Psoriatic ArthritisPhase 2NCT02319759
Efficacy and Safety Study of Guselkumab in the Treatment of Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)
A Phase 2 study testing Guselkumab and Ustekinumab in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 41 sites in 7 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of guselkumab in participants with Active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Psoriatic Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Guselkumab and Ustekinumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 149 participants
- Where
- 41 sitesin 7 countries
- Study dates
- 27 Mar 2015to 17 Jan 2017
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Has had Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) for at least 6 months before the first administration of study drug and meet classification criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) at Screening
- Had active PsA as defined by:
- At least 3 swollen joints and at least 3 tender joints at Screening and at baseline
- C-reactive protein (CRP) greater than or equal to (>=) 0.3 milligram (mg)/deciliter (dL) at Screening from the central laboratory
- Has at least 1 of the PsA subsets: distal interphalangeal joint involvement, polyarticular arthritis with absence of rheumatoid nodules, arthritis mutilans, asymmetric peripheral arthritis, or spondylitis with peripheral arthritis
- Has plaque psoriasis with body surface area (BSA) involvement greater than or equal to (>=) 3% at Screening and baseline
- Has active PsA despite current or previous non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD), oral corticosteroid, and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy
- If using methotrexate (MTX), oral corticosteroids or NSAIDs, the dose must be stable
Who cannot join
- Have other inflammatory diseases that might confound the evaluations of benefit of guselkumab therapy, including but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), systemic lupus erythematosus, or Lyme disease
- Has previously received guselkumab or ustekinumab
- Has received more than 1 type of biologic anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agent previously
- Have received infliximab (or its biosimilars) or golimumab intraveneous (IV) within 12 weeks before the first administration of study drug
- Have received adalimumab (or its biosimilars), golimumab subcutaneous (SC), certolizumab pegol or etanercept (or its biosimilars) within 8 weeks before the first administration of study drug
Trial locations and contacts
41 sites in 7 countries.
41 sites in 7 countries
United States12 sites
Study site
Arlington, Virginia
Study site
Boston, Massachusetts
Study site
Clearwater, Florida
Study site
Edina, Minnesota
Study site
Huntsville, Alabama
Study site
Indianapolis, Indiana
Study site
Jackson, Tennessee
Study site
Sandy Springs, Georgia
Study site
St Louis, Missouri
Study site
Tampa, Florida
Study site
Trumbull, Connecticut
Study site
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania
Russia9 sites
Study site
Bataysk
Study site
Moscow
Study site
Novosibirsk
Study site
Ryazan
Study site
Saint Petersburg
Study site
Saratov
Study site
Ufa
Study site
Ulyanovsk
Study site
Yaroslavl
Germany6 sites
Study site
Berlin
Study site
Cologne
Study site
Hamburg
Study site
Herne
Study site
Kiel
Study site
Lübeck
Spain5 sites
Study site
Barcelona
Study site
Madrid
Study site
Sabadell
Study site
Santiago de Compostela
Study site
Seville
Canada4 sites
Study site
Barrie, Ontario
Study site
London, Ontario
Study site
Peterborough, Ontario
Study site
Waterloo, Ontario
Poland4 sites
Study site
Bialystok
Study site
Elblag
Study site
Poznan
Study site
Warsaw
About this study
Official title: A Phase 2a, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab in the Treatment of Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of guselkumab in participants with Active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA).
Read the detailed description
This is a multi-center (more than one clinical site will work on a medical research study), randomized (study medication assigned to participants by chance), double-blind (neither investigator nor participant knows which treatment the participant receives), placebo-controlled (placebo is an inactive substance that is compared with a drug to test whether the drug has a real effect in a clinical trial) study to determine the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in participants with PsA. The study will consist of 4 parts: Screening period (6 weeks), a double-blind treatment period (consists of guselkumab and placebo treatment for 24 weeks), an active treatment period (guselkumab for 20 weeks), and follow-up period (12 weeks). The maximal study duration for a participant will not exceed 62 weeks including the Screening period. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups in a 2:1 ratio to either receive Guselkumab 100 milligram (mg) at Weeks 0, 4 then every 8 weeks or Placebo at Weeks 0, 4 then every 8 weeks until Week 24. At week 24, participants remaining in the placebo group will start to receive guselkumab 100 mg at Weeks 24, 28, 36 and 44. Participants in both treatment groups who have less than (<) 5 percent (%) improvement from baseline in both tender and swollen joint counts at Week 16 will qualify for early escape and will switch to open-label therapy with ustekinumab 45 mg or 90 mg at Weeks 16, 20, 32, and 44 based on the approved dosage for the PsA indication in the particular country of study. The efficacy will be assessed primarily by measuring percentage of participants who achieve an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.
- Conditions
- Psoriatic Arthritis
- Being tested
- Guselkumab, Ustekinumab, Placebo
- Keywords
- Psoriatic Arthritis, Guselkumab, Ustekinumab, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Psoriatic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GuselkumabDrug
In the guselkumab group, Guselkumab 100 mg subcutaneous injection will be administered at Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36 and 44. In the placebo group, guselkumab 100 mg subcutaneous injection will be administered at Weeks 24, 28, 36 and 44 for participants remaining on placebo at Week 24.
UstekinumabDrug
In both placebo and guselkumab groups, if the participants qualify for early escape, they will switch to receive ustekinumab 45 mg or 90 mg subcutaneous injection at Weeks 16, 20, 32, and 44 based on the approved dosage in the particular country of the study.
