Rectal CarcinomaPhase 2BISERNCT02268006
IMRT-SIB and Capecitabine in Preoperative Rectal Cancer Treatment
A Phase 2 study testing IMRT-SIB, Capecitabine and Surgery in people with Rectal Carcinoma, run by Institute of Oncology Ljubljana at 1 site in Slovenia.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Using small radiation beamlets of different intensity, IMRT (intensity modulated radiation therapy) allows shaping the dose around planning target volume with better sparing of normal tissue comparing to 3D conformal radiotherapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Rectal Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- IMRT-SIB, Capecitabine and Surgery
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSlovenia
- Study dates
- Jan 2014to Dec 2020
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Biopsy-proven newly diagnosed primary rectal adenocarcinoma
- Locally advanced tumor fulfilling at least one of the following criteria on pelvic MRI:
- T ≥ 3 or
- N ≥ 1
- Positive mesorectal fascia (MRF), i.e. tumor or lymph node one mm or less from the mesorectal fascia
- Tumor located od 0 - 15 cm above anocutaneous junction or below peritoneum
Show all 11Show fewer
- Age 18 years and more
- Signed informed consent
- WHO Performance Status 0-2
- Patients is considered to be mentally and physically ft for chemotherapy as judged by oncologist
- Adequate hematological, hepatic and renal function (WBC ≥ 3.0 x 109/L, neu ≥ 1.5 x 109/L, platelet count ≥ 100 x 109/L, renal clearance ≥ 50 ml/min, bilirubin ≤ 3x normal value, aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase (AST/ALT) ≤ 2,5x normal value)
Who cannot join
- T4 inoperable tumor - extensive growth into cranial part of the sacrum (above S3) or the lumbosacral nerve roots
- Metastatic or recurrent rectal cancer
- Other co-existing malignancy or malignancy within the past 5 years, with the exception of adequately treated in situ carcinoma of the cervix or basal cell carcinoma of the skin
- Chronic bowel inflammatory disease
- Pregnant or lactating patient
- Significant heart disease (uncontrolled hypertension despite of medication (> 150/100 mmHg), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV heart disease,unstable angina or myocardial infarction within the past 1 year prior the study entry, history of significant ventricular arrhythmia requiring treatment)
- Inability to consciously sign the consent form due to physical or psychological disabilities
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Slovenia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Institute of Oncology
Ljubljana, 1000
Jasna But-Hadzic, MD, +38615879503, jbut@onko-i.si
Vaneja Velenik, MD,PhD, asist. prof., +38615879661, vvelenik@onko-i.si
About this study
Official title: Preoperative Radiochemotherapy With IMRT - Simultaneous Integrated Boost in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer - BISER
RATIONALE: Using small radiation beamlets of different intensity, IMRT (intensity modulated radiation therapy) allows shaping the dose around planning target volume with better sparing of normal tissue comparing to 3D conformal radiotherapy. It allows daily delivery of higher dose to the tumor with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), consequently shortening total treatment time with potentially better response to treatment. In advanced rectal adenocarcinoma excellent response to preoperative radiochemotherapy with complete eradication of the primary tumor observed in the histopathological specimen (pathological complete response, pCR) correlates with a favorable overall prognosis, so trying to achieve better response to preoperative treatment with higher pCR seams feasible.
PURPOSE:The hypothesis of this study is that in preoperative radiochemotherapy for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma shortening of the total treatment time with IMRT-SIB to 22 daily fractions concomitant with capecitabine results in an improved pCR rate from 9% (Slovenian trial) to 25%. Secondary objectives are to evaluate pathological down-staging rate, histopathological R0 resection rate, sphincter preservation rate, perioperative surgical complication rate, local control, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), late toxicity and quality of life.
- Conditions
- Rectal Carcinoma
- Being tested
- IMRT-SIB, Capecitabine, Surgery
- Keywords
- rectal carcinoma, preoperative radiochemotherapy, IMRT, SIB
- Medical subject headings
- Rectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
IMRT-SIBRadiation
CapecitabineDrug
Also called (Xeloda, Capecitabine Teva, Ecansya)
SurgeryProcedure or surgery
Also called Total Mesorectal Exscision
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| IMRT-SIB | Other | Not described Receives: Radiation: IMRT-SIB; Drug: Capecitabine; Procedure: Surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pathological complete remission rate (pCR)
Measured: after the pathological examination of surgical specimens i.e. within 14 days after the operation
Secondary outcomes (8)
Toxicity
Measured: According to NCI-CTC (version 4.0): every week for 16 week preoperative, perioperative (0-30 days postoperative), early (30 days - 6 months postoperative), and late (more than 6 months postoperative)
Histopathological R0 resection rate
Measured: after the pathological examination of resected specimens i.e. within 14 days after the operation
Tumor down-staging rate
Measured: after the pathological examination of resected specimens i.e. within 14 days after the operation
Rate of sphincter sparing surgical procedure
Measured: Toxicity/safety: one month after surgery.
