Advanced Metastatic Breast CancerPhase 3MONALEESA-7NCT02278120
Study of Efficacy and Safety in Premenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor Positive, HER2-negative Advanced Breast Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing Ribociclib, Tamoxifen and Letrozole in people with Advanced Metastatic Breast Cancer, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 183 sites in 30 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study was to determine whether treatment with tamoxifen or a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAI) + goserelin + LEE011 prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared to treatment with tamoxifen or a NSAI + goserelin + placebo in premenopausal women with hormone receptor positive (HR+)… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 59 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Advanced Metastatic Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Ribociclib, Tamoxifen and Letrozole
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 672 participants
- Where
- 183 sitesin 30 countries
- Study dates
- 20 Nov 2014to 20 Apr 2023
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 59 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients had advanced (locoregionally recurrent or metastatic) breast cancer not amenable to curative therapy
- Patients were premenopausal or perimenopausal at the time of study entry
- Patients who had received (neo) adjuvant therapy for breast cancer were eligible
- Patients had a histologically and/or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of estrogen-receptor positive and/or progesterone receptor positive breast cancer
- Patients had HER2-negative breast cancer
- Patients must have either had measurable disease or If no measurable disease was present, then at least one predominantly lytic bone lesion
- Patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1
- Patients had adequate bone marrow and organ function
Who cannot join
- Patients who had received a prior CDK4/6 inhibitor
- Patients were postmenopausal
- Patients who currently had inflammatory breast cancer at screening.
- Patients who had received any prior hormonal anti-cancer therapy for advanced breast cancer, except for ≤ 14 days of tamoxifen or NSAI ± goserelin for advanced breast cancer prior to randomization.
- Patients had a concurrent malignancy or malignancy within 3 years of randomization, with the exception of adequately treated basal cell skin carcinoma, squamous cell skin carcinoma, non-melanomatous skin cancer or curatively resected cervical cancer.
- Patients with CNS metastases.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Patients had active cardiac disease or a history of cardiac dysfunction
- Patients were currently using other antineoplastic agents
- Patients were pregnant or nursing or physiologically capable of becoming pregnant and not using highly effective contraception.
Trial locations and contacts
183 sites in 30 countries.
183 sites in 30 countries
United States35 sites
University of New Mexico Hospital SC-2
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106
University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center Onc Dept
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Comprehensive Blood and Cancer SC-2
Bakersfield, California, 93309
Sidney Kimmel CCC At JH Dept of Onc.
Baltimore, Maryland, 21231
Massachusetts General Hospital Onc Dept
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Erlanger Medical Center SC
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37403
University of Chicago SC-3
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Danbury Hospital SC
Danbury, Connecticut, 06810
Comprehensive Cancer Center at Saint Joseph Hospital SC
Denver, Colorado, 80218
Duke Univ Medical Center Duke (SC)
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Providence Regional Cancer Partnership
Everett, Washington, 98201
Florida Cancer Specialists Onc Dept
Fort Myers, Florida, 33901
Florida Cancer Specialists SC-2
Fort Myers, Florida, 33901
The Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders SC
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
Bon Secours Cancer Center SC
Greenville, South Carolina, 29607
Penn State University Milton S Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
Memorial Cancer Institute SC
Hollywood, Florida, 33021
Moanalua Medical Center. Attn: Oncology Dept SC
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96817
Methodist Hospita Methodist Can Cen Dept of Oncology
Houston, Texas, 77030
Uni of TX MD Anderson Cancer Cntr SC-5
Houston, Texas, 77030
Kadlec Clinic Hematology and Onco Kadlec Clinic Hematology & Onc
Kennewick, Washington, 99336
Clinical Research Alliance .
