Coronary Artery Bypass SurgeryPhase 2MACBCNCT02303704
Myocardial Protection With Multiport Antegrade Cold Blood Cardioplegia
A Phase 2 study testing multiport antegrade cardioplegia and Aortic root antegrade cardioplegia in people with Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery, run by Chaudhry Pervaiz Elahi Institute of Cardiology.
Trial summary
In spite improvements in methods of myocardial protection, peri-operative myocardial damage is still the commonest cause of early morbidity and mortality after technically successful CABG Surgery. What is the optimum method of myocardial protection is still debatable. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
- What is being tested?
- multiport antegrade cardioplegia and Aortic root antegrade cardioplegia
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 448 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Apr 2013to Aug 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All patients undergoing isolated conventional CABG were included in the study
Who cannot join
- The redo CABG surgery. Those who required 2 or less than 2 grafts. Patients who had major postoperative neurological complications like stroke. 2nd arterial graft along with LIMA. Patients who need CABG within a week of STEMI or NSTEMI. Patients with calcified or diseased aorta in which single cross clamp technique was used for proximal aorto-coronary anastomosis
About this study
Official title: Myocardial Protection With Multiport Antegrade Cold Blood Cardioplegia and Continuous Controlled Warm Shot Through Vein Grafts During Proximal Ends Anastomosis in Conventional CABG
In spite improvements in methods of myocardial protection, peri-operative myocardial damage is still the commonest cause of early morbidity and mortality after technically successful CABG Surgery. What is the optimum method of myocardial protection is still debatable.
The investigators conducted this study to see effects of multiport antegrade cold blood cardioplegia on myocardial protection, along with continuous controlled warm blood perfusion through veins graft during proximal ends anastomosis in conventional CABG surgery in patients having multi-vessel disease.
Read the detailed description
A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted between April-2013 and June-2014, in the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Chaudary Pervaiz Elahi Institute of cardiology (CPEIC) Multan, Pakistan. The CPEIC is a tertiary cardiac care center and is presently performing over 600 coronary artery bypass surgery annually. The study was conducted in strict compliance of the rules established by the revised Helsinki convention and had approval from the ethical committee of the institute.
Patients undergoing isolated conventional CABG were included in the study except; The redo CABG, those who required 2 or less than 2 grafts, patients who had major postoperative neurological complications like stroke, 2nd arterial graft along with LIMA, patients who need CABG within a week of STEMI or NSTEMI and Patients with calcified or diseased aorta in which single cross clamp technique was used for proximal aorto-coronary anastomosis.
The patients were randomized into two groups by using draw randomization technique. The investigators made 112 sets, each set containing four patients. The staff nurse on duty was requested to pick up the two folded papers from four containing hidden identity of the patients. The patients chosen by draw were included in the study group, others in the control group.
Group I: Patients who received multiport antegrade cardioplegia and continuous controlled warm blood perfusion through vein grafts (Study Group) and Group II: Patients who underwent routine conventional CABG with antegrade aortic root cardioplegia without warm blood perfusion (Control Group).
All operations were carried out by two consultant surgeons at the investigators institution, who are certified cardiac surgeons with sufficient experience. Patients were premedicated with oral dose of 3mg bromazepam the night before surgery. Anaesthesia was induced with intra-venous morphine (0.1mg/kg), midazolam (0.05-0.1 mg /kg), and propofol (1.0-2.5 mg/kg titrated according to the response. They were given atracuronium (1mg/kg) before endotracheal intubation. The anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflorane/isoflurane.
In all patients the standard cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was established with an ascending aortic arterial cannula and a two stage single venous cannula in the right atrium. The CPB circuit was primed with crystalloid Ringer's solution. Heparin was administered in a dose of 400 U/Kg. The body temperature was lowered to 30-32°C. The local cooling was achieved with ice cold saline. Cold blood cardioplegia was used in each group. The first dose of cardioplegia was 10-15 ml/kg and further doses were given as 5-7ml/kg repeated after each graft or after 20 minutes. Cold blood cardioplegia was given by using cardioplegia delivery system including heat exchanger in both groups. A cardioplegia delivery cannula with a separate vent line (DLP Medtronic, Grand Rapids, MI, USA) was inserted into the ascending aorta. The pump flow rate was kept between 2.0 and 2.4 L/min/m2 to maintain a mean arterial pressure of 55 - 70 mmHg. In both groups, myocardial protection was achieved by an initial antegrade infusion of cold (4 °C) blood cardioplegic potassium solution followed by intermittent antegrade cold blood cardioplegia at the completion of each distal anastomosis via a cardioplegia delivery cannula from the aortic root. Whereas in Group I, a multiple perfusion set was used to deliver cardioplegia simultaneously in aortic root and vein grafts. After the distal anastomosis of each vein graft had been completed, the proximal ends were connected to the free branch of the multi- perfusion set. In this way, simultaneous intermittent antegrade graft cardioplegia was administered in addition to aortic root cardioplegia (named as multiport antegrade cardioplegia).
