Homozygous Familial HypercholesterolemiaPhase 2NCT02265952
Study of REGN1500 in Participants With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HoFH)
A Phase 2 study testing REGN1500 250 mg SC/15 mg/kg IV/450 mg SC in people with Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 5 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
This is an open-label, single-arm study to assess the reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by REGN1500 in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia
- What is being tested?
- REGN1500 250 mg SC/15 mg/kg IV/450 mg SC
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 9 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 4 Feb 2015to 23 Jul 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men and women ≥18 years of age at the time of the screening visit
- Diagnosis of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH)
- Willing to consistently maintain usual diet for the duration of the study
Who cannot join
- Background medical lipid modifying therapy that has not been stable for at least 4 weeks (6 weeks for fibrates) prior to the screening visit
- Having undergone lipid apheresis within 4 weeks prior to the screening visit
- Use of another investigational drug or therapy within 30 days or at least 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to the screening visit
- Previous participation in any clinical trial of REGN1500
- Note: The information listed above is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in this clinical trial therefore not all inclusion/ exclusion criteria are listed.
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 3 countries.
5 sites in 3 countries
United States3 sites
Study site
Dallas, Texas
Study site
Los Angeles, California
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
About this study
Official title: An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Proof-of-Concept Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Single and Multiple Doses of REGN1500 in Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia
This is an open-label, single-arm study to assess the reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by REGN1500 in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH).
- Conditions
- Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia
- Being tested
- REGN1500 250 mg SC/15 mg/kg IV/450 mg SC
- Medical subject headings
- Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
REGN1500 250 mg SC/15 mg/kg IV/450 mg SCDrug
Participants received single dose of REGN1500 subcutaneous (SC) injection of 250 milligrams (mg) at Week 0 (Day 1), followed by single dose of REGN1500 intravenous (IV) injection of 15 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) at Week 2 (Day 15) and then followed by 4 doses of REGN1500 SC injection of 450 mg once weekly starting from Week 12 (Day 85). Only the first 2 enrolled participants received 4 weekly REGN1500 450 mg SC doses at weeks 12, 13, 14, and 15 per the protocol. This dose regimen was removed under protocol amendment 4. Participants were followed for a period of 24 weeks (through Week 26 [Day 183]) after the last dose of study drug in the main study period.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Open-label | Experimental | Open-label REGN1500 Receives: Drug: REGN1500 250 mg SC/15 mg/kg IV/450 mg SC |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 4 in the Main Study Period
Percent change was reported for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline (week 0) up to week 4. LDL-C was measured using conventional units mg/dL. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the safety analysis set (SAF) who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 4
Secondary outcomes (21)
Absolute Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 4 in the Main Study Period
Absolute change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline (week 0) up to week 4 was reported. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 4
Absolute Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Week 2 to Week 4 in the Main Study Period
Absolute change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from week 2 to week 4 was reported. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.
Measured: Week 2 to Week 4
Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Week 2 to Week 4 in the Main Study Period
Percent change was reported in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from week 2 to week 4. LDL-C was measured using conventional units mg/dL. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.
