AzTrials
AzTrials

Colonoscopy: Bowel PreparationNCT02287051

Bowel Prep Acceptance in Clinical Practice

An observational study of Colonoscopy: Bowel Preparation, run by Valduce Hospital.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Bowel preparation for colonoscopy is crucial, since the diagnostic accuracy of the procedure depends on an adequate visualization of the mucosa of the colon.There is strong evidence that the quality of bowel preparation is inversely correlated with the interval between the end of the assumption of the purgative and… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Colonoscopy: Bowel Preparation
How many people
1,500 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Mar 2014to Oct 2014
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: population undergoing colonoscopy

Who may be able to join

  • adult patientes undergoing colonscopy

Who cannot join

  • afternoon colonoscopy
  • partial colonoscopy
  • ASA III-IV
  • pregnancy
  • incapacity to give informed consent

About this study

Official title: Acceptance and Compliance of Split-dose Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in Clinical Practice

Bowel preparation for colonoscopy is crucial, since the diagnostic accuracy of the procedure depends on an adequate visualization of the mucosa of the colon.There is strong evidence that the quality of bowel preparation is inversely correlated with the interval between the end of the assumption of the purgative and the start of colonoscopy (shorter intervals are associated with higher levels of preparation).Recent studies have shown that split dose prep significantly improves the quality of bowel cleansing. In light of these data, both the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) and the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) recommend now split dose prep in order to improve the quality of bowel cleansing. Despite these recommendations, the uptake of schemes in divided doses appears clearly underused in actual clinical practice. In particular, in Italy only a few centers routinely adopt the regime split as their first choice for the preparation for colonoscopy.The reasons why the "split dose" is under-utilized in clinical practice are not entirely clear, but probably in part reflecting gastroenterologists' concerns about potential elements that theoretically could make it less acceptable to the patient (get up early in the morning, potential problems during the journey from home to the hospital) The hypothesis of the study is that many patients would still be willing to accept these potential drawbacks if they were adequately informed about the positive impact of the scheme in divided doses on the effectiveness of bowel preparation, which results in higher reliability of the examination, shorter duration of the procedure, and less risk of rescheduling the exam in the near future

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02287051
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
colonoscopy populationNot described

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. acceptance

    structured questionnaire on acceptability and problems related to the modality of the preparation

    Measured: 3 month

  2. compliance

    structured questionnaire on completeness and difficulties related to the modality of the preparation

    Measured: 3 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Nov 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2014
  3. Primary completionJun 2014
  4. Study completionOct 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,500 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02287051
Sponsor's protocol ID
7/14
Status last verified
Nov 2014
First submitted
12 Oct 2014
Last updated
10 Nov 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Radaelli F, Paggi S, Repici A, Gullotti G, Cesaro P, Rotondano G, Cugia L, Trovato C, Spada C, Fuccio L, Occhipinti P, Pace F, Fabbri C, Buda A, Manes G, Feliciangeli G, Manno M, Barresi L, Anderloni A, Dulbecco P, Rogai F, Amato A, Senore C, Hassan C. Barriers against split-dose bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Gut. 2017 Aug;66(8):1428-1433. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311049. Epub 2016 Apr 19.

    PubMed 27196589

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Colonoscopy: Bowel Preparation, run by Valduce Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Nov 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

acceptance (time frame: 3 month). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02287051, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Nov 2014.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in