Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL)Phase 2NCT02314247
Efficacy and Safety Study of Selinexor in Relapsed or Refractory Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma or Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma
A Phase 2 study testing Selinexor in people with Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL) and Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma (CTCL), run by Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc at 5 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
This is a single-arm, multi-center, open-label phase 2 study of the SINE™ compound selinexor given orally to patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL or CTCL. Approximately 60 patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL or CTCL who meet the eligibility criteria and have none of the exclusion criteria will be enrolled… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL), Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma (CTCL)
- What is being tested?
- Selinexor
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 16 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Feb 2015to Feb 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ECOG performance status of ≤2.
- Relapsed or refractory disease to at least one prior systemic regimen.
- Measurable disease: according to International Working Group (IWG) guidelines for all patients with PTCL and according to CTCL Response in Skin consensus criteria for all patients with CTCL.
- Objective, documented evidence of disease progression on study entry.
Who cannot join
- Known active central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma.
- Active graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. At least 4 months must have elapsed since completion of allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
- Unable to swallow tablets or malabsorption syndrome, disease significantly affecting gastrointestinal function.
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 2 countries.
5 sites in 2 countries
Australia4 sites
Concord Repatriation General Hospital (CRGH)
Concord, New South Wales, 2139
Cabrini Hospital
Malvern, Victoria
Royal North Shore Hospital
St Leonards, New South Wales, 2139
Westmead Hospital
Westmead, New South Wales, 2145
About this study
Official title: Multi-center, Phase 2, Open-label Study of Efficacy and Safety of the Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE™) Selinexor (KPT-330) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL) and Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma (CTCL)
This is a single-arm, multi-center, open-label phase 2 study of the SINE™ compound selinexor given orally to patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL or CTCL.
Approximately 60 patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL or CTCL who meet the eligibility criteria and have none of the exclusion criteria will be enrolled to receive selinexor until either disease progression or intolerance has occurred.
Read the detailed description
This is a single-arm, multi-center, open-label phase 2 study of the SINE™ compound selinexor given orally to patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL or CTCL.
Approximately 60 patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL or CTCL who meet the eligibility criteria and have none of the exclusion criteria will be enrolled to receive selinexor until either disease progression or intolerance has occurred.
Enrolled patients will be given selinexor as an oral fixed 60 mg dose (equivalent to ~35 mg/m²) on Days 1 and 3 of Weeks 1-4 of each 4-week cycle (total 8 doses per cycle).
There is no maximum treatment duration. Patients will receive supportive therapy to mitigate selinexor side effects, as well as best supportive care (BSC).
Patients enrolled under Protocol Versions <3.0 were to receive selinexor orally, at a fixed dose of 60 mg (equivalent to ~35 mg/m²) on Days 1 and 3 of Weeks 1-3 of each 4-week cycle (total of 6 doses per cycle). Selinexor was not taken during Week 4.
For all patients enrolled in this study (regardless of the protocol version) who continued onto Cycle 3 and forward, the dose was to be increased by 20 mg to 80 mg (administered on Days 1 and 3 of Weeks 1-4), only after consultation with the Sponsor's Medical Monitor.
- Being tested
- Selinexor
- Keywords
- PTCL, CTCL, Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma, Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Karyopharm, KPT-330, Selinexor
- Medical subject headings
- Lymphoma, T-Cell, Peripheral, Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SelinexorDrug
Also called KPT-330
20 mg oral tablets: 60 mg dose on Days 1 and 3 of Weeks 1-4 of each 4-week cycle (Protocol V.3.0).
20 mg oral tablets: 60 mg dose on Days 1 and 3 of Weeks 1-3 of each 4-week cycle (Protocol V.<3.0).
Number of Cycles: up to 12 but there is no maximal duration for treatment.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Selinexor | Experimental | 60 mg dose (equivalent to ~35 mg/m²) Receives: Drug: Selinexor |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Overall Response (OR) = Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR). Objective disease response assessment in PTCL patients was made according to the revised response criteria based on the International Working Group (IWG) guidelines for malignant lymphoma (Cheson, 2007). Objective disease response assessment in CTCL patients was assessed according to the revised CTCL Consensus Response Criteria (Olsen, 2011) using physical examination, including the Modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) for skin assessment. CTCL Global Response Score was used as a secondary efficacy assessment. Progression was defined as the first occurrence of progressive disease (PD) per the revised response criteria. Clinical disease progression in the absence of formal criteria for PD must be documented by a physician.
Measured: Disease response was assessed at screening and every 8 weeks (patients with PTCL); or at Cycle 1 Day 1 and every 4 weeks (patients with CTCL), until disease progression.