LIMA and great saphenous vein were used as conduits. LIMA was anastomosed to LAD and other coronary vessels received greater saphenous vein grafts as conduits.
Just before the removal of the aortic cross-clamp, warm blood shot (normo-kalemic) was started through multi-perfusion set attached to cardioplegia cannula in the aortic root and vein grafts in Group I. As contraction of heart started the multiport limb attached to cardioplegia cannula was off and cross clamp was removed .The warm perfusion through the vein grafts was continued at controlled pressures of about 50-70 mmHg, flow rate of 10-30ml/min/graft and temperature of 35-37 oC. Proximal anastmosis was performed in both groups using partial occluding clamp.
The necessity of inotropic support and the choice of inotropic drugs to be administered during weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were determined by a cardiac anaesthetist team, who were blinded and independent with respect to the study.
The CK-MB levels were determined at five points of time i.e. before operation, immediately after shifting to ICU, at 12, 24 hours and 36 hours after shifting of patient to ICU. The reagent used for determining the serum CK-MB levels was the product of Merck (Merck, France) and the designated reference value for detection of myocardial damage were >25 units/liter for CK-MB.
448 patient characteristics were prospectively entered in the investigators electronic database (CASCADE DATABASES, Lahore, Pakistan). The study specific data not included in the database were separately entered in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet (MS Excel, version 2007, Microsoft Co USA). The statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS (SPSS version 20, SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). The preoperative, operative and postoperative characteristics were summarized using means and standard deviation for the numeric variables. The groups were compared using Student's t-test for numeric variables and Chi-square test for categorical variables.
The significance of differences between the groups was expressed as p-value and a value of <0.05 was considered significant.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
- Being tested
- multiport antegrade cardioplegia, Aortic root antegrade cardioplegia
- Keywords
- Multiperfusion set, Myocardial protection, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
multiport antegrade cardioplegiaProcedure or surgery
Also called multiperfusion set
Cold blood cardioplegia was used for myocardial protection and just before the removal of the aortic cross-clamp, warm blood shot (normo-kalemic) was started through multi-perfusion set attached to cardioplegia cannula in the aortic root and vein grafts.As contraction of heart started the multiport limb attached to cardioplegia cannula was off and cross clamp was removed .The warm perfusion through the vein grafts was continued at controlled pressures of about 50-70 mmHg, flow rate of 10-30ml/min/graft and temperature of 35-37 oC
Aortic root antegrade cardioplegiaProcedure or surgery
only cold blood cardioplegia was used for myocardial protection without hotshot.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| multiport antegrade cardioplegia | Active comparator | Patients who received multiport antegrade cardioplegia and continuous controlled warm blood perfusion through vein grafts. Receives: Procedure: multiport antegrade cardioplegia |
| Aortic root antegrade cardioplegia | Active comparator | Patients who underwent routine conventional CABG with antegrade aortic root cardioplegia without warm blood perfusion Receives: Procedure: Aortic root antegrade cardioplegia |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Post-op CK-MB Levels
CK-MB is a marker of Myocardial Damage.
Measured: 36 hours after surgery.
Secondary outcomes (5)
Pharmacologic Inotropic Support (Adrenaline)
The need, dose and duration of adrenaline infusion to maintain hemodynamic stability after surgery were noted.
Measured: Upto 1 week after sugery
Pharmacological Inotropic Support (Nor-adrenaline)
The need, dose and duration of Nor-adrenaline infusion to maintain hemodynamic stability after surgery.
Measured: Upto 1 week after sugery
Pharamacological Inotropic Support (Dobutamine)
The Need, Dose and duration of Dobutamine to maintain hemodynamic stability after surgery.
