SubfertilityDOTNCT02302781
Why Subfertile Couples Drop Out
An observational study of Subfertility, run by Isala at 7 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Dropout rates for fertility treatments are high. This study will examine the rate of patients that drop out during any type of subfertility work up or treatment. Furthermore, we will determine what reasons for discontinuation are and we will identify the demographic characteristics of the couples and the prognostic… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 44 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Subfertility
- What is being tested?
- Questionnaires
- How many people
- 500 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- Apr 2015to 1 Aug 2023
- How long will I take part?
- 3 Years
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 44 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Study population: Couples referred to one of the four participating hospitals with any type of subfertility for work up and/ or treatment will be screened for inclusion. Couples have not visited any other clinic yet.
Who may be able to join
- Couples with any type of subfertility referred to one of the four participating centres
- Both partners are willing and able to separately fill out the questionnaires.
Who cannot join
- Unable to read or speak the Dutch language
- Medical contra-indication for pregnancy
- Previous OFO (initial infertility consultation), non IVF or IVF/ICSI cycles
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 1 country.
7 sites in 1 country
Netherlands7 sites
Noordwest Ziekenhuis Groep
Den Helder, North Holland, 1782 GZ
St Antonius Hospital
Nieuwegein, Utrecht, 3435 CM
Erasmus Medical Centre
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3000 CA
Elisabeth Twee Stedeb Hospital
Tilburg, North Brabant, 5022 GC
Maxima Medisch Centrum
Veldhoven, North Brabant, 5504 DB
Reinier de Graaf Ziekenhuis Groep
Voorburg, South Holland, 2275 CX
Isala
Zwolle, Overijssel, 8000 GK
About this study
Official title: Why Subfertile Couples Drop Out (Drop Out Trial); a Prospective Survey in the Netherlands.
Dropout rates for fertility treatments are high. This study will examine the rate of patients that drop out during any type of subfertility work up or treatment. Furthermore, we will determine what reasons for discontinuation are and we will identify the demographic characteristics of the couples and the prognostic factors for drop out during assessment or treatment at a Fertility Centre in the Isala (Zwolle), Erasmus University Centre (Rotterdam), Elisabeth Twee Steden Hospital (Tilburg), Reinier de Graaf Group (Voorburg), St Antonius Hospital (Nieuwegein), Maxima Medical Centre (Veldhoven) and Noordwest Hospital Group (Den Helder/Alkmaar) in The Netherlands.
Read the detailed description
Rationale Although fertility success rates are rising due to improved techniques and patients are usually highly motivated at their first visit of the clinic, dropout rates are high. Research has shown that fertility treatment is a cause for physical, psychological and economic burden.
Objective The aim of this study is to examine the rate of patient drop out during any type of subfertility work up or treatment. Furthermore, the investigators want to determine what the reasons for discontinuation are and to identify the demographic characteristics of these couples and the prognostic factors for drop out during assessment or treatment at a fertility clinic.
Study design Prospective cohort study at the fertility centres of Isala (Zwolle - The Netherlands), Erasmus University Centre (Rotterdam- The Netherlands), Elisabeth Twee Steden Hospital (Tilburg - The Netherlands), Reinier de Graaf Group (Voorburg - The Netherlands), St Antonius Hospital (Nieuwegein - The Netherlands), Maxima Medical Centre (Veldhoven - The Netherlands) and Noordwest Hospital Group (Den Helder/Alkmaar - The Netherlands).
Study population Every couple that undergoes any type of work up or treatment for subfertility problems and that has not visited any other clinic yet.
Methods Patient records of included couples will be studied and included patients will be asked to fill in a validated questionnaire after evaluations during work up or treatment. The data from both will be put in a database and analysed.
First visit (Q1) EPQ-RSS, SCREENIVF, MMQ, FertiQoL, demographic questions (128 items)
Evaluation (Q2) FertiQoL, HADS (48 items)
Evaluation (Q3) >4-6 cycles non-IVF (Q3) FertiQoL, HADS (48 items)
Evaluation (Q4) > 3 cycles IVF (Q4) FertiQoL, HADS (48 items)
Dropout (Q5) FertiQol, SCREENIVF, MMQ, PCQ-infertility, reasons for dropout (128 items)
Pregnancy (Q6) PCQ-infertility (53 items)
- Conditions
- Subfertility
- Being tested
- Questionnaires
- Keywords
- Reasons for Dropout, Subfertility, IVF, NON IVF
- Medical subject headings
- Infertility
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
QuestionnairesOther
Several validated questionnaires, depending on moment in fertility work up or treatment.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Subfertile couples | Couples referred to one of the four participating hospitals with any type of subfertility for work up and/ or treatment will be screened for inclusion. Couples have not visited only other clinic yet. Receives: Other: Questionnaires |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Dropout rates
To identify dropout rates at all stages of fertility care at the fertility centres of Isala (Zwolle), Erasmus MC (Rotterdam), IVF centre Voorburg (Voorburg), st Elisabeth (Tilburg).
