Mouth NeoplasmsPhase 2NCT02285543
A Phase II Trial of TPF Induction Chemotherapy in cN2 OSCC Patients
A Phase 2 study testing TPF induction chemotherapy, surgery and radiotherapy in people with Mouth Neoplasms and Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, run by Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
To confirm the subgroup result from TPF (docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil ) trial (NCT01542931) that cN2 OSCC patients could benefit from TPF induction chemotherapy compared to the standard treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Mouth Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
- What is being tested?
- TPF induction chemotherapy, surgery and radiotherapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2016to 30 Jul 2023
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age: 18 to 75 years old.
- Sex: both males and females.
- Karnofsky performance status (KPS) >60.
- Histological biopsy confirming squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (tongue, gingiva, buccal mucosa, floor of mouth, palate, and retromolar region).
- Clinical stage III/IVA (T1-2, N2, M0 or T3-4, N2, M0, UICC[International Union Against Cancer ]2002) with resectable lesions.
- Adequate hematologic function: white blood cell >3,000/mm3, hemoglobin>8g/L, platelet count>80,000/mm3.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Hepatic function: ALAT(alanine aminotransferase )/ASAT(aspartate transaminase ) <2.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), bilirubin <1.5 times ULN.
- Renal function: serum creatinine <1.5 times ULN.
- Written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Evidence of distant metastatic disease and other cancers.
- Surgical procedure of the primary tumors or lymph nodes (except diagnostic biopsy).
- Previous radiotherapy or chemotherapy.
- Other previous malignancies within 5 years.
- Can not tolerate the treatment protocol with systematic diseases such as history of severe pulmonary or cardiac diseases.
- Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity.
- Creatinine clearance <30ml/min.
- Pregnancy (confirmed by serum or urine β-HCG) or lactation period
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
Ninth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200011
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Phase II Trial of TPF Induction Chemotherapy in cN2 Patients With Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
To confirm the subgroup result from TPF (docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil ) trial (NCT01542931) that cN2 OSCC patients could benefit from TPF induction chemotherapy compared to the standard treatment.
Read the detailed description
Induction chemotherapy is regarded as an effective way to reduce or downgrade the locally advanced or aggressive cancers, and to improve the chance of eradication of the locoregional lesions by radical surgery and/or radiotherapy. However, there are still debates on the clinical value of induction chemotherapy for patients with advanced and resectable oral squamous cell carcinoma(OSCC). A prospective, open label, parallel, interventional, randomized control trial on TPF induction chemotherapy indicate there is no difference in overall survival, disease free survival, local regional recurrence free survival and metastasis free survival between experimental group and control group,(Zhong et al, Randomized Phase III Trial of Induction Chemotherapy With Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and Fluorouracil Followed by Surgery Versus Up-Front Surgery in Locally Advanced Resectable Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma, J Clin Oncol 2013) however, the meta analysis proves that the induction chemotherapy of TPF protocol could benefit the patients with cN2 locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma. The previous study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov website with NCT01542931 identification number.
This prospective, interventional, randomized control trial was to evaluate the TPF induction chemotherapy have a better effects in the cN2 patients with locally advanced and resectable OSCC. The patients would receive TPF induction chemotherapy followed by radical surgery and post-operative radiotherapy (the experimental group) or radical surgery and post-operative radiotherapy (the control group).
The study had a power of 80% on the basis of an assumed 2-year survival rate of 62.4% in the experiment group and 36.9% in the control group, with use of a two-sided log-rank test at a level of significance of 0.05. The recruitment period would be 2 years, and the follow-up period would be 2 years, and 15% of patients would drop out early or be lost to follow-up. A total number of 101 patients were to be recruited with stplan 4.5 software calculation. (Department of Biostatics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas,USA) The patients in the experimental group received the TPF induction chemotherapy for 2 cycles followed by radical surgery and post-operative radiotherapy. The palpable edges of the primary lesion (both the longest and shortest axis) were marked before induction chemotherapy by at least four points, which were 0.5cm away. The patients in the control group received the radical surgery and post-operative radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy.
