CB, Secher NJ. Subcuticular suture compared with staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;122(4):878-884. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a5f0c3.
PubMed 24084548
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Mar 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Controlled Trial of Dressing Versus Glue (2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate) for Coverage of the Skin Incision After Closure During Cesarean Delivery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02323711
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- WCHN/IRB 13-56
- Conditions
- Pregnant Women, Cesarean Section
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Investigator Preference.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Danbury HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2015
- Primary completion
- Mar 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is investigating the relative risks and benefits of using two common materials for coverage of the skin incision at cesarean delivery. We will perform the first prospective and the first randomized controlled trial examining the use of a standard postoperative dressing versus skin glue for coverage of the closed skin incision after cesarean delivery. The hypothesis is that using skin glue for coverage of the incision will be associated with decreased wound complications and increased patient satisfaction.
Detailed description
Given the plethora of literature regarding technical aspects of performing cesarean delivery, and given the large number of procedures performed each year and available for prospective trials (approximately 700 cesarean deliveries per year at Danbury Hospital), only quality level I evidence is broadly considered influential in this area of research. Therefore we propose a RCT for incision coverage with dressing versus glue at cesarean delivery.
On admission to L\&D for schedule cesarean section, or on admission to L\&D for labor, patients will be asked to participate by a Trial Coordinator or the admitting Obstetrics and Gynecology resident physician. Patients admitted for labor will be asked to participate given the possibility that they may ultimately require cesarean delivery, and because using only patients admitted for scheduled cesarean delivery would eliminate urgent and emergent cesarean deliveries from the trial, and therefore decrease the generalizability of the trial results to general obstetrics practice.
When consented and the patient undergoes cesarean delivery, the patient's surgeon will decide if skin closure will be performed by placement of staples or suture. The circulating nurse in the OR will open one of a set of sequentially numbered, opaque sealed envelopes (SNOSE) to indicate the patient's allocation for coverage of the incision with a dressing or glue. The circulating nurse will then tell the surgeon to which group the patient has been allocated.
Before closure of the incision, care is taken to ensure hemostasis of the subcutaneous tissues and skin edges. If the subcutaneous tissues are > 2 cm thick, this tissue layer should be approximated before closure of the skin as is currently a level I evidence-based recommendation based on multiple RCTs and promoted by current clinical guidelines. Choice of suture material and needle for the running subcuticular closure, or use of staples for closure, are per the surgeon's preference.
If allocated to coverage with dressing, the standard dressing will be applied by a member of the surgical team in the standard fashion as follows: The closed incision will be covered first with a primary dressing consisting of a nonadherent, composite dressing (Telfa), which is covered with a secondary dressing consisting of an Army Battle Dressing (ABD), before removal of the sterile surgical drapes. This dressing is then held in place with an adhesive fabric tape, currently Mefix tape, which is typically applied by the surgical scrub tech.
If allocated to coverage with glue, no dressing is placed. After closure of the incision with suture or staples, the incision is patted dry under sterile conditions. The incision is then covered longitudinally by a member of the surgical team with a thick layer of skin glue dispensed from 1 tube of surgical skin glue (2-octyl cyanoacrylate, currently using brand: Derma+Flex QS). The glue is then allowed to dry before the sterile surgical drapes are removed.
Staples placed for incision closure are routinely removed on the day of discharge. Sutures placed for skin closure are absorbable and are therefore not removed.
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | –This group would be receiving the standard of care. The subject would receive the standard dressing applied by a member of the surgical team in the standard fashion as follows: The closed incision will be covered first with a primary dressing consisting of a nonadherent, composite dressing (Telfa), which is covered with a secondary dressing consisting of an Army Battle Dressing (ABD), before removal of the sterile surgical drapes. This dressing is then held in place with an adhesive fabric tape, currently Mefix tape, which is typically applied by the surgical scrub tech. |
| 2-octyl cyanoacrylate | Experimental | Device: 2-octyl cyanoacrylateThis group would receive the experimental treatment. If allocated to coverage with glue, no dressing is placed. After closure of the incision with suture or staples, the incision is patted dry under sterile conditions. The incision is then covered longitudinally by a member of the surgical team with a thick layer of skin glue dispensed from 1 tube of surgical skin glue (2-octyl cyanoacrylate, currently using brand: Derma+Flex QS). The glue is then allowed to dry before the sterile surgical drapes are removed. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Pregnant women admitted to Labor and Delivery for scheduled cesarean section, for labor, or for induction of labor
- Age >/= 18 years
- All gestational ages
- All numbers of gestations
- All fetal presentations
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patient is under 18 years of age.