Measured: 5 years
Secondary outcomes (4)
Reasons
Investigate the reasons for dropout, using the 'reason for dropout' questionnaire (made by the researchteam).
Measured: 5 years
Patient satisfaction
Examine patient satisfaction with received fertility care, using the 'patient centredness questionnaire infertility' (PCQ-infertility).
Measured: 5 years
Demographic characteristics
Identify demographic characteristics of dropout patients, using the 'demographic questions' (made by the researchteam).
Measured: 5 years
Predictors
Identify predictors for discontinuation, using the 'Eysenck personality questionnaire' (short version or EPQ-RSS), the 'SCREENIVF' (including 'Hospital anxiety and depression scale' or HADS) questionnaire, the 'fertility quality of life questionnaire' (FertiQol) and the 'Maudsley Marital Questionnaire' (MMQ).
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2015
- Primary completion1 Aug 2023
- Study completion1 Aug 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (22)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for SubfertilityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 3 Years
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Isala
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Erasmus Medical Center, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Reinier de Graaf Groep, St. Antonius Hospital, Maxima Medical Center, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, B.J. Cohlen, Isala
- Investigators
- B.J. Cohlen, MD/PhD, Principal investigator, Isala Zwolle
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02302781
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL47393.075.14
- Acronym
- DOT
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 25 Nov 2014
- Last updated
- 6 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Aarts JW, van Empel IW, Boivin J, Nelen WL, Kremer JA, Verhaak CM. Relationship between quality of life and distress in infertility: a validation study of the Dutch FertiQoL. Hum Reprod. 2011 May;26(5):1112-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der051. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
PubMed 21372046Aarts JW, Huppelschoten AG, van Empel IW, Boivin J, Verhaak CM, Kremer JA, Nelen WL. How patient-centred care relates to patients' quality of life and distress: a study in 427 women experiencing infertility. Hum Reprod. 2012 Feb;27(2):488-95. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der386. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
PubMed 22108249Boivin J, Takefman J, Braverman A. The fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) tool: development and general psychometric properties. Hum Reprod. 2011 Aug;26(8):2084-91. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der171. Epub 2011 Jun 10.
PubMed 21665875Brandes M, van der Steen JO, Bokdam SB, Hamilton CJ, de Bruin JP, Nelen WL, Kremer JA. When and why do subfertile couples discontinue their fertility care? A longitudinal cohort study in a secondary care subfertility population. Hum Reprod. 2009 Dec;24(12):3127-35. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep340. Epub 2009 Sep 26.
PubMed 19783833Dawson AA, Diedrich K, Felberbaum RE. Why do couples refuse or discontinue ART? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005 Nov;273(1):3-11. doi: 10.1007/s00404-005-0010-5. Epub 2005 Oct 28.
PubMed 16080011van Dongen AJ, Verhagen TE, Dumoulin JC, Land JA, Evers JL. Reasons for dropping out from a waiting list for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2010 Oct;94(5):1713-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.08.066. Epub 2009 Nov 6.
PubMed 19896662van Empel IW, Aarts JW, Cohlen BJ, Huppelschoten DA, Laven JS, Nelen WL, Kremer JA. Measuring patient-centredness, the neglected outcome in fertility care: a random multicentre validation study. Hum Reprod. 2010 Oct;25(10):2516-26. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq219. Epub 2010 Aug 18.
PubMed 20719811Gameiro S, Boivin J, Peronace L, Verhaak CM. Why do patients discontinue fertility treatment? A systematic review of reasons and predictors of discontinuation in fertility treatment. Hum Reprod Update. 2012 Nov-Dec;18(6):652-69. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dms031. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
PubMed 22869759Joseph O, Alfons V, Rob S. Further validation of the Maudsley Marital Questionnaire (MMQ). Psychol Health Med. 2007 May;12(3):346-52. doi: 10.1080/13548500600855481.
PubMed 17510905McDowell S, Murray A. Barriers to continuing in vitro fertilisation--why do patients exit fertility treatment? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011 Feb;51(1):84-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2010.01236.x. Epub 2010 Oct 22.
PubMed 21299515Olivius C, Friden B, Borg G, Bergh C. Why do couples discontinue in vitro fertilization treatment? A cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2004 Feb;81(2):258-61. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.06.029.
PubMed 14967352Rajkhowa M, McConnell A, Thomas GE. Reasons for discontinuation of IVF treatment: a questionnaire study. Hum Reprod. 2006 Feb;21(2):358-63. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei355. Epub 2005 Nov 3.
