AsthmaPhase 3NCT02281318
Efficacy and Safety Study of Mepolizumab Adjunctive Therapy in Participants With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma on Markers of Asthma Control
A Phase 3 study testing Mepolizumab and SOC in people with Asthma, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 144 sites in 19 countries.
Trial summary
This is a multi-centre, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mepolizumab adjunctive therapy in participants with severe eosinophilic asthma on markers of asthma control. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Asthma
- What is being tested?
- Mepolizumab and SOC
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 556 participants
- Where
- 144 sitesin 19 countries
- Study dates
- 11 Dec 2014to 10 Jun 2016
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age: At least 12 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent/assent (For those countries where local regulations permit enrolment of adults only, participant recruitment will be restricted to those who are >=18 years of age)
- Inhaled Corticosteroid: A well-documented requirement for regular treatment with high dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) in the 12 months prior to Visit 1 with or without maintenance oral corticosteroids (OCS). For participants >=18 years old: ICS dose must be >=880 micrograms (mcg)/day fluticasone propionate (FP) (exactuator) or equivalent daily. For ICS/long-acting beta-2-agonist (LABA) combination preparations, the highest approved maintenance dose in the local country will meet this ICS criterion. For participants >=12 to <=17 years old: ICS dose must be >=440 mcg/day FP (ex-actuator) or equivalent daily. For ICS/LABA combination preparations, the mid-strength approved maintenance dose in the local country will meet this ICS criterion
- Controller Medication: Current treatment with an additional controller medication, besides ICS, for at least 3 months or a documented failure in the past 12 months of an additional controller medication for at least 3 successive months (e.g. LABA, leukotriene receptor antagonist [LTRA], or theophylline)
- Eosinophilic asthma: Prior documentation of eosinophilic asthma or high likelihood of eosinophilic asthma as per Randomisation Criteria 1 and 2
- FEV1: Persistent airflow obstruction as indicated by : For participants >=18 years of age at visit 1, a pre-bronchodilator FEV1 <80% predicted (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES III]) recorded at Visit 1. For participants 12-17 years of age at Visit 1: A pre-bronchodilator FEV1 <90% predicted (NHANES III) recorded at Visit 1 OR FEV1:FVC ratio <0.8 recorded at Visit 1
- Exacerbation history: Previously confirmed history of two or more exacerbations requiring treatment with systemic Corticosteroid (CS) (intramuscular, intravenous, or oral), in the 12 months prior to visit 1, despite the use of high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). For participants receiving maintenance CS, the CS treatment for the exacerbations must have been a two-fold dose increase or greater.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Gender: Male or Eligible Female. To be eligible for entry into the study, females of childbearing potential must commit to consistent and correct use of an acceptable method of birth control listed in the protocol for the duration of the trial and for 4 months after the last study drug administration.
- Informed Consent/Assent: Able to give written informed consent/assent prior to participation in the core study, which will include the ability to comply with the requirements and restrictions listed in the consent/assent form and in this protocol. Participants must be able to read, comprehend, and write at a level sufficient to complete study related materials. Written informed consent must be obtained from ALL patients/legally authorized representative(s); for patients 12-17 years old, written informed assent must be obtained in addition to the legally authorized representative(s)' consent.
- French participants: In France, a participant will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if either affiliated to or a beneficiary of a social security category.
Who cannot join
- Smoking history: Current smokers or former smokers with a smoking history of >=10 pack years (number of pack years = (number of cigarettes per day/20) x number of years smoked). A former smoker is defined as a participant who quit smoking at least 6 months prior to Visit 1.
- Concurrent Respiratory Disease: Presence of a known pre-existing, clinically important lung condition other than asthma. This includes current infection, bronchiectasis, pulmonary fibrosis, bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, or diagnoses of emphysema or chronic bronchitis (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease other than asthma) or a history of lung cancer.
- Malignancy: A current malignancy or previous history of cancer in remission for less than 12 months prior to screening (Participants that had localized carcinoma of the skin which was resected for cure will not be excluded).
- Liver Disease: Known, pre-existing, unstable liver disease (as defined by the presence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminaemia, esophageal or gastric varices or persistent jaundice), cirrhosis, and known biliary abnormalities (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones).