Induction chemotherapy: For the patients who were randomly assigned to receive TPF induction chemotherapy, peripherally inserted central catheter was firstly inserted before intravenous infusion, docetaxel(at a dose of 75mg/m2 of body surface area) was administered as a 2-hour intravenous infusion, followed by intravenous cisplatin(75 mg/m2), administered during a period of 2 to 3 hours. Then, 5-Fu(750 mg/m2/day) was administered as a 120-hour continuous intravenous infusion for 5 days. Induction chemotherapy was given every 3 weeks for 2 cycles, unless there was disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal of consent by the patients. Dexamethasone was given before docetaxel infusion to prevent docetaxel-related hypersensitivity reactions, skin toxic effects, and fluid retention; prophylactic antibiotics were also given starting on day 5 of each cycle for 3 days. Hydration with diuretic and antiemetic treatment was also performed. Primary prophylaxis with recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was not suggested. Chemotherapy dose reductions were allowed for grade 3/4 toxicities occurring after cycle 1: 25% and 50% dose reductions of the three chemotherapy agents were suggested for grade 3 and grade 4 hematologic toxicities or gastrointestinal toxicities, respectively; 25% and 50% cisplatin dose reductions were suggested for grade 3 and grade 4 renal toxicities, respectively. Surgery was performed at least 2 weeks after completion of induction chemotherapy.
Surgery: Radical resection of the primary lesion and full neck dissection(functional or radical) with proper reconstruction(pedicle or free flap) were performed. The safety margins of the primary lesion were 1.0-1.5cm far away from the palpable margins of the lesion; for patients who received induction chemotherapy, the safety margins were 1.0cm away from the marks that were placed before induction chemotherapy, to ensure the same extent surgery in both arms. Frozen sections during surgery were performed to confirm adequate margins.
Post-operative radiotherapy: Radiotherapy was arranged 4 to 6 weeks after surgery. Routine external beam radiotherapy, such as conformal or intensity modulated radiotherapy was performed, and the dose was 1.8-2 Gy/day, 5 days/week for 6 weeks, and totally 54-60 Gy, in the patient with high risk features, such as positive surgical margin, extra capsular nodal spread, vascular embolism, concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin 80mg/m2 was suggested.
A complete medical history was obtained and tumor assessment was performed at baseline. Clinical tumor response was assessed by clinical evaluation and imaging study and was characterized according to the criteria of response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (version 1.1) before surgery. Post-operative pathologic response was assessed by post-operative pathologic examination as good and bad response. A good response was defined as absence of any tumor cells (pathologic complete response) or presence of scattered foci of a few tumor cells (minimal residual disease with <10% viable tumor cells); otherwise, a bad pathologic response was defined. Toxic effects were assessed weekly during and after completion of induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events (version 3.0).
Overall survival was calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death; disease free survival was calculated from the date of randomization to tumor recurrence or distant metastasis or death from any cause; locoregional recurrence/distant metastasis free survival was calculated from the date of randomization to locoregional recurrence/distant metastasis of tumor or death from any cause. Time to locoregional recurrence/distant metastasis was calculated from the date of finishing treatment to tumor locoregional recurrence/distant metastasis. Patients were monitored by every three months in the first two years, every six months in the next 2 years, and once a year thereafter until death or data censoring.
- Conditions
- Mouth Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
- Being tested
- TPF induction chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy
- Keywords
- TPF induction chemotherapy, randomized, trial,OSCC
- Medical subject headings
- Mouth Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TPF induction chemotherapyDrug
Also called TPF protocol group
TPF induction chemotherapy: 2 cycles; docetaxel(75mg/m^2), cisplatin(75 mg/m^2), 5-Fu(750 mg/m^2/day) for 5 days; 16 days later, the 2nd cycle. 2 weeks later, surgery.
Surgery: radical resection and full neck dissection with reconstruction. Radiotherapy: 4-6 weeks after surgery, 1.8-2Gy/day, 5 days/week for 6 weeks, and totally 54-60Gy
surgeryProcedure or surgery
In the TPF group,surgery was performed at least 2 weeks after completion of induction chemotherapy.Surgery group includes radical resection of the primary lesion and full neck dissection(functional or radical) with proper reconstruction(pedicle or free flap) were performed.
radiotherapyRadiation
Radiotherapy was arranged 4 to 6 weeks after surgery.Routine external beam radiotherapy, such as conformal or intensity modulated radiotherapy was performed, and the dose was 1.8-2 Gy(gray)/day, 5 days/week for 6 weeks, and totally 54-60 Gy.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TPF group | Experimental | The patients in the experimental group received the TPF induction chemotherapy for 2 cycles followed with surgery and radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy.
docetaxel:75mg/m2 cisplatin:75 mg/m2 5-Fu:750 mg/m2/day Receives: Drug: TPF induction chemotherapy; Procedure: surgery; Radiation: radiotherapy |
| Control group | Other | The patients in the control group received the radical surgery and radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy. Receives: Procedure: surgery; Radiation: radiotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
overall survival rate as a measure by the numbers of living patients overall Survival rate
Measured: 2 year
Secondary outcomes (3)
disease free survival as a measure by the number of patients without recurrence or death
Measured: 2 year
local recurrence free survival as a measure by the number of patients without recurrence
Measured: 2 year
distant metastasis free survival as a measure by the number of patients without metastasis
Measured: 2 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Study start1 Dec 2016
- Primary completion30 Jul 2023
- Study completion30 Jul 2023
Why it stopped: No new participants could be enrolled.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Mouth NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Lai-ping Zhong, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02285543
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TOPIC
- Status last verified
- Nov 2023
- First submitted
- 22 Oct 2014
- Last updated
- 22 Nov 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Nov 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Phase II Trial of TPF Induction Chemotherapy in cN2 Patients With Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02285543
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TOPIC
- Conditions
- Mouth Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
- Keywords
- TPF induction chemotherapy, randomized, trial,OSCC
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: No new participants could be enrolled.
