Chronic Idiopathic ConstipationPhase 3NCT02291679
Trial of Linaclotide in Patients With Chronic Idiopathic Constipation
A Phase 3 study testing Linaclotide in people with Chronic Idiopathic Constipation, run by Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 95 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The objective of this trial was to determine the efficacy and safety of linaclotide 72 ug administered once daily to patients with chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC). The primary efficacy parameter is the percentage of participants in each dosing group that meet the protocol definition for complete spontaneous… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Idiopathic Constipation
- What is being tested?
- Linaclotide
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 1,223 participants
- Where
- 95 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2014to Aug 2015
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient has completed a colonoscopy if one is needed according to the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) criteria, with no clinically significant findings
- Patient has no clinically significant findings on a physical examination and clinical laboratory tests
- Patient meets protocol criteria for CIC: reports < 3 bowel movements (BMs) per week and reports one or more of the following during ≥ 25% of BMs: straining, lumpy or hard stools, sensation of incomplete evacuation during the 3 months before the diagnosis with the onset at least 6 months before the diagnosis
- Patient is compliant with daily interactive voice response system (IVRS) calls
- Patient reports an average of < 3 complete spontaneous BMs (CSBMs) and ≤ 6 SBMs per week by the IVRS over the 14 calendar days before the Randomization Visit and the calendar day of Randomization.
Who cannot join
- Patient has history of loose or watery stools
- Patient has symptoms of or been diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)
- Patient has a structural abnormality of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract or a disease or condition that can affect GI motility
- Patient has any protocol-excluded or clinically significant medical or surgical history that could confound the study assessments
- Patient has Bristol Stool Form Scale score of 7 during Pretreatment period.
Trial locations and contacts
95 sites in 1 country.
95 sites in 1 country
United States95 sites
Ironwood Investigational Site
Anaheim, California, 92801
Ironwood Investigational Site
Anderson, South Carolina, 29621
Ironwood Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30328
Ironwood Investigational Site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21215
Ironwood Investigational Site
Bastrop, Louisiana, 71220
Ironwood Investigational Site
Beaumont, Texas, 77701
Ironwood Investigational Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02135
Ironwood Investigational Site
Boynton Beach, Florida, 33426
Ironwood Investigational Site
Bozeman, Montana, 59718
Ironwood Investigational Site
Bristol, Connecticut, 06010
Ironwood Investigational Site
Bristol, Tennessee, 37620
Ironwood Investigational Site
Brooklyn, New York, 11206
Ironwood Investigational Site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28209
Ironwood Investigational Site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28226
Ironwood Investigational Site
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37421
Ironwood Investigational Site
Chesterfield, Michigan, 48047
Ironwood Investigational Site
Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815
Ironwood Investigational Site
Christiansburg, Virginia, 24073
Ironwood Investigational Site
Chula Vista, California, 91910
Ironwood Investigational Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Ironwood Investigational Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45224
Ironwood Investigational Site
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80904
Ironwood Investigational Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43214
Ironwood Investigational Site
Coral Gables, Florida, 33134
Ironwood Investigational Site
Dakota Dunes, South Dakota, 57049
Ironwood Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75230
Ironwood Investigational Site
DeLand, Florida, 32720
Ironwood Investigational Site
El Paso, Texas, 79905
Ironwood Investigational Site
Endwell, New York, 13760
Ironwood Investigational Site
Evansville, Indiana, 47714
Ironwood Investigational Site
Fargo, North Dakota, 58103
Ironwood Investigational Site
Garden Grove, California, 92843
Ironwood Investigational Site
Great Neck, New York, 11023
Ironwood Investigational Site
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27403
Ironwood Investigational Site
Greer, South Carolina, 29651
Ironwood Investigational Site
Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740
Ironwood Investigational Site
Hialeah, Florida, 33016
Ironwood Investigational Site
High Point, North Carolina, 27262
Ironwood Investigational Site
Hollywood, Maryland, 20636
Ironwood Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77074
Ironwood Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77098
Ironwood Investigational Site
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
Ironwood Investigational Site
Inverness, Florida, 34452
Ironwood Investigational Site
Jackson, Mississippi, 39202
Ironwood Investigational Site