Lake Success, New York, 11042
University Of California Los Angeles Dept of Onc
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Norton Cancer Institute SC
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
University of Wisconsin / Paul P. Carbone Comp Cancer Center Univ Wisc 3
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792-6164
NorthWest Georgia Oncology Centers IRB
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
University Of Miami Univ Miami 2
Miami, Florida, 33136
Bon Secours Virginia Health System
Midlothian, Virginia, 23114
SCRI Oncology Partners Tennessee Oncology (3)
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Meridian Health Systems SC
Neptune City, New Jersey, 07754
Northern Utah Cancer Associates
Ogden, Utah, 84403-3105
Mays Cancer Ctr Uthsa Mdacc SC-4
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Brooke Army Medical Center SC
San Antonio, Texas, 78234
Washington Uni School of Med SC
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Northwest Medical Specialties Dept of Onc
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
Italy20 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Benevento, BN, 82100
Novartis Investigative Site
Bologna, BO, 40138
Novartis Investigative Site
Candiolo, TO, 10060
Novartis Investigative Site
Catania, CT, 95124
Novartis Investigative Site
Cona, FE, 44100
Novartis Investigative Site
Cremona, CR, 26100
Novartis Investigative Site
Genova, GE, 16132
Novartis Investigative Site
L’Aquila, AQ, 67100
Novartis Investigative Site
Lecce, LE, 73100
Novartis Investigative Site
Lucca, LU, 55100
Novartis Investigative Site
Meldola, FC, 47014
Novartis Investigative Site
Milan, MI, 20141
Novartis Investigative Site
Naples, 80131
Novartis Investigative Site
Pavia, PV, 27100
Novartis Investigative Site
Perugia, PG, 06129
Novartis Investigative Site
Prato, PO, 59100
Novartis Investigative Site
Province of Macerata, MC, 62100
Novartis Investigative Site
Roma, RM, 00168
Novartis Investigative Site
Terni, TR, 05100
Novartis Investigative Site
Udine, UD, 33100
Spain17 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Alcorcón, Madrid, 28922
Novartis Investigative Site
Almería, Andalusia, 04009
Novartis Investigative Site
Badalona, Catalonia, 08916
Novartis Investigative Site
Barakaldo, Vizcaya, 48903
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08003
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08035
Novartis Investigative Site
Donostia / San Sebastian, Basque Country, 20080
Novartis Investigative Site
Elche, Alicante, 03203
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28033
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28034
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28040
Novartis Investigative Site
Málaga, Andalusia, 29010
Novartis Investigative Site
Mallorca, Balearic Islands, 07198
Novartis Investigative Site
Sabadell, Barcelona, 08208
Novartis Investigative Site
Sant Joan Despí, Barcelona, 08970
Novartis Investigative Site
Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, 15706
Novartis Investigative Site
Valencia, Valencia, 46010
Germany12 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bonn, 53111
Novartis Investigative Site
Dresden, 01307
Novartis Investigative Site
Erlangen, 91054
Novartis Investigative Site
Essen, 45136
Novartis Investigative Site
Esslingen am Neckar, 73730
Novartis Investigative Site
Kiel, 24105
Novartis Investigative Site
Leipzig, 04103
Novartis Investigative Site
Mühlhausen, 99974
Novartis Investigative Site
München, 81377
Novartis Investigative Site
Offenbach, 63069
Novartis Investigative Site
Ravensburg, 88214
Novartis Investigative Site
Ulm, 89081
France8 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Caen, 14021
Novartis Investigative Site
Lille, 59020
Novartis Investigative Site
Lyon, 69373
Novartis Investigative Site
Montpellier, 34298
Novartis Investigative Site
Paris, 75015
Novartis Investigative Site
Rouen, 76038
Novartis Investigative Site
Strasbourg, 67000
Novartis Investigative Site
Toulouse, 31059
Taiwan8 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Changhua, 50006
Novartis Investigative Site
Kaohsiung City, 83301
Novartis Investigative Site
New Taipei City, 23561
Novartis Investigative Site
Taipei, 10002
Novartis Investigative Site
Taipei, 103616
Novartis Investigative Site
Taipei, 10449
Novartis Investigative Site
Taipei, 11217
Novartis Investigative Site
Taoyuan, 33305
Brazil7 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Barretos, São Paulo, 14784 400
Novartis Investigative Site
Ijuí, Rio Grande do Sul, 98700-000
Novartis Investigative Site
Londrina, Paraná, 86015-520
Novartis Investigative Site
Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul, 99010-260
Novartis Investigative Site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01317-002
Novartis Investigative Site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01509-900
Novartis Investigative Site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 04014-002
Canada6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2
Novartis Investigative Site
Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1L5
Novartis Investigative Site
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6
Novartis Investigative Site
Québec, Quebec, G1S 4L8
Novartis Investigative Site
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
Novartis Investigative Site
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E6
Hungary6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Budapest, 1134
Novartis Investigative Site
Budapest, H 1122
Novartis Investigative Site
Budapest, H-1032
Novartis Investigative Site
Debrecen, 4032
Novartis Investigative Site
Szeged, 6720
Novartis Investigative Site
Szolnok, H-5000
Lebanon6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Beirut, 10999
Novartis Investigative Site
Beirut, 1107 2020
Novartis Investigative Site
Beirut, 166378
Novartis Investigative Site
El Achrafiyé, 166830
Novartis Investigative Site
El Chouf, LBN, 1503201002
Novartis Investigative Site
Saida, 652
South Korea6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bundang Gu, Gyeonggi-do, 13620
Novartis Investigative Site