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jul 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To confirm the subgroup result from TPF (docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil ) trial (NCT01542931) that cN2 OSCC patients could benefit from TPF induction chemotherapy compared to the standard treatment.
Detailed description
Induction chemotherapy is regarded as an effective way to reduce or downgrade the locally advanced or aggressive cancers, and to improve the chance of eradication of the locoregional lesions by radical surgery and/or radiotherapy. However, there are still debates on the clinical value of induction chemotherapy for patients with advanced and resectable oral squamous cell carcinoma(OSCC). A prospective, open label, parallel, interventional, randomized control trial on TPF induction chemotherapy indicate there is no difference in overall survival, disease free survival, local regional recurrence free survival and metastasis free survival between experimental group and control group,(Zhong et al, Randomized Phase III Trial of Induction Chemotherapy With Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and Fluorouracil Followed by Surgery Versus Up-Front Surgery in Locally Advanced Resectable Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma, J Clin Oncol 2013) however, the meta analysis proves that the induction chemotherapy of TPF protocol could benefit the patients with cN2 locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma. The previous study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov website with NCT01542931 identification number.
This prospective, interventional, randomized control trial was to evaluate the TPF induction chemotherapy have a better effects in the cN2 patients with locally advanced and resectable OSCC. The patients would receive TPF induction chemotherapy followed by radical surgery and post-operative radiotherapy (the experimental group) or radical surgery and post-operative radiotherapy (the control group).
The study had a power of 80% on the basis of an assumed 2-year survival rate of 62.4% in the experiment group and 36.9% in the control group, with use of a two-sided log-rank test at a level of significance of 0.05. The recruitment period would be 2 years, and the follow-up period would be 2 years, and 15% of patients would drop out early or be lost to follow-up. A total number of 101 patients were to be recruited with stplan 4.5 software calculation. (Department of Biostatics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas,USA) The patients in the experimental group received the TPF induction chemotherapy for 2 cycles followed by radical surgery and post-operative radiotherapy. The palpable edges of the primary lesion (both the longest and shortest axis) were marked before induction chemotherapy by at least four points, which were 0.5cm away. The patients in the control group received the radical surgery and post-operative radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy.
Induction chemotherapy: For the patients who were randomly assigned to receive TPF induction chemotherapy, peripherally inserted central catheter was firstly inserted before intravenous infusion, docetaxel(at a dose of 75mg/m2 of body surface area) was administered as a 2-hour intravenous infusion, followed by intravenous cisplatin(75 mg/m2), administered during a period of 2 to 3 hours. Then, 5-Fu(750 mg/m2/day) was administered as a 120-hour continuous intravenous infusion for 5 days. Induction chemotherapy was given every 3 weeks for 2 cycles, unless there was disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal of consent by the patients. Dexamethasone was given before docetaxel infusion to prevent docetaxel-related hypersensitivity reactions, skin toxic effects, and fluid retention; prophylactic antibiotics were also given starting on day 5 of each cycle for 3 days. Hydration with diuretic and antiemetic treatment was also performed. Primary prophylaxis with recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was not suggested. Chemotherapy dose reductions were allowed for grade 3/4 toxicities occurring after cycle 1: 25% and 50% dose reductions of the three chemotherapy agents were suggested for grade 3 and grade 4 hematologic toxicities or gastrointestinal toxicities, respectively; 25% and 50% cisplatin dose reductions were suggested for grade 3 and grade 4 renal toxicities, respectively. Surgery was performed at least 2 weeks after completion of induction chemotherapy.
Surgery: Radical resection of the primary lesion and full neck dissection(functional or radical) with proper reconstruction(pedicle or free flap) were performed. The safety margins of the primary lesion were 1.0-1.5cm far away from the palpable margins of the lesion; for patients who received induction chemotherapy, the safety margins were 1.0cm away from the marks that were placed before induction chemotherapy, to ensure the same extent surgery in both arms. Frozen sections during surgery were performed to confirm adequate margins.
