Brain ConcussionNCT02299128
Effectiveness of Early Physical Therapy Intervention for Patients With Dizziness After a Sports-Related Concussion
A study testing Physical Therapy Treatment in people with Brain Concussion and Dizziness, run by Walsh University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Therefore, the purpose of this pilot study is to determine the feasibility of conducting a randomized clinical trial (RCT) on physical therapist treatment for dizziness after sports-related concussion. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 10 to 23 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Brain Concussion, Dizziness
- What is being tested?
- Physical Therapy Treatment
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 41 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2014to Jan 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 10 to 23 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients age 10 - 23 who have sustained a sports-related concussion.
- Sports will include participation in any organized sporting activity (including club teams, recreational sports, or school teams).
- Patients with a history of learning disorders, use of medication (including psychotropics or narcotics) will be included.
Who cannot join
- Patients younger than 10 years or older than 23 years of age.
- If the patient has a concussion that was sustained during activities other than sports-related (bicycle accident, motor vehicle accident, or other non-sports related activities) they will not be enrolled in this study.
- Athletes with concussion who have symptoms but none of their complaints include dizziness or indicate a postural/vestibular/ocular or perceptual abnormality will be excluded.
- Finally, athletes who present to the sports-medicine physician for an initial assessment greater than 14 days after they sustained a concussion will be excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Feasibility Study for a Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effectiveness of Early Physical Therapy Intervention for Patients With Dizziness After a Sports-Related Concussion
Therefore, the purpose of this pilot study is to determine the feasibility of conducting a randomized clinical trial (RCT) on physical therapist treatment for dizziness after sports-related concussion. The specific research question for this pilot RCT is: What is the feasibility of conducting a RCT on athletes who have dizziness 10 or greater days after a sports-related concussion to explore the effectiveness of directed vestibular rehabilitation, neuromotor retraining, and/or manual physical therapy (PT) when compared to sham treatment? The findings of this study (for both feasibility and effect size) will be used to inform and direct revisions to the methods for a larger RCT on this population.
Primary Aims:
Read more
Specific Aim 1: Assess the feasibility of the following: recruitment and retention of participants, required resources for project management, and assessment of patient safety.
Specific Aim 2: Estimate the size of the effect between skilled physical therapist intervention and a sham treatment for the recovery rate for athletes with a concussion who have dizziness 10 - 14 days post-concussion.
Read the detailed description
Study design: This study will be a pilot feasibility study of a RCT, randomized at the individual level.
Subjects:
The population of interest includes athletes who are seen by the physicians from a Sports Medicine Center (on site at Akron Children's Hospital (ACH) or at proxy locations, e.g. Walsh University or North Canton Children's Hospital Clinic) with a sports-related concussion. The specific population of interest is concussed patients who present for a medical assessment with dizziness as measured by the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCS).
Sample Size and Sampling: Because this is a pilot study exploring the feasibility of the recruitment, retention and methods for a larger RCT, the sample is not intended to power a full scale study. It is standard for a pilot study to include at least 12 participants per arm of the study, however, because of the potential for loss to follow up the investigators plan to enroll 20 subjects per treatment group.
Study Subject Selection and Definitions: All patients who present to a Sports Medicine Center after an acute concussion (defined as any time between the event causing the concussion and up to 14 days after concussion) will complete the PCS. Within this 22 item scale, 7 items specify physical symptoms as components of the migraine cluster. These symptoms include: headaches, visual problems, dizziness, noise-light sensitivity, nausea/vomiting, balance problems, numbness/tingling. Although dizziness is the primary patient complaint being targeted, these other symptoms within the migraine cluster may also be present in addition to dizziness and may implicate a cervical, proprioceptive, and/or vestibular injury. For this reason, patients who report symptoms in the migraine cluster with one of the following criteria will be asked to enroll in the study at the initial assessment:
- An initial score of at least 3 on the 7 point Likert scale for dizziness as a singular symptom OR
- A score of 10 across the 7 items within the migraine cluster including a complaint of dizziness with at a score of at least 1 on the 7 point Likert scale OR
- If findings from the objective assessment conducted by the physician indicate that postural/vestibular/ocular perception is abnormal.