Measured: Week 2 to Week 4
Absolute Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline (Week 0) Over Time in the Main Study Period
Absolute change was reported in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline (week 0) up to week 26. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the safety analysis set (SAF) who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 26
Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline (Week 0) Over Time in the Main Study Period
Percent change was reported in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline (week 0) up to week 26. LDL-C was measured using conventional units mg/dL. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 26
Absolute Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline (Week 26) to Week 214 in the Open Label Extension (OLE) Period
Absolute change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline (week 26) up to week 214 was reported. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period. (ET= Early Termination; EOS = End of Study)
Measured: Baseline (Week 26) up to Week 214
Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline (Week 26) to Week 214 in the Open Label Extension (OLE) Period
Percent change was reported in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline (week 26) to week 214 in the OLE period. LDL-C was measured using conventional units mg/dL. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period. (ET= Early Termination; EOS = End of Study)
Measured: Baseline (Week 26) up to Week 214
Absolute Change in Apolipoprotein (Apo B), Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Total Cholesterol (Total-C), and Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) From Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 26 in the Main Study Period
Absolute change was reported for Apo B, Non-HDL-C, Total-C, and Lp(a) from baseline (week 0) up to Week 26. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 26
Percent Change in Apolipoprotein (Apo B), Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Total Cholesterol (Total-C), and Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) From Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 26 in the Main Study Period
Percent change was reported for Apo B, Non-HDL-C, Total-C, and Lp(a) from baseline (week 0) up to week 26. Apo B, Non-HDL-C, Total-C, and Lp(a) were measured using conventional units mg/dL. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 26
Absolute Change in Apolipoprotein (Apo B), Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Total Cholesterol (Total-C), and Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) From Baseline (Week 26) to Week 214 in the Open Label Extension (OLE) Period
Absolute changein Apo B, Non-HDL-C, Total-C, and Lp(a) from baseline to week 214 in open label extension (OLE) period. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least one post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period. (ET = Early Termination; EOS = End of Study)
Measured: Baseline (Week 26) up to Week 214
Percent Change in Apolipoprotein (Apo B), Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Total Cholesterol (Total-C), and Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) From Baseline (Week 26) to Week 214 in the Open Label Extension (OLE) Period
Percent change was reported in Apo B, Non-HDL-C, Total-C, and Lp(a) from baseline (week 26) up to week 214 in OLE Period. Apo B, Non-HDL-C, Total-C, and Lp(a) were measured using conventional units mg/dL. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least one post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period. (ET= Early Termination; EOS = End of Study)
Measured: Baseline (Week 26) up to Week 214
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Reduction in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) of ≥ 25% From Baseline (Week 0) in the Main Study Period
Percentage of participants who achieved reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) of greater than or equal to (≥) 25 percent (%) from baseline in the main study period was reported. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 26
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Reduction in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) of ≥ 25% From Baseline (Week 26) in the Open Label Extension (OLE) Period
Percentage of participants who achieved a reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) of ≥ 25% from baseline (week 26) to week 214 was reported. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.
Measured: Baseline (Week 26) to Week 214
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Reduction in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) of ≥ 50% From Baseline (Week 0) in the Main Study Period
Percentage of participants who achieved a reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) of ≥ 50% from baseline (week 0) to week 26 was reported. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) to Week 26
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Reduction in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) of ≥ 50% From Baseline (Week 26) in the Open Label Extension (OLE) Period
Percentage of participants who achieved reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) of ≥ 50% from baseline (week 26) in the OLE period was reported. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.
Measured: Baseline (Week 26) up to Week 214
Absolute Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Triglycerides (TG), and Apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-1) From Baseline (Week 0) Over Time in the Main Study Period
Absolute change was reported in HDL-C, TG, and Apo A-1 from baseline (week 0) up to week 26. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least one post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 26
Percent Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Triglycerides (TG), and Apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-1) From Baseline (Week 0) Over Time in the Main Study Period
Percent change was reported in HDL-C, TG, and Apo A-1 from baseline (week 0) up to week 26. HDL-C, TG, and Apo A-1 were measured using conventional units mg/dL. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 26
Percent Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Triglycerides (TG), and Apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-1) From Baseline (Week 26) to Week 214 in the Open Label Extension (OLE) Period
Percent change was reported in HDL-C, TG and Apo A-1 from baseline (week 26) up to week 214. HDL-C, TG and Apo A-1 were measured using conventional units mg/dL. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least one post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period. (ET= Early Termination; EOS = End of Study)
Measured: Baseline (Week 26) up to Week 214
Absolute Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Triglycerides (TG), and Apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-1) From Baseline (Week 26) to Week 214 in the Open Label Extension (OLE) Period
Absolute change was reported in HDL-C, TG and Apo A-1 from baseline (week 26) up to week 214. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least one post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period. (ET= Early Termination; EOS = End of Study)
Measured: Baseline (Week 26) up to Week 214
Absolute Change in Apolipoprotein CIII (Apo CIII) From Baseline (Week 0) Over Time in the Main Study Period
Absolute change was reported in Apo CIII from baseline (week 0) up to week 16. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 16
Percent Change in Apolipoprotein CIII (Apo CIII) From Baseline (Week 0) Over Time in the Main Study Period
Percent change was reported in Apo CIII from baseline (week 0) up to week 16. Apo CIII was measured using conventional units mg/dL. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the SAF who had baseline and at least one post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) to Week 16
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Study start4 Feb 2015
- Primary completion21 Nov 2016
- Study completion23 Jul 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Homozygous Familial HypercholesterolemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Regeneron PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 9 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trial Management, Study director, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02265952
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R1500-CL-1331
- Other IDs
- 2016-000411-32, 2016
- Status last verified
- Dec 2019
- First submitted
- 10 Oct 2014
- Last updated
- 9 Dec 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Gaudet D, Gipe DA, Pordy R, Ahmad Z, Cuchel M, Shah PK, Chyu KY, Sasiela WJ, Chan KC, Brisson D, Khoury E, Banerjee P, Gusarova V, Gromada J, Stahl N, Yancopoulos GD, Hovingh GK. ANGPTL3 Inhibition in Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 20;377(3):296-297. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1705994. No abstract available.