- Cardiovascular: Participants who have severe or clinically significant cardiovascular disease uncontrolled with standard treatment. Including but not limited to: (a) known ejection fraction of <30% OR (b) severe heart failure meeting New York Heart Association Class IV classification OR (c) hospitalised in the 12 months prior to Visit 1 for severe heart failure meeting New York Heart Association Class III OR (d) angina diagnosed less than 3 months prior to Visit 1 or at Visit 1.
- Other Concurrent Medical Conditions: Participants who have known, pre-existing, clinically significant endocrine, autoimmune, metabolic, neurological, renal, gastrointestinal, hepatic, haematological or any other system abnormalities that are uncontrolled with standard treatment.
Show all 17Show fewer
- Eosinophilic Diseases: Participants with other conditions that could lead to elevated eosinophils such as Hypereosinophilic Syndromes, including Churg-Strauss Syndrome (Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis [EGPA]), or Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Participants with a known, pre-existing parasitic infestation within 6 months prior to Visit 1 are also to be excluded.
- Electrocardiogram (ECG) Assessment: QT interval corrected for heart rate by Fridericia's formula (QTc(F)) >=450 milliseconds (msec) or QTc(F) >=480 msec for participants with Bundle Branch Block at Visit 1.
- Alcohol/Substance Abuse: A history (or suspected history) of alcohol misuse or substance abuse within 2 years prior to Visit 1.
- Immunodeficiency: A known immunodeficiency (e.g. human immunodeficiency virus [HIV]), other than that explained by the use of corticosteroids taken as therapy for asthma.
- Xolair: Participants who have received omalizumab (Xolair) within 130 days of Visit 1.
- Other Monoclonal Antibodies: Participants who have received any monoclonal antibody (other than Xolair) to treat inflammatory disease within 5 half-lives of Visit 1.
- Investigational Medications: Participants who have received treatment with an investigational drug within the past 30 days or five terminal phase half-lives of the drug whichever is longer, prior to Visit 1 (this also includes investigational formulations of marketed products).
- Hypersensitivity: Participants with allergy/intolerance to a monoclonal antibody or biologic.
- Pregnancy: Participants who are pregnant or breastfeeding. Patients should not be enrolled if they plan to become pregnant during the time of study participation. A urine pregnancy test is required of all women of child bearing potential. This test will be performed at the time points specified in the Time and Events Schedule in protocol.
- Adherence: Participants who have known evidence of lack of adherence to controller medications and/or ability to follow physician's recommendations.
- Previous participation: Previously participated in any study with mepolizumab and received investigational product (including placebo)
Trial locations and contacts
144 sites in 19 countries.
144 sites in 19 countries
United States24 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Aventura, Florida, 33180
GSK Investigational Site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21236
GSK Investigational Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35243
GSK Investigational Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
GSK Investigational Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45231
GSK Investigational Site
Denver, Colorado, 80206
GSK Investigational Site
Durham, North Carolina, 27705
GSK Investigational Site
Fresno, California, 93720
GSK Investigational Site
Gastonia, North Carolina, 28054
GSK Investigational Site
Long Beach, California, 90808
GSK Investigational Site
New Haven, Connecticut, 06520
GSK Investigational Site
Newport Beach, California, 92663
GSK Investigational Site
Orangeburg, South Carolina, 29118
GSK Investigational Site
Orlando, Florida, 32825
GSK Investigational Site
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57702
GSK Investigational Site
Richmond, Virginia, 23229
GSK Investigational Site
Riverside, California, 92506
GSK Investigational Site
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
GSK Investigational Site
Rochester, New York, 14642
GSK Investigational Site
Rolling Hills Estates, California, 90274
GSK Investigational Site
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132
GSK Investigational Site
Upland, California, 91786
GSK Investigational Site
Upland, Pennsylvania, 19013
GSK Investigational Site
Williamsburg, Virginia, 23188
Germany12 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bamberg, Bavaria, 96049
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 10717
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 12157
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 12203
GSK Investigational Site
Hamburg, 20354
GSK Investigational Site
Hamburg, 22299
GSK Investigational Site
Koblenz, Rhineland-Palatinate, 56068
GSK Investigational Site
Leipzig, Saxony, 04103
GSK Investigational Site
Leipzig, Saxony, 04357
GSK Investigational Site
Munich, Bavaria, 80539
GSK Investigational Site
Schleswig, Schleswig-Holstein, 24837
GSK Investigational Site
Witten, North Rhine-Westphalia, 58452