Jupiter, Florida, 33458
Ironwood Investigational Site
Kissimmee, Florida, 34741
Ironwood Investigational Site
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37919
Ironwood Investigational Site
La Crosse, Wisconsin, 54601
Ironwood Investigational Site
La Mesa, California, 91942
Ironwood Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89119
Ironwood Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89121
Ironwood Investigational Site
Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, 33319
Ironwood Investigational Site
Lenoir, North Carolina, 28645
Ironwood Investigational Site
Levittown, Pennsylvania, 19056
Ironwood Investigational Site
Longview, Texas, 75605
Ironwood Investigational Site
Lynchburg, Virginia, 24502
Ironwood Investigational Site
Mentor, Ohio, 44060
Ironwood Investigational Site
Metairie, Louisiana, 70006
Ironwood Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33015
Ironwood Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33126
Ironwood Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33133
Ironwood Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33135
Ironwood Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33165
Ironwood Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33175
Ironwood Investigational Site
North Hollywood, California, 91606
Ironwood Investigational Site
North Little Rock, Arkansas, 72117
Ironwood Investigational Site
Oakwood, Georgia, 30566
Ironwood Investigational Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112
Ironwood Investigational Site
Orange, California, 92868
Ironwood Investigational Site
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Ironwood Investigational Site
Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174
Ironwood Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85018
Ironwood Investigational Site
Port Orange County, Florida, 32129
Ironwood Investigational Site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612
Ironwood Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78209
Ironwood Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Ironwood Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78258
Ironwood Investigational Site
San Diego, California, 92108
Ironwood Investigational Site
Sandy Springs, Georgia, 30328
Ironwood Investigational Site
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71103
Ironwood Investigational Site
Simpsonville, South Carolina, 29681
Ironwood Investigational Site
South Miami, Florida, 33143
Ironwood Investigational Site
South Ogden, Utah, 84405
Ironwood Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63128
Ironwood Investigational Site
Sylvania, Ohio, 43560
Ironwood Investigational Site
Tampa, Florida, 33634
Ironwood Investigational Site
Thousand Oaks, California, 91360
Ironwood Investigational Site
Troy, Michigan, 48098
Ironwood Investigational Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85712
Ironwood Investigational Site
Wellesley, Massachusetts, 02481
Ironwood Investigational Site
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33409
Ironwood Investigational Site
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401
Ironwood Investigational Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
Ironwood Investigational Site
Winter Park, Florida, 32792
Ironwood Investigational Site
Wyoming, Michigan, 49519
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Trial of Linaclotide (72 ug or 145 ug) Administered Orally for 12 Weeks to Patients With Chronic Idiopathic Constipation
The objective of this trial was to determine the efficacy and safety of linaclotide 72 ug administered once daily to patients with chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC). The primary efficacy parameter is the percentage of participants in each dosing group that meet the protocol definition for complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) Overall Responder.
Read the detailed description
The trial also included a 145 ug linaclotide treatment arm (an FDA-approved dose for CIC) as an established positive control to validate the study design.
- Conditions
- Chronic Idiopathic Constipation
- Being tested
- Linaclotide, Matching Placebo
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LinaclotideDrug
Also called Linzess, Constella
Matching PlaceboDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 72 μg linaclotide | Experimental | 72 μg oral linaclotide, once daily for 12 weeks Receives: Drug: Linaclotide |
| 145 μg linaclotide | Experimental | 145 μg oral linaclotide, once daily for 12 weeks Receives: Drug: Linaclotide |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | matching placebo, once daily for 12 weeks Receives: Drug: Matching Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of 12-Week CSBM Overall Responders
A 12-week CSBM Overall Responder is a participant who was a CSBM Weekly Responder for at least 9 of the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period. A CSBM Weekly Responder is a participant who had a CSBM weekly frequency rate that was 3 or greater and increased by 1 or more from baseline, and completed ≥ 4 IVRS calls for the specified week.
A CSBM is defined as an SBM that is associated with a sense of complete evacuation. An SBM is defined as a bowel movement BM that occurred in the absence of laxative, enema, or suppository use on either the calendar day of the BM or the calendar day before the BM.