PubMed 28723334Banerjee P, Chan KC, Tarabocchia M, Benito-Vicente A, Alves AC, Uribe KB, Bourbon M, Skiba PJ, Pordy R, Gipe DA, Gaudet D, Martin C. Functional Analysis of LDLR (Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor) Variants in Patient Lymphocytes to Assess the Effect of Evinacumab in Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia Patients With a Spectrum of LDLR Activity. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2019 Nov;39(11):2248-2260. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.313051. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
PubMed 31578082
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Dec 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Proof-of-Concept Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Single and Multiple Doses of REGN1500 in Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02265952
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- R1500-CL-1331
- Conditions
- Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 9 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Regeneron PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 4 Feb 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Nov 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 23 Jul 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 9 Dec 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is an open-label, single-arm study to assess the reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by REGN1500 in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Open-label | Experimental | Drug: REGN1500 250 mg SC/15 mg/kg IV/450 mg SCOpen-label REGN1500 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Men and women ≥18 years of age at the time of the screening visit
- Diagnosis of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH)
- Willing to consistently maintain usual diet for the duration of the study
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Background medical lipid modifying therapy that has not been stable for at least 4 weeks (6 weeks for fibrates) prior to the screening visit
- Having undergone lipid apheresis within 4 weeks prior to the screening visit
- Use of another investigational drug or therapy within 30 days or at least 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to the screening visit
- Previous participation in any clinical trial of REGN1500
- Note: The information listed above is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in this clinical trial therefore not all inclusion/ exclusion criteria are listed.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| REGN1500 250 mg SC/15 mg/kg IV/450 mg SCParticipants received single dose of REGN1500 subcutaneous (SC) injection of 250 milligrams (mg) at Week 0 (Day 1), followed by single dose of REGN1500 intravenous (IV) injection of 15 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) at Week 2 (Day 15) and then followed by 4 doses of REGN1500 SC injection of 450 mg once weekly starting from Week 12 (Day 85). Only the first 2 enrolled participants received 4 weekly REGN1500 450 mg SC doses at weeks 12, 13, 14, and 15 per the protocol. This dose regimen was removed under protocol amendment 4. Participants were followed for a period of 24 weeks (through Week 26 [Day 183]) after the last dose of study drug in the main study period. | Drug | Open-label |
Primary outcome
Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 4 in the Main Study Period
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 4
Percent change was reported for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline (week 0) up to week 4. LDL-C was measured using conventional units mg/dL. The efficacy analysis set included all participants in the safety analysis set (SAF) who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline measure of the lipid panel in the main study period.