Canada10 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Burlington, Ontario, L7N 3V2
GSK Investigational Site
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4Z6
GSK Investigational Site
Montreal, Quebec, H4J 1C5
GSK Investigational Site
Sainte-Foy, Quebec, G1V 4G5
GSK Investigational Site
St-Charles-Borromée, Ontario, J6E 2B4
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3A9
GSK Investigational Site
Trois-Rivières, Quebec, G8T 7A1
GSK Investigational Site
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9
GSK Investigational Site
Windsor, Ontario, N8X 5A6
GSK Investigational Site
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R2H 2A6
France10 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Brest, 29609
GSK Investigational Site
Dijon, 21079
GSK Investigational Site
Lille, 59037
GSK Investigational Site
Lyon, 69317
GSK Investigational Site
Marseille, 13915
GSK Investigational Site
Montpellier, 34295
GSK Investigational Site
Nantes, 44093
GSK Investigational Site
Paris, 75877
GSK Investigational Site
Pessac, 33604
GSK Investigational Site
Reims, 51092
Ukraine10 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Dnipro, 49074
GSK Investigational Site
Kharkiv, 61093
GSK Investigational Site
Kharkiv, 61124
GSK Investigational Site
Kyiv, 03038
GSK Investigational Site
Kyiv, 03049
GSK Investigational Site
Kyiv, 03680
GSK Investigational Site
Odesa, 65025
GSK Investigational Site
Vinnytsia, 21018
GSK Investigational Site
Vinnytsia, 21029
GSK Investigational Site
Zaporizhia, 69076
Russia9 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Irkutsk, 664043
GSK Investigational Site
Moscow, 115211
GSK Investigational Site
Novosibirsk, 630102
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, 198216
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Petesburg, 195030
GSK Investigational Site
Sestroretsk, 197706
GSK Investigational Site
Stavropol, 355030
GSK Investigational Site
Voronezh, 394066
GSK Investigational Site
Yekaterinburg, 620109
Argentina8 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, C1121ABE
GSK Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, C1425BEN
GSK Investigational Site
Concepción del Uruguay, Entre Ríos Province, 3260
GSK Investigational Site
La Plata, Buenos Aires, 1900
GSK Investigational Site
Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, 7600
GSK Investigational Site
Mendoza, 5500
GSK Investigational Site
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, 2000
GSK Investigational Site
San Rafael, Mendoza Province, 5600
Spain8 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Alcorcón (Madrid), 28922
GSK Investigational Site
Alicante, 03004
GSK Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08041
GSK Investigational Site
Madrid, 28041
GSK Investigational Site
Pozuelo de Alarcón/Madrid, 28223
GSK Investigational Site
Santander, 39008
GSK Investigational Site
Santiago de Compostela, 15706
GSK Investigational Site
Valencia, 46026
Czechia7 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Brno, 625 00
GSK Investigational Site
Hlučín, 748 01
GSK Investigational Site
Hradec Králové, 500 05
GSK Investigational Site
Kralupy nad Vltavou, 278 01
GSK Investigational Site
Olomouc, 775 20
GSK Investigational Site
Pilsen, 305 99
GSK Investigational Site
Prague, 140 59
Greece7 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Athens, 106 76
GSK Investigational Site
Athens, 11527
GSK Investigational Site
Haidari / Athens, 124 62
GSK Investigational Site
Rethymnon, Crete, 74100
GSK Investigational Site
Thessaloniki, 56403
GSK Investigational Site
Thessaloniki, 56429
GSK Investigational Site
Thessaloniki, 57010
Italy7 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bari, Apulia, 70124
GSK Investigational Site
Chieti, Abruzzo, 66100
GSK Investigational Site
Florence, Tuscany, 50134
GSK Investigational Site
Foggia, Apulia, 71100
GSK Investigational Site
Parma, Emilia-Romagna, 43100
GSK Investigational Site
Pisa, Tuscany, 56124
GSK Investigational Site
Reggio Emilia, Emilia-Romagna, 42100
Belgium5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Brussels, 1000
GSK Investigational Site
Erpent, 5101
GSK Investigational Site
Ghent, 9000
GSK Investigational Site
Leuven, 3000
GSK Investigational Site
Liège, 4000
Netherlands5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Amsterdam, 1105 AZ
GSK Investigational Site
Breda, 4818 CK
GSK Investigational Site
Leeuwarden, 8934 AD
GSK Investigational Site
Leiden, 2333 ZA
GSK Investigational Site
Rotterdam, 3045 PM
Peru5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Lima, Lima Province, Lima 27
GSK Investigational Site
Lima, Lima 1
GSK Investigational Site
Lima, Lima 32
GSK Investigational Site
San Martín de Porres, Lima region, Lima 31
GSK Investigational Site
San Miguel, Lima region, Lima 32
Norway4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bergen, 5021
GSK Investigational Site
Oslo, 0405
GSK Investigational Site
Stavanger, 4011
GSK Investigational Site
Trondheim, 7006
Slovakia4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bojnice, 972 01
GSK Investigational Site
Šaľa, 927 01
GSK Investigational Site
Spišská Nová Ves, 052 01
GSK Investigational Site
Vráble, 952 01
United Kingdom4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bradford, BD9 6RJ