PlaceboDrug
In placebo group, Placebo subcutaneous injection will be administered at Weeks 0, 4, 12, and 20. In guselkumab group, placebo subcutaneous injection will be administered at Week 24 to maintain the blind.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Guselkumab | Experimental | Participants will receive guselkumab 100 milligram (mg) subcutaneous injection (injected under the skin by way of a needle) at Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44, and placebo for guselkumab at Week 24 to maintain the blind. Participants who enter early escape at Week 16 will switch to open label therapy with ustekinumab 45 mg or 90 mg at Weeks 16, 20, 32, and 44 based on the approved dosage in the particular country of the study. Receives: Drug: Guselkumab; Drug: Ustekinumab; Drug: Placebo |
| Placebo | Experimental | Participants will receive placebo for guselkumab at Weeks 0, 4, 12, and 20, and guselkumab 100 mg subcutaneous injection at Weeks 24, 28, 36, and 44. Participants who enter early escape at Week 16 will switch to open label therapy with ustekinumab 45 mg or 90 mg at Weeks 16, 20, 32, and 44 based on the approved dosage in the particular country of the study. Receives: Drug: Guselkumab; Drug: Ustekinumab; Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24
ACR 20 response: at least 20% improvement from baseline in both swollen joint (66 joints) and tender joint (68 joints) counts and at least 20% improvement from baseline in 3 of following 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain (VAS: 0-100 millimeter [mm], 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity on arthritis (VAS:0-100mm, 0=excellent and 100=poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS:0-100mm; 0=no arthritis activity and 100 = extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function measured by HAQ-DI (defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas;derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0=no difficulty, to 3=inability to perform a task in that area) and serum CRP. Treatment Failure (TF) criteria: Discontinued study drug due to lack of efficacy or worsening of PsA, initiated or increased dose of methotrexate or oral corticosteroids, or initiated prohibited PsA treatments. FAS is full analysis set.
Measured: Week 24
Secondary outcomes (43)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)-75 Response at Week 24
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percentage (%)-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (worst condition). PASI 75 response was defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to Baseline. As planned, results data was analyzed and reported for the specified arms for this outcome measure.
Measured: Week 24
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 24
Change from baseline in HAQ-DI score is a measure of the change in the physical function, where a negative change reflects an improvement and a positive change reflects worsening of physical function. HAQ-DI is a 20-question instrument that assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0 indicating no difficulty, to 3 indicating inability to perform a task in that area (that is, lower scores are indicative of better functioning). The total HAQ-DI score ranges from 0-24 with lower score indicating better functioning.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an ACR 20 Response at Week 16
ACR 20 response is defined as at least 20 percent (%) improvement from baseline in both swollen joint (66 joints) and tender joint (68 joints) counts and at least 20% improvement from baseline in 3 of following 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain (visual analog scale [VAS]: 0-100 millimeter [mm]; 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity on arthritis (VAS: 0-100 mm, 0=excellent and 100=poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS: 0-100mm; 0=no arthritis activity and 100 = extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI, defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas;derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0 indicating no difficulty, to 3 indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and serum C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who an Achieved ACR 50 Response at Week 24
ACR 50 response is defined as at least 50 % improvement from baseline in both swollen joint (66 joints) and tender joint (68 joints) counts and at least 50% improvement from baseline in 3 of following 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain (VAS:0-100 mm; 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity on arthritis (VAS:0-100mm; 0=excellent and 100=poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS: 0-100mm; 0=no arthritis activity and 100 = extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function measured by HAQ-DI (defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas;derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0 indicating no difficulty, to 3 indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and serum CRP.
Measured: Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) Scores Among Participants With Enthesitis at Week 24
Enthesitis was assessed using the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI). The LEI was developed to assess enthesitis in participants with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and evaluates the presence (score of 1) or absence of pain (score of 0) by applying local pressure to Lateral elbow epicondyle, left and right, Medial femoral condyle, left and right, and Achilles tendon insertion, left and right. LEI scores ranging from 0 (0 sites with tenderness) to 6 (worst possible score; 6 sites with tenderness).
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Scores Among Participants With Dactylitis at Baseline at Week 24
Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. The severity of dactylitis is scored on a scale of 0-3, where 0, 1, 2, 3 indicates none, mild, moderate, severe, respectively in each digit of the hands and feet. The range of total dactylitis scores for a participant is 0-60. Higher score indicates more severe dactylitis.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 20, ACR 50, and ACR 70 Responses at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
ACR 20, 50, and 70 response is defined as at least 20%, 50%, and 70% improvement from baseline in swollen joint (66 joints) and tender joint (68 joints) counts and at least 20%, 50%, and 70% improvement from baseline in 3 of following 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain (VAS: 0-100mm, 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity on arthritis (VAS: 0-100mm; 0=excellent and 100=poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS: 0-100mm; 0=no arthritis activity and 100= extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI, defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas;derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0 indicating no difficulty, to 3 indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and serum C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 20, ACR 50, and ACR 70 Responses at Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 44, and 56
ACR 20, ACR 50 and ACR 70 response is defined as at least 20%, 50%, and 70% improvement from baseline in swollen joint (66 joints) and tender joint (68 joints) counts and at least 20%, 50%, and 70% improvement from baseline in 3 of following 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain (VAS: 0-100mm, 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity on arthritis (VAS: 0-100mm; 0=excellent and 100=poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS; 0-100mm; 0=no arthritis activity and 100 = extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI, defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas;derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0 indicating no difficulty, to 3 indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and serum C-Reactive Protein (CRP). As planned, results data was analyzed and reported for the specified arms for this outcome measure.
