AzTrials
AzTrials

Type 2 Diabetes MellitusPhase 4SMARTNCT02243176

24-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-group, Open-label, Active Controlled Phase IV Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Saxagliptin Compared With Acarbose When in Combination With Metformin in Patients With T2D Inadequately Controlled With Metformin Monotherapy

A Phase 4 study testing Saxagliptin and Acarbose in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by AstraZeneca at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

SMART Study - A 24-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-group, Open-label, Active Controlled Phase IV Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Saxagliptin Compared with Acarbose when in Combination with Metformin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D) Inadequately Controlled with Metformin… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 150 years
Conditions the study is for
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
What is being tested?
Saxagliptin and Acarbose
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
689 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Sep 2014to Sep 2015
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 150 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Men and women (non-pregnant and using a medically approved birth-control method) aged at least 18 years at screening.
  • T2D patients treated with stable metformin monotherapy for at least 8 weeks prior to screening. Metformin dose should be ≥ 1500 mg/day (or individual maximally tolerated dose), but not more than the maximum dose specified in the label
  • HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and ≤ 11.0% at screening or within 4 weeks prior to screening (by local laboratory) and HbA1c ≥ 7.0% and ≤ 11.0% at pre-randomization visit (by central laboratory)
  • FPG ≤ 13.3 mmol/L (≤ 240 mg/dL) at pre-randomization visit (by central laboratory)
  • Able and willing to provide written informed consent and to comply with the study protocol

Who cannot join

  • Women who are pregnant, intending to become pregnant during the study period, lactating females, or women of child-bearing potential not using highly effective, medically approved birth control methods.
  • Diagnosis or history of:
  • Type 1 diabetes mellitus, diabetes resulting from pancreatic injury or secondary forms of diabetes, eg, acromegaly or Cushing's syndrome.
  • Acute metabolic diabetic complications such as ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar coma within the past 6 months.
  • Previous treatment with any dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitor or GLP-1 receptor agonists within the past one year.
  • History of hypersensitivity reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis, angioedema, exfoliative skin conditions) to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4) or Acarbose.
  • Treatment with any anti-diabetic medication for more than 7 consecutive days other than metformin in the last 8 weeks prior to screening

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Research Site

    Shanghai

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: SMART Study - A 24-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-group, Open-label, Active Controlled Phase IV Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Saxagliptin Compared With Acarbose When in Combination With Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D) Inadequately Controlled With Metformin Monotherapy

SMART Study - A 24-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-group, Open-label, Active Controlled Phase IV Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Saxagliptin Compared with Acarbose when in Combination with Metformin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D) Inadequately Controlled with Metformin Monotherapy

Being tested
Saxagliptin, Acarbose
Keywords
Saxagliptin, Acarbose, Type 2 Diabetes, Metformin
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SaxagliptinDrug

    Also called Onglyza

    The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd.

  • AcarboseDrug

    Also called Glucobay

    Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose.

Study groups in NCT02243176
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SaxagliptinExperimentalThe dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
Receives: Drug: Saxagliptin
AcarboseActive comparatorPatients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
Receives: Drug: Acarbose

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Absolute Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 24 (DAO)

    Primary Objective: Efficacy of saxagliptin plus metformin on glycemic control compared with acarbose plus metformin in patients with T2D inadequately controlled with metformin. By Measure absolute change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 24

    Measured: From baseline to 24 week

  2. Absolute Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 24 (DAO)

    The primary endpoint was analyzed based on Per protocol analysis set as the supportive analysis.

    Measured: From baseline to 24 week

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Proportion (%) of Patients With Any GI Adverse Events

    Secondary Objective: Assessment of any gastrointestinal adverse events of saxagliptin versus acarbose. by measure proportion (%) of patients with any gastrointestinal adverse events.

    Measured: 24 weeks

  2. Proportion (%) of Patients Achieving a Therapeutic Glycemic Response Defined as HbA1c<7.0%

    Secondary Objective: Effects of saxagliptin versus acarbose on the additional parameters, by measure proportion (%) of patients achieving a therapeutic glycemic response defined as HbA1c<7.0%

    Measured: 24 weeks

  3. Proportion (%) of Patients Achieving HbA1c<7.0% Without GI Adverse Events

    Secondary Objective: Assessment of any gastrointestinal adverse events of saxagliptin versus acarbose. by measure proportion (%) of patients achieving HbA1c<7.0% without GI adverse events.

    Measured: Whole study duration

  4. Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

    Secondary objective: Effects of saxagliptin versus acarbose on the additional parameters, by measure change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose, 2h postprandial glucose, β-cell function, body weight at week 24

    Measured: From baseline to 24 week

  5. Change From Baseline in 2H Postprandial Glucose (2HPPG)

    Secondary objective: Effects of saxagliptin versus acarbose on the additional parameters, by measure change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose, 2h postprandial glucose, β-cell function, body weight at week 24

    Measured: From baseline to 24 week

  6. Change From Baseline in HOMA-β

    Secondary objective: Effects of saxagliptin versus acarbose on the additional parameters, by measure change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose, 2h postprandial glucose, β-cell function was estimated by the Homeostasis model assessment-β (HOMA-β), which was defined as fasting insulin (mU/mL) x 20 / (fasting glucose (mmol/mL) - 3.5, body weight at week 24

    Measured: From baseline to 24 week

  7. Change From Baseline in Body Weight

    Secondary objective: Effects of saxagliptin versus acarbose on the additional parameters, by measure change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose, 2h postprandial glucose, β-cell function, body weight at week 24

    Measured: From baseline to 24 week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Sep 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2014
  3. Primary completionSep 2015
  4. Study completionSep 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
689 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02243176
Sponsor's protocol ID
D1680L00018
Acronym
SMART
Status last verified
Mar 2017
First submitted
16 Sep 2014
Last updated
14 Apr 2017
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Du J, Liang L, Fang H, Xu F, Li W, Shen L, Wang X, Xu C, Bian F, Mu Y. Efficacy and safety of saxagliptin compared with acarbose in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus uncontrolled on metformin monotherapy: Results of a Phase IV open-label randomized controlled study (the SMART study). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Nov;19(11):1513-1520. doi: 10.1111/dom.12942. Epub 2017 Jul 6.

    PubMed 28296055

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Saxagliptin and Acarbose in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by AstraZeneca at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Apr 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Absolute Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 24 (DAO) (time frame: From baseline to 24 week). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02243176, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Apr 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in