Measured: Upto 1 week after sugery
Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Counter-pulsation (IABPC) Support
The need of IABPC (mechanical support) before surgery or during weaning from Cardiopulmonary bypass and in ICU to assist in maintaining hemodynamics of the patient.
Measured: 24 hours before surgery and upto 1 week of surgical procedure.
Operative Mortality
Deaths due to surgical complication during or after surgery.
Measured: Within 30 days after surgical Procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2013
- Primary completionJun 2014
- Study completionAug 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (22)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery Bypass SurgeryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 448 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chaudhry Pervaiz Elahi Institute of Cardiology
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Muhammad Sher-i-Murtaza, Chaudhry Pervaiz Elahi Institute of Cardiology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02303704
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- multanic
- Acronym
- MACBC
- Status last verified
- Feb 2021
- First submitted
- 19 Nov 2014
- Last updated
- 9 Feb 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Mack MJ, Brown PP, Kugelmass AD, Battaglia SL, Tarkington LG, Simon AW, Culler SD, Becker ER. Current status and outcomes of coronary revascularization 1999 to 2002: 148,396 surgical and percutaneous procedures. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Mar;77(3):761-6; discussion 766-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.06.019.
PubMed 14992867Onorati F, De Feo M, Mastroroberto P, Cristodoro L, Pezzo F, Renzulli A, Cotrufo M. Determinants and prognosis of myocardial damage after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Mar;79(3):837-45. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.07.060.
PubMed 15734390Steuer J, Horte LG, Lindahl B, Stahle E. Impact of perioperative myocardial injury on early and long-term outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur Heart J. 2002 Aug;23(15):1219-27. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2002.3171.
PubMed 12127924Soltesz EG, Laurence RG, De Grand AM, Cohn LH, Mihaljevic T, Frangioni JV. Image-guided quantification of cardioplegia delivery during cardiac surgery. Heart Surg Forum. 2007;10(5):E381-6. doi: 10.1532/HSF98.20071099.
PubMed 17855203Sanjay OP, Srikrishna SV, Prashanth P, Kajrekar P, Vincent V. Antegrade versus antegrade with retrograde delivery of cardioplegic solution in myocardial revascularisation. A clinical study in patients with triple vessel coronary artery disease. Ann Card Anaesth. 2003 Jul;6(2):143-8.
PubMed 17827576Teoh KH, Christakis GT, Weisel RD, Fremes SE, Mickle DA, Romaschin AD, Harding RS, Ivanov J, Madonik MM, Ross IM, et al. Accelerated myocardial metabolic recovery with terminal warm blood cardioplegia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1986 Jun;91(6):888-95.
PubMed 3520161Onorati F, Renzulli A, De Feo M, Santarpino G, Gregorio R, Biondi A, Cerasuolo F, Cotrufo M. Does antegrade blood cardioplegia alone provide adequate myocardial protection in patients with left main stem disease? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Nov;126(5):1345-51. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(03)00736-0.
PubMed 14666005Tian G, Xiang B, Dai G, Sun J, Lindsay WG, Deslauriers R. Simultaneous antegrade/retrograde cardioplegia protects myocardium distal to a coronary occlusion: a study in isolated pig hearts. Magn Reson Med. 2001 Oct;46(4):773-80. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1256.
PubMed 11590654Allen BS, Winkelmann JW, Hanafy H, Hartz RS, Bolling KS, Ham J, Feinstein S. Retrograde cardioplegia does not adequately perfuse the right ventricle. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995 Jun;109(6):1116-24; discussion 1124-6. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70195-8.
PubMed 7776676Ardehali A, Gates RN, Laks H, Drinkwater DC Jr, Rudis E, Sorensen TJ, Chang P, Aharon A. The regional capillary distribution of retrograde blood cardioplegia in explanted human hearts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995 May;109(5):935-9; discussion 939-40. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70319-5.
PubMed 7739255Carrier M, Gregoire J, Khalil A, Thai P, Latour JG, Pelletier LC. Myocardial distribution of retrograde cardioplegic solution assessed by myocardial thallium 201 uptake. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994 Dec;108(6):1115-8.
PubMed 7983880Sabzi F, Zokaei A. Factors predicting coronary sinus rupture following cannula insertion for retrograde cardioplegia. Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2012;6:1-6. doi: 10.4137/CMC.S7861. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
PubMed 22259260Panos AL, Ali IS, Birnbaum PL, Barrozo CA, al-Nowaiser O, Salerno TA. Coronary sinus injuries during retrograde continuous normothermic blood cardioplegia. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992 Dec;54(6):1137-8. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(92)90082-f.