21 secondary outcomes
Absolute Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 4 in the Main Study Period
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 4
Absolute Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Week 2 to Week 4 in the Main Study Period
Time frame: Week 2 to Week 4
Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Week 2 to Week 4 in the Main Study Period
Time frame: Week 2 to Week 4
Absolute Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline (Week 0) Over Time in the Main Study Period
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 26
Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline (Week 0) Over Time in the Main Study Period
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 26
Absolute Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline (Week 26) to Week 214 in the Open Label Extension (OLE) Period
Time frame: Baseline (Week 26) up to Week 214
Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline (Week 26) to Week 214 in the Open Label Extension (OLE) Period
Time frame: Baseline (Week 26) up to Week 214
Absolute Change in Apolipoprotein (Apo B), Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Total Cholesterol (Total-C), and Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) From Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 26 in the Main Study Period
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 26
Percent Change in Apolipoprotein (Apo B), Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Total Cholesterol (Total-C), and Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) From Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 26 in the Main Study Period
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 26
Absolute Change in Apolipoprotein (Apo B), Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Total Cholesterol (Total-C), and Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) From Baseline (Week 26) to Week 214 in the Open Label Extension (OLE) Period
Time frame: Baseline (Week 26) up to Week 214
Percent Change in Apolipoprotein (Apo B), Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), Total Cholesterol (Total-C), and Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) From Baseline (Week 26) to Week 214 in the Open Label Extension (OLE) Period
Time frame: Baseline (Week 26) up to Week 214
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Reduction in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) of ≥ 25% From Baseline (Week 0) in the Main Study Period
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 26
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Reduction in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) of ≥ 25% From Baseline (Week 26) in the Open Label Extension (OLE) Period
Time frame: Baseline (Week 26) to Week 214
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Reduction in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) of ≥ 50% From Baseline (Week 0) in the Main Study Period
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) to Week 26
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Reduction in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) of ≥ 50% From Baseline (Week 26) in the Open Label Extension (OLE) Period
Time frame: Baseline (Week 26) up to Week 214
Absolute Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Triglycerides (TG), and Apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-1) From Baseline (Week 0) Over Time in the Main Study Period
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 26
Percent Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Triglycerides (TG), and Apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-1) From Baseline (Week 0) Over Time in the Main Study Period
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 26
Percent Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Triglycerides (TG), and Apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-1) From Baseline (Week 26) to Week 214 in the Open Label Extension (OLE) Period
Time frame: Baseline (Week 26) up to Week 214
Absolute Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Triglycerides (TG), and Apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-1) From Baseline (Week 26) to Week 214 in the Open Label Extension (OLE) Period
Time frame: Baseline (Week 26) up to Week 214
Absolute Change in Apolipoprotein CIII (Apo CIII) From Baseline (Week 0) Over Time in the Main Study Period
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 16
Percent Change in Apolipoprotein CIII (Apo CIII) From Baseline (Week 0) Over Time in the Main Study Period
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) to Week 16
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Dec 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 28723334Gaudet D, Gipe DA, Pordy R, Ahmad Z, Cuchel M, Shah PK, Chyu KY, Sasiela WJ, Chan KC, Brisson D, Khoury E, Banerjee P, Gusarova V, Gromada J, Stahl N, Yancopoulos GD, Hovingh GK. ANGPTL3 Inhibition in Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 20;377(3):296-297. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1705994. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31578082Banerjee P, Chan KC, Tarabocchia M, Benito-Vicente A, Alves AC, Uribe KB, Bourbon M, Skiba PJ, Pordy R, Gipe DA, Gaudet D, Martin C. Functional Analysis of LDLR (Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor) Variants in Patient Lymphocytes to Assess the Effect of Evinacumab in Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia Patients With a Spectrum of LDLR Activity. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2019 Nov;39(11):2248-2260. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.313051. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
Related trials for Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Evaluation of the Effect of Lomitapide Treatment on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) in Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HoFH), Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)
RecruitingPhase 3
Study of Zodasiran in Adolescent Participants With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Recruiting
The ORIGIN-FH Study
Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HeFH), Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HoFH)
RecruitingPhase 3
Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Inclisiran in Participants With HeFH or HoFH Who Have Completed the Pediatric ORION-16, ORION-13, ORION-20, or ORION-19 Studies
Heterozygous or Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Safety and Tolerability Trial Evaluating CTX310 in Participants With Refractory Dyslipidemias
Cardiovascular, Metabolic Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trial Management study director
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
5 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing REGN1500 250 mg SC/15 mg/kg IV/450 mg SC in people with Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 5 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in United States, Canada, Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Dec 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 4 in the Main Study Period (time frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 4). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02265952, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Dec 2019.