Measured: Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 44, and 56
Percent Change From Baseline in the ACR Components at Weeks 12 and 24
The 7 components of ACR response are: swollen joint counts (0-66), tender joint counts (0-68), patient's assessment of pain (PAIN) (VAS:0-100mm; 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity (GDPT) on arthritis (VAS:0-100mm; 0=excellent and 100= poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (GDEV) (VAS: 0-100mm; 0=no arthritis activity and 100 = extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function measured by HAQ-DI (20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas (total score of 0-24 with lower score indicating better functioning);derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0 indicating no difficulty, to 3 indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and serum CRP.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24
Percent Change From Baseline in the ACR Components at Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 44 and 56
The 7 components of ACR response are: swollen joint counts (0-66), tender joint counts (0-68), patient's assessment of pain (PAIN) (VAS:0-100mm; 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity (GDPT) on arthritis (VAS:0-100mm; 0=excellent and 100= poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (GDEV) (VAS: 0-100mm; 0=no arthritis activity and 100 = extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function measured by HAQ-DI (20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas (total score of 0-24 with lower score indicating better functioning);derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0 indicating no difficulty, to 3 indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and serum CRP.
Measured: Basline and Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 44, 56
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Change from baseline in HAQ-DI score is a measure of the change in the physical function, where a negative change reflects an improvement and a positive change reflects worsening of physical function. HAQ-DI is a 20-question instrument that assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0 indicating no difficulty, to 3 indicating inability to perform a task in that area (that is, lower scores are indicative of better functioning). The total HAQ-DI score ranges from 0-24 with lower score indicating better functioning.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 44, and 56
Change from baseline in HAQ-DI score is a measure of the change in the physical function, where a negative change reflects an improvement and a positive change reflects worsening of physical function. HAQ-DI is a 20-question instrument that assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area (that is, lower scores are indicative of better functioning). The total HAQ-DI score ranges from 0-24 with lower score indicating better functioning.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 44, 56
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a HAQ-DI Response With Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 0.3 Improvement From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
HAQ-DI response was defined as >= 0.3 improvement from baseline in HAQ-DI score. HAQ-DI is a 20-question instrument that assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0 indicating no difficulty, to 3 indicating inability to perform a task in that area (that is, lower scores are indicative of better functioning). The total HAQ-DI score ranges from 0-24 with lower score indicating better functioning.
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an HAQ-DI Response With >= -0.3 Improvement From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 44, and 56
HAQ-DI response was defined as >= 0.3 improvement from baseline in HAQ-DI score. HAQ-DI is a 20-question instrument that assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0 indicating no difficulty, to 3 indicating inability to perform a task in that area (that is, lower scores are indicative of better functioning). The total HAQ-DI score ranges from 0-24 with lower score indicating better functioning. As planned, results data was analyzed and reported for the specified arms for this outcome measure.
Measured: Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 44, 56
Percent Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24
Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. The severity of dactylitis is scored on a scale of 0-3, where 0, 1, 2, 3 indicates none, mild, moderate, severe, respectively in each digit of the hands and feet. The range of total dactylitis scores for a participant is 0-60. Higher score indicates more severe dactylitis.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Scores at Weeks 24, 28, 32, 44, 56
Dactylitis was characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. The severity of dactylitis is scored on a scale of 0-3, where 0, 1, 2, 3 indicates none, mild, moderate, severe, respectively in each digit of the hands and feet. The range of total dactylitis scores for a participant is 0-60. Higher score indicates more severe dactylitis. As planned, results data was analyzed and reported for the specified arms for this outcome measure.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 24, 28, 32, 44, 56
Percentage of Participants With Dactylitis at Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24
Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. The severity of dactylitis is scored on a scale of 0-3, where 0, 1, 2, 3 indicates none, mild, moderate, severe, respectively in each digit of the hands and feet. The range of total dactylitis scores for a participant is 0-60. Participants with dactylitis had dactylitis score >0. Higher score indicates more severe dactylitis.
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24
Percentage of Participants With Dactylitis at Weeks 24, 28, 32, 44, and 56
Dactylitis was characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. The severity of dactylitis is scored on a scale of 0-3, where 0, 1, 2, 3 indicates none, mild, moderate, severe, respectively in each digit of the hands and feet. The range of total dactylitis scores for a participant is 0-60. Higher score indicates greater degree of tenderness.
Measured: Weeks 24, 28, 32, 44, and 56
Percent Change From Baseline in LEI Scores at Week 4, 8, 16, and 24
Enthesitis was assessed using the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI). The LEI was developed to assess enthesitis in participants with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and evaluates the presence (score of 1) or absence of pain (score of 0) by applying local pressure to Lateral elbow epicondyle, left and right, Medial femoral condyle, left and right, and Achilles tendon insertion, left and right. LEI scores ranging from 0 (0 sites with tenderness) to 6 (worst possible score; 6 sites with tenderness).
