Acute Myeloid LeukemiaPhase 3FLUGAZANCT02319135
Azacytidine (Vidaza®) Versus Fludarabine and Cytarabine (Fluga Scheme) in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
A Phase 3 study testing Azacitadine, Fludarabine and Cytarabine in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, run by PETHEMA Foundation at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
The hypothesis is that the replacement of the standard fludarabine and cytarabine based therapy by azacytidine could result in an improvement of RFS and OS rates in the experimental arm. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- What is being tested?
- Azacitadine, Fludarabine and Cytarabine
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 289 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- Oct 2014to 28 Oct 2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- - Having voluntarily given informed consent before performing any test that is not part of
- routine care of patients.
- - Age greater than or equal to 65.
- - Morphological diagnosis of non-promyelocytic AML according to the WHO criteria.
- - Newly diagnosed AML.
- - ECOG performance status <4.
- - Ability and willingness to comply with the schedule of study visits.
Who cannot join
- - Genetic diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia.
- - Patients with AML secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or chronic myeloproloferative syndrome who have been previously treated with antileukemic agents
- (hypomethylating or standard chemotherapy). Treatment with hydroxyurea prior to randomization is allowed.
- - Serum creatinine ≥ 250 mmol / l (≥ 2.5 mg/dL) (unless attributed to AML).
- - Bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase or ALT > 5 times the value of the upper limit of normal (unless attributed to AML) .
- - Presence of an active and/or non controlled pathology different to AML which is severe and life-threatening, that in the investigator's opinion, prevents the subject participation in the study.
Show all 10Show fewer
- - Other active concomitant malignancy or whose remission is less than one year from the screening day (except carcinoma in situ).
- - Presence of any psychiatric illness or medical condition that, in the investigator's opinion, prevents the subject participation in the study.
- - Life expectancy less than X months.
- - Inability of the patient or his legal representative to understand and voluntarily sign the informed consent form.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A PHASE III, MULTICENTRE, RANDOMIZED, OPEN LABEL CLINICAL TRIAL OF AZACYTIDINE (VIDAZA®) VERSUS FLUDARABINE AND CYTARABINE (FLUGA SCHEME) IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA.
The hypothesis is that the replacement of the standard fludarabine and cytarabine based therapy by azacytidine could result in an improvement of RFS and OS rates in the experimental arm. To fulfill the medical needs in such frail and elderly population, improvements in terms of atileukemic efficacy in the azacytidine experimental arm should be attained without increasing the therapy-related toxicity or decreasing the patients QoL.
Read the detailed description
This is a multicenter, randomized 1:1, open, and at national level, Phase III clinical trial.
This study will be conducted in 3 phases of different duration:
- Selection phase (up to 14 days from the signature of informed consent): informed consent and review of the inclusion and exclusion criteria performing the relevant assessments.
- Treatment Phase (from the start of treatment until the end of cycle 9): Induction phase (3 cycles) and consolidation phase (cycles 4-9). Study visits during treatment will be weekly during the induction phase (first 3 cycles) and every 2 weeks until the end of the consolidation phase.
- Follow-up phase: monthly monitoring will be performed on all patients until they have completed a minimum of 2 years from the start of treatment, whether or not they continue receiving azacitidine cycles or Mini-Fluga according to the protocol. Following these 24 months, follow-up will be carried out at least quarterly. Patients suffering disease progression or relapse of the disease, or being early withdrawn due to any of the reasons specified in the protocol will be followed-up for survival until the end of the study or until the death of all patients, whichever comes first.
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- Being tested
- Azacitadine, Fludarabine, Cytarabine, Lenograstim, Filgastrim
- Keywords
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AzacitadineDrug
FludarabineDrug
CytarabineDrug
LenograstimDrug
FilgastrimDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| fludarabine cytarabine | Active comparator | Priming with daily administration of subcutaneous G-CSF (lenograstim or filgrastim 5 mcg /kg / day, days -1, 1 and 2) (not given if hyperleukocytosis> 25 x 109/l), followed by:
* Oral fludarabine (40 mg/m2/day, days 1 to 5) and subcutaneous cytarabine (75mg/m2/day, days 1 to 5) (FLUGA scheme) (fludarabine and cytarabine only days 1 to 4 if age ≥75 years), OR
* Fludarabine (25 mg/m2/day) and cytarabine (75 mg/m2/day infusion of 6 hours) on their intravenous formulations if the patient is hospitalized (patients with hyperleukocytosis or other unfavourable conditions).
