Low Back PainSeMoPoPNCT02304120
Sensorimotor Training in Low-back Pain Rehabilitation
A study testing Proprioceptive postural training, Treadmill training and Conventional physiotherapy in people with Low Back Pain, run by Michael A. McCaskey at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
This study evaluates the effects of additional sensorimotor training (proprioceptive postural training, PPT) to conventional therapy in the treatment of chronic low-back pain. Half of the participants will receive instructed treadmill training as an active comparator against PPT. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Low Back Pain
- What is being tested?
- Proprioceptive postural training, Treadmill training and Conventional physiotherapy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- Dec 2014to Jan 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with musculoskeletal low back pain (non-specific low back pain)
- Age ≥ 18 years
Who cannot join
- Known or suspected neurological diseases or lesions
- Traumatic injury of musculoskeletal system (fractures, tumours)
- Spinal pathologies (e.g., tumour, infection, fracture, and inflammatory disease)
- Previous spinal surgery
- Presence of any contraindication to exercise (fracture or cardiovascular limitations)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effects of a Sensorimotor Training on Postural Control and Pain: A Parallel, Single-blinded Randomised Controlled Trial
This study evaluates the effects of additional sensorimotor training (proprioceptive postural training, PPT) to conventional therapy in the treatment of chronic low-back pain. Half of the participants will receive instructed treadmill training as an active comparator against PPT. All participants receive conventional physiotherapy as prescribed by their treating medical doctors. It is expected that the PPT group will improve in postural control, proprioceptive, as well as pain and function outcomes to a significantly greater extent than the active control group.
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Being tested
- Proprioceptive postural training, Treadmill training, Conventional physiotherapy
- Keywords
- proprioception, postural control, sensorimotor training, uncontrolled manifold
- Medical subject headings
- Low Back Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Proprioceptive postural trainingOther
Also called Sensorimotor training
Treadmill trainingOther
Conventional physiotherapyOther
All participating patients will attend usual care according to their treatment plan (taking part in the study does not affect the treatment plan). A physiotherapy referral requests 9 treatments, each of which takes 30 minutes. These will take place twice a week for 4.5 weeks. The study protocol does not dictate the content of the physiotherapy sessions themselves, but detailed documentation of provided treatments is required (therapy documentation sheet). Additionally, the aim of the physiotherapy sessions should always include reduction of muscular imbalances and optimisation of posture.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sensorimotor | Experimental | The experimental group will receive added PPT to the conventional physiotherapy. PPT will be applied by means of a neuro-orthopaedic medical device ("Posturomed®", see section 3.2). The "Posturomed" allows adaptive oscillation in the horizontal plane. Therapy instructions advise seven stages of difficulty. In all stages the patient is asked to provoke oscillation by stepping on site. After three steps, the patient must stand still on one leg for 2 seconds before he or she repeats the steps. Difficulty is increased by a) decreasing the damping through release of the breaks and b) through added juggling of a ball during the motor task (dual-task and divided attention). The next stage is reached once stabilisation in the previous stage is secured. Receives: Other: Proprioceptive postural training; Other: Conventional physiotherapy |
| Low-intensity activity | Active comparator | Added to conventional therapy, as administered to all participants, the control group will do added treadmill walking. The control intervention will consist of 10 minutes of walking at comfortable pace. The patient will be instructed in treadmill functions and asked to set the speed between 2 and 4 km/h. The speed should be adjusted to the level where the patient would still be able to talk comfortably. Receives: Other: Treadmill training; Other: Conventional physiotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change of self-reported pain on 100mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Measured: Baseline (-4 days); Pre-Test (0 days); Post-Test (+25 days) and follow-up (+45 days)
Change of functional status recorded with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Measured: Baseline (-4 days); Pre-Test (0 days); Post-Test (+25 days) and follow-up (+45 days)
Secondary outcomes (3)
Centre of Pressure
Area of surface a the 95% confidence ellipse of centre of pressure displacement during postural task
Measured: Baseline (-4 days); Pre-Test (0 days); Post-Test (+25 days) and follow-up (+45 days)
Joint Repositioning Error (segmental)
Repositioning acuity after surface perturbation.
Measured: Baseline (-4 days); Pre-Test (0 days); Post-Test (+25 days) and follow-up (+45 days)
Uncontrolled Manifold Index (UCM)
Segmental joint configuration.
Measured: Baseline (-4 days); Pre-Test (0 days); Post-Test (+25 days) and follow-up (+45 days)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2014
- Primary completionDec 2015
- Study completionJan 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Michael A. McCaskey
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Zurich
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Michael A. McCaskey, Reha Rheinfelden
- Investigators
- Michael A McCaskey, MSc, Principal investigator, Reha RheinfeldenEling D. de Bruin, PD PhD, Study chair, ETH ZurichCorina Schuster-Amft, PT PhD, Study chair, Reha Rheinfelden
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02304120
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2014-0873
- Acronym
- SeMoPoP
- Status last verified
- Apr 2016
- First submitted
- 17 Nov 2014
- Last updated
- 6 Apr 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Scholz JP, Schoner G. The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task. Exp Brain Res. 1999 Jun;126(3):289-306. doi: 10.1007/s002210050738.