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24
Percent Change From Baseline in LEI Scores at Weeks 24, 28, 32, 44, and 56
Enthesitis will be assessed using the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI). The LEI was developed to assess enthesitis in participants with PsA, and evaluates the presence (score of 1) or absence of pain (score of 0) by applying local pressure to Lateral elbow epicondyle, left and right, Medial femoral condyle, left and right, and Achilles tendon insertion, left and right. LEI scores ranging from 0 (0 sites with tenderness) to 6 (worst possible score; 6 sites with tenderness).
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 24, 28, 32, 44, 56
Percentage of Participants With Enthesitis Based on LEI Score at Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 in Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline
Enthesitis was assessed using the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI). The LEI was developed to assess enthesitis in participants with PsA, and evaluates the presence (score of 1) or absence of pain (score of 0) by applying local pressure to Lateral elbow epicondyle, left and right, Medial femoral condyle, left and right, and Achilles tendon insertion, left and right. Participants with enthesitis had LEI score >0. LEI scores ranging from 0 (0 sites with tenderness) to 6 (worst possible score; 6 sites with tenderness).
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24
Percentage of Participants With Enthesitis Based on LEI at Weeks 24, 28, 32, 44, and 56 in Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline
Enthesitis will be assessed using the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI). The LEI was developed to assess enthesitis in participants with PsA, and evaluates the presence (score of 1) or absence of pain (score of 0) by applying local pressure to Lateral elbow epicondyle, left and right, Medial femoral condyle, left and right, and Achilles tendon insertion, left and right. Participants with enthesitis had LEI score >0. LEI scores ranging from 0 (0 sites with tenderness) to 6 (worst possible score; 6 sites with tenderness).
Measured: Weeks 24, 28, 32, 44, and 56
Change From Baseline in Psoriatic ArthritiS Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) Score at Weeks 16 and 24
Change from baseline in PASDAS score measures the change in disease activity where a negative value indicates an improvement and a positive value indicates worsening of PsA disease activity. PASDAS is a PsA disease activity score that assesses 4 domains (joints, entheses, dactylitis and quality of life) of PsA. PASDAS is a derived score combining Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (arthritis and psoriasis, on a 100-unit VAS), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (on a 100-unit VAS), swollen joint count (66 joints), tender joint count (68 joints), CRP (mg/L), enthesitis based on LEI (scaled to a 0-6 range), dactylitis count (scoring each digit from 0-3 and recoding to 0-1, where any score > 0 equaled 1), and the PCS score of the SF-36 health survey. The total score range is 0-10 and the cutoffs for disease activity were 3.2 (low) to 5.4 (high). Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement of overall disease activity.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 16, 24
Change From Baseline in PASDAS Score at Weeks 24 and 44
Change from baseline in PASDAS score measures the change in disease activity where a negative value indicates an improvement and a positive value indicates worsening of PsA disease activity. PASDAS is a PsA disease activity score that assesses 4 domains (joints, entheses, dactylitis and quality of life) of PsA. PASDAS is a derived score combining Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (arthritis and psoriasis, on a 100-unit VAS), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (on a 100-unit VAS), swollen joint count (66 joints), tender joint count (68 joints), CRP (mg/L), enthesitis based on LEI (scaled to a 0-6 range), dactylitis count (scoring each digit from 0-3 and recoding to 0-1, where any score > 0 equaled 1), and the PCS score of the SF-36 health survey. The total score range is 0-10 and the cutoffs for disease activity were 3.2 (low) to 5.4 (high). Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement of overall disease activity.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 24, 44
Change From Baseline in GRAppa Composite scorE (GRACE) Index Score at Weeks 16 and 24
Change from baseline in GRACE index score measures the change in disease activity, where a negative change indicates an improvement and a positive change indicates a worsening of PsA disease activity. GRACE index was converted from Arithmetic Mean of the Desirability Function (AMDF). AMDF is calculated by transforming all variables using predefined algorithms and expressing the total score as a mean with a score range of 0 - 1, where 1 indicates a better state than 0. GRACE Index = (1 - AMDF)*10, where GRACE index has a range of 0-10, with higher scores indicate more active disease. As planned, results data was analyzed and reported for the specified arms for this outcome measure.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 16, 24
Change From Baseline in GRACE Index Score at Weeks 24 and 44
Change from baseline in GRACE index score measures the change in disease activity, where a negative change indicates an improvement and a positive change indicates a worsening of PsA disease activity. GRACE index was converted from Arithmetic Mean of the Desirability Function (AMDF). AMDF is calculated by transforming all variables using predefined algorithms and expressing the total score as a mean with a score range of 0 - 1, where 1 indicates a better state than 0. GRACE Index = (1 - AMDF)*10, where GRACE index has a range of 0-10, with higher scores indicate more active disease.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 24, 44
Change From Baseline in Modified Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index (mCPDAI) Score at Weeks 16 and 24
The mCPDAI assessed 4 domains (joints, skin, entheses, and dactylitis). The mCPDAI scores were calculated using the following assessments: joints (66 swollen and 68 tender joint counts), HAQ-DI score, PASI, dactylitis, and enthesitis. Within each domain a score (range 0-3) was assigned, where 0= Not involved, 1= Mild, 2= Moderate and 3= Severe. The scores for each domain were then added together to give a final score range of 0 to 12. A higher score indicates more active disease activity. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement of PsA disease activity.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 16, 24
Change From Baseline in mCPDAI Index Score at Weeks 24 and 44
The mCPDAI assessed 4 domains (joints, skin, entheses, and dactylitis). The mCPDAI scores were calculated using the following assessments: joints (66 swollen and 68 tender joint counts), HAQ-DI score, PASI, dactylitis, and enthesitis. Within each domain a score (range 0-3) was assigned, where 0= Not involved, 1= Mild, 2= Moderate and 3= Severe. The scores for each domain were then added together to give a final score range of 0 to 12. A higher score indicates more active disease activity. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement of PsA disease activity.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 24, 44
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Change from baseline in DAPSA measures the change in disease activity, where a negative change indicates an improvement and a positive change indicates worsening of disease activity. DAPSA score is a the sum of swollen joint count (66 joints), tender joint count (68 joints), CRP (mg/dL), Patient's Assessment of Pain (on a 10-unit VAS;0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain), and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (arthritis, on a 10-unit VAS; 0 to 100 centimeter [cm] VAS, 0=excellent and 10=poor). Cut-off values for disease activity: 0-4 remission; 5-14 low; 15-28 moderate; >28 high.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Change From Baseline in DAPSA Index Score at Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 44, and 56