GSK Investigational Site
Oxford, OX3 7LE
GSK Investigational Site
Plymouth, PL6 8DH
GSK Investigational Site
Swansea, SA2 8PP
Estonia3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Tallinn, 13419
GSK Investigational Site
Tallinn, 13619
GSK Investigational Site
Tartu, 51014
Bulgaria2 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Pleven, 5800
GSK Investigational Site
Sofia, 1431
About this study
Official title: A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multi-centre 24-week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Mepolizumab Adjunctive Therapy in Subjects With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma on Markers of Asthma Control
This is a multi-centre, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mepolizumab adjunctive therapy in participants with severe eosinophilic asthma on markers of asthma control. The overall intent of the current study is to more fully explore the impact of mepolizumab on health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) and other measures of asthma control, including lung function.
Participants who meet the predefined criteria will be randomised to receive either mepolizumab or placebo in addition to standard of care asthma treatment. Approximately 780 participants with severe eosinophilic asthma will be screened to ensure the randomisation of 544 participants (272 participants per treatment group) into the study.
- Conditions
- Asthma
- Being tested
- Mepolizumab, Placebo, SOC
- Keywords
- Asthma control, Lung function, Health-related quality of life, Mepolizumab, Severe Eosinophilic asthma
- Medical subject headings
- Asthma, Pulmonary Eosinophilia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MepolizumabBiological
Humanised Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody (IgG1, kappa) with human heavy and light chain frameworks, provided as a lyophilised cake in sterile vial. Vial to be reconstituted with sterile water for injection, just prior to use
PlaceboDrug
Sterile 0.9% sodium chloride solution
SOCDrug
Standard of Care (SOC) will differ by participants, however it will include high dose ICS with at least one other controller, e.g. LABA, with or without maintenance OCS
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Mepolizumab SC | Experimental | Participants will receive Mepolizumab 100 mg subcutaneously (SC) into the upper arm or thigh every 4 weeks for a period of 24 weeks (total of 6 doses) along with their respective standard care of treatment Receives: Biological: Mepolizumab; Drug: SOC |
| Placebo SC | Placebo comparator | Participants will receive placebo (0.9% sodium chloride) subcutaneously into the upper arm or thigh every 4 weeks for a period of 24 weeks (total of 6 doses) along with their respective standard care of treatment Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: SOC |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Score at Week 24
SGRQ consisted of 50 questions (scored from 0 to 100 where 0 indicates best and 100 indicates worst health) designed to measure Quality of Life in par. with diseases of airway obstruction, measuring symptoms, impact, and activity. Questions were completed by the par. with a recall over the past 4 weeks. SGRQ Total Score was calculated by summing the pre-assigned weights of answers, dividing by the sum of the maximum weights for items in SGRQ and multiplying by 100 to get a %. Change from BL in SGRQ was calculated as value at Week 24 minus value at BL for each par. and was analyzed using mixed model repeated measures allowing for covariates of BL value, region, BL maintenance oral corticosteroid (OCS) therapy, exacerbations in the year prior to the study (as an ordinal variable), BL % predicted FEV1 and visit, plus interaction terms for visit by BL and visit by treatment group. Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population consisted of all randomized par. who received >= 1 dose of drug.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Secondary outcomes (3)
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinic Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 24
FEV1 is the volume of air that can be forced out in one second after taking a deep breath. The change from Baseline in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 was calculated as the value at Week 24 minus the value at Baseline for each subject and was analyzed using a mixed model repeated measures adjusting for Baseline absolute pre-bronchodilator FEV1, region, Baseline maintenance OCS therapy, exacerbations in the year prior to the study and visit, plus interaction terms for visit by Baseline and visit by treatment group.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 4 Point or Greater Reduction From Baseline in SGRQ Score at Week 24
The percentage of participants achieving a 4 point or greater reduction from Baseline in SGRQ (scored from 0-100 with lower scores indicating better outcome) at Week 24 was compared between treatment groups using a logistic regression model with covariates of Baseline value, region, Baseline maintenance OCS therapy, exacerbations in the year prior to the study (as an ordinal variable) and Baseline % predicted FEV1.