Best Overall Response: Complete Response (CR)
Patients who achieved CR (disappearance of all detectable evidence of disease). Objective disease response assessment in PTCL patients was made according to the revised response criteria based on the International Working Group (IWG) guidelines for malignant lymphoma (Cheson, 2007). Objective disease response assessment in CTCL patients was assessed according to the revised CTCL Consensus Response Criteria (Olsen, 2011) using physical examination, including the Modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) for skin assessment. CTCL Global Response Score was used as a secondary efficacy assessment.
Measured: Disease response was assessed at screening and every 8 weeks (patients with PTCL); or at Cycle 1 Day 1 and every 4 weeks (patients with CTCL), until disease progression.
Best Overall Response: Partial Response (PR)
Patients whose best overall response to study treatment was PR (regression of measurable disease and no new sites). Objective disease response assessment in PTCL patients was made according to the revised response criteria based on the International Working Group (IWG) guidelines for malignant lymphoma (Cheson, 2007). Objective disease response assessment in CTCL patients was assessed according to the revised CTCL Consensus Response Criteria (Olsen, 2011) using physical examination, including the Modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) for skin assessment. CTCL Global Response Score was used as a secondary efficacy assessment.
Measured: Disease response was assessed at screening and every 8 weeks (patients with PTCL); or at Cycle 1 Day 1 and every 4 weeks (patients with CTCL), until disease progression.
Best Overall Response: Stable Disease (SD)
Patients whose best overall response to study treatment was SD (failure to attain criteria needed for CR or PR, or to meet criteria for PD). Objective disease response assessment in PTCL patients was made according to the revised response criteria based on the International Working Group (IWG) guidelines for malignant lymphoma (Cheson, 2007). Objective disease response assessment in CTCL patients was assessed according to the revised CTCL Consensus Response Criteria (Olsen, 2011) using physical examination, including the Modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) for skin assessment. CTCL Global Response Score was used as a secondary efficacy assessment.
Measured: Disease response was assessed at screening and every 8 weeks (patients with PTCL); or at Cycle 1 Day 1 and every 4 weeks (patients with CTCL), until disease progression.
Best Overall Response: Progressive Disease (PD)
Patients whose best overall response to study treatment was PD. Progression was defined as the first occurrence of progressive disease (PD). Objective disease response assessment in PTCL patients was made according to the revised response criteria based on the International Working Group (IWG) guidelines for malignant lymphoma (Cheson, 2007). Objective disease response assessment in CTCL patients was assessed according to the revised CTCL Consensus Response Criteria (Olsen, 2011) using physical examination, including the Modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) for skin assessment. CTCL Global Response Score was used as a secondary efficacy assessment. Clinical disease progression in the absence of formal criteria for PD must be documented by a physician.
Measured: Disease response was assessed at screening and every 8 weeks (patients with PTCL); or at Cycle 1 Day 1 and every 4 weeks (patients with CTCL), until disease progression.
Best Overall Response: Not Evaluable (NE)
Patients who could not be assessed quantitatively for disease response for any reason.
Measured: Disease response was assessed at screening and every 8 weeks (patients with PTCL); or at Cycle 1 Day 1 and every 4 weeks (patients with CTCL), until disease progression.
Secondary outcomes (3)
Duration of Stable Disease, Including Patients With Partial Response
Duration of time from the date of start of study treatment to the date of disease progression. Objective disease response assessment in PTCL patients was made according to the revised response criteria based on the International Working Group (IWG) guidelines for malignant lymphoma (Cheson, 2007). Objective disease response assessment in CTCL patients was assessed according to the revised CTCL Consensus Response Criteria (Olsen, 2011) using physical examination, including the Modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) for skin assessment. CTCL Global Response Score was used as a secondary efficacy assessment.
Measured: Date of start of study treatment to date of progression. Patients without documented PD are censored on date of last radiologic assessment.
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Percentage of patients who have CR, PR, or SD lasting ≥ 8 weeks. Objective disease response assessment in PTCL patients was made according to the revised response criteria based on the International Working Group (IWG) guidelines for malignant lymphoma (Cheson, 2007). Objective disease response assessment in CTCL patients was assessed according to the revised CTCL Consensus Response Criteria (Olsen, 2011) using physical examination, including the Modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) for skin assessment. CTCL Global Response Score was used as a secondary efficacy assessment.
Measured: Disease response was assessed at screening and every 8 weeks (patients with PTCL); or at Cycle 1 Day 1 and every 4 weeks (patients with CTCL), until disease progression.