Gyeonggi-do, Korea, 10408
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, 03080
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, 03722
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, 05505
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, 06351
Turkey (Türkiye)6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Adana, 01160
Novartis Investigative Site
Ankara, 06100
Novartis Investigative Site
Diyarbakır, 21000
Novartis Investigative Site
Edirne, 22030
Novartis Investigative Site
Istanbul, TUR, 34098
Novartis Investigative Site
Izmir, 35040
Australia5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Box Hill, Victoria, 3128
Novartis Investigative Site
Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084
Novartis Investigative Site
Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150
Novartis Investigative Site
Nedlands, Western Australia, 6009
Novartis Investigative Site
Waratah, New South Wales, 2298
Portugal5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Lisbon, 1099 023
Novartis Investigative Site
Lisbon, 1400-038
Novartis Investigative Site
Lisbon, 1500 650
Novartis Investigative Site
Porto, 4200 319
Novartis Investigative Site
Porto, 4200-072
Belgium4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Brussels, 1000
Novartis Investigative Site
Leuven, 3000
Novartis Investigative Site
Namur, 5000
Novartis Investigative Site
Wilrijk, 2610
India4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bangalore, Karnataka, 560 095
Novartis Investigative Site
Kolkata, West Bengal, 700 053
Novartis Investigative Site
Mumbai, 400 012
Novartis Investigative Site
Nashik, Maharashtra, 422 004
Argentina3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Córdoba, X5004FHP
Novartis Investigative Site
La Rioja, 5300
Novartis Investigative Site
San Salvador de Jujuy, Jujuy Province, 4600
Hong Kong3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Hong Kong
Novartis Investigative Site
Kowloon
Novartis Investigative Site
Wan Chai
Mexico3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
León, Guanajuato, 37000
Novartis Investigative Site
Metepec, Edo. de México, 01722
Novartis Investigative Site
Monterrey Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, 64710
Bulgaria2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Sofia, 1303
Novartis Investigative Site
Varna, 9010
Colombia2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bogotá, 110221
Novartis Investigative Site
Montería, 230004
Greece2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Heraklion Crete, 711 10
Novartis Investigative Site
Thessaloniki, GR, 54645
Malaysia2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Johor Bahru, Johor, 81100
Novartis Investigative Site
Kuala Lumpur, 59100
Poland2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Gdansk, 80 952
Novartis Investigative Site
Konin, 62 500
Russia2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Arkhangelsk, 163045
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint Petersburg, 192148
Singapore2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Singapore, 119228
Novartis Investigative Site
Singapore, 168583
Thailand2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bangkok, 10330
Novartis Investigative Site
Bangkok, 10700
United Arab Emirates1 site
Novartis Investigative Site
Al Ain Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
About this study
Official title: A Phase III Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of LEE011 or Placebo in Combination With Tamoxifen and Goserelin or a Non-steroidal Aromatase Inhibitor (NSAI) and Goserelin for the Treatment of Premenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor Positive, HER2-negative, Advanced Breast Cancer
The purpose of this study was to determine whether treatment with tamoxifen or a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAI) + goserelin + LEE011 prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared to treatment with tamoxifen or a NSAI + goserelin + placebo in premenopausal women with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer.
Read the detailed description
This was a randomized, Phase III, double-blind, global study comparing the treatment efficacy and safety of ribociclib + goserelin + tamoxifen or a NSAI (letrozole or anastrozole) versus placebo + goserelin + tamoxifen or a NSAI in premenopausal women with HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer.
Eligible participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the ribociclib arm or the placebo arm. Study treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or discontinuation for any other reason.
Participants who discontinued treatment due to reasons other than disease progression or withdrawal of consent for efficacy follow-up continued to be monitored until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, loss to follow-up, or subject/guardian decision (post-treatment efficacy follow-up).
All participants who discontinued treatment were followed for survival until the predetermined number of overall survival (OS) events was reached.
Following the final OS analysis (performed when approximately 189 deaths were recorded) and with protocol amendment 6 (dated 18-Jul-2019), participants and investigators were unblinded and those participants in the placebo arm had the opportunity to cross-over to the ribociclib arm to receive ribociclib + goserelin + NSAI. Cross-over was optional and was conducted at the investigator's discretion and upon participant consent.
- Conditions
- Advanced Metastatic Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Ribociclib, Tamoxifen, Letrozole, Anastrozole, Goserelin
- Keywords
- LEE011, ribociclib, HR-positive, HER2-negative, Advanced breast cancer, Letrozole, Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, Goserelin, CDK, CDK4, CDK6, CDK4/6, Phase III, ER-positive, PR-positive, Premenopausal
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RibociclibDrug
Also called LEE011
Ribociclib (600 mg, in three 200 mg hard gelatin capsules) was administered orally once daily on Days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle.