- Intrauterine fetal death, excluded simply for social reasons concerning consenting the patient for the study during upsetting circumstances.
- Patient is NOT fluent in English, Spanish, or Portuguese.
- Urgent or emergent cesarean delivery for fetal distress that develops before the patient is approached for consent
- Patient incompetent to provide independent informed consent.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 2-octyl cyanoacrylateAlso: Derma+flex QSIf the subject is allocated to the experimental group, they would receive 2-octyl cyanoacrylate in place of a primary dressing consisting of their non-adherent composite dressing (Tefla) and a secondary dressing of Army Battle Dressing (ABD). | Device | 2-octyl cyanoacrylate |
Primary outcome
Any Significant complications
Time frame: 30 Days following cesarean delivery.
the primary outcome of the study will be a composite outcome of any significant complications including wound separation, wound infection, symptomatic seroma or hematoma, or readmission for a wound complication within 30 days postoperatively. This data is gathered from the subject's medical record and from the Discharging Resident Questionnaire.
1 secondary outcome
Minor Complications and/or Patient Dissatisfaction
Time frame: 30 Days following cesarean delivery
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Mar 2015.
- Background: PubMed 21283958Romero P, Frongia G, Wingerter S, Holland-Cunz S. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing a tissue adhesive (Dermabond) with adhesive strips (Steri-Strips) for the closure of laparoscopic trocar wounds in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2011 May;21(3):159-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1270458. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
- Background: PubMed 12415411Ong CC, Jacobsen AS, Joseph VT. Comparing wound closure using tissue glue versus subcuticular suture for pediatric surgical incisions: a prospective, randomised trial. Pediatr Surg Int. 2002 Sep;18(5-6):553-5. doi: 10.1007/s00383-002-0728-0. Epub 2002 Jun 14.
- Background: PubMed 12657178Cho J, Harrop J, Veznadaroglu E, Andrews DW. Concomitant use of computer image guidance, linear or sigmoid incisions after minimal shave, and liquid wound dressing with 2-octyl cyanoacrylate for tumor craniotomy or craniectomy: analysis of 225 consecutive surgical cases with antecedent historical control at one institution. Neurosurgery. 2003 Apr;52(4):832-40; discussion 840-1. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000054219.35102.b4.
- Background: PubMed 15126862Rajimwale A, Golden BK, Oottomasathien S, Krishnamurthy M, Ullrich NO, Koyle MA. Octyl-2-cyanoacrylate as a routine dressing after open pediatric urological procedures. J Urol. 2004 Jun;171(6 Pt 1):2407-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000125221.50141.33.
- Background: PubMed 16079683van de Kar AL, Corion LU, Smeulders MJ, Draaijers LJ, van der Horst CM, van Zuijlen PP. Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Aug;116(2):514-22. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000172982.43599.d6.
- Background: PubMed 9492126Singer AJ, Hollander JE, Valentine SM, Turque TW, McCuskey CF, Quinn JV. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of tissue adhesive (2-octylcyanoacrylate) vs standard wound closure techniques for laceration repair. Stony Brook Octylcyanoacrylate Study Group. Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Feb;5(2):94-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02590.x.
- Background: PubMed 22875661Siddiqui DS, Lacuna EM, Chen HY, Chauhan SP. Skin closure of pfannenstiel incision with dermabond, staples, or suture during cesarean delivery: experience of a single attending. Am J Perinatol. 2013 Mar;30(3):219-24. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1323583. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
- Background: PubMed 24084548Aabakke AJM, Krebs L, Pipper CB, Secher NJ. Subcuticular suture compared with staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;122(4):878-884. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a5f0c3.
Related trials for Pregnant Women
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Population Pharmacokinetics of Temocillin in Acute Enterobacterial Pyelonephritis in Children
Pyelonephritis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Belzutifan (MK-6482) in Combination With Lenvatinib Versus Cabozantinib for Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma (MK-6482-011)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
Recruiting
Safety and Performance of UCon Patch Electrode
Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing 2-octyl cyanoacrylate in people with Pregnant Women and Cesarean Section, run by Danbury Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Any Significant complications (time frame: 30 Days following cesarean delivery.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02323711, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2015.