PubMed 16269448Smeenk JM, Verhaak CM, Stolwijk AM, Kremer JA, Braat DD. Reasons for dropout in an in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection program. Fertil Steril. 2004 Feb;81(2):262-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.09.027.
PubMed 14967353Spinhoven P, Ormel J, Sloekers PP, Kempen GI, Speckens AE, Van Hemert AM. A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects. Psychol Med. 1997 Mar;27(2):363-70. doi: 10.1017/s0033291796004382.
PubMed 9089829Van den Broeck U, Holvoet L, Enzlin P, Bakelants E, Demyttenaere K, D'Hooghe T. Reasons for dropout in infertility treatment. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2009;68(1):58-64. doi: 10.1159/000214839. Epub 2009 Apr 25.
PubMed 19401627
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Why Subfertile Couples Drop Out (Drop Out Trial); a Prospective Survey in the Netherlands.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02302781
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DOT / NL47393.075.14
- Conditions
- Subfertility
- Keywords
- Reasons for Dropout, Subfertility, IVF, NON IVF
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- IsalaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Erasmus Medical Center, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Reinier de Graaf Groep, St. Antonius Hospital, Maxima Medical Center, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep
- Study start
- Apr 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Aug 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Dropout rates for fertility treatments are high. This study will examine the rate of patients that drop out during any type of subfertility work up or treatment. Furthermore, we will determine what reasons for discontinuation are and we will identify the demographic characteristics of the couples and the prognostic factors for drop out during assessment or treatment at a Fertility Centre in the Isala (Zwolle), Erasmus University Centre (Rotterdam), Elisabeth Twee Steden Hospital (Tilburg), Reinier de Graaf Group (Voorburg), St Antonius Hospital (Nieuwegein), Maxima Medical Centre (Veldhoven) and Noordwest Hospital Group (Den Helder/Alkmaar) in The Netherlands.
Detailed description
Rationale Although fertility success rates are rising due to improved techniques and patients are usually highly motivated at their first visit of the clinic, dropout rates are high. Research has shown that fertility treatment is a cause for physical, psychological and economic burden.
Objective The aim of this study is to examine the rate of patient drop out during any type of subfertility work up or treatment. Furthermore, the investigators want to determine what the reasons for discontinuation are and to identify the demographic characteristics of these couples and the prognostic factors for drop out during assessment or treatment at a fertility clinic.
Study design Prospective cohort study at the fertility centres of Isala (Zwolle - The Netherlands), Erasmus University Centre (Rotterdam- The Netherlands), Elisabeth Twee Steden Hospital (Tilburg - The Netherlands), Reinier de Graaf Group (Voorburg - The Netherlands), St Antonius Hospital (Nieuwegein - The Netherlands), Maxima Medical Centre (Veldhoven - The Netherlands) and Noordwest Hospital Group (Den Helder/Alkmaar - The Netherlands).
Study population Every couple that undergoes any type of work up or treatment for subfertility problems and that has not visited any other clinic yet.
Methods Patient records of included couples will be studied and included patients will be asked to fill in a validated questionnaire after evaluations during work up or treatment. The data from both will be put in a database and analysed.
First visit (Q1) EPQ-RSS, SCREENIVF, MMQ, FertiQoL, demographic questions (128 items)
Evaluation (Q2) FertiQoL, HADS (48 items)
Evaluation (Q3) >4-6 cycles non-IVF (Q3) FertiQoL, HADS (48 items)
Evaluation (Q4) > 3 cycles IVF (Q4) FertiQoL, HADS (48 items)
Dropout (Q5) FertiQol, SCREENIVF, MMQ, PCQ-infertility, reasons for dropout (128 items)
Pregnancy (Q6) PCQ-infertility (53 items)
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 3 Years
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Subfertile couples | – | Other: QuestionnairesCouples referred to one of the four participating hospitals with any type of subfertility for work up and/ or treatment will be screened for inclusion. Couples have not visited only other clinic yet. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 44 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- Couples referred to one of the four participating hospitals with any type of subfertility for work up and/ or treatment will be screened for inclusion. Couples have not visited any other clinic yet.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Couples with any type of subfertility referred to one of the four participating centres
- Both partners are willing and able to separately fill out the questionnaires.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Unable to read or speak the Dutch language
- Medical contra-indication for pregnancy
- Previous OFO (initial infertility consultation), non IVF or IVF/ICSI cycles
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| QuestionnairesSeveral validated questionnaires, depending on moment in fertility work up or treatment. | Other | Subfertile couples |
Primary outcome
Dropout rates
Time frame: 5 years
To identify dropout rates at all stages of fertility care at the fertility centres of Isala (Zwolle), Erasmus MC (Rotterdam), IVF centre Voorburg (Voorburg), st Elisabeth (Tilburg).