Change from baseline in DAPSA measures the change in disease activity, where a negative change indicates an improvement and a positive change indicates worsening of disease activity. DAPSA score is a the sum of swollen joint count (66 joints), tender joint count (68 joints), CRP (mg/dL), Patient's Assessment of Pain (on a 10-unit VAS;0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain), and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (arthritis, on a 10-unit VAS; 0 to 10cm VAS, 0=excellent and 10=poor). Cut-off values for disease activity: 0-4 remission; 5-14 low; 15-28 moderate; >28 high.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 44, 56
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) at Weeks 16 and 24
MDA defines a satisfactory state of disease activity that includes 5 domains of PsA (joint symptoms, skin psoriasis, patient's perspective of pain and disease activity on arthritis and psoriasis, physical function and enthesitis). Participants were classified as achieving MDA if they fulfilled 5 of 7 outcome measures: tender joint count <=1; swollen joint count <=1; PASI <=1; patient pain VAS score of <=15 mm; patient global disease activity on arthritis and psoriasis; VAS score of <=20 mm; Health Assessment Questionnaire score <=0.5; and tender entheseal points <=1.
Measured: Weeks 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MDA at Weeks 24 and 44
MDA defines a satisfactory state of disease activity that includes 5 domains of PsA (joint symptoms, skin psoriasis, patient's perspective of pain and disease activity on arthritis and psoriasis, physical function and enthesitis). Participants were classified as achieving MDA if they fulfilled 5 of 7 outcome measures: tender joint count <=1; swollen joint count <=1; PASI <=1; patient pain VAS score of <=15 mm; patient global disease activity on arthritis and psoriasis; VAS score of <=20 mm; Health Assessment Questionnaire score <=0.5; and tender entheseal points <=1.
Measured: Weeks 24 and 44
Change From Baseline in the Physical and Mental Component Summary (PCS and MCS) Scores of 36- Item Short Form Health Assessment Questionnaire (SF-36) at Weeks 16 and 24
SF-36 is a multi-domain instrument with 36 items to evaluate the health status and quality of life. It included 8 subscales (physical functioning, physical role functioning, bodily pain, general health perception, vitality, social functioning, emotional role functioning, and mental health), which yielded a Physical Component Summary (PCS) with score range 0-100 (higher score-better quality of life) and a Mental Component Summary (MCS) with score range 0-100 (higher score-better quality of life) in addition to subscale scores. The PCS and MCS scores are normalized to a mean of 50 and standard deviations of 10, based upon general US population norms as presented in this outcome measure. A positive change indicates improvement while a negative change indicates worsening of health status and quality of life.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 16, 24
Change From Baseline in the PCS Scores of SF-36 at Weeks 24 and 44
SF-36 is a multi-domain instrument with 36 items to evaluate the health status and quality of life. It included 8 subscales (physical functioning, physical role functioning, bodily pain, general health perception, vitality, social functioning, emotional role functioning, and mental health), which yielded a Physical Component Summary (PCS) with score range 0-100 (higher score-better quality of life) and a Mental Component Summary (MCS) with score range 0-100 (higher score-better quality of life) in addition to subscale scores. The PCS scores are normalized to a mean of 50 and standard deviations of 10, based upon general US population norms as presented in this outcome measure. A positive change indicates improvement while a negative change indicates worsening of health status and quality of life.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 24, 44
Change From Baseline in the MCS Scores of SF-36 at Weeks 24 and 44
SF-36 is a multi-domain instrument with 36 items to evaluate the health status and quality of life. It included 8 subscales (physical functioning, physical role functioning, bodily pain, general health perception, vitality, social functioning, emotional role functioning, and mental health), which yielded a Physical Component Summary (PCS) with score range 0-100 (higher score-better quality of life) and a Mental Component Summary (MCS) with score range 0-100 (higher score-better quality of life) in addition to subscale scores. The MCS scores are normalized to a mean of 50 and standard deviations of 10, based upon general US population norms as presented in this outcome measure. A positive change indicates improvement while a negative change indicates worsening of health status and quality of life.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 24, 44
Change From Baseline in Norm-based SF-36 Scales at Week 16 and 24
SF-36 evaluates 8 individual subscales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health). Each 8 scales scored from 0 to 100 with higher scores= better health. The scores are normalized to a mean of 50 and standard deviations of 10, based upon general US population norms. Higher scores indicate better health. A positive change indicates improvement while a negative change indicates worsening of health status and quality of life.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 16, 24
Change From Baseline in Norm-based SF-36 Scale at Week 24 and 44
SF-36 evaluates 8 individual subscales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health). Each 8 scales scored from 0 to 100 with higher scores= better health. The scores are normalized to a mean of 50 and standard deviations of 10, based upon general US population norms. Higher scores indicate better health. A positive change indicates improvement while a negative change indicates worsening of health status and quality of life.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 24, 44
Change From Baseline in Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) Score at Weeks 16 and 24
RAPID3 is a multi-dimensional health assessment questionnaire that was designed for use in routine clinical care. Three core data set for function, pain, and patient global estimate of disease activity were recorded. Each was scored 0-10 and the score ranges from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating worse condition. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in condition.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 16, 24
Change From Baseline in RAPID3 Score at Weeks 24 and 44
RAPID3 is a multi-dimensional health assessment questionnaire that was designed for use in routine clinical care. Three core data set for function, pain, and patient global estimate of disease activity were recorded. Each was scored 0-10 and the score ranges from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating worse condition. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in condition.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 24, 44
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90 and PASI 100 Response at Weeks 16 and 24
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percentage (%)-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100 responses were defined as at least a 50%, 75%, 90%, and 100% reduction in PASI relative to Baseline respectively. As planned, results data was analyzed and reported for the specified arms for this outcome measure.