Measured: Baseline (Visit 2-latest pre-dose assessment) and Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) Score at Week 24
The ACQ-5 is a five-item questionnaire, designed to be self-completed by the participants. ACQ-5 score is the mean score of 5 questions, each assessed on a 0-6 point scale to give a mean ranging between 0-6 with lower scores indicating better outcome. The five questions inquired about the frequency and/or severity of symptoms over the previous week. The response options for all these questions consisted of a zero (no impairment/limitation) to six (total impairment/limitation) scale. The mean change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value for each participant and analyzed using a mixed model repeated measures allowing for covariates of Baseline value, region, Baseline maintenance OCS therapy, exacerbations in the year prior to the study (as an ordinal variable), Baseline % predicted FEV1 and visit, plus interaction terms for visit by Baseline and visit by treatment group.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Study start11 Dec 2014
- Primary completion10 Jun 2016
- Study completion10 Jun 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AsthmaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 556 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02281318
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 200862
- Status last verified
- Aug 2018
- First submitted
- 30 Oct 2014
- Last updated
- 6 Aug 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Publications
Lemiere C, Taille C, Lee JK, Smith SG, Mallett S, Albers FC, Bradford ES, Yancey SW, Liu MC. Impact of baseline clinical asthma characteristics on the response to mepolizumab: a post hoc meta-analysis of two Phase III trials. Respir Res. 2021 Jun 22;22(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12931-021-01767-z.
PubMed 34158028Gibson PG, Prazma CM, Chupp GL, Bradford ES, Forshag M, Mallett SA, Yancey SW, Smith SG, Bel EH. Mepolizumab improves clinical outcomes in patients with severe asthma and comorbid conditions. Respir Res. 2021 Jun 7;22(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12931-021-01746-4.
PubMed 34098955Yancey SW, Ortega HG, Keene ON, Bradford ES. Efficacy of add-on mepolizumab in adolescents with severe eosinophilic asthma. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2019 Sep 3;15:53. doi: 10.1186/s13223-019-0366-x. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31507641Nelsen LM, Cockle SM, Gunsoy NB, Jones P, Albers FC, Bradford ES, Mullerova H. Impact of exacerbations on St George's Respiratory Questionnaire score in patients with severe asthma: post hoc analyses of two clinical trials and an observational study. J Asthma. 2020 Sep;57(9):1006-1016. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2019.1630640. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
PubMed 31251094Yancey SW, Bradford ES, Keene ON. Disease burden and efficacy of mepolizumab in patients with severe asthma and blood eosinophil counts of >/=150-300 cells/muL. Respir Med. 2019 May;151:139-141. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
PubMed 31047111Ortega H, Menzies-Gow A, Llanos JP, Forshag M, Albers F, Gunsoy N, Bradford ES, Yancey SW, Kraft M. Rapid and Consistent Improvements in Morning PEF in Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Treated with Mepolizumab. Adv Ther. 2018 Jul;35(7):1059-1068. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0727-8. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
PubMed 29949045Chupp GL, Bradford ES, Albers FC, Bratton DJ, Wang-Jairaj J, Nelsen LM, Trevor JL, Magnan A, Ten Brinke A. Efficacy of mepolizumab add-on therapy on health-related quality of life and markers of asthma control in severe eosinophilic asthma (MUSCA): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre, phase 3b trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2017 May;5(5):390-400. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30125-X. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
PubMed 28395936
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Aug 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multi-centre 24-week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Mepolizumab Adjunctive Therapy in Subjects With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma on Markers of Asthma Control
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02281318
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 200862
- Conditions
- Asthma
- Keywords
- Asthma control, Lung function, Health-related quality of life, Mepolizumab, Severe Eosinophilic asthma
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 556 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 11 Dec 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Jun 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Jun 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 4 May 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a multi-centre, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mepolizumab adjunctive therapy in participants with severe eosinophilic asthma on markers of asthma control. The overall intent of the current study is to more fully explore the impact of mepolizumab on health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) and other measures of asthma control, including lung function.