PubMed 10382616McCaskey MA, Wirth B, Schuster-Amft C, de Bruin ED. Postural sensorimotor training versus sham exercise in physiotherapy of patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: An exploratory randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2018 Mar 9;13(3):e0193358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193358. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 29522571McCaskey MA, Schuster-Amft C, Wirth B, de Bruin ED. Effects of postural specific sensorimotor training in patients with chronic low back pain: study protocol for randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Dec 15;16:571. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1104-4.
PubMed 26666457
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Apr 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of a Sensorimotor Training on Postural Control and Pain: A Parallel, Single-blinded Randomised Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02304120
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SeMoPoP / 2014-0873
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Keywords
- proprioception, postural control, sensorimotor training, uncontrolled manifold
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Michael A. McCaskeyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Zurich
- Study start
- Dec 2014
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates the effects of additional sensorimotor training (proprioceptive postural training, PPT) to conventional therapy in the treatment of chronic low-back pain. Half of the participants will receive instructed treadmill training as an active comparator against PPT. All participants receive conventional physiotherapy as prescribed by their treating medical doctors. It is expected that the PPT group will improve in postural control, proprioceptive, as well as pain and function outcomes to a significantly greater extent than the active control group.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sensorimotor | Experimental | Other: Proprioceptive postural training, Other: Conventional physiotherapyThe experimental group will receive added PPT to the conventional physiotherapy. PPT will be applied by means of a neuro-orthopaedic medical device ("Posturomed®", see section 3.2). The "Posturomed" allows adaptive oscillation in the horizontal plane. Therapy instructions advise seven stages of difficulty. In all stages the patient is asked to provoke oscillation by stepping on site. After three steps, the patient must stand still on one leg for 2 seconds before he or she repeats the steps. Difficulty is increased by a) decreasing the damping through release of the breaks and b) through added juggling of a ball during the motor task (dual-task and divided attention). The next stage is reached once stabilisation in the previous stage is secured. |
| Low-intensity activity | Active comparator | Other: Treadmill training, Other: Conventional physiotherapyAdded to conventional therapy, as administered to all participants, the control group will do added treadmill walking. The control intervention will consist of 10 minutes of walking at comfortable pace. The patient will be instructed in treadmill functions and asked to set the speed between 2 and 4 km/h. The speed should be adjusted to the level where the patient would still be able to talk comfortably. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients with musculoskeletal low back pain (non-specific low back pain)
- Age ≥ 18 years
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Known or suspected neurological diseases or lesions
- Traumatic injury of musculoskeletal system (fractures, tumours)
- Spinal pathologies (e.g., tumour, infection, fracture, and inflammatory disease)
- Previous spinal surgery
- Presence of any contraindication to exercise (fracture or cardiovascular limitations)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Proprioceptive postural trainingAlso: Sensorimotor training | Other | Sensorimotor |
| Treadmill training | Other | Low-intensity activity |
| Conventional physiotherapyAll participating patients will attend usual care according to their treatment plan (taking part in the study does not affect the treatment plan). A physiotherapy referral requests 9 treatments, each of which takes 30 minutes. These will take place twice a week for 4.5 weeks. The study protocol does not dictate the content of the physiotherapy sessions themselves, but detailed documentation of provided treatments is required (therapy documentation sheet). Additionally, the aim of the physiotherapy sessions should always include reduction of muscular imbalances and optimisation of posture. | Other | Low-intensity activity, Sensorimotor |
Primary outcome
Change of self-reported pain on 100mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time frame: Baseline (-4 days); Pre-Test (0 days); Post-Test (+25 days) and follow-up (+45 days)
Change of functional status recorded with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time frame: Baseline (-4 days); Pre-Test (0 days); Post-Test (+25 days) and follow-up (+45 days)
3 secondary outcomes
Centre of Pressure
Time frame: Baseline (-4 days); Pre-Test (0 days); Post-Test (+25 days) and follow-up (+45 days)
Joint Repositioning Error (segmental)
Time frame: Baseline (-4 days); Pre-Test (0 days); Post-Test (+25 days) and follow-up (+45 days)
Uncontrolled Manifold Index (UCM)
Time frame: Baseline (-4 days); Pre-Test (0 days); Post-Test (+25 days) and follow-up (+45 days)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Apr 2016.
- Background: PubMed 10382616Scholz JP, Schoner G. The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task. Exp Brain Res. 1999 Jun;126(3):289-306. doi: 10.1007/s002210050738.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29522571McCaskey MA, Wirth B, Schuster-Amft C, de Bruin ED. Postural sensorimotor training versus sham exercise in physiotherapy of patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: An exploratory randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2018 Mar 9;13(3):e0193358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193358. eCollection 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26666457McCaskey MA, Schuster-Amft C, Wirth B, de Bruin ED. Effects of postural specific sensorimotor training in patients with chronic low back pain: study protocol for randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Dec 15;16:571. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1104-4.
Related trials for Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael A McCaskey, MSc principal investigator
Reha Rheinfelden
Eling D. de Bruin, PD PhD study chair
ETH Zurich
Corina Schuster-Amft, PT PhD study chair
Reha Rheinfelden
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Proprioceptive postural training, Treadmill training and Conventional physiotherapy in people with Low Back Pain, run by Michael A. McCaskey at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Apr 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change of self-reported pain on 100mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (time frame: Baseline (-4 days); Pre-Test (0 days); Post-Test (+25 days) and follow-up (+45 days)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02304120, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Apr 2016.