Measured: Weeks 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90 and PASI 100 Response at Weeks 24, 28, 32, 44, and 56
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percentage (%)-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100 responses were defined as at least a 50%, 75%, 90%, and 100% reduction in PASI relative to Baseline respectively.
Measured: Weeks 24, 28, 32, 44, and 56
Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Score at Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percentage (%)-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A negative percent change from baseline indicates the percent improvement from baseline in the severity of psoriatic lesions. As planned, results data was analyzed and reported for the specified arms for this outcome measure.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24
Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Score at Weeks 24, 28, 32, 44, and 56
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percentage (%)-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A negative percent change from baseline indicates the percent improvement from baseline in the severity of psoriatic lesions.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 24, 28, 32, 44, 56
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Study start27 Mar 2015
- Primary completion31 May 2016
- Study completion17 Jan 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Psoriatic ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Janssen Research & Development, LLCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 149 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Study director, Janssen Research & Development, LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02319759
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR105964
- Other IDs
- 2014-003697-17, CNTO1959PSA2001, 2014
- Status last verified
- Jan 2025
- First submitted
- 15 Dec 2014
- Last updated
- 4 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
Publications
Strober B, Coates LC, Lebwohl MG, Deodhar A, Leibowitz E, Rowland K, Kollmeier AP, Miller M, Wang Y, Li S, Chakravarty SD, Chan D, Shawi M, Yang YW, Thaҫi D, Rahman P. Long-Term Safety of Guselkumab in Patients with Psoriatic Disease: An Integrated Analysis of Eleven Phase II/III Clinical Studies in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis. Drug Saf. 2024 Jan;47(1):39-57. doi: 10.1007/s40264-023-01361-w. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
PubMed 37906417Rahman P, Boehncke WH, Mease PJ, Gottlieb AB, McInnes IB, Shawi M, Wang Y, Sheng S, Kollmeier AP, Theander E, Yu J, Leibowitz E, Marrache AM, Coates LC. Safety of Guselkumab With and Without Prior Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Treatment: Pooled Results Across 4 Studies in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2023 Jun;50(6):769-780. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.220928. Epub 2023 Jan 15.
PubMed 36642439Mease PJ, Gladman DD, Deodhar A, McGonagle DG, Nash P, Boehncke WH, Gottlieb A, Xu XL, Xu S, Hsia EC, Karyekar CS, Helliwell PS. Impact of guselkumab, an interleukin-23 p19 subunit inhibitor, on enthesitis and dactylitis in patients with moderate to severe psoriatic arthritis: results from a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase II study. RMD Open. 2020 Jul;6(2):e001217. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001217.
PubMed 32665433Helliwell PS, Deodhar A, Gottlieb AB, Boehncke WH, Xu XL, Xu S, Wang Y, Hsia EC, Gladman DD, Ritchlin CT. Composite Measures of Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis: Comparative Instrument Performance Based on the Efficacy of Guselkumab in an Interventional Phase II Trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Nov;72(11):1579-1588. doi: 10.1002/acr.24046.
PubMed 31421033Deodhar A, Gottlieb AB, Boehncke WH, Dong B, Wang Y, Zhuang Y, Barchuk W, Xu XL, Hsia EC; CNTO1959PSA2001 Study Group. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study. Lancet. 2018 Jun 2;391(10136):2213-2224. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30952-8. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
PubMed 29893222
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 2a, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab in the Treatment of Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02319759
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CR105964
- Conditions
- Psoriatic Arthritis
- Keywords
- Psoriatic Arthritis, Guselkumab, Ustekinumab, Placebo
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 149 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 27 Mar 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 Jan 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 14 Oct 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of guselkumab in participants with Active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA).