Measured: Week 12
Secondary outcomes (10)
Change From Baseline in 12-Week CSBM Frequency Rate
A participant's 12-week CSBM Frequency Rate is the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period. A CSBM is defined as an SBM that is associated with a sense of complete evacuation. An SBM is defined as a BM that occurred in the absence of laxative, enema, or suppository use on either the calendar day of the BM or the calendar day before the BM.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1 to Week 12
Change From Baseline in 12-Week SBM Frequency Rate
A participant's 12-week SBM Frequency Rate is the SBM rate (SBMs/week) calculated over the 12-weeks of the Treatment Period. An SBM is defined as a BM that occurred in the absence of laxative, enema, or suppository use on either the calendar day of the BM or the calendar day before the BM.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1 to Week 12
Change From Baseline in 12-Week Stool Consistency Score
Stool consistency was measured daily using the 7-point ordinal Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS; 1 = separate hard lumps like nuts [difficult to pass]; 2 = sausage shaped but lumpy; 3 = like a sausage but with cracks on surface; 4 = like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft; 5 = soft blobs with clear-cut edges [passed easily]; 6 = fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool; 7 = watery, no solid pieces [entirely liquid]). The participant's BSFS score for the Treatment Period is the average of the non-missing BSFS scores from the SBMs reported by the participant during the 12-week Treatment Period.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1 to Week 12
Change From Baseline in 12-Week Straining Score
Straining was measured daily using a 5-point ordinal scale (1 = not at all; 2 = a little bit; 3 = a moderate amount; 4 = a great deal; 5 = an extreme amount). The participant's straining score for the Treatment Period is the average of the non-missing straining scores from the SBMs reported by the participant during the 12-week Treatment Period.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1 to Week 12
Percentage of 12-Week CSBM Overall Responders (>1 SBM/Week Subpopulation)
A 12-week CSBM Overall Responder is a participant who was a CSBM Weekly Responder for at least 9 of the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period. A CSBM Weekly Responder is a participant who had a CSBM weekly frequency rate that was 3 or greater and increased by 1 or more from baseline, and completed ≥4 IVRS calls for the specified week.
A CSBM is defined as an SBM that is associated with a sense of complete evacuation. An SBM is defined as a BM that occurred in the absence of laxative, enema, or suppository use on either the calendar day of the BM or the calendar day before the BM.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Month 1 CSBM Responders
A Month 1 CSBM Responder is a participant who is a CSBM weekly responder for at least 3 of the 4 weeks of Month 1 of the Treatment Period. A CSBM weekly responder is a participant who had a CSBM weekly frequency rate that was 3 or greater and increased by 1 or more from baseline based on a minimum of 4 complete IVRS calls for that week.
A CSBM is defined as an SBM that is associated with a sense of complete evacuation. An SBM is defined as a BM that occurred in the absence of laxative, enema, or suppository use on either the calendar day of the BM or the calendar day before the BM.
Measured: Month 1
Percentage of Month 2 CSBM Responders
A Month 2 CSBM Responder is a participant who is a CSBM weekly responder for at least 3 of the 4 weeks of Month 2 of the Treatment Period. A CSBM weekly responder is a participant who had a CSBM weekly frequency rate that was 3 or greater and increased by 1 or more from baseline based on a minimum of 4 complete IVRS calls for that week.
A CSBM is defined as an SBM that is associated with a sense of complete evacuation. An SBM is defined as a BM that occurred in the absence of laxative, enema, or suppository use on either the calendar day of the BM or the calendar day before the BM.
Measured: Month 2
Percentage of Month 3 CSBM Responders
A Month 3 CSBM Responder is a participant who is a CSBM weekly responder for at least 3 of the 4 weeks of Month 3 of the Treatment Period. A CSBM weekly responder is a participant who had a CSBM weekly frequency rate that was 3 or greater and increased by 1 or more from baseline based on a minimum of 4 complete IVRS calls for that week.
A CSBM is defined as an SBM that is associated with a sense of complete evacuation. An SBM is defined as a BM that occurred in the absence of laxative, enema, or suppository use on either the calendar day of the BM or the calendar day before the BM.
Measured: Month 3
Change From Baseline in 12-Week Abdominal Bloating
Abdominal bloating was measured daily using an 11-point NRS (0 = none; 10 = very severe). The participant's abdominal bloating score for the Treatment Period is the average of the non-missing daily participant assessments of abdominal bloating scores reported during the 12-week Treatment Period.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1 to Week 12
Change From Baseline in 12-Week Abdominal Discomfort
Abdominal discomfort was measured daily using an 11-point NRS (0 = none; 10 = very severe). The participant's abdominal discomfort score for the Treatment Period is the average of the non-missing daily participant assessments of abdominal discomfort scores reported during the 12-week Treatment Period.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1 to Week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2014
- Primary completionAug 2015
- Study completionAug 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Chronic Idiopathic ConstipationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1,223 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Forest Laboratories
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bernard J Lavins, MD, Study chair, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02291679
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MCP-103-309
- Status last verified
- May 2017
- First submitted
- 11 Nov 2014
- Last updated
- 15 Jun 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jun 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Trial of Linaclotide (72 ug or 145 ug) Administered Orally for 12 Weeks to Patients With Chronic Idiopathic Constipation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02291679
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MCP-103-309
- Conditions
- Chronic Idiopathic Constipation
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,223 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Forest Laboratories
- Study start
- Oct 2014
- Primary completion
- Aug 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 19 May 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this trial was to determine the efficacy and safety of linaclotide 72 ug administered once daily to patients with chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC). The primary efficacy parameter is the percentage of participants in each dosing group that meet the protocol definition for complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) Overall Responder.