Loco-regional failure rate
Measured: after 3y and 5y of operation
Disease-free survival
Measured: after 3y and 5y of operation
Overall survival
Measured: after 3y and 5y of the operation
Quality of life
Measured: before the treatment, after surgery, after1,2,3,4 and 5 years of the operation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2014
- Primary completionDec 2015 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rectal CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Institute of Oncology Ljubljana
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02268006
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 41/12/13
- Acronym
- BISER
- Status last verified
- Sep 2014
- First submitted
- 2 Feb 2014
- Last updated
- 20 Oct 2014
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Engels B, De Ridder M, Tournel K, Sermeus A, De Coninck P, Verellen D, Storme GA. Preoperative helical tomotherapy and megavoltage computed tomography for rectal cancer: impact on the irradiated volume of small bowel. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Aug 1;74(5):1476-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.017. Epub 2009 Feb 21.
PubMed 19231097Arbea L, Ramos LI, Martinez-Monge R, Moreno M, Aristu J. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) vs. 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): dosimetric comparison and clinical implications. Radiat Oncol. 2010 Feb 26;5:17. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-5-17.
PubMed 20187944Mok H, Crane CH, Palmer MB, Briere TM, Beddar S, Delclos ME, Krishnan S, Das P. Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): differences in target volumes and improvement in clinically relevant doses to small bowel in rectal carcinoma. Radiat Oncol. 2011 Jun 8;6:63. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-6-63.
PubMed 21651775Li JL, Ji JF, Cai Y, Li XF, Li YH, Wu H, Xu B, Dou FY, Li ZY, Bu ZD, Wu AW, Tham IW. Preoperative concomitant boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy with oral capecitabine in locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer: a phase II trial. Radiother Oncol. 2012 Jan;102(1):4-9. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.07.030. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
PubMed 21903285Velenik V, Anderluh F, Oblak I, Strojan P, Zakotnik B. Capecitabine as a radiosensitizing agent in neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced resectable rectal cancer: prospective phase II trial. Croat Med J. 2006 Oct;47(5):693-700.
PubMed 17042060Velenik V, Oblak I, Anderluh F. Long-term results from a randomized phase II trial of neoadjuvant combined-modality therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Radiat Oncol. 2010 Sep 29;5:88. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-5-88.
PubMed 20920276
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Oct 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Preoperative Radiochemotherapy With IMRT - Simultaneous Integrated Boost in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer - BISER
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02268006
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BISER / 41/12/13
- Conditions
- Rectal Carcinoma
- Keywords
- rectal carcinoma, preoperative radiochemotherapy, IMRT, SIB
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Institute of Oncology LjubljanaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2014
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Using small radiation beamlets of different intensity, IMRT (intensity modulated radiation therapy) allows shaping the dose around planning target volume with better sparing of normal tissue comparing to 3D conformal radiotherapy. It allows daily delivery of higher dose to the tumor with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), consequently shortening total treatment time with potentially better response to treatment. In advanced rectal adenocarcinoma excellent response to preoperative radiochemotherapy with complete eradication of the primary tumor observed in the histopathological specimen (pathological complete response, pCR) correlates with a favorable overall prognosis, so trying to achieve better response to preoperative treatment with higher pCR seams feasible.