PubMed 1449299Radmehr H, Soleimani A, Tatari H, Salehi M. Does combined antegrade-retrograde cardioplegia have any superiority over antegrade cardioplegia? Heart Lung Circ. 2008 Dec;17(6):475-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2008.04.009. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
PubMed 18676202Guyton RA, Thourani VH, Puskas JD, Shanewise JS, Steele MA, Palmer-Steele CL, Vinten-Johansen J. Perfusion-assisted direct coronary artery bypass: selective graft perfusion in off-pump cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Jan;69(1):171-5. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)01386-7.
PubMed 10654508
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Feb 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Myocardial Protection With Multiport Antegrade Cold Blood Cardioplegia and Continuous Controlled Warm Shot Through Vein Grafts During Proximal Ends Anastomosis in Conventional CABG
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02303704
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MACBC / multanic
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
- Keywords
- Multiperfusion set, Myocardial protection, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 448 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Chaudhry Pervaiz Elahi Institute of CardiologyOther government
- Study start
- Apr 2013
- Primary completion
- Jun 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 8 Dec 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In spite improvements in methods of myocardial protection, peri-operative myocardial damage is still the commonest cause of early morbidity and mortality after technically successful CABG Surgery. What is the optimum method of myocardial protection is still debatable.
The investigators conducted this study to see effects of multiport antegrade cold blood cardioplegia on myocardial protection, along with continuous controlled warm blood perfusion through veins graft during proximal ends anastomosis in conventional CABG surgery in patients having multi-vessel disease.
Detailed description
A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted between April-2013 and June-2014, in the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Chaudary Pervaiz Elahi Institute of cardiology (CPEIC) Multan, Pakistan. The CPEIC is a tertiary cardiac care center and is presently performing over 600 coronary artery bypass surgery annually. The study was conducted in strict compliance of the rules established by the revised Helsinki convention and had approval from the ethical committee of the institute.
Patients undergoing isolated conventional CABG were included in the study except; The redo CABG, those who required 2 or less than 2 grafts, patients who had major postoperative neurological complications like stroke, 2nd arterial graft along with LIMA, patients who need CABG within a week of STEMI or NSTEMI and Patients with calcified or diseased aorta in which single cross clamp technique was used for proximal aorto-coronary anastomosis.
The patients were randomized into two groups by using draw randomization technique. The investigators made 112 sets, each set containing four patients. The staff nurse on duty was requested to pick up the two folded papers from four containing hidden identity of the patients. The patients chosen by draw were included in the study group, others in the control group.
Group I: Patients who received multiport antegrade cardioplegia and continuous controlled warm blood perfusion through vein grafts (Study Group) and Group II: Patients who underwent routine conventional CABG with antegrade aortic root cardioplegia without warm blood perfusion (Control Group).
All operations were carried out by two consultant surgeons at the investigators institution, who are certified cardiac surgeons with sufficient experience. Patients were premedicated with oral dose of 3mg bromazepam the night before surgery. Anaesthesia was induced with intra-venous morphine (0.1mg/kg), midazolam (0.05-0.1 mg /kg), and propofol (1.0-2.5 mg/kg titrated according to the response. They were given atracuronium (1mg/kg) before endotracheal intubation. The anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflorane/isoflurane.
In all patients the standard cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was established with an ascending aortic arterial cannula and a two stage single venous cannula in the right atrium. The CPB circuit was primed with crystalloid Ringer's solution. Heparin was administered in a dose of 400 U/Kg. The body temperature was lowered to 30-32°C. The local cooling was achieved with ice cold saline. Cold blood cardioplegia was used in each group. The first dose of cardioplegia was 10-15 ml/kg and further doses were given as 5-7ml/kg repeated after each graft or after 20 minutes. Cold blood cardioplegia was given by using cardioplegia delivery system including heat exchanger in both groups. A cardioplegia delivery cannula with a separate vent line (DLP Medtronic, Grand Rapids, MI, USA) was inserted into the ascending aorta. The pump flow rate was kept between 2.0 and 2.4 L/min/m2 to maintain a mean arterial pressure of 55 - 70 mmHg. In both groups, myocardial protection was achieved by an initial antegrade infusion of cold (4 °C) blood cardioplegic potassium solution followed by intermittent antegrade cold blood cardioplegia at the completion of each distal anastomosis via a cardioplegia delivery cannula from the aortic root. Whereas in Group I, a multiple perfusion set was used to deliver cardioplegia simultaneously in aortic root and vein grafts. After the distal anastomosis of each vein graft had been completed, the proximal ends were connected to the free branch of the multi- perfusion set. In this way, simultaneous intermittent antegrade graft cardioplegia was administered in addition to aortic root cardioplegia (named as multiport antegrade cardioplegia).
