AzTrials
AzTrials

CalciphylaxisVitK-CUANCT02278692

Evaluation of Vitamin K Supplementation for Calcific Uremic Arteriolopathy

A study testing Vitamin K in people with Calciphylaxis and Calcific Uremic Arteriolopathy, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Calcific uremic arteriolopathy a.k.a. calciphylaxis is a vascular calcification disorder seen in dialysis patients. Calcific uremic arteriolopathy has 60-80% one-year mortality and significant morbidity associated with non-healing and extremely painful skin lesions. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Calciphylaxis, Calcific Uremic Arteriolopathy
What is being tested?
Vitamin K
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
26 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Mar 2015to Aug 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Calcific uremic arteriolopathy (a.k.a. calciphylaxis)

Who cannot join

  • Warfarin discontinuation contra-indicated (e.g. mechanical heart valve)
  • Prior allergic reaction to vitamin K
  • Prior history of venous thromboembolism*
  • Pregnancy and lactation
  • (Patients with prior history of thrombosis who are treated with non-warfarin anticoagulant agents (e.g. apixaban, enoxaparin, etc) will be considered for inclusion)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

Other trials in United States

About this study

Calcific uremic arteriolopathy a.k.a. calciphylaxis is a vascular calcification disorder seen in dialysis patients. Calcific uremic arteriolopathy has 60-80% one-year mortality and significant morbidity associated with non-healing and extremely painful skin lesions. At present, there is no effective treatment for calcific uremic arteriolopathy.

Vitamin K is an important vitamin for inhibiting vascular calcification. It is known to increase the circulating levels of carboxylated Matrix Gla Protein, a potent inhibitor of vascular calcification. However, the effects of vitamin K supplementation in patients with calcific uremic arteriolopathy are unknown.

The purpose of this study is to conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial to examine the effects of oral vitamin K supplementation on circulating levels of anti-calcification factor (carboxylated Matrix Gla Protein) and clinical outcomes in patients with calcific uremic arteriolopathy.

Read the detailed description

Calcific uremic arteriolopathy (CUA), also known as calciphylaxis, is a vascular calcification disorder associated with 60-80% one-year mortality and significant morbidity. CUA predominantly affects end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients and presents with painful skin lesions. Although rare (prevalence: 4% in dialysis patients), the incidence of CUA is on the rise as shown by us and others. Mural calcification of dermal arterioles is the hallmark histological finding of CUA. However, there are significant gaps in the understanding of the pathophysiology and risk factors for CUA and there are no effective therapies.

In animal models, vitamin K prevents vascular calcification by serving as a co-factor for Matrix Gla Protein (MGP) carboxylation, a process that converts decarboxylated-MGP (dc-MGP) to carboxylated-MGP (c-MGP). By inhibiting pro-calcification Bone Morphogenic Protein (BMP) ligands, c-MGP acts as a potent vascular calcification inhibitor. uc-MGP is inactive with no vascular calcification inhibitory properties. However, the effects of vitamin K administration on CUA remain unknown.

Aim: To conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) of oral vitamin K in CUA.

The investigators will examine the following hypotheses:

Hypothesis 1: Vitamin K therapy, when compared to placebo, reduces uncarboxylated Matrix Gla Protein in chronic hemodialysis patients with CUA.

Hypothesis 2: Vitamin K therapy can be safely administered in chronic hemodialysis patients with CUA.

Hypothesis 3: Vitamin K therapy leads to improvement in CUA pain and average lesion size when compared to placebo in chronic hemodialysis patients.

Study population and procedures: Twenty patients will be enrolled in this pilot RCT over the 2-year study period.

Study Procedures: Patients meeting the eligibility criteria will be consented and randomized to receive either vitamin K (phylloquinone) 10 mg orally three times a week for a total of 12 weeks or identical appearing placebo. Follow-up will occur every 4 weeks during which information will be obtained regarding pain severity, number and size of CUA lesion (s), and adverse events. Blood samples will be taken at baseline and at 12-week follow-up.