Treatment cycles every 28 days Receives: Drug: Fludarabine; Drug: Cytarabine; Drug: Lenograstim; Drug: Filgastrim |
| Azacitidine | Experimental | Subcutaneous Azacitidine 75 mg/m2/day, days 1 to 7. Treatment cycles every 28 days. Receives: Drug: Azacitadine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Efficacy (overall survival (OS) attained without increasing the therapy-related toxicity or decreasing the patients QoL.
To evaluate the overall survival (OS) in one year treatment with 2 first-line regimens in newly diagnosed elderly patients: 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy based on fludarabine and cytarabine (FLUGA scheme) followed by maintenance with reduced doses(Mini-FLUGA) (standard treatment arm) versus subcutaneous azacitidine cycles (experimental treatment arm).
Measured: 4 years
Secondary outcomes (4)
Efficacy (Event free survival (EFS)
Event free survival (EFS)
Measured: 4 years
Efficacy (Duration of remission.)
Duration of remission.
Measured: 4 years
Efficacy (Overall survival) Efficcacy
Overall survival at 2nd and 3rd year.
Measured: 3 years
Safety (Compare hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity)
Compare hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity in both arms.
Measured: 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2014
- Primary completion28 Oct 2018
- Study completion28 Oct 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Myeloid LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 289 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- PETHEMA Foundation
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Dynamic Solutions
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pau Montesinos, Dr, Principal investigator, PETHEMA Foundation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02319135
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FLUGAZA
- Acronym
- FLUGAZA
- Status last verified
- Apr 2020
- First submitted
- 10 Dec 2014
- Last updated
- 6 Apr 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Ayala R, Rapado I, Onecha E, Martinez-Cuadron D, Carreno-Tarragona G, Bergua JM, Vives S, Algarra JL, Tormo M, Martinez P, Serrano J, Herrera P, Ramos F, Salamero O, Lavilla E, Gil C, Lopez Lorenzo JL, Vidriales MB, Labrador J, Falantes JF, Sayas MJ, Paiva B, Barragan E, Prosper F, Sanz MA, Martinez-Lopez J, Montesinos P, On Behalf Of The Programa Para El Estudio de la Terapeutica En Hemopatias Malignas Pethema Cooperative Study Group. The Mutational Landscape of Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Predicts Responses and Outcomes in Elderly Patients from the PETHEMA-FLUGAZA Phase 3 Clinical Trial. Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 18;13(10):2458. doi: 10.3390/cancers13102458.
PubMed 34070172
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Apr 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A PHASE III, MULTICENTRE, RANDOMIZED, OPEN LABEL CLINICAL TRIAL OF AZACYTIDINE (VIDAZA®) VERSUS FLUDARABINE AND CYTARABINE (FLUGA SCHEME) IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02319135
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FLUGAZA / FLUGAZA
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- Keywords
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 289 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PETHEMA FoundationUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Dynamic Solutions
- Study start
- Oct 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Oct 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The hypothesis is that the replacement of the standard fludarabine and cytarabine based therapy by azacytidine could result in an improvement of RFS and OS rates in the experimental arm. To fulfill the medical needs in such frail and elderly population, improvements in terms of atileukemic efficacy in the azacytidine experimental arm should be attained without increasing the therapy-related toxicity or decreasing the patients QoL.
Detailed description
This is a multicenter, randomized 1:1, open, and at national level, Phase III clinical trial.
This study will be conducted in 3 phases of different duration:
- Selection phase (up to 14 days from the signature of informed consent): informed consent and review of the inclusion and exclusion criteria performing the relevant assessments.
- Treatment Phase (from the start of treatment until the end of cycle 9): Induction phase (3 cycles) and consolidation phase (cycles 4-9). Study visits during treatment will be weekly during the induction phase (first 3 cycles) and every 2 weeks until the end of the consolidation phase.