TamoxifenDrug
Tamoxifen (20 mg, tablets) was administered orally on a continuous daily schedule (days 1-28 of each 28-day cycle)
LetrozoleDrug
Letrozole (2.5 mg, tablets) was administered orally once daily on a continuous daily schedule (days 1-28 of each 28-day cycle)
AnastrozoleDrug
Anastrozole (1 mg, tablets) was administered orally once daily on a continuous daily schedule (days 1-28 of each 28-day cycle)
GoserelinDrug
Goserelin (3.6 mg, subcutaneous implant) was administered on day 1 of every 28-day cycle
PlaceboDrug
Placebo (hard gelatin capsules) was administered orally once daily on Days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ribociclib + NSAI/tamoxifen + goserelin | Experimental | Ribociclib 600 mg daily oral (3 weeks on/ 1 week off) in combination with NSAI or tamoxifen (tamoxifen 20 mg daily oral or letrozole 2.5 mg daily oral or anastrozole 1 mg daily oral) and goserelin 3.6 mg subcutaneous injection (once every 28 days) Receives: Drug: Ribociclib; Drug: Tamoxifen; Drug: Letrozole; Drug: Anastrozole; Drug: Goserelin |
| Placebo + NSAI/tamoxifen + goserelin | Placebo comparator | Placebo daily oral (3 weeks on/ 1 week off) in combination with NSAI or tamoxifen (tamoxifen 20 mg daily oral or letrozole 2.5 mg daily oral or anastrozole 1 mg daily oral) and goserelin 3.6 mg subcutaneous injection (once every 28 days).
Participants were unblinded once the final OS analysis was conducted and after the implementation of protocol amendment 6 (16-Jul-2019) and were given the option to crossover to treatment with ribociclib +NSAI/tamoxifen + goserelin. Receives: Drug: Tamoxifen; Drug: Letrozole; Drug: Anastrozole; Drug: Goserelin; Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Investigator Assessment
PFS was defined as the period starting from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented progression or death caused by any reason. In cases where patients did not experience an event, the PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Clinical deterioration without objective radiological evidence was not considered as documented disease progression. PFS was assessed via local radiology assessment according to RECIST 1.1. As per protocol, the final PFS analysis was conducted after approximately 392 PFS events were documented. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS, and the median PFS, along with 95% confidence intervals, was reported for each treatment group. A stratified Cox regression model was used to estimate the hazard ratio of PFS, along with 95% confidence interval
Measured: From randomization to first documented progression or death, assessed up to approximately 29 months
Secondary outcomes (8)
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. In cases where the patient's death was not recorded, the OS value was censored at the date of the last known patient's survival status. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. As per protocol, the final OS analysis was conducted after approximately 189 deaths were documented.
The median OS, along with 95% confidence intervals, was reported for each treatment group.The distribution of OS between the two treatment arms was compared using a log-rank test at one-sided cumulative 2.5% level of significance. A stratified Cox regression was used to estimate the OS hazard ratio and the associated 95% CI.
Measured: From randomization to death, assessed up to approximately 45 months
Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Investigator Assessment
ORR is the percentage of participants with the best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1 as per local assessment. CR = Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Measured: Up to approximately 29 months
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by Investigator Assessment
Percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) lasting 24 weeks or longer as defined in RECIST 1.1 and local assessment. CR = Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; SD = Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progressive disease: PD = At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20% the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Measured: Up to approximately 29 months
Time to Response (TTR) by Investigator Assessment
Time to response is the time from the date of randomization to the first documented response (CR or PR, which must be confirmed subsequently) according to RECIST 1.1 as per local assessment. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate TTR, and the median TTR, along with 95% confidence intervals, was reported for each treatment group. Participants who did not achieve a confirmed response were censored at the maximum follow-up time for patients who had a PFS event (i.e. either progressed or died due to any cause) or at the date of last adequate tumor assessment otherwise.
CR = Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Measured: Up to approximately 29 months
Duration of Response (DOR) by Investigator Assessment
DOR was defined as the time from the first documented response (CR or PR) to the first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer as defined in RECIST 1.1 per investigator assessment. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate DOR, and the median DOR, along with 95% confidence intervals, was reported for each treatment group. If a participant had not had an event, duration was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment.
CR = Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Measured: Up to approximately 29 months
Time to Definitive Deterioration of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) by at Least One Category of the Score
ECOG PS categorized patients based on their ability to perform daily activities and self-care, with scores ranging from 0 to 5. A score of 0 indicated no restrictions in activity, while higher scores indicated increasing limitations. Time to definitive deterioration was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the event, defined as experiencing an increase in ECOG PS by at least one category from the baseline or death. A deterioration was considered definitive if no improvements in the ECOG PS were observed at a subsequent time. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the distribution, and the median time to definitive deterioration, along with 95% confidence intervals, was reported for each treatment group. Patients receiving any further therapy prior to definitive worsening were censored at their date of last assessment prior to start of therapy. Patients that had not worsened at the data cutoff point were censored at the date of last assessment.
Measured: Baseline, up to approximately 29 months
Time to Definitive 10% Deterioration in the Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) Scale Score of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire that includes 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales, 1 GHS/QoL scale, and 6 single items. GHS/QoL scale score ranges between 0 and 100. A high score for GHS/QoL represents better functioning or QoL.The time to definitive 10% deterioration is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of event, which is defined as at least 10% relative to baseline worsening of the QoL score (without further improvement above the threshold) or death due to any cause. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the distribution, and the median time to definitive 10% deterioration, along with 95% confidence intervals, was reported for each treatment group. If a patient had not had an event, time to deterioration was censored at the date of the last adequate QoL evaluation.