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Duration of time from start of study treatment to date of disease progression or death from any cause.
Measured: Study treatment start date to date of disease progression or date of death. Patients without documented PD are censored on date of last radiologic assessment.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2015
- Primary completionJan 2016
- Study completionFeb 2016
Why it stopped: Due to enrollment challenges
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02314247
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KCP-330-013
- Status last verified
- Jan 2023
- First submitted
- 3 Dec 2014
- Last updated
- 26 Jan 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jan 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multi-center, Phase 2, Open-label Study of Efficacy and Safety of the Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE™) Selinexor (KPT-330) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL) and Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma (CTCL)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02314247
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KCP-330-013
- Keywords
- PTCL, CTCL, Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma, Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Karyopharm, KPT-330, Selinexor
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Due to enrollment challenges
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Karyopharm Therapeutics IncIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 2015
- Primary completion
- Jan 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 20 Aug 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a single-arm, multi-center, open-label phase 2 study of the SINE™ compound selinexor given orally to patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL or CTCL.
Approximately 60 patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL or CTCL who meet the eligibility criteria and have none of the exclusion criteria will be enrolled to receive selinexor until either disease progression or intolerance has occurred.
Detailed description
This is a single-arm, multi-center, open-label phase 2 study of the SINE™ compound selinexor given orally to patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL or CTCL.
Approximately 60 patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL or CTCL who meet the eligibility criteria and have none of the exclusion criteria will be enrolled to receive selinexor until either disease progression or intolerance has occurred.
Enrolled patients will be given selinexor as an oral fixed 60 mg dose (equivalent to ~35 mg/m²) on Days 1 and 3 of Weeks 1-4 of each 4-week cycle (total 8 doses per cycle).
There is no maximum treatment duration. Patients will receive supportive therapy to mitigate selinexor side effects, as well as best supportive care (BSC).
Patients enrolled under Protocol Versions <3.0 were to receive selinexor orally, at a fixed dose of 60 mg (equivalent to ~35 mg/m²) on Days 1 and 3 of Weeks 1-3 of each 4-week cycle (total of 6 doses per cycle). Selinexor was not taken during Week 4.
For all patients enrolled in this study (regardless of the protocol version) who continued onto Cycle 3 and forward, the dose was to be increased by 20 mg to 80 mg (administered on Days 1 and 3 of Weeks 1-4), only after consultation with the Sponsor's Medical Monitor.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Selinexor | Experimental | Drug: Selinexor60 mg dose (equivalent to ~35 mg/m²) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- ECOG performance status of ≤2.
- Relapsed or refractory disease to at least one prior systemic regimen.
- Measurable disease: according to International Working Group (IWG) guidelines for all patients with PTCL and according to CTCL Response in Skin consensus criteria for all patients with CTCL.
- Objective, documented evidence of disease progression on study entry.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Known active central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma.
- Active graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. At least 4 months must have elapsed since completion of allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
- Unable to swallow tablets or malabsorption syndrome, disease significantly affecting gastrointestinal function.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SelinexorAlso: KPT-33020 mg oral tablets: 60 mg dose on Days 1 and 3 of Weeks 1-4 of each 4-week cycle (Protocol V.3.0). 20 mg oral tablets: 60 mg dose on Days 1 and 3 of Weeks 1-3 of each 4-week cycle (Protocol V.<3.0). Number of Cycles: up to 12 but there is no maximal duration for treatment. | Drug | Selinexor |
Primary outcome
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Time frame: Disease response was assessed at screening and every 8 weeks (patients with PTCL); or at Cycle 1 Day 1 and every 4 weeks (patients with CTCL), until disease progression.
Overall Response (OR) = Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR). Objective disease response assessment in PTCL patients was made according to the revised response criteria based on the International Working Group (IWG) guidelines for malignant lymphoma (Cheson, 2007). Objective disease response assessment in CTCL patients was assessed according to the revised CTCL Consensus Response Criteria (Olsen, 2011) using physical examination, including the Modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) for skin assessment. CTCL Global Response Score was used as a secondary efficacy assessment. Progression was defined as the first occurrence of progressive disease (PD) per the revised response criteria. Clinical disease progression in the absence of formal criteria for PD must be documented by a physician.
Best Overall Response: Complete Response (CR)
Time frame: Disease response was assessed at screening and every 8 weeks (patients with PTCL); or at Cycle 1 Day 1 and every 4 weeks (patients with CTCL), until disease progression.