PURPOSE:The hypothesis of this study is that in preoperative radiochemotherapy for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma shortening of the total treatment time with IMRT-SIB to 22 daily fractions concomitant with capecitabine results in an improved pCR rate from 9% (Slovenian trial) to 25%. Secondary objectives are to evaluate pathological down-staging rate, histopathological R0 resection rate, sphincter preservation rate, perioperative surgical complication rate, local control, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), late toxicity and quality of life.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| IMRT-SIB | Other | Radiation: IMRT-SIB, Drug: Capecitabine, Procedure: Surgery |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Biopsy-proven newly diagnosed primary rectal adenocarcinoma
- Locally advanced tumor fulfilling at least one of the following criteria on pelvic MRI:
- Age 18 years and more
- Signed informed consent
- WHO Performance Status 0-2
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- T4 inoperable tumor - extensive growth into cranial part of the sacrum (above S3) or the lumbosacral nerve roots
- Metastatic or recurrent rectal cancer
- Other co-existing malignancy or malignancy within the past 5 years, with the exception of adequately treated in situ carcinoma of the cervix or basal cell carcinoma of the skin
- Chronic bowel inflammatory disease
- Pregnant or lactating patient
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| IMRT-SIB | Radiation | IMRT-SIB |
| CapecitabineAlso: (Xeloda, Capecitabine Teva, Ecansya) | Drug | IMRT-SIB |
| SurgeryAlso: Total Mesorectal Exscision | Procedure or surgery | IMRT-SIB |
Primary outcome
Pathological complete remission rate (pCR)
Time frame: after the pathological examination of surgical specimens i.e. within 14 days after the operation
8 secondary outcomes
Toxicity
Time frame: According to NCI-CTC (version 4.0): every week for 16 week preoperative, perioperative (0-30 days postoperative), early (30 days - 6 months postoperative), and late (more than 6 months postoperative)
Histopathological R0 resection rate
Time frame: after the pathological examination of resected specimens i.e. within 14 days after the operation
Tumor down-staging rate
Time frame: after the pathological examination of resected specimens i.e. within 14 days after the operation
Rate of sphincter sparing surgical procedure
Time frame: Toxicity/safety: one month after surgery.
Loco-regional failure rate
Time frame: after 3y and 5y of operation
Disease-free survival
Time frame: after 3y and 5y of operation
Overall survival
Time frame: after 3y and 5y of the operation
Quality of life
Time frame: before the treatment, after surgery, after1,2,3,4 and 5 years of the operation
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Oct 2014.
- Background: PubMed 19231097Engels B, De Ridder M, Tournel K, Sermeus A, De Coninck P, Verellen D, Storme GA. Preoperative helical tomotherapy and megavoltage computed tomography for rectal cancer: impact on the irradiated volume of small bowel. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Aug 1;74(5):1476-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.017. Epub 2009 Feb 21.
- Background: PubMed 20187944Arbea L, Ramos LI, Martinez-Monge R, Moreno M, Aristu J. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) vs. 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): dosimetric comparison and clinical implications. Radiat Oncol. 2010 Feb 26;5:17. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-5-17.
- Background: PubMed 21651775Mok H, Crane CH, Palmer MB, Briere TM, Beddar S, Delclos ME, Krishnan S, Das P. Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): differences in target volumes and improvement in clinically relevant doses to small bowel in rectal carcinoma. Radiat Oncol. 2011 Jun 8;6:63. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-6-63.
- Background: PubMed 21903285Li JL, Ji JF, Cai Y, Li XF, Li YH, Wu H, Xu B, Dou FY, Li ZY, Bu ZD, Wu AW, Tham IW. Preoperative concomitant boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy with oral capecitabine in locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer: a phase II trial. Radiother Oncol. 2012 Jan;102(1):4-9. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.07.030. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
- Results publication: PubMed 17042060Velenik V, Anderluh F, Oblak I, Strojan P, Zakotnik B. Capecitabine as a radiosensitizing agent in neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced resectable rectal cancer: prospective phase II trial. Croat Med J. 2006 Oct;47(5):693-700.
- Results publication: PubMed 20920276Velenik V, Oblak I, Anderluh F. Long-term results from a randomized phase II trial of neoadjuvant combined-modality therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Radiat Oncol. 2010 Sep 29;5:88. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-5-88.
Related trials for Rectal Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Multidimensional Study Designed to Develop a Methodological Framework Based on MRI Data to Predict Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Treatment
Rectal Cancer, Chemoradiotherapy
RecruitingObservational study
Outcomes of Knife-Assisted Full-Thickness Resection for Rectal Lesions: A Multicenter Study
Colorectal Cancer
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing IMRT-SIB, Capecitabine and Surgery in people with Rectal Carcinoma, run by Institute of Oncology Ljubljana at 1 site in Slovenia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Slovenia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pathological complete remission rate (pCR) (time frame: after the pathological examination of surgical specimens i.e. within 14 days after the operation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02268006, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2014.