AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetic FootWOUNDJOURNEYNCT02280733

A Real-World Registry of Chronic Wounds and Ulcers

An observational study of Diabetic Foot and Pressure Ulcer, run by U.S. Wound Registry at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

WOUNDJOURNEY is a longitudinal, real-world, observational registry designed to capture the full clinical course and patient journey associated with chronic wounds and ulcers. Data are collected during routine care from over 1,400 clinicians across the USA and Puerto Rico using a highly structured certified electronic… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
How many people
300,000 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Jan 2005to Jan 2030
How long will I take part?
5 Years
Phase
Observational

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with chronic wounds or ulcers treated at participating sites in any US State and Puerto Rico. All patients and wounds are included without sampling. Each wound can be analyzed independently, even when multiple wounds exist on a single patient. Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample Minimum Age: 0 Years Maximum Age: None (patients aged 90+ are reported in aggregate per HIPAA) Sex: All Gender Based: No Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Who may be able to join

  • Presence of one or more chronic wounds or ulcers of any etiology
  • Wound or ulcer must be treated at a participating site (which can be a hospital outpatient department, office, mobile practitioner, in the home setting, skilled nursing, etc.)
  • Care must be documented using the purpose-built, wound-specific structured electronic health record (EHR) or electronic data capture (EDC) system
  • All ages, including infants and patients aged 90 years or older (reported in aggregate in accordance with HIPAA de-identification standards)
  • All sexes and gender identities
  • All wound types and severities, including multiple wounds per patient

Who cannot join

  • -None (the registry includes all eligible patients treated at participating sites without sampling or exclusion criteria)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • US Wound Registry

    The Woodlands, Texas, 77386

    Caroline E Fife, MD, 800-603-7896, cfife@intellicure.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Longitudinal, Real World, Observational Registry of Chronic Wounds and Ulcers and the Patients Who Have Them

WOUNDJOURNEY is a longitudinal, real-world, observational registry designed to capture the full clinical course and patient journey associated with chronic wounds and ulcers. Data are collected during routine care from over 1,400 clinicians across the USA and Puerto Rico using a highly structured certified electronic health record (EHR) or electronic data capture (EDC) system. Data are transmitted daily to the U.S. Wound Registry (USWR), a CMS-recognized Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR). The registry captures real-time, research-ready data on patient demographics, comorbidities, wound characteristics, standard-of-care treatments, complications, and advanced therapeutics. It supports robust, fit-for-purpose real-world evidence generation by enabling risk-adjusted outcome analysis, comparative effectiveness research, and quality improvement across diverse sites of care.

Read the detailed description

WOUNDJOURNEY is a longitudinal, real-world observational registry focused on the chronic disease burden and patient journey of individuals with chronic wounds and ulcers. Data collection began in 2005 and continues prospectively, capturing structured clinical data at the point of care using a purpose-built certified EHR or EDC system. These data are securely transmitted to the U.S. Wound Registry (USWR), a CMS-designated Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR).

All major wound types are represented: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), diabetic ulcers not on the foot, Venous leg ulcers (VLUs), Arterial ulcers, Pressure ulcers/injuries, Surgical complications, Traumatic wounds, Vasculitic/inflammatory, and sickle cell-related ulcers, and chronic non-pressure ulcers.

The registry collects detailed data on standard-of-care practices and advanced wound care interventions, including brand-specific information on: Advanced dressings (e.g., collagen, antimicrobial), Compression therapy, Offloading devices, Cellular and/or tissue-based products (CTPs) also called Cellular, Acellular, or Matrix-like Products (CAMPs) or "skin substitutes," Negative pressure wound therapy, MIST therapy (low-frequency ultrasound), Topical oxygen therapy (TOT), Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT), Topical growth factors (e.g., Becaplermin), Enzymatic and mechanical debridement, Fluorescent imaging for bacterial load, Topical antibiotics and antimicrobials, and other treatments.

The registry captures key elements of the patient journey, including: Frequency of debridement, Sites of care, number of patient visits and number of wound visits, Dressing changes, Use and timing of advanced therapies, Comorbid disease burden and clinical complexity, Patient Frailty, number of wounds and ulcers per patient, patient time in service, wound time service, patient and wound outcomes, the development of new wounds while in service and complication rates.

Wounds are risk stratified using the Wound Healing Index, enabling case-mix adjustment and longitudinal outcome tracking. Follow-up may extend over five years, capturing outcomes such as: Complete healing (epithelialization), Non-healing, Major and minor amputations, Mortality, and Loss to follow-up or transfer of care. Quality of care is assessed using wound-specific quality measures. The registry integrates real-world clinical care with research and quality improvement, supporting a learning healthcare system model.

Through secure tokenization, registry data may be linked to payer claims for comprehensive longitudinal analysis of healthcare utilization, interventions, hospitalizations, medication use, and long-term outcomes across care settings. This enables rigorous, policy-relevant evaluations of standard care and advanced wound therapies in routine practice. The robust patient and wound level data are suitable to understand the natural history of chronic wounds and ulcers and to create historical controls for prospective clinical trials.