Methods Allocation: At day10 after concussion, patients who enrolled in the study at their initial medical visit will be contacted by e-mail through Qualtrics and will be asked to complete the PCS a second time (if the patient sees the medical provider from Sports Medicine between day 10 and day 14, this will done on that same day). If at day 10 - 14 after the concussion was sustained, the patient continues to report dizziness with a score of at least 3 or a total score in the migraine cluster of at least 10 (including a score of at least 1 for dizziness) he/she will be randomized into one of the treatment groups using a random allocation sequence generator. If the patient does not meet the threshold of symptoms at day 10 - 14, they will receive standard medical care from the Sports Medicine physicians but will not be randomized into one of the PT treatment arms. One study investigator will be responsible for assignment into the treatment groups using a 1:1 allocation ratio.
Blinding: This study will be conducted as a double-blind trial whereby the physicians in the sports-medicine center, the patient participants, and their families will be blinded to the treatment allocation (sham or skilled) of patients throughout the study time. Blinding here is important to limit study bias because the physicians will determine one key outcome, the timeframe for return to play, and the athletes will report on the second key outcome, symptom severity on the PCS. The PTs performing the assessment and treatments will not be blinded to the allocation of the patients as they will be delivering the intervention. The same therapists will deliver both treatments (sham and skilled) based on allocation. Because the PTs cannot be blinded to the allocation of treatment, they will not determine the timeframe for return to play.
Patient follow-up: All patients allocated into one of the treatment arms will be followed for 4 consecutive weeks or until they are released for return to play by the sports medicine physician. All patients will continue to be followed by physicians in the sports medicine practice (as that is the standard of care).
Patient safety: Because this study is challenging the rest paradigm and using a progressive and active treatment to manage acute dizziness, it is not without risk. Patients will be carefully monitored during each visit to determine their response to treatment. Since the sham treatment incorporates no actual therapeutic activities, an exacerbation in symptoms is not expected. The skilled treatment group is pragmatic, allowing the treating therapists to determine the type and aggressiveness of each treatment session. This gives therapists the ability to modify the activity using their expert clinical judgment. For all subjects in the study, patient response between PT sessions will be monitored at the beginning of each PT treatment. If patient symptoms increase between therapy sessions, greater than the standard error of measure 6.3 points, treatment will be ceased and patients will be referred back to Sports Medicine for follow up. All adverse events will be recorded.
- Conditions
- Brain Concussion, Dizziness
- Being tested
- Physical Therapy Treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Concussion, Dizziness
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Physical Therapy TreatmentOther
Also called Vestibular rehabilitation, Manual Therapy, Neuromotor training
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Minimally Therapeutic Treatment | Sham comparator | Non-differential, prescriptive protocol of physical therapy treatment with minimal to no therapeutic benefit. Receives: Other: Physical Therapy Treatment |
| Skilled Treatment | Experimental | Differential treatment based on the results from the assessment. Physical Therapy treatment in this arm will be pragmatically designed and modified by the treating therapist. Treatments will include manual therapy to the cervical spine, neuromotor retraining (position sense and movement sense), habituation and adaptation exercises. Receives: Other: Physical Therapy Treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Symptom recovery as measured by the Post Concussion Symptom (PCS) Score
7 point Likert scale (0 - 6) rating the severity of 22 symptoms commonly associated with concussion.
Measured: Final visit (by the end of 4 weeks of treatment)
Return to Play (RTP)
Five stage progressive increase in physical activity ranging from minimal exertion to full contact in a game
Measured: Final visit (by the end of 4 weeks of treatment)
Secondary outcomes (3)
Change Score of Functional Gait Assessment
Used to test balance with gait activities.