Detailed description
This is a multi-center (more than one clinical site will work on a medical research study), randomized (study medication assigned to participants by chance), double-blind (neither investigator nor participant knows which treatment the participant receives), placebo-controlled (placebo is an inactive substance that is compared with a drug to test whether the drug has a real effect in a clinical trial) study to determine the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in participants with PsA. The study will consist of 4 parts: Screening period (6 weeks), a double-blind treatment period (consists of guselkumab and placebo treatment for 24 weeks), an active treatment period (guselkumab for 20 weeks), and follow-up period (12 weeks). The maximal study duration for a participant will not exceed 62 weeks including the Screening period. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups in a 2:1 ratio to either receive Guselkumab 100 milligram (mg) at Weeks 0, 4 then every 8 weeks or Placebo at Weeks 0, 4 then every 8 weeks until Week 24. At week 24, participants remaining in the placebo group will start to receive guselkumab 100 mg at Weeks 24, 28, 36 and 44. Participants in both treatment groups who have less than (<) 5 percent (%) improvement from baseline in both tender and swollen joint counts at Week 16 will qualify for early escape and will switch to open-label therapy with ustekinumab 45 mg or 90 mg at Weeks 16, 20, 32, and 44 based on the approved dosage for the PsA indication in the particular country of study. The efficacy will be assessed primarily by measuring percentage of participants who achieve an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Guselkumab | Experimental | Drug: Guselkumab, Drug: Ustekinumab, Drug: PlaceboParticipants will receive guselkumab 100 milligram (mg) subcutaneous injection (injected under the skin by way of a needle) at Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44, and placebo for guselkumab at Week 24 to maintain the blind. Participants who enter early escape at Week 16 will switch to open label therapy with ustekinumab 45 mg or 90 mg at Weeks 16, 20, 32, and 44 based on the approved dosage in the particular country of the study. |
| Placebo | Experimental | Drug: Guselkumab, Drug: Ustekinumab, Drug: PlaceboParticipants will receive placebo for guselkumab at Weeks 0, 4, 12, and 20, and guselkumab 100 mg subcutaneous injection at Weeks 24, 28, 36, and 44. Participants who enter early escape at Week 16 will switch to open label therapy with ustekinumab 45 mg or 90 mg at Weeks 16, 20, 32, and 44 based on the approved dosage in the particular country of the study. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Has had Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) for at least 6 months before the first administration of study drug and meet classification criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) at Screening
- Had active PsA as defined by:
- Has at least 1 of the PsA subsets: distal interphalangeal joint involvement, polyarticular arthritis with absence of rheumatoid nodules, arthritis mutilans, asymmetric peripheral arthritis, or spondylitis with peripheral arthritis
- Has plaque psoriasis with body surface area (BSA) involvement greater than or equal to (>=) 3% at Screening and baseline
- Has active PsA despite current or previous non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD), oral corticosteroid, and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Have other inflammatory diseases that might confound the evaluations of benefit of guselkumab therapy, including but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), systemic lupus erythematosus, or Lyme disease
- Has previously received guselkumab or ustekinumab
- Has received more than 1 type of biologic anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agent previously
- Have received infliximab (or its biosimilars) or golimumab intraveneous (IV) within 12 weeks before the first administration of study drug
- Have received adalimumab (or its biosimilars), golimumab subcutaneous (SC), certolizumab pegol or etanercept (or its biosimilars) within 8 weeks before the first administration of study drug
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| GuselkumabIn the guselkumab group, Guselkumab 100 mg subcutaneous injection will be administered at Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36 and 44. In the placebo group, guselkumab 100 mg subcutaneous injection will be administered at Weeks 24, 28, 36 and 44 for participants remaining on placebo at Week 24. | Drug | Guselkumab, Placebo |
| UstekinumabIn both placebo and guselkumab groups, if the participants qualify for early escape, they will switch to receive ustekinumab 45 mg or 90 mg subcutaneous injection at Weeks 16, 20, 32, and 44 based on the approved dosage in the particular country of the study. | Drug | Guselkumab, Placebo |
| PlaceboIn placebo group, Placebo subcutaneous injection will be administered at Weeks 0, 4, 12, and 20. In guselkumab group, placebo subcutaneous injection will be administered at Week 24 to maintain the blind. | Drug | Guselkumab, Placebo |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
ACR 20 response: at least 20% improvement from baseline in both swollen joint (66 joints) and tender joint (68 joints) counts and at least 20% improvement from baseline in 3 of following 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain (VAS: 0-100 millimeter [mm], 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity on arthritis (VAS:0-100mm, 0=excellent and 100=poor), physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS:0-100mm; 0=no arthritis activity and 100 = extremely active arthritis), patient's assessment of physical function measured by HAQ-DI (defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas;derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0=no difficulty, to 3=inability to perform a task in that area) and serum CRP. Treatment Failure (TF) criteria: Discontinued study drug due to lack of efficacy or worsening of PsA, initiated or increased dose of methotrexate or oral corticosteroids, or initiated prohibited PsA treatments. FAS is full analysis set.