Detailed description
The trial also included a 145 ug linaclotide treatment arm (an FDA-approved dose for CIC) as an established positive control to validate the study design.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 72 μg linaclotide | Experimental | Drug: Linaclotide72 μg oral linaclotide, once daily for 12 weeks |
| 145 μg linaclotide | Experimental | Drug: Linaclotide145 μg oral linaclotide, once daily for 12 weeks |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Matching Placebomatching placebo, once daily for 12 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patient has completed a colonoscopy if one is needed according to the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) criteria, with no clinically significant findings
- Patient has no clinically significant findings on a physical examination and clinical laboratory tests
- Patient meets protocol criteria for CIC: reports < 3 bowel movements (BMs) per week and reports one or more of the following during ≥ 25% of BMs: straining, lumpy or hard stools, sensation of incomplete evacuation during the 3 months before the diagnosis with the onset at least 6 months before the diagnosis
- Patient is compliant with daily interactive voice response system (IVRS) calls
- Patient reports an average of < 3 complete spontaneous BMs (CSBMs) and ≤ 6 SBMs per week by the IVRS over the 14 calendar days before the Randomization Visit and the calendar day of Randomization.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patient has history of loose or watery stools
- Patient has symptoms of or been diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)
- Patient has a structural abnormality of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract or a disease or condition that can affect GI motility
- Patient has any protocol-excluded or clinically significant medical or surgical history that could confound the study assessments
- Patient has Bristol Stool Form Scale score of 7 during Pretreatment period.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LinaclotideAlso: Linzess, Constella | Drug | 145 μg linaclotide, 72 μg linaclotide |
| Matching Placebo | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Percentage of 12-Week CSBM Overall Responders
Time frame: Week 12
A 12-week CSBM Overall Responder is a participant who was a CSBM Weekly Responder for at least 9 of the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period. A CSBM Weekly Responder is a participant who had a CSBM weekly frequency rate that was 3 or greater and increased by 1 or more from baseline, and completed ≥ 4 IVRS calls for the specified week. A CSBM is defined as an SBM that is associated with a sense of complete evacuation. An SBM is defined as a bowel movement BM that occurred in the absence of laxative, enema, or suppository use on either the calendar day of the BM or the calendar day before the BM.
10 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in 12-Week CSBM Frequency Rate
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 to Week 12
Change From Baseline in 12-Week SBM Frequency Rate
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 to Week 12
Change From Baseline in 12-Week Stool Consistency Score
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 to Week 12
Change From Baseline in 12-Week Straining Score
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 to Week 12
Percentage of 12-Week CSBM Overall Responders (>1 SBM/Week Subpopulation)
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Month 1 CSBM Responders
Time frame: Month 1
Percentage of Month 2 CSBM Responders
Time frame: Month 2
Percentage of Month 3 CSBM Responders
Time frame: Month 3
Change From Baseline in 12-Week Abdominal Bloating
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 to Week 12
Change From Baseline in 12-Week Abdominal Discomfort
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 to Week 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jun 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Chronic Idiopathic Constipation
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
This is a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter, Parallel-group Study of the Efficacy and Safety of 2 Weight-based Treatment Groups of Plecanatide Versus Placebo in Children and Adolescent Participants 6 to Less Than 18 Years of Age With FC
Functional Constipation (FC)
Active, not recruiting
Do the Symptoms of Chronic Constipation Improve With a Primary Care Programme Based on Behavioural Re-education and Abdominal Massage?
Constipation Chronic Idiopathic
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Post-Marketing Study of Prucalopride Safety In Pregnancy
Chronic Idiopathic Constipation (CIC)
RecruitingPhase 3
A 26-Wk Study to Assess Safety & Efficacy of Tenapanor for T/t of Chronic Idiopathic Constipation in Adults
Chronic Idiopathic Constipation (CIC)
RecruitingObservational study
A Study of Prucalopride in Breastfeeding Women With Constipation
Chronic Idiopathic Constipation (CIC)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bernard J Lavins, MD study chair
Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
95 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Linaclotide in people with Chronic Idiopathic Constipation, run by Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 95 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 95 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 May 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of 12-Week CSBM Overall Responders (time frame: Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jun 2017.