Measured: Initial assessment and final visit (by the end of 4 weeks of treatment)
Change score of Vertigo Symptom Scale - Short Form
Frequency of various types and durations of sensation of dizziness
Measured: Initial assessment and final visit (by the end of 4 weeks of treatment)
Global Response to Treatment
Global perception of change in physical symptoms from the beginning of treatment to the end
Measured: Final Visit (by the end of 4 weeks of treatment)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2014
- Primary completionDec 2015
- Study completionJan 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Brain ConcussionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 41 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Walsh University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron, Kent State University, American Academy of Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapists, Ohio Physical Therapy Association
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jennifer Reneker, Walsh University
- Investigators
- Jennifer C Reneker, MSPT, Principal investigator, Walsh University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02299128
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 14-20
- Status last verified
- Feb 2016
- First submitted
- 17 Nov 2014
- Last updated
- 25 Feb 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Feb 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Feasibility Study for a Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effectiveness of Early Physical Therapy Intervention for Patients With Dizziness After a Sports-Related Concussion
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02299128
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 14-20
- Conditions
- Brain Concussion, Dizziness
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 41 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Walsh UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron, Kent State University, American Academy of Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapists, Ohio Physical Therapy Association
- Study start
- Sep 2014
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Therefore, the purpose of this pilot study is to determine the feasibility of conducting a randomized clinical trial (RCT) on physical therapist treatment for dizziness after sports-related concussion. The specific research question for this pilot RCT is: What is the feasibility of conducting a RCT on athletes who have dizziness 10 or greater days after a sports-related concussion to explore the effectiveness of directed vestibular rehabilitation, neuromotor retraining, and/or manual physical therapy (PT) when compared to sham treatment? The findings of this study (for both feasibility and effect size) will be used to inform and direct revisions to the methods for a larger RCT on this population.
Primary Aims:
Specific Aim 1: Assess the feasibility of the following: recruitment and retention of participants, required resources for project management, and assessment of patient safety.
Specific Aim 2: Estimate the size of the effect between skilled physical therapist intervention and a sham treatment for the recovery rate for athletes with a concussion who have dizziness 10 - 14 days post-concussion.
Detailed description
Study design: This study will be a pilot feasibility study of a RCT, randomized at the individual level.
Subjects:
The population of interest includes athletes who are seen by the physicians from a Sports Medicine Center (on site at Akron Children's Hospital (ACH) or at proxy locations, e.g. Walsh University or North Canton Children's Hospital Clinic) with a sports-related concussion. The specific population of interest is concussed patients who present for a medical assessment with dizziness as measured by the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCS).
Sample Size and Sampling: Because this is a pilot study exploring the feasibility of the recruitment, retention and methods for a larger RCT, the sample is not intended to power a full scale study. It is standard for a pilot study to include at least 12 participants per arm of the study, however, because of the potential for loss to follow up the investigators plan to enroll 20 subjects per treatment group.
Study Subject Selection and Definitions: All patients who present to a Sports Medicine Center after an acute concussion (defined as any time between the event causing the concussion and up to 14 days after concussion) will complete the PCS. Within this 22 item scale, 7 items specify physical symptoms as components of the migraine cluster. These symptoms include: headaches, visual problems, dizziness, noise-light sensitivity, nausea/vomiting, balance problems, numbness/tingling. Although dizziness is the primary patient complaint being targeted, these other symptoms within the migraine cluster may also be present in addition to dizziness and may implicate a cervical, proprioceptive, and/or vestibular injury. For this reason, patients who report symptoms in the migraine cluster with one of the following criteria will be asked to enroll in the study at the initial assessment:
- An initial score of at least 3 on the 7 point Likert scale for dizziness as a singular symptom OR
- A score of 10 across the 7 items within the migraine cluster including a complaint of dizziness with at a score of at least 1 on the 7 point Likert scale OR
- If findings from the objective assessment conducted by the physician indicate that postural/vestibular/ocular perception is abnormal.
Methods Allocation: At day10 after concussion, patients who enrolled in the study at their initial medical visit will be contacted by e-mail through Qualtrics and will be asked to complete the PCS a second time (if the patient sees the medical provider from Sports Medicine between day 10 and day 14, this will done on that same day). If at day 10 - 14 after the concussion was sustained, the patient continues to report dizziness with a score of at least 3 or a total score in the migraine cluster of at least 10 (including a score of at least 1 for dizziness) he/she will be randomized into one of the treatment groups using a random allocation sequence generator. If the patient does not meet the threshold of symptoms at day 10 - 14, they will receive standard medical care from the Sports Medicine physicians but will not be randomized into one of the PT treatment arms. One study investigator will be responsible for assignment into the treatment groups using a 1:1 allocation ratio.
Blinding: This study will be conducted as a double-blind trial whereby the physicians in the sports-medicine center, the patient participants, and their families will be blinded to the treatment allocation (sham or skilled) of patients throughout the study time. Blinding here is important to limit study bias because the physicians will determine one key outcome, the timeframe for return to play, and the athletes will report on the second key outcome, symptom severity on the PCS. The PTs performing the assessment and treatments will not be blinded to the allocation of the patients as they will be delivering the intervention. The same therapists will deliver both treatments (sham and skilled) based on allocation. Because the PTs cannot be blinded to the allocation of treatment, they will not determine the timeframe for return to play.