Participants who meet the predefined criteria will be randomised to receive either mepolizumab or placebo in addition to standard of care asthma treatment. Approximately 780 participants with severe eosinophilic asthma will be screened to ensure the randomisation of 544 participants (272 participants per treatment group) into the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Mepolizumab SC | Experimental | Biological: Mepolizumab, Drug: SOCParticipants will receive Mepolizumab 100 mg subcutaneously (SC) into the upper arm or thigh every 4 weeks for a period of 24 weeks (total of 6 doses) along with their respective standard care of treatment |
| Placebo SC | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo, Drug: SOCParticipants will receive placebo (0.9% sodium chloride) subcutaneously into the upper arm or thigh every 4 weeks for a period of 24 weeks (total of 6 doses) along with their respective standard care of treatment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Age: At least 12 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent/assent (For those countries where local regulations permit enrolment of adults only, participant recruitment will be restricted to those who are >=18 years of age)
- Inhaled Corticosteroid: A well-documented requirement for regular treatment with high dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) in the 12 months prior to Visit 1 with or without maintenance oral corticosteroids (OCS). For participants >=18 years old: ICS dose must be >=880 micrograms (mcg)/day fluticasone propionate (FP) (exactuator) or equivalent daily. For ICS/long-acting beta-2-agonist (LABA) combination preparations, the highest approved maintenance dose in the local country will meet this ICS criterion. For participants >=12 to <=17 years old: ICS dose must be >=440 mcg/day FP (ex-actuator) or equivalent daily. For ICS/LABA combination preparations, the mid-strength approved maintenance dose in the local country will meet this ICS criterion
- Controller Medication: Current treatment with an additional controller medication, besides ICS, for at least 3 months or a documented failure in the past 12 months of an additional controller medication for at least 3 successive months (e.g. LABA, leukotriene receptor antagonist [LTRA], or theophylline)
- Eosinophilic asthma: Prior documentation of eosinophilic asthma or high likelihood of eosinophilic asthma as per Randomisation Criteria 1 and 2
- FEV1: Persistent airflow obstruction as indicated by : For participants >=18 years of age at visit 1, a pre-bronchodilator FEV1 <80% predicted (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES III]) recorded at Visit 1. For participants 12-17 years of age at Visit 1: A pre-bronchodilator FEV1 <90% predicted (NHANES III) recorded at Visit 1 OR FEV1:FVC ratio <0.8 recorded at Visit 1
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Smoking history: Current smokers or former smokers with a smoking history of >=10 pack years (number of pack years = (number of cigarettes per day/20) x number of years smoked). A former smoker is defined as a participant who quit smoking at least 6 months prior to Visit 1.
- Concurrent Respiratory Disease: Presence of a known pre-existing, clinically important lung condition other than asthma. This includes current infection, bronchiectasis, pulmonary fibrosis, bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, or diagnoses of emphysema or chronic bronchitis (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease other than asthma) or a history of lung cancer.
- Malignancy: A current malignancy or previous history of cancer in remission for less than 12 months prior to screening (Participants that had localized carcinoma of the skin which was resected for cure will not be excluded).
- Liver Disease: Known, pre-existing, unstable liver disease (as defined by the presence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminaemia, esophageal or gastric varices or persistent jaundice), cirrhosis, and known biliary abnormalities (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones).