Measured: Up to approximately 29 months
Change From Baseline in the GHS/QoL Scale Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire that includes 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales, 1 GHS/QoL scale, and 6 single items. GHS/QoL scale score ranges between 0 and 100. A high score for GHS/QoL represents better functioning or QoL.The change from baseline in the GHS/QoL score was assessed. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement. For subjects who discontinued treatment without disease progression, post-treatment efficacy visits occurred every 8 weeks during the initial 18 months since start of treatment, followed by visits every 12 weeks until disease progression.
Measured: Baseline, every 2 cycles after randomization during 18 months, then every 3 cycles up to end of treatment (EOT); EOT; and every 8 or 12 weeks post-treatment until progression, assessed up to approximately 29 months. Cycle=28 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Study start20 Nov 2014
- Primary completion21 Aug 2017
- Study completion20 Apr 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Advanced Metastatic Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 672 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02278120
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CLEE011E2301
- Other IDs
- 2014-001931-36, 2014
- Acronym
- MONALEESA-7
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 22 Oct 2014
- Last updated
- 12 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Publications
Ji Y, Wang C, Combes FP, Ho YY, Fasching PA, Untch M, Zarate JP, Crown J. Quantitative Pharmacology Justifying Ribociclib Dose in Early Breast Cancer. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2026 Aug;65(8):1217-1228. doi: 10.1007/s40262-026-01643-3. Epub 2026 Jun 23.
PubMed 42334791Hart LL, Im SA, Tolaney SM, Campone M, Pluard T, Sousa B, Freyer G, Decker T, Kalinsky K, Sopher G, Gao M, Hu H, Kuemmel S. Efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes across young to older age groups of patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer treated with ribociclib plus endocrine therapy in the randomized MONALEESA-2, -3, and -7 trials. Eur J Cancer. 2025 Feb 25;217:115225. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115225. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
PubMed 39826197Andre F, Su F, Solovieff N, Hortobagyi G, Chia S, Neven P, Bardia A, Tripathy D, Lu YS, Lteif A, Taran T, Babbar N, Slamon D, Arteaga CL. Pooled ctDNA analysis of MONALEESA phase III advanced breast cancer trials. Ann Oncol. 2023 Nov;34(11):1003-1014. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.08.011. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
PubMed 37673211Ji Y, Yartsev V, Quinlan M, Serra P, Wang Y, Chakraborty A, Miller M. Justifying Ribociclib Dose in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer with Renal Impairment Based on PK, Safety, and Efficacy Data: An Innovative Approach Integrating Data from a Dedicated Renal Impairment Study and Oncology Clinical Trials. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2023 Mar;62(3):493-504. doi: 10.1007/s40262-022-01206-2. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
PubMed 36800111Lu YS, Im SA, Colleoni M, Franke F, Bardia A, Cardoso F, Harbeck N, Hurvitz S, Chow L, Sohn J, Lee KS, Campos-Gomez S, Villanueva Vazquez R, Jung KH, Babu KG, Wheatley-Price P, De Laurentiis M, Im YH, Kuemmel S, El-Saghir N, O'Regan R, Gasch C, Solovieff N, Wang C, Wang Y, Chakravartty A, Ji Y, Tripathy D. Updated Overall Survival of Ribociclib plus Endocrine Therapy versus Endocrine Therapy Alone in Pre- and Perimenopausal Patients with HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer in MONALEESA-7: A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Mar 1;28(5):851-859. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3032.