LIMA and great saphenous vein were used as conduits. LIMA was anastomosed to LAD and other coronary vessels received greater saphenous vein grafts as conduits.
Just before the removal of the aortic cross-clamp, warm blood shot (normo-kalemic) was started through multi-perfusion set attached to cardioplegia cannula in the aortic root and vein grafts in Group I. As contraction of heart started the multiport limb attached to cardioplegia cannula was off and cross clamp was removed .The warm perfusion through the vein grafts was continued at controlled pressures of about 50-70 mmHg, flow rate of 10-30ml/min/graft and temperature of 35-37 oC. Proximal anastmosis was performed in both groups using partial occluding clamp.
The necessity of inotropic support and the choice of inotropic drugs to be administered during weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were determined by a cardiac anaesthetist team, who were blinded and independent with respect to the study.
The CK-MB levels were determined at five points of time i.e. before operation, immediately after shifting to ICU, at 12, 24 hours and 36 hours after shifting of patient to ICU. The reagent used for determining the serum CK-MB levels was the product of Merck (Merck, France) and the designated reference value for detection of myocardial damage were >25 units/liter for CK-MB.
448 patient characteristics were prospectively entered in the investigators electronic database (CASCADE DATABASES, Lahore, Pakistan). The study specific data not included in the database were separately entered in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet (MS Excel, version 2007, Microsoft Co USA). The statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS (SPSS version 20, SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). The preoperative, operative and postoperative characteristics were summarized using means and standard deviation for the numeric variables. The groups were compared using Student's t-test for numeric variables and Chi-square test for categorical variables.
The significance of differences between the groups was expressed as p-value and a value of <0.05 was considered significant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| multiport antegrade cardioplegia | Active comparator | Procedure: multiport antegrade cardioplegiaPatients who received multiport antegrade cardioplegia and continuous controlled warm blood perfusion through vein grafts. |
| Aortic root antegrade cardioplegia | Active comparator | Procedure: Aortic root antegrade cardioplegiaPatients who underwent routine conventional CABG with antegrade aortic root cardioplegia without warm blood perfusion |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All patients undergoing isolated conventional CABG were included in the study
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- The redo CABG surgery. Those who required 2 or less than 2 grafts. Patients who had major postoperative neurological complications like stroke. 2nd arterial graft along with LIMA. Patients who need CABG within a week of STEMI or NSTEMI. Patients with calcified or diseased aorta in which single cross clamp technique was used for proximal aorto-coronary anastomosis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| multiport antegrade cardioplegiaAlso: multiperfusion setCold blood cardioplegia was used for myocardial protection and just before the removal of the aortic cross-clamp, warm blood shot (normo-kalemic) was started through multi-perfusion set attached to cardioplegia cannula in the aortic root and vein grafts.As contraction of heart started the multiport limb attached to cardioplegia cannula was off and cross clamp was removed .The warm perfusion through the vein grafts was continued at controlled pressures of about 50-70 mmHg, flow rate of 10-30ml/min/graft and temperature of 35-37 oC | Procedure or surgery | multiport antegrade cardioplegia |
| Aortic root antegrade cardioplegiaonly cold blood cardioplegia was used for myocardial protection without hotshot. | Procedure or surgery | Aortic root antegrade cardioplegia |
Primary outcome
Post-op CK-MB Levels
Time frame: 36 hours after surgery.
CK-MB is a marker of Myocardial Damage.
5 secondary outcomes
Pharmacologic Inotropic Support (Adrenaline)
Time frame: Upto 1 week after sugery
Pharmacological Inotropic Support (Nor-adrenaline)
Time frame: Upto 1 week after sugery
Pharamacological Inotropic Support (Dobutamine)
Time frame: Upto 1 week after sugery
Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Counter-pulsation (IABPC) Support
Time frame: 24 hours before surgery and upto 1 week of surgical procedure.