- Cardiovascular: Participants who have severe or clinically significant cardiovascular disease uncontrolled with standard treatment. Including but not limited to: (a) known ejection fraction of <30% OR (b) severe heart failure meeting New York Heart Association Class IV classification OR (c) hospitalised in the 12 months prior to Visit 1 for severe heart failure meeting New York Heart Association Class III OR (d) angina diagnosed less than 3 months prior to Visit 1 or at Visit 1.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MepolizumabHumanised Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody (IgG1, kappa) with human heavy and light chain frameworks, provided as a lyophilised cake in sterile vial. Vial to be reconstituted with sterile water for injection, just prior to use | Biological | Mepolizumab SC |
| PlaceboSterile 0.9% sodium chloride solution | Drug | Placebo SC |
| SOCStandard of Care (SOC) will differ by participants, however it will include high dose ICS with at least one other controller, e.g. LABA, with or without maintenance OCS | Drug | Mepolizumab SC, Placebo SC |
Primary outcome
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
SGRQ consisted of 50 questions (scored from 0 to 100 where 0 indicates best and 100 indicates worst health) designed to measure Quality of Life in par. with diseases of airway obstruction, measuring symptoms, impact, and activity. Questions were completed by the par. with a recall over the past 4 weeks. SGRQ Total Score was calculated by summing the pre-assigned weights of answers, dividing by the sum of the maximum weights for items in SGRQ and multiplying by 100 to get a %. Change from BL in SGRQ was calculated as value at Week 24 minus value at BL for each par. and was analyzed using mixed model repeated measures allowing for covariates of BL value, region, BL maintenance oral corticosteroid (OCS) therapy, exacerbations in the year prior to the study (as an ordinal variable), BL % predicted FEV1 and visit, plus interaction terms for visit by BL and visit by treatment group. Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population consisted of all randomized par. who received >= 1 dose of drug.
3 secondary outcomes
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinic Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 4 Point or Greater Reduction From Baseline in SGRQ Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2-latest pre-dose assessment) and Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Aug 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34158028Lemiere C, Taille C, Lee JK, Smith SG, Mallett S, Albers FC, Bradford ES, Yancey SW, Liu MC. Impact of baseline clinical asthma characteristics on the response to mepolizumab: a post hoc meta-analysis of two Phase III trials. Respir Res. 2021 Jun 22;22(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12931-021-01767-z.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34098955Gibson PG, Prazma CM, Chupp GL, Bradford ES, Forshag M, Mallett SA, Yancey SW, Smith SG, Bel EH. Mepolizumab improves clinical outcomes in patients with severe asthma and comorbid conditions. Respir Res. 2021 Jun 7;22(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12931-021-01746-4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31507641Yancey SW, Ortega HG, Keene ON, Bradford ES. Efficacy of add-on mepolizumab in adolescents with severe eosinophilic asthma. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2019 Sep 3;15:53. doi: 10.1186/s13223-019-0366-x. eCollection 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31251094Nelsen LM, Cockle SM, Gunsoy NB, Jones P, Albers FC, Bradford ES, Mullerova H. Impact of exacerbations on St George's Respiratory Questionnaire score in patients with severe asthma: post hoc analyses of two clinical trials and an observational study. J Asthma. 2020 Sep;57(9):1006-1016. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2019.1630640. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31047111Yancey SW, Bradford ES, Keene ON. Disease burden and efficacy of mepolizumab in patients with severe asthma and blood eosinophil counts of >/=150-300 cells/muL. Respir Med. 2019 May;151:139-141. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29949045Ortega H, Menzies-Gow A, Llanos JP, Forshag M, Albers F, Gunsoy N, Bradford ES, Yancey SW, Kraft M. Rapid and Consistent Improvements in Morning PEF in Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Treated with Mepolizumab. Adv Ther. 2018 Jul;35(7):1059-1068. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0727-8. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28395936Chupp GL, Bradford ES, Albers FC, Bratton DJ, Wang-Jairaj J, Nelsen LM, Trevor JL, Magnan A, Ten Brinke A. Efficacy of mepolizumab add-on therapy on health-related quality of life and markers of asthma control in severe eosinophilic asthma (MUSCA): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre, phase 3b trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2017 May;5(5):390-400. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30125-X. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
- Researchers can use this site to request access to anonymised patient level data and/or supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Related trials for Asthma
RecruitingPhase 1
Pilot Study to Identify the Mediators and Inflammatory Cell Surface Receptors Involved in Allergic Airway Inflammation
Asthma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Compare the Relative Potency of Salbutamol Administered Via Metered Dose Inhalers (MDI) Containing Propellants HFA-152a to HFA-134a in Mild Asthmatics Aged 18 to 65 Inclusive
Asthma, Mild Asthma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Assessing the Effect of Dupilumab on Inducing Clinical Remission in Asthma
Asthma Control
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Local Antibiotic Delivery for Community Acquired Pneumonia
Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-07275315 in People With Moderate-To-Severe Asthma
Asthma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
144 sites in 19 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Mepolizumab and SOC in people with Asthma, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 144 sites in 19 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 144 sites in United States, Germany, Canada, France, Ukraine and 14 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 May 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Score at Week 24 (time frame: Baseline and Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02281318, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Aug 2018.