PubMed 34965945Bardia A, Su F, Solovieff N, Im SA, Sohn J, Lee KS, Campos-Gomez S, Jung KH, Colleoni M, Vazquez RV, Franke F, Hurvitz S, Harbeck N, Chow L, Taran T, Rodriguez Lorenc K, Babbar N, Tripathy D, Lu YS. Genomic Profiling of Premenopausal HR+ and HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer by Circulating Tumor DNA and Association of Genetic Alterations With Therapeutic Response to Endocrine Therapy and Ribociclib. JCO Precis Oncol. 2021 Sep 1;5:PO.20.00445. doi: 10.1200/PO.20.00445. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 34504990Burris HA, Chan A, Bardia A, Thaddeus Beck J, Sohn J, Neven P, Tripathy D, Im SA, Chia S, Esteva FJ, Hart L, Zarate JP, Ridolfi A, Lorenc KR, Yardley DA. Safety and impact of dose reductions on efficacy in the randomised MONALEESA-2, -3 and -7 trials in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2021 Aug;125(5):679-686. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01415-9. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
PubMed 34158598Prat A, Chaudhury A, Solovieff N, Pare L, Martinez D, Chic N, Martinez-Saez O, Braso-Maristany F, Lteif A, Taran T, Babbar N, Su F. Correlative Biomarker Analysis of Intrinsic Subtypes and Efficacy Across the MONALEESA Phase III Studies. J Clin Oncol. 2021 May 1;39(13):1458-1467. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02977. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
PubMed 33769862Yardley DA. MONALEESA clinical program: a review of ribociclib use in different clinical settings. Future Oncol. 2019 Aug;15(23):2673-2686. doi: 10.2217/fon-2019-0130. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
PubMed 31305131Im SA, Lu YS, Bardia A, Harbeck N, Colleoni M, Franke F, Chow L, Sohn J, Lee KS, Campos-Gomez S, Villanueva-Vazquez R, Jung KH, Chakravartty A, Hughes G, Gounaris I, Rodriguez-Lorenc K, Taran T, Hurvitz S, Tripathy D. Overall Survival with Ribociclib plus Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 25;381(4):307-316. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1903765. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
PubMed 31166679Tripathy D, Im SA, Colleoni M, Franke F, Bardia A, Harbeck N, Hurvitz SA, Chow L, Sohn J, Lee KS, Campos-Gomez S, Villanueva Vazquez R, Jung KH, Babu KG, Wheatley-Price P, De Laurentiis M, Im YH, Kuemmel S, El-Saghir N, Liu MC, Carlson G, Hughes G, Diaz-Padilla I, Germa C, Hirawat S, Lu YS. Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer (MONALEESA-7): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jul;19(7):904-915. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30292-4. Epub 2018 May 24.
PubMed 29804902
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of LEE011 or Placebo in Combination With Tamoxifen and Goserelin or a Non-steroidal Aromatase Inhibitor (NSAI) and Goserelin for the Treatment of Premenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor Positive, HER2-negative, Advanced Breast Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02278120
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MONALEESA-7 / CLEE011E2301
- Conditions
- Advanced Metastatic Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- LEE011, ribociclib, HR-positive, HER2-negative, Advanced breast cancer, Letrozole, Anastrozole, Tamoxifen
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 672 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 20 Nov 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Apr 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 26 Feb 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether treatment with tamoxifen or a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAI) + goserelin + LEE011 prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared to treatment with tamoxifen or a NSAI + goserelin + placebo in premenopausal women with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer.
Detailed description
This was a randomized, Phase III, double-blind, global study comparing the treatment efficacy and safety of ribociclib + goserelin + tamoxifen or a NSAI (letrozole or anastrozole) versus placebo + goserelin + tamoxifen or a NSAI in premenopausal women with HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer.
Eligible participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the ribociclib arm or the placebo arm. Study treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or discontinuation for any other reason.
Participants who discontinued treatment due to reasons other than disease progression or withdrawal of consent for efficacy follow-up continued to be monitored until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, loss to follow-up, or subject/guardian decision (post-treatment efficacy follow-up).
All participants who discontinued treatment were followed for survival until the predetermined number of overall survival (OS) events was reached.
Following the final OS analysis (performed when approximately 189 deaths were recorded) and with protocol amendment 6 (dated 18-Jul-2019), participants and investigators were unblinded and those participants in the placebo arm had the opportunity to cross-over to the ribociclib arm to receive ribociclib + goserelin + NSAI. Cross-over was optional and was conducted at the investigator's discretion and upon participant consent.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ribociclib + NSAI/tamoxifen + goserelin | Experimental | Drug: Ribociclib, Drug: Tamoxifen, Drug: Letrozole, Drug: Anastrozole, Drug: GoserelinRibociclib 600 mg daily oral (3 weeks on/ 1 week off) in combination with NSAI or tamoxifen (tamoxifen 20 mg daily oral or letrozole 2.5 mg daily oral or anastrozole 1 mg daily oral) and goserelin 3.6 mg subcutaneous injection (once every 28 days) |
| Placebo + NSAI/tamoxifen + goserelin | Placebo comparator | Drug: Tamoxifen, Drug: Letrozole, Drug: Anastrozole, Drug: Goserelin, Drug: PlaceboPlacebo daily oral (3 weeks on/ 1 week off) in combination with NSAI or tamoxifen (tamoxifen 20 mg daily oral or letrozole 2.5 mg daily oral or anastrozole 1 mg daily oral) and goserelin 3.6 mg subcutaneous injection (once every 28 days). Participants were unblinded once the final OS analysis was conducted and after the implementation of protocol amendment 6 (16-Jul-2019) and were given the option to crossover to treatment with ribociclib +NSAI/tamoxifen + goserelin. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 59 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients had advanced (locoregionally recurrent or metastatic) breast cancer not amenable to curative therapy
- Patients were premenopausal or perimenopausal at the time of study entry
- Patients who had received (neo) adjuvant therapy for breast cancer were eligible
- Patients had a histologically and/or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of estrogen-receptor positive and/or progesterone receptor positive breast cancer
- Patients had HER2-negative breast cancer
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients who had received a prior CDK4/6 inhibitor
- Patients were postmenopausal
- Patients who currently had inflammatory breast cancer at screening.