43 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)-75 Response at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an ACR 20 Response at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who an Achieved ACR 50 Response at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) Scores Among Participants With Enthesitis at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Scores Among Participants With Dactylitis at Baseline at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 20, ACR 50, and ACR 70 Responses at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved ACR 20, ACR 50, and ACR 70 Responses at Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 44, and 56
Time frame: Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 44, and 56
Percent Change From Baseline in the ACR Components at Weeks 12 and 24
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24
Percent Change From Baseline in the ACR Components at Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 44 and 56
Time frame: Basline and Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 44, 56
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 44, and 56
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 44, 56
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a HAQ-DI Response With Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 0.3 Improvement From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an HAQ-DI Response With >= -0.3 Improvement From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 44, and 56
Time frame: Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 44, 56
Percent Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Scores at Weeks 24, 28, 32, 44, 56
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 24, 28, 32, 44, 56
Percentage of Participants With Dactylitis at Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24
Percentage of Participants With Dactylitis at Weeks 24, 28, 32, 44, and 56
Time frame: Weeks 24, 28, 32, 44, and 56
Percent Change From Baseline in LEI Scores at Week 4, 8, 16, and 24
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24
Percent Change From Baseline in LEI Scores at Weeks 24, 28, 32, 44, and 56
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 24, 28, 32, 44, 56
Percentage of Participants With Enthesitis Based on LEI Score at Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 in Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24
Percentage of Participants With Enthesitis Based on LEI at Weeks 24, 28, 32, 44, and 56 in Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline
Time frame: Weeks 24, 28, 32, 44, and 56
Change From Baseline in Psoriatic ArthritiS Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) Score at Weeks 16 and 24
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 16, 24
Change From Baseline in PASDAS Score at Weeks 24 and 44
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 24, 44
Change From Baseline in GRAppa Composite scorE (GRACE) Index Score at Weeks 16 and 24
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 16, 24
Change From Baseline in GRACE Index Score at Weeks 24 and 44
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 24, 44
Change From Baseline in Modified Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index (mCPDAI) Score at Weeks 16 and 24
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 16, 24
Change From Baseline in mCPDAI Index Score at Weeks 24 and 44
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 24, 44
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Change From Baseline in DAPSA Index Score at Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 44, and 56
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 44, 56
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) at Weeks 16 and 24
Time frame: Weeks 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MDA at Weeks 24 and 44
Time frame: Weeks 24 and 44
Change From Baseline in the Physical and Mental Component Summary (PCS and MCS) Scores of 36- Item Short Form Health Assessment Questionnaire (SF-36) at Weeks 16 and 24
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 16, 24
Change From Baseline in the PCS Scores of SF-36 at Weeks 24 and 44
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 24, 44
Change From Baseline in the MCS Scores of SF-36 at Weeks 24 and 44
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 24, 44
Change From Baseline in Norm-based SF-36 Scales at Week 16 and 24
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 16, 24
Change From Baseline in Norm-based SF-36 Scale at Week 24 and 44
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 24, 44
Change From Baseline in Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) Score at Weeks 16 and 24
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 16, 24
Change From Baseline in RAPID3 Score at Weeks 24 and 44
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 24, 44
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90 and PASI 100 Response at Weeks 16 and 24
Time frame: Weeks 16 and 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Feb 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37906417Strober B, Coates LC, Lebwohl MG, Deodhar A, Leibowitz E, Rowland K, Kollmeier AP, Miller M, Wang Y, Li S, Chakravarty SD, Chan D, Shawi M, Yang YW, Thaҫi D, Rahman P. Long-Term Safety of Guselkumab in Patients with Psoriatic Disease: An Integrated Analysis of Eleven Phase II/III Clinical Studies in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis. Drug Saf. 2024 Jan;47(1):39-57. doi: 10.1007/s40264-023-01361-w. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36642439Rahman P, Boehncke WH, Mease PJ, Gottlieb AB, McInnes IB, Shawi M, Wang Y, Sheng S, Kollmeier AP, Theander E, Yu J, Leibowitz E, Marrache AM, Coates LC. Safety of Guselkumab With and Without Prior Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Treatment: Pooled Results Across 4 Studies in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2023 Jun;50(6):769-780. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.220928. Epub 2023 Jan 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32665433Mease PJ, Gladman DD, Deodhar A, McGonagle DG, Nash P, Boehncke WH, Gottlieb A, Xu XL, Xu S, Hsia EC, Karyekar CS, Helliwell PS. Impact of guselkumab, an interleukin-23 p19 subunit inhibitor, on enthesitis and dactylitis in patients with moderate to severe psoriatic arthritis: results from a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase II study. RMD Open. 2020 Jul;6(2):e001217. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001217.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31421033Helliwell PS, Deodhar A, Gottlieb AB, Boehncke WH, Xu XL, Xu S, Wang Y, Hsia EC, Gladman DD, Ritchlin CT. Composite Measures of Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis: Comparative Instrument Performance Based on the Efficacy of Guselkumab in an Interventional Phase II Trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Nov;72(11):1579-1588. doi: 10.1002/acr.24046.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29893222Deodhar A, Gottlieb AB, Boehncke WH, Dong B, Wang Y, Zhuang Y, Barchuk W, Xu XL, Hsia EC; CNTO1959PSA2001 Study Group. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study. Lancet. 2018 Jun 2;391(10136):2213-2224. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30952-8. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
Related trials for Psoriatic Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Extension Study of Safety and Tolerability of DDY391 in Participants With Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis (CDDY391A12201-extension)
Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis
Recruiting
Efficacy of a Self-Management Smartphone App to Improve Safety Skills in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis
Rhumatoid Arthisis, Spondyloarthritis (SA)
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn if Bimekizumab Given in Different Ways is Safe and Moves Similarly Throughout the Body Over Time in Adults
Psoriatic Arthritis, Axial Spondyloarthritis
RecruitingPhase 4
Impact of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Analogs on Disease Outcomes in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Guselkumab vs Golimumab in PsA TNF Inadequate Responder Patients
Psoriatic Arthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial study director
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
41 sites in 7 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Guselkumab and Ustekinumab in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 41 sites in 7 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 41 sites in United States, Russia, Germany, Spain, Canada and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Oct 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24 (time frame: Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02319759, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Feb 2025.