Operative Mortality
Time frame: Within 30 days after surgical Procedure
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Feb 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 14992867Mack MJ, Brown PP, Kugelmass AD, Battaglia SL, Tarkington LG, Simon AW, Culler SD, Becker ER. Current status and outcomes of coronary revascularization 1999 to 2002: 148,396 surgical and percutaneous procedures. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Mar;77(3):761-6; discussion 766-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.06.019.
- Background: PubMed 15734390Onorati F, De Feo M, Mastroroberto P, Cristodoro L, Pezzo F, Renzulli A, Cotrufo M. Determinants and prognosis of myocardial damage after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Mar;79(3):837-45. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.07.060.
- Background: PubMed 12127924Steuer J, Horte LG, Lindahl B, Stahle E. Impact of perioperative myocardial injury on early and long-term outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur Heart J. 2002 Aug;23(15):1219-27. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2002.3171.
- Background: PubMed 17855203Soltesz EG, Laurence RG, De Grand AM, Cohn LH, Mihaljevic T, Frangioni JV. Image-guided quantification of cardioplegia delivery during cardiac surgery. Heart Surg Forum. 2007;10(5):E381-6. doi: 10.1532/HSF98.20071099.
- Background: PubMed 17827576Sanjay OP, Srikrishna SV, Prashanth P, Kajrekar P, Vincent V. Antegrade versus antegrade with retrograde delivery of cardioplegic solution in myocardial revascularisation. A clinical study in patients with triple vessel coronary artery disease. Ann Card Anaesth. 2003 Jul;6(2):143-8.
- Background: PubMed 3520161Teoh KH, Christakis GT, Weisel RD, Fremes SE, Mickle DA, Romaschin AD, Harding RS, Ivanov J, Madonik MM, Ross IM, et al. Accelerated myocardial metabolic recovery with terminal warm blood cardioplegia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1986 Jun;91(6):888-95.
- Background: PubMed 14666005Onorati F, Renzulli A, De Feo M, Santarpino G, Gregorio R, Biondi A, Cerasuolo F, Cotrufo M. Does antegrade blood cardioplegia alone provide adequate myocardial protection in patients with left main stem disease? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Nov;126(5):1345-51. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(03)00736-0.
- Background: PubMed 11590654Tian G, Xiang B, Dai G, Sun J, Lindsay WG, Deslauriers R. Simultaneous antegrade/retrograde cardioplegia protects myocardium distal to a coronary occlusion: a study in isolated pig hearts. Magn Reson Med. 2001 Oct;46(4):773-80. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1256.
- Background: PubMed 7776676Allen BS, Winkelmann JW, Hanafy H, Hartz RS, Bolling KS, Ham J, Feinstein S. Retrograde cardioplegia does not adequately perfuse the right ventricle. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995 Jun;109(6):1116-24; discussion 1124-6. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70195-8.
- Background: PubMed 7739255Ardehali A, Gates RN, Laks H, Drinkwater DC Jr, Rudis E, Sorensen TJ, Chang P, Aharon A. The regional capillary distribution of retrograde blood cardioplegia in explanted human hearts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995 May;109(5):935-9; discussion 939-40. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70319-5.
- Background: PubMed 7983880Carrier M, Gregoire J, Khalil A, Thai P, Latour JG, Pelletier LC. Myocardial distribution of retrograde cardioplegic solution assessed by myocardial thallium 201 uptake. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994 Dec;108(6):1115-8.
- Background: PubMed 22259260Sabzi F, Zokaei A. Factors predicting coronary sinus rupture following cannula insertion for retrograde cardioplegia. Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2012;6:1-6. doi: 10.4137/CMC.S7861. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Thiamine Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Coronary Heart Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Anaesthetic Management in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Preoperative Fasting, Pulmonary Aspiration During Anesthetic Induction
Active, not recruiting
Investigation of the Effects of Respiratory Muscle Training Combined With Otago Exercises in Elderly Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing multiport antegrade cardioplegia and Aortic root antegrade cardioplegia in people with Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery, run by Chaudhry Pervaiz Elahi Institute of Cardiology.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Dec 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Post-op CK-MB Levels (time frame: 36 hours after surgery.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02303704, which also lists 22 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Feb 2021.