- Patients who had received any prior hormonal anti-cancer therapy for advanced breast cancer, except for ≤ 14 days of tamoxifen or NSAI ± goserelin for advanced breast cancer prior to randomization.
- Patients had a concurrent malignancy or malignancy within 3 years of randomization, with the exception of adequately treated basal cell skin carcinoma, squamous cell skin carcinoma, non-melanomatous skin cancer or curatively resected cervical cancer.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RibociclibAlso: LEE011Ribociclib (600 mg, in three 200 mg hard gelatin capsules) was administered orally once daily on Days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle. | Drug | Ribociclib + NSAI/tamoxifen + goserelin |
| TamoxifenTamoxifen (20 mg, tablets) was administered orally on a continuous daily schedule (days 1-28 of each 28-day cycle) | Drug | Placebo + NSAI/tamoxifen + goserelin, Ribociclib + NSAI/tamoxifen + goserelin |
| LetrozoleLetrozole (2.5 mg, tablets) was administered orally once daily on a continuous daily schedule (days 1-28 of each 28-day cycle) | Drug | Placebo + NSAI/tamoxifen + goserelin, Ribociclib + NSAI/tamoxifen + goserelin |
| AnastrozoleAnastrozole (1 mg, tablets) was administered orally once daily on a continuous daily schedule (days 1-28 of each 28-day cycle) | Drug | Placebo + NSAI/tamoxifen + goserelin, Ribociclib + NSAI/tamoxifen + goserelin |
| GoserelinGoserelin (3.6 mg, subcutaneous implant) was administered on day 1 of every 28-day cycle | Drug | Placebo + NSAI/tamoxifen + goserelin, Ribociclib + NSAI/tamoxifen + goserelin |
| PlaceboPlacebo (hard gelatin capsules) was administered orally once daily on Days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle. | Drug | Placebo + NSAI/tamoxifen + goserelin |
Primary outcome
Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Investigator Assessment
Time frame: From randomization to first documented progression or death, assessed up to approximately 29 months
PFS was defined as the period starting from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented progression or death caused by any reason. In cases where patients did not experience an event, the PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Clinical deterioration without objective radiological evidence was not considered as documented disease progression. PFS was assessed via local radiology assessment according to RECIST 1.1. As per protocol, the final PFS analysis was conducted after approximately 392 PFS events were documented. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS, and the median PFS, along with 95% confidence intervals, was reported for each treatment group. A stratified Cox regression model was used to estimate the hazard ratio of PFS, along with 95% confidence interval
8 secondary outcomes
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: From randomization to death, assessed up to approximately 45 months
Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Investigator Assessment
Time frame: Up to approximately 29 months
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by Investigator Assessment
Time frame: Up to approximately 29 months
Time to Response (TTR) by Investigator Assessment
Time frame: Up to approximately 29 months
Duration of Response (DOR) by Investigator Assessment
Time frame: Up to approximately 29 months
Time to Definitive Deterioration of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) by at Least One Category of the Score
Time frame: Baseline, up to approximately 29 months
Time to Definitive 10% Deterioration in the Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) Scale Score of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Time frame: Up to approximately 29 months
Change From Baseline in the GHS/QoL Scale Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30
Time frame: Baseline, every 2 cycles after randomization during 18 months, then every 3 cycles up to end of treatment (EOT); EOT; and every 8 or 12 weeks post-treatment until progression, assessed up to approximately 29 months. Cycle=28 days
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Mar 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42334791Ji Y, Wang C, Combes FP, Ho YY, Fasching PA, Untch M, Zarate JP, Crown J. Quantitative Pharmacology Justifying Ribociclib Dose in Early Breast Cancer. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2026 Aug;65(8):1217-1228. doi: 10.1007/s40262-026-01643-3. Epub 2026 Jun 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39826197Hart LL, Im SA, Tolaney SM, Campone M, Pluard T, Sousa B, Freyer G, Decker T, Kalinsky K, Sopher G, Gao M, Hu H, Kuemmel S. Efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes across young to older age groups of patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer treated with ribociclib plus endocrine therapy in the randomized MONALEESA-2, -3, and -7 trials. Eur J Cancer. 2025 Feb 25;217:115225. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115225. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37673211Andre F, Su F, Solovieff N, Hortobagyi G, Chia S, Neven P, Bardia A, Tripathy D, Lu YS, Lteif A, Taran T, Babbar N, Slamon D, Arteaga CL. Pooled ctDNA analysis of MONALEESA phase III advanced breast cancer trials. Ann Oncol. 2023 Nov;34(11):1003-1014. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.08.011. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36800111Ji Y, Yartsev V, Quinlan M, Serra P, Wang Y, Chakraborty A, Miller M. Justifying Ribociclib Dose in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer with Renal Impairment Based on PK, Safety, and Efficacy Data: An Innovative Approach Integrating Data from a Dedicated Renal Impairment Study and Oncology Clinical Trials. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2023 Mar;62(3):493-504. doi: 10.1007/s40262-022-01206-2. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34965945Lu YS, Im SA, Colleoni M, Franke F, Bardia A, Cardoso F, Harbeck N, Hurvitz S, Chow L, Sohn J, Lee KS, Campos-Gomez S, Villanueva Vazquez R, Jung KH, Babu KG, Wheatley-Price P, De Laurentiis M, Im YH, Kuemmel S, El-Saghir N, O'Regan R, Gasch C, Solovieff N, Wang C, Wang Y, Chakravartty A, Ji Y, Tripathy D. Updated Overall Survival of Ribociclib plus Endocrine Therapy versus Endocrine Therapy Alone in Pre- and Perimenopausal Patients with HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer in MONALEESA-7: A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Mar 1;28(5):851-859. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3032.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34504990Bardia A, Su F, Solovieff N, Im SA, Sohn J, Lee KS, Campos-Gomez S, Jung KH, Colleoni M, Vazquez RV, Franke F, Hurvitz S, Harbeck N, Chow L, Taran T, Rodriguez Lorenc K, Babbar N, Tripathy D, Lu YS. Genomic Profiling of Premenopausal HR+ and HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer by Circulating Tumor DNA and Association of Genetic Alterations With Therapeutic Response to Endocrine Therapy and Ribociclib. JCO Precis Oncol. 2021 Sep 1;5:PO.20.00445. doi: 10.1200/PO.20.00445. eCollection 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34158598Burris HA, Chan A, Bardia A, Thaddeus Beck J, Sohn J, Neven P, Tripathy D, Im SA, Chia S, Esteva FJ, Hart L, Zarate JP, Ridolfi A, Lorenc KR, Yardley DA. Safety and impact of dose reductions on efficacy in the randomised MONALEESA-2, -3 and -7 trials in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2021 Aug;125(5):679-686. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01415-9. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33769862Prat A, Chaudhury A, Solovieff N, Pare L, Martinez D, Chic N, Martinez-Saez O, Braso-Maristany F, Lteif A, Taran T, Babbar N, Su F. Correlative Biomarker Analysis of Intrinsic Subtypes and Efficacy Across the MONALEESA Phase III Studies. J Clin Oncol. 2021 May 1;39(13):1458-1467. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02977. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31305131Yardley DA. MONALEESA clinical program: a review of ribociclib use in different clinical settings. Future Oncol. 2019 Aug;15(23):2673-2686. doi: 10.2217/fon-2019-0130. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31166679Im SA, Lu YS, Bardia A, Harbeck N, Colleoni M, Franke F, Chow L, Sohn J, Lee KS, Campos-Gomez S, Villanueva-Vazquez R, Jung KH, Chakravartty A, Hughes G, Gounaris I, Rodriguez-Lorenc K, Taran T, Hurvitz S, Tripathy D. Overall Survival with Ribociclib plus Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 25;381(4):307-316. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1903765. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29804902Tripathy D, Im SA, Colleoni M, Franke F, Bardia A, Harbeck N, Hurvitz SA, Chow L, Sohn J, Lee KS, Campos-Gomez S, Villanueva Vazquez R, Jung KH, Babu KG, Wheatley-Price P, De Laurentiis M, Im YH, Kuemmel S, El-Saghir N, Liu MC, Carlson G, Hughes G, Diaz-Padilla I, Germa C, Hirawat S, Lu YS. Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer (MONALEESA-7): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jul;19(7):904-915. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30292-4. Epub 2018 May 24.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Related trials for Advanced Metastatic Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Multiple Treatment Combinations in Patients With Metastatic or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer
Metastatic Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of MR001 in Patients With Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)
Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study With NKT3964 for Adults With Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors
Solid Tumor, Advanced Solid Tumor
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
P-MUC1C-ALLO1 Allogeneic CAR-T Cells in the Treatment of Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Breast Cancer, Ovarian Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Beamion BCGC-1: A Study to Find a Suitable Dose of Zongertinib Used Alone and in Combination With Other Treatments to Test Whether it Helps People With Different Types of HER2+ Cancer That Has Spread
Metastatic Breast Cancer, Metastatic Gastric Adenocarcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
183 sites in 30 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Ribociclib, Tamoxifen and Letrozole in people with Advanced Metastatic Breast Cancer, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 183 sites in 30 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 183 sites in United States, Italy, Spain, Germany, France and 25 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Feb 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Investigator Assessment (time frame: From randomization to first documented progression or death, assessed up to approximately 29 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02278120, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Mar 2024.