4 secondary outcomes
Reasons
Time frame: 5 years
Patient satisfaction
Time frame: 5 years
Demographic characteristics
Time frame: 5 years
Predictors
Time frame: 5 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Mar 2024.
- Background: PubMed 21372046Aarts JW, van Empel IW, Boivin J, Nelen WL, Kremer JA, Verhaak CM. Relationship between quality of life and distress in infertility: a validation study of the Dutch FertiQoL. Hum Reprod. 2011 May;26(5):1112-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der051. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
- Background: PubMed 22108249Aarts JW, Huppelschoten AG, van Empel IW, Boivin J, Verhaak CM, Kremer JA, Nelen WL. How patient-centred care relates to patients' quality of life and distress: a study in 427 women experiencing infertility. Hum Reprod. 2012 Feb;27(2):488-95. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der386. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
- Background: PubMed 21665875Boivin J, Takefman J, Braverman A. The fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) tool: development and general psychometric properties. Hum Reprod. 2011 Aug;26(8):2084-91. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der171. Epub 2011 Jun 10.
- Background: PubMed 19783833Brandes M, van der Steen JO, Bokdam SB, Hamilton CJ, de Bruin JP, Nelen WL, Kremer JA. When and why do subfertile couples discontinue their fertility care? A longitudinal cohort study in a secondary care subfertility population. Hum Reprod. 2009 Dec;24(12):3127-35. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep340. Epub 2009 Sep 26.
- Background: PubMed 16080011Dawson AA, Diedrich K, Felberbaum RE. Why do couples refuse or discontinue ART? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005 Nov;273(1):3-11. doi: 10.1007/s00404-005-0010-5. Epub 2005 Oct 28.
- Background: PubMed 19896662van Dongen AJ, Verhagen TE, Dumoulin JC, Land JA, Evers JL. Reasons for dropping out from a waiting list for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2010 Oct;94(5):1713-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.08.066. Epub 2009 Nov 6.
- Background: PubMed 20719811van Empel IW, Aarts JW, Cohlen BJ, Huppelschoten DA, Laven JS, Nelen WL, Kremer JA. Measuring patient-centredness, the neglected outcome in fertility care: a random multicentre validation study. Hum Reprod. 2010 Oct;25(10):2516-26. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq219. Epub 2010 Aug 18.
- Background: PubMed 22869759Gameiro S, Boivin J, Peronace L, Verhaak CM. Why do patients discontinue fertility treatment? A systematic review of reasons and predictors of discontinuation in fertility treatment. Hum Reprod Update. 2012 Nov-Dec;18(6):652-69. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dms031. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
- Background: PubMed 17510905Joseph O, Alfons V, Rob S. Further validation of the Maudsley Marital Questionnaire (MMQ). Psychol Health Med. 2007 May;12(3):346-52. doi: 10.1080/13548500600855481.
- Background: PubMed 21299515McDowell S, Murray A. Barriers to continuing in vitro fertilisation--why do patients exit fertility treatment? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011 Feb;51(1):84-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2010.01236.x. Epub 2010 Oct 22.
- Background: PubMed 14967352Olivius C, Friden B, Borg G, Bergh C. Why do couples discontinue in vitro fertilization treatment? A cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2004 Feb;81(2):258-61. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.06.029.
- Background: PubMed 16269448Rajkhowa M, McConnell A, Thomas GE. Reasons for discontinuation of IVF treatment: a questionnaire study. Hum Reprod. 2006 Feb;21(2):358-63. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei355. Epub 2005 Nov 3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Subfertility
RecruitingObservational study
Association of Ultrasound Features of the Myometrium Suggestive of Adenomyosis and Clinical Symptoms
Adenomyosis of Uterus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Progesterone Luteal Support in Unexplained Infertility Management
Infertility, Female Infertility
RecruitingObservational study
Assessing the Correlation Between Phospholipase C Zeta Measurements and Semen Parameters
Male Infertility, Male Subfertility
RecruitingObservational study
The FLORA-project: in Search for the Microbial Cause of Chronic Endometritis and the Most Appropriate Treatment to Obtain a Successful Pregnancy IVF/ICSI
Endometritis; Chronic, Subfertility
RecruitingPhase 3
GnRH Agonist for Dual Trigger in IVF and for Luteal Phase Support in FET
Subfertility
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
B.J. Cohlen, MD/PhD principal investigator
Isala Zwolle
7 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Subfertility, run by Isala at 7 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Dropout rates (time frame: 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02302781, which also lists 22 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Mar 2024.