Post-operative radiotherapy: Radiotherapy was arranged 4 to 6 weeks after surgery. Routine external beam radiotherapy, such as conformal or intensity modulated radiotherapy was performed, and the dose was 1.8-2 Gy/day, 5 days/week for 6 weeks, and totally 54-60 Gy, in the patient with high risk features, such as positive surgical margin, extra capsular nodal spread, vascular embolism, concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin 80mg/m2 was suggested.
A complete medical history was obtained and tumor assessment was performed at baseline. Clinical tumor response was assessed by clinical evaluation and imaging study and was characterized according to the criteria of response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (version 1.1) before surgery. Post-operative pathologic response was assessed by post-operative pathologic examination as good and bad response. A good response was defined as absence of any tumor cells (pathologic complete response) or presence of scattered foci of a few tumor cells (minimal residual disease with <10% viable tumor cells); otherwise, a bad pathologic response was defined. Toxic effects were assessed weekly during and after completion of induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events (version 3.0).
Overall survival was calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death; disease free survival was calculated from the date of randomization to tumor recurrence or distant metastasis or death from any cause; locoregional recurrence/distant metastasis free survival was calculated from the date of randomization to locoregional recurrence/distant metastasis of tumor or death from any cause. Time to locoregional recurrence/distant metastasis was calculated from the date of finishing treatment to tumor locoregional recurrence/distant metastasis. Patients were monitored by every three months in the first two years, every six months in the next 2 years, and once a year thereafter until death or data censoring.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TPF group | Experimental | Drug: TPF induction chemotherapy, Procedure: surgery, Radiation: radiotherapyThe patients in the experimental group received the TPF induction chemotherapy for 2 cycles followed with surgery and radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy. docetaxel:75mg/m2 cisplatin:75 mg/m2 5-Fu:750 mg/m2/day |
| Control group | Other | Procedure: surgery, Radiation: radiotherapyThe patients in the control group received the radical surgery and radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Age: 18 to 75 years old.
- Sex: both males and females.
- Karnofsky performance status (KPS) >60.
- Histological biopsy confirming squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (tongue, gingiva, buccal mucosa, floor of mouth, palate, and retromolar region).
- Clinical stage III/IVA (T1-2, N2, M0 or T3-4, N2, M0, UICC[International Union Against Cancer ]2002) with resectable lesions.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Evidence of distant metastatic disease and other cancers.
- Surgical procedure of the primary tumors or lymph nodes (except diagnostic biopsy).
- Previous radiotherapy or chemotherapy.
- Other previous malignancies within 5 years.
- Can not tolerate the treatment protocol with systematic diseases such as history of severe pulmonary or cardiac diseases.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TPF induction chemotherapyAlso: TPF protocol groupTPF induction chemotherapy: 2 cycles; docetaxel(75mg/m^2), cisplatin(75 mg/m^2), 5-Fu(750 mg/m^2/day) for 5 days; 16 days later, the 2nd cycle. 2 weeks later, surgery. Surgery: radical resection and full neck dissection with reconstruction. Radiotherapy: 4-6 weeks after surgery, 1.8-2Gy/day, 5 days/week for 6 weeks, and totally 54-60Gy | Drug | TPF group |
| surgeryIn the TPF group,surgery was performed at least 2 weeks after completion of induction chemotherapy.Surgery group includes radical resection of the primary lesion and full neck dissection(functional or radical) with proper reconstruction(pedicle or free flap) were performed. | Procedure or surgery | Control group, TPF group |
| radiotherapyRadiotherapy was arranged 4 to 6 weeks after surgery.Routine external beam radiotherapy, such as conformal or intensity modulated radiotherapy was performed, and the dose was 1.8-2 Gy(gray)/day, 5 days/week for 6 weeks, and totally 54-60 Gy. | Radiation | Control group, TPF group |
Primary outcome
overall survival rate as a measure by the numbers of living patients overall Survival rate
Time frame: 2 year
3 secondary outcomes
disease free survival as a measure by the number of patients without recurrence or death
Time frame: 2 year
local recurrence free survival as a measure by the number of patients without recurrence
Time frame: 2 year
distant metastasis free survival as a measure by the number of patients without metastasis
Time frame: 2 year
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: No new participants could be enrolled.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Nov 2023.
Related trials for Mouth Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Study of Oral MRT-2359 in Selected Cancer Patients
NSCLC, SCLC
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Docetaxel and SX-682 in Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Salivary Gland Carcinoma, and Advanced Prostate Cancer
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Oral Gallium Maltolate for the Treatment of Relapsed and Refractory Glioblastoma
Glioblastoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing TPF induction chemotherapy, surgery and radiotherapy in people with Mouth Neoplasms and Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, run by Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: No new participants could be enrolled.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
overall survival rate as a measure by the numbers of living patients overall Survival rate (time frame: 2 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Nov 2023.