- Follow-up phase: monthly monitoring will be performed on all patients until they have completed a minimum of 2 years from the start of treatment, whether or not they continue receiving azacitidine cycles or Mini-Fluga according to the protocol. Following these 24 months, follow-up will be carried out at least quarterly. Patients suffering disease progression or relapse of the disease, or being early withdrawn due to any of the reasons specified in the protocol will be followed-up for survival until the end of the study or until the death of all patients, whichever comes first.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| fludarabine cytarabine | Active comparator | Drug: Fludarabine, Drug: Cytarabine, Drug: Lenograstim, Drug: FilgastrimPriming with daily administration of subcutaneous G-CSF (lenograstim or filgrastim 5 mcg /kg / day, days -1, 1 and 2) (not given if hyperleukocytosis> 25 x 109/l), followed by: * Oral fludarabine (40 mg/m2/day, days 1 to 5) and subcutaneous cytarabine (75mg/m2/day, days 1 to 5) (FLUGA scheme) (fludarabine and cytarabine only days 1 to 4 if age ≥75 years), OR * Fludarabine (25 mg/m2/day) and cytarabine (75 mg/m2/day infusion of 6 hours) on their intravenous formulations if the patient is hospitalized (patients with hyperleukocytosis or other unfavourable conditions). Treatment cycles every 28 days |
| Azacitidine | Experimental | Drug: AzacitadineSubcutaneous Azacitidine 75 mg/m2/day, days 1 to 7. Treatment cycles every 28 days. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- - Having voluntarily given informed consent before performing any test that is not part of
- routine care of patients.
- - Age greater than or equal to 65.
- - Morphological diagnosis of non-promyelocytic AML according to the WHO criteria.
- - Newly diagnosed AML.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- - Genetic diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia.
- - Patients with AML secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or chronic myeloproloferative syndrome who have been previously treated with antileukemic agents
- (hypomethylating or standard chemotherapy). Treatment with hydroxyurea prior to randomization is allowed.
- - Serum creatinine ≥ 250 mmol / l (≥ 2.5 mg/dL) (unless attributed to AML).
- - Bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase or ALT > 5 times the value of the upper limit of normal (unless attributed to AML) .
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Azacitadine | Drug | Azacitidine |
| Fludarabine | Drug | fludarabine cytarabine |
| Cytarabine | Drug | fludarabine cytarabine |
| Lenograstim | Drug | fludarabine cytarabine |
| Filgastrim | Drug | fludarabine cytarabine |
Primary outcome
Efficacy (overall survival (OS) attained without increasing the therapy-related toxicity or decreasing the patients QoL.
Time frame: 4 years
To evaluate the overall survival (OS) in one year treatment with 2 first-line regimens in newly diagnosed elderly patients: 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy based on fludarabine and cytarabine (FLUGA scheme) followed by maintenance with reduced doses(Mini-FLUGA) (standard treatment arm) versus subcutaneous azacitidine cycles (experimental treatment arm).
4 secondary outcomes
Efficacy (Event free survival (EFS)
Time frame: 4 years
Efficacy (Duration of remission.)
Time frame: 4 years
Efficacy (Overall survival) Efficcacy
Time frame: 3 years
Safety (Compare hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity)
Time frame: 3 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Apr 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34070172Ayala R, Rapado I, Onecha E, Martinez-Cuadron D, Carreno-Tarragona G, Bergua JM, Vives S, Algarra JL, Tormo M, Martinez P, Serrano J, Herrera P, Ramos F, Salamero O, Lavilla E, Gil C, Lopez Lorenzo JL, Vidriales MB, Labrador J, Falantes JF, Sayas MJ, Paiva B, Barragan E, Prosper F, Sanz MA, Martinez-Lopez J, Montesinos P, On Behalf Of The Programa Para El Estudio de la Terapeutica En Hemopatias Malignas Pethema Cooperative Study Group. The Mutational Landscape of Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Predicts Responses and Outcomes in Elderly Patients from the PETHEMA-FLUGAZA Phase 3 Clinical Trial. Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 18;13(10):2458. doi: 10.3390/cancers13102458.
- CROLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CHM-029 in Participants With NPM1 Mutated, KMT2A or NUP98 Rearranged AML
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Venetoclax and CLAG-M for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High-Grade Myeloid Neoplasms
Acute Biphenotypic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
ATRN-119 in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With TP53-Mutated AML or Higher-Risk MDS
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pau Montesinos, Dr principal investigator
PETHEMA Foundation
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Azacitadine, Fludarabine and Cytarabine in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, run by PETHEMA Foundation at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Efficacy (overall survival (OS) attained without increasing the therapy-related toxicity or decreasing the patients QoL. (time frame: 4 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02319135, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Apr 2020.