Patients who achieved CR (disappearance of all detectable evidence of disease). Objective disease response assessment in PTCL patients was made according to the revised response criteria based on the International Working Group (IWG) guidelines for malignant lymphoma (Cheson, 2007). Objective disease response assessment in CTCL patients was assessed according to the revised CTCL Consensus Response Criteria (Olsen, 2011) using physical examination, including the Modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) for skin assessment. CTCL Global Response Score was used as a secondary efficacy assessment.
Best Overall Response: Partial Response (PR)
Time frame: Disease response was assessed at screening and every 8 weeks (patients with PTCL); or at Cycle 1 Day 1 and every 4 weeks (patients with CTCL), until disease progression.
Patients whose best overall response to study treatment was PR (regression of measurable disease and no new sites). Objective disease response assessment in PTCL patients was made according to the revised response criteria based on the International Working Group (IWG) guidelines for malignant lymphoma (Cheson, 2007). Objective disease response assessment in CTCL patients was assessed according to the revised CTCL Consensus Response Criteria (Olsen, 2011) using physical examination, including the Modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) for skin assessment. CTCL Global Response Score was used as a secondary efficacy assessment.
Best Overall Response: Stable Disease (SD)
Time frame: Disease response was assessed at screening and every 8 weeks (patients with PTCL); or at Cycle 1 Day 1 and every 4 weeks (patients with CTCL), until disease progression.
Patients whose best overall response to study treatment was SD (failure to attain criteria needed for CR or PR, or to meet criteria for PD). Objective disease response assessment in PTCL patients was made according to the revised response criteria based on the International Working Group (IWG) guidelines for malignant lymphoma (Cheson, 2007). Objective disease response assessment in CTCL patients was assessed according to the revised CTCL Consensus Response Criteria (Olsen, 2011) using physical examination, including the Modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) for skin assessment. CTCL Global Response Score was used as a secondary efficacy assessment.
Best Overall Response: Progressive Disease (PD)
Time frame: Disease response was assessed at screening and every 8 weeks (patients with PTCL); or at Cycle 1 Day 1 and every 4 weeks (patients with CTCL), until disease progression.
Patients whose best overall response to study treatment was PD. Progression was defined as the first occurrence of progressive disease (PD). Objective disease response assessment in PTCL patients was made according to the revised response criteria based on the International Working Group (IWG) guidelines for malignant lymphoma (Cheson, 2007). Objective disease response assessment in CTCL patients was assessed according to the revised CTCL Consensus Response Criteria (Olsen, 2011) using physical examination, including the Modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) for skin assessment. CTCL Global Response Score was used as a secondary efficacy assessment. Clinical disease progression in the absence of formal criteria for PD must be documented by a physician.
Best Overall Response: Not Evaluable (NE)
Time frame: Disease response was assessed at screening and every 8 weeks (patients with PTCL); or at Cycle 1 Day 1 and every 4 weeks (patients with CTCL), until disease progression.
Patients who could not be assessed quantitatively for disease response for any reason.
3 secondary outcomes
Duration of Stable Disease, Including Patients With Partial Response
Time frame: Date of start of study treatment to date of progression. Patients without documented PD are censored on date of last radiologic assessment.
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Time frame: Disease response was assessed at screening and every 8 weeks (patients with PTCL); or at Cycle 1 Day 1 and every 4 weeks (patients with CTCL), until disease progression.
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: Study treatment start date to date of disease progression or date of death. Patients without documented PD are censored on date of last radiologic assessment.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jan 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL)
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Platform Trial Evaluating New Drugs or Combination in R/R Peripheral T-cell Lymphomas
Peripheral T Cells Lymphoma (PTCL), Follicular Helper T-Cell Lymphoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Zilovertamab Vedotin and Lenalidomide (ZiVLen) Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma
Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Refractory
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of MDSY-1240, a STAT3 Degrader, for the Treatment of Hematologic Malignancies and Advanced Solid Tumors
Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC), Gastric Cancer (GC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Anti-ICOS Monoclonal Antibody MEDI-570 in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma Follicular Variant or Angioimmunoblastic T-cell Lymphoma
Advanced Primary Cutaneous T-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Recurrent Follicular Helper T-Cell Lymphoma, Angioimmunoblastic-Type
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Dose Escalation Study Evaluating CPI-818 in Relapsed/Refractory T-Cell Lymphoma
T-cell Lymphoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
5 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Selinexor in people with Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL) and Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma (CTCL), run by Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc at 5 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in Australia, Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Aug 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Response Rate (ORR) (time frame: Disease response was assessed at screening and every 8 weeks (patients with PTCL); or at Cycle 1 Day 1 and every 4 weeks (patients with CTCL), until disease progression.). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jan 2023.