Sample processing and assays: Blood samples (plasma and serum, total 30 mL) will be taken at baseline and at 12-week follow-up.

Being tested
Vitamin K, Placebo
Keywords
Vitamin K, Calciphylaxis, Calcific uremic arteriolopathy, Dialysis, End-stage renal disease
Medical subject headings
Calciphylaxis, Kidney Failure, Chronic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Vitamin KDietary supplement

    Oral vitamin K

  • PlaceboOther

    Oral placebo tablet

Study groups in NCT02278692
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Vitamin KActive comparatorVitamin K1 (phytonadione) 10 mg orally three times a week after dialysis for 12 weeks
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin K
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorIdentical appearing placebo orally three times a week after dialysis for 12 weeks
Receives: Other: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from baseline in circulating MGP level at 12 weeks

    Measured: Baseline and 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Change from baseline in largest lesion size at 12 weeks

    Lesion size is measured in centimeters2

    Measured: Baseline and every month for 3 months

  2. Change from baseline in combined area of all lesions at 12 weeks

    Lesion size is measured in centimeters2

    Measured: Baseline and every month for 3 months

  3. Change from baseline in pain at 12 weeks

    Pain is measured using Wong-Baker Faces pain rating scale

    Measured: Baseline and every month for 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Oct 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2015
  3. Primary completionAug 2019
  4. Study completionAug 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
26 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02278692
Sponsor's protocol ID
2014P001961
Acronym
VitK-CUA
Status last verified
Sep 2019
First submitted
27 Oct 2014
Last updated
17 Sep 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Nigwekar SU, Brunelli SM, Meade D, Wang W, Hymes J, Lacson E Jr. Sodium thiosulfate therapy for calcific uremic arteriolopathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Jul;8(7):1162-70. doi: 10.2215/CJN.09880912. Epub 2013 Mar 21.

    PubMed 23520041
  • Nigwekar SU, Bhan I, Turchin A, Skentzos SC, Hajhosseiny R, Steele D, Nazarian RM, Wenger J, Parikh S, Karumanchi A, Thadhani R. Statin use and calcific uremic arteriolopathy: a matched case-control study. Am J Nephrol. 2013;37(4):325-32. doi: 10.1159/000348806. Epub 2013 Mar 21.

    PubMed 23548843
  • Nigwekar SU, Bloch DB, Nazarian RM, Vermeer C, Booth SL, Xu D, Thadhani RI, Malhotra R. Vitamin K-Dependent Carboxylation of Matrix Gla Protein Influences the Risk of Calciphylaxis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Jun;28(6):1717-1722. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016060651. Epub 2017 Jan 3.

    PubMed 28049648
  • Nigwekar SU, Zhao S, Wenger J, Hymes JL, Maddux FW, Thadhani RI, Chan KE. A Nationally Representative Study of Calcific Uremic Arteriolopathy Risk Factors. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Nov;27(11):3421-3429. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2015091065. Epub 2016 Apr 14.

    PubMed 27080977
  • Cozzolino M, Mangano M, Galassi A, Ciceri P, Messa P, Nigwekar S. Vitamin K in Chronic Kidney Disease. Nutrients. 2019 Jan 14;11(1):168. doi: 10.3390/nu11010168.

    PubMed 30646590
  • D Shirsat P, Sonavane K, Botana LR, Sachdeva B. Calciphylaxis in the Upper GI Tract in an ESRD Patient: An Atypical Presentation and Review of Literature. Case Rep Nephrol. 2025 Dec 11;2025:3967671. doi: 10.1155/crin/3967671. eCollection 2025.

    PubMed 41472909
  • Krishnasamy R, Jardine MJ; BEAT-Calci Trialists. Adaptive Designs for Clinical Trials in Nephrology. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2025 Jan 1;36(1):147-149. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000000000497. Epub 2024 Aug 26. No abstract available.

    PubMed 39186385

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Vitamin K in people with Calciphylaxis and Calcific Uremic Arteriolopathy, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from baseline in circulating MGP level at 12 weeks (time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02278692, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Sep 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in