Patient follow-up: All patients allocated into one of the treatment arms will be followed for 4 consecutive weeks or until they are released for return to play by the sports medicine physician. All patients will continue to be followed by physicians in the sports medicine practice (as that is the standard of care).
Patient safety: Because this study is challenging the rest paradigm and using a progressive and active treatment to manage acute dizziness, it is not without risk. Patients will be carefully monitored during each visit to determine their response to treatment. Since the sham treatment incorporates no actual therapeutic activities, an exacerbation in symptoms is not expected. The skilled treatment group is pragmatic, allowing the treating therapists to determine the type and aggressiveness of each treatment session. This gives therapists the ability to modify the activity using their expert clinical judgment. For all subjects in the study, patient response between PT sessions will be monitored at the beginning of each PT treatment. If patient symptoms increase between therapy sessions, greater than the standard error of measure 6.3 points, treatment will be ceased and patients will be referred back to Sports Medicine for follow up. All adverse events will be recorded.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Minimally Therapeutic Treatment | Sham comparator | Other: Physical Therapy TreatmentNon-differential, prescriptive protocol of physical therapy treatment with minimal to no therapeutic benefit. |
| Skilled Treatment | Experimental | Other: Physical Therapy TreatmentDifferential treatment based on the results from the assessment. Physical Therapy treatment in this arm will be pragmatically designed and modified by the treating therapist. Treatments will include manual therapy to the cervical spine, neuromotor retraining (position sense and movement sense), habituation and adaptation exercises. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 10 to 23 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients age 10 - 23 who have sustained a sports-related concussion.
- Sports will include participation in any organized sporting activity (including club teams, recreational sports, or school teams).
- Patients with a history of learning disorders, use of medication (including psychotropics or narcotics) will be included.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients younger than 10 years or older than 23 years of age.
- If the patient has a concussion that was sustained during activities other than sports-related (bicycle accident, motor vehicle accident, or other non-sports related activities) they will not be enrolled in this study.
- Athletes with concussion who have symptoms but none of their complaints include dizziness or indicate a postural/vestibular/ocular or perceptual abnormality will be excluded.
- Finally, athletes who present to the sports-medicine physician for an initial assessment greater than 14 days after they sustained a concussion will be excluded.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Physical Therapy TreatmentAlso: Vestibular rehabilitation, Manual Therapy, Neuromotor training | Other | Minimally Therapeutic Treatment, Skilled Treatment |
Primary outcome
Symptom recovery as measured by the Post Concussion Symptom (PCS) Score
Time frame: Final visit (by the end of 4 weeks of treatment)
7 point Likert scale (0 - 6) rating the severity of 22 symptoms commonly associated with concussion.
Return to Play (RTP)
Time frame: Final visit (by the end of 4 weeks of treatment)
Five stage progressive increase in physical activity ranging from minimal exertion to full contact in a game
3 secondary outcomes
Change Score of Functional Gait Assessment
Time frame: Initial assessment and final visit (by the end of 4 weeks of treatment)
Change score of Vertigo Symptom Scale - Short Form
Time frame: Initial assessment and final visit (by the end of 4 weeks of treatment)
Global Response to Treatment
Time frame: Final Visit (by the end of 4 weeks of treatment)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Feb 2016.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Brain Concussion
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
Pilot Safety and Exploratory Efficacy of PSC-05 for the Treatment of Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Recruiting
Evaluation of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) in Individuals With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI)
Sleep Architecture, Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Active, not recruiting
Pilot TMS in Mild TBI
Persistent Post Concussive Headache, Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Recruiting
Non-invasive Stimulation of the Glymphatic System for Slowing Cognitive Decline
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Post Concussion Syndrome
Enrolling by invitation
Improving In-hospital and Post-discharge Patient Education for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Concussion, Mild, Traumatic Brain Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jennifer C Reneker, MSPT principal investigator
Walsh University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Physical Therapy Treatment in people with Brain Concussion and Dizziness, run by Walsh University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Symptom recovery as measured by the Post Concussion Symptom (PCS) Score (time frame: Final visit (by the end of 4 weeks of treatment)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Feb 2016.