AzTrials
AzTrials

Surgery AmbulatoryPhase 4NCT02282319

Spinal or Intravenous Dexmedetomidine in Ambulatory Surgery

A Phase 4 study testing spinal dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg, spinal chloroprocaine 40 mg and IV dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg in people with Surgery Ambulatory, run by University Hospital, Antwerp at 2 sites in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this double blind randomized study is to determine the effect of dexmedetomidine on onset and duration of the sensory and motor block and on the influence on bladder function after spinal anesthesia with chloroprocaine. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Surgery Ambulatory
What is being tested?
spinal dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg, spinal chloroprocaine 40 mg and IV dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
150 participants
Where
2 sitesBelgium
Study dates
Oct 2014to Dec 2020
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) class 1 \& 2,
  • undergoing day-case knee arthroscopy

Who cannot join

  • micturition problems,
  • neurological history or
  • previous lower abdominal surgery with an abnormal micturition

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Belgium2 sites
  • University Hospital Antwerp

    Antwerp, 2650

  • Sint Augustinus

    Wilrijk, 2610

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: Influence of Spinal or Intravenous Dexmedetomidine on Spinal Anesthesia With Chloroprocaine and Bladder Function in Day-case Surgery. A Double Blind Randomized Study.

The primary objective of this double blind randomized study is to determine the effect of dexmedetomidine on onset and duration of the sensory and motor block and on the influence on bladder function after spinal anesthesia with chloroprocaine. Our primary hypothesis is that sensory block will significantly be prolonged by dexmedetomidine administered by both the spinal and the intravenous route. The investigators do not expect a significant difference in motor block duration between intravenous or spinal administration. Secondary outcomes are micturition problems, duration of analgesia and the occurrence of side effects such as sedation and hypotension.

Read the detailed description

The study is designed as a multicenter study and randomization and inclusion of patients will be performed in three hospitals. Each hospital has its own randomisation sequence and coordinating investigator who will be responsible for appointing blinded and unblinded participators in the study.

Patients scheduled for spinal anesthesia in ambulatory surgery will be randomized by sealed envelopes (computer generated sequence) into one of the following three study groups:

spinal chloroprocaine 40 mg with spinal dexmedetomidine (5mcg) spinal chloroprocaine 40 mg with intravenous dexmedetomidine ( 0.5 mcg/kg) spinal chloroprocaine 40 mg alone (control group)

All patients will receive the same amount of spinal solution, containing chloroprocaine 1% (4 ml) with dexmedetomidine (0.5 ml, 1 mcg/ml) or NaCl ( sodiumchloride) 0,9% (0.5 ml ) ( and 50 ml intravenous Nacl 0.9, containing dexmedetomidine (0.5 mcg/kg) or not depending on the study group. All solutions are prepared by an independent anesthesiologist and labelled as Intravenous study medication and spinal study medication. Spinal anesthesia and data registration will be done by a blinded anesthesist and/or study nurse on a data sheet designed for the study.

Spinal anesthesia is performed in the lateral decubitus at L3-L4 vertebral interspace and standard monitoring for this procedure is applied. Insufficient analgesia will be treated with sufentanil increments. Hypotension and bradycardia will be treated with ephedrine and atropine. Patients will be discharged when the block is regressed, there is no sedation or nausea and nrs scores of pain are below 4. Patients will be contacted by telephone after one week to evaluate any postoperative complaints.Micturition will receive a score based on bladder volumes measured by bladder scanning and subjective complaints . This score system was used in two of our former studies (1,2)

To calculate the power of this study, we used the mean L2 regression of a previous study after spinal chloroprocaine with its standard deviation (SD 20 min, mean 90 min) and compared it to a mean increase with 30 %. We calculated that we should include 7 patients in each group to obtain a power of 80%.

To be sure to detect a possible difference in discharge time as well, we calculated a sample size of 48 patients for each group to detect a 30-minute difference.

Statistical analysis will be done with ANOVA analysis , A kruskal-Wallis of Mann Whitney test depending on the distribution of the population and if the values are parametric or not. This will be done by spss.

Being tested
spinal dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg, spinal chloroprocaine 40 mg, IV dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg
Keywords
spinal or intravenous dexmedetomidine

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • spinal dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcgDrug

    Also called dexdor

    Administration of dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg

  • spinal chloroprocaine 40 mgOther

    Also called ampres

    spinal anesthesia with chloroprocaine 40 mg

  • IV dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kgDrug

    Also called dexdor

    intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg

Study groups in NCT02282319
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
A chloroExperimentalspinal chloroprocaine 40 mg
Receives: Other: spinal chloroprocaine 40 mg
B chloro+ spin dexdorExperimentalSpinal chloroprocaine 40 mg spinal dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg
Receives: Drug: spinal dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg; Other: spinal chloroprocaine 40 mg
C chloro + IV dexdorExperimentalSpinal chloroprocaine 40 mg IV dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg
Receives: Other: spinal chloroprocaine 40 mg; Drug: IV dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. sensory block regression L2 dermatome (minutes) (Time from injection until First time registration of loss of cold sensation)

    Time from injection until First time registration of loss of cold sensation at the L2 dermatome during block regression. Loss of cold sensation will be regularly assessed from spinal injection until total regression of the sensory block

    Measured: up to 360 minutes

  2. Motor block regression (minutes) (time from injection until achievement of active knee movement)

    time from injection until achievement of active knee movement during block regression. Motor block will be assessed at regular intervals from spinal injection untill total regression of the motor block

    Measured: up to 240 minutes

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. discharge time (minutes)

    time from spinal injection until achievement of discharge criteria

    Measured: up to 240 minutes

  2. time to micturition ( minutes)

    time from injection until first voiding

    Measured: up to 240 minutes

  3. blood pressure drop

    percentage of drop blood pressure compared to base line ( measured before spinal injection) . Blood pressure will be measured at regular intervals from just prior to spinal injection until discharge

    Measured: up to 240 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Nov 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2014
  3. Primary completionDec 2020
  4. Study completionDec 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
150 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02282319
Sponsor's protocol ID
13/35/334
Status last verified
Aug 2022
First submitted
30 Oct 2014
Last updated
5 Aug 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Breebaart MB, Vercauteren MP, Hoffmann VL, Adriaensen HA. Urinary bladder scanning after day-case arthroscopy under spinal anaesthesia: comparison between lidocaine, ropivacaine, and levobupivacaine. Br J Anaesth. 2003 Mar;90(3):309-13. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg078.

    PubMed 12594142
  • Breebaart MB, Teune A, Sermeus LA, Vercauteren MP. Intrathecal chloroprocaine vs. lidocaine in day-case surgery: recovery, discharge and effect of pre-hydration on micturition. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Feb;58(2):206-13. doi: 10.1111/aas.12247.

    PubMed 24563922

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing spinal dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg, spinal chloroprocaine 40 mg and IV dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg in people with Surgery Ambulatory, run by University Hospital, Antwerp at 2 sites in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

sensory block regression L2 dermatome (minutes) (Time from injection until First time registration of loss of cold sensation) (time frame: up to 360 minutes). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02282319, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Aug 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in