Being tested
Usual care
Keywords
Qualified Clinical Data Registry, Quality Measures, Clinical Data Research Network, Real world data, chronic wounds, chronic ulcers, Diabetic Foot Ulcer, Venous Leg Ulcer, Pressure Ulcer, Pressure Injury, Arterial Ulcer, Traumatic Wound, Surgical Complication, Pyoderma Gangrenosum, Advanced Wound Care, Skin Substitutes, CAMPs, CTPs, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy, NPWT
Medical subject headings
Diabetic Foot, Pressure Ulcer, Surgical Wound Dehiscence, Vasculitis, Skin Ulcer, Leg Ulcer, Pyoderma, Peripheral Arterial Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Usual careOther

    Also called usual and customary care

    advanced dressings, off-loading, venous ulcer compression, arterial screening

Study groups in NCT02280733
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
chronic wound patientsThis cohort includes pediatric and adult patients with one or more chronic wounds or ulcers treated in any site of care including hospital outpatient clinics, office-based practices, skilled nursing, and home. Data are captured prospectively during routine care using a purpose built certified EHR. Wounds include diabetic foot ulcers, venous leg ulcers, pressure ulcers/injuries, arterial ulcers, surgical wounds, traumatic wounds, and inflammatory ulcers. Interventions are at the discretion of the treating clinician and include standard and advanced wound therapies. Data collected include patient demographics, comorbid conditions, medications, total number of concomitant wounds per patient, wound characteristics, treatments, visit frequency, complications, and outcomes including healing, amputation, recurrence, hospitalization, and death. Patients may be followed for over five years.
Receives: Other: Usual care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Healed

    Wound closure by secondary intention

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Major amputation

    Below the knee, above the knee

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Minor amputation

    toe amputation, transmetatarsal amputation, midfoot amputation

    Measured: 1 year

  4. Patient Death

    patient death while in treatment

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Percent surface area (PAR) reduction over time

    Percent surface area reduction (PSAR) is defined as the percentage decrease in wound surface area from the initial documented size at baseline (first qualifying wound care visit) to subsequent visits over time. Wound surface area is measured using length × width, captured at the point of care using structured fields within the electronic health record (EHR) or electronic data capture (EDC) system. Values are recorded in cm² and used to calculate PSAR as:

    [(Baseline area - Follow-up area) ÷ Baseline area] × 100

    This metric is assessed at multiple time intervals, including 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. PSAR is a key performance indicator for healing trajectory and is used to evaluate response to interventions. All wound types are included, and multiple wounds per patient are analyzed independently. Surface area measurements are case-mix adjusted using the Wound Healing Index for comparative effectiveness and quality reporting.

    Measured: variable - measured at multiple intervals (e.g., 4, 12, 16, 24, and 52 weeks)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Oct 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Jan 2005
  3. Primary completionJan 2030 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2030 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
300,000 participants (estimated)
Target duration
5 Years
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02280733
Sponsor's protocol ID
USWR 001
Acronym
WOUNDJOURNEY
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
29 Oct 2014
Last updated
16 Jul 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified individual participant data (IPD) collected through the U.S. Wound Registry (USWR) may be made available to qualified researchers, payers, regulatory agencies, or industry partners upon request. Shared data may include demographics, comorbidities, wound characteristics, interventions, and outcomes captured longitudinally in a structured electronic health record (EHR) or data capture system. All shared data comply with HIPAA de-identification standards and may be subject to data use agreements and institutional review board (IRB) approval.

Publications

  • Fife CE, Walker D, Thomson B, Otto G. The safety of negative pressure wound therapy using vacuum-assisted closure in diabetic foot ulcers treated in the outpatient setting. Int Wound J. 2008 Jun;5 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):17-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2008.00467.x.

    PubMed 18577134
  • Fife CE, Walker D, Thomson B. Electronic Health Records, Registries, and Quality Measures: What? Why? How? Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2013 Dec;2(10):598-604. doi: 10.1089/wound.2013.0476.

    PubMed 24761335
  • Horn SD, Fife CE, Smout RJ, Barrett RS, Thomson B. Development of a wound healing index for patients with chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2013 Nov-Dec;21(6):823-32. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12107. Epub 2013 Oct 17.

    PubMed 24134202
  • Carter MJ, Fife CE, Walker D, Thomson B. Estimating the applicability of wound care randomized controlled trials to general wound-care populations by estimating the percentage of individuals excluded from a typical wound-care population in such trials. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2009 Jul;22(7):316-24. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000305486.06358.e0.

    PubMed 20375969
  • Fife CE, Carter MJ, Walker D, Thomson B. A retrospective data analysis of antimicrobial dressing usage in 3,084 patients. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2010 Mar 1;56(3):28-42.

    PubMed 20368672
  • Fife CE, Carter MJ, Walker D. Why is it so hard to do the right thing in wound care? Wound Repair Regen. 2010 Mar-Apr;18(2):154-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2010.00571.x. Epub 2010 Feb 16.

    PubMed 20163568

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in