Coronary Artery DiseasePhase 2/3NCT02236975
First-in-man Trial Examining the Safety and Efficacy of BuMA Supreme and Resolute Integrity in Patients With de Novo Coronary Artery Stenosis
A Phase 2/3 study testing BuMA Supreme Biodegradable drug coating coronary stent system and Resolute Integrity durable polymer stent system in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Sino Medical Sciences Technology Inc. at 12 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
Prospective, multi-center, randomized 1:1, single blind trial using BuMA Supreme versus Resolute Integrity conducted in approximately 14 interventional cardiology centers in The Netherlands, Belgium, Spain and Portugal. Clinical follow-up will occur at 1, 9 and 12 months post-stent implantation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- BuMA Supreme Biodegradable drug coating coronary stent system and Resolute Integrity durable polymer stent system
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 168 participants
- Where
- 12 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- Apr 2015to Mar 2019
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The subject is at least 18 years of age.
- Clinical evidence of ischemic heart disease and/or a positive territorial functional study.
- Documented stable angina pectoris (Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Classification 1, 2, 3 or 4) or unstable angina pectoris with documented ischemia (Braunwald Class IB-C, IIB-C, or IIIB-C), or documented silent ischemia
- The patient has a planned intervention of a single de-novo lesion in one or two separate major epicardial territories (LAD, LCX or RCA).
- Diameter Stenosis≥50 and<100%.
- The visually estimated target lesion must be able to be covered by a single BuMA Supreme stent or a single Resolute Integrity stent (for available sizes refer to tables 1 and 2, page 20 and 21).
Show all 10Show fewer
- The target lesion reference diameter must be visually estimated to be ≥2.5 mm and ≤4.5 mm in diameter.
- Written informed consent.
- The patient agrees to the follow-up visits including a 9 month angiographic follow-up.
- Patient must have completed the follow-up phase of any previous study.
Who cannot join
- Female of child bearing potential (age <50 years and last menstruation within the last 12 months). Subjects with age <50 who underwent tubal ligation, ovariectomy or hysterectomy can be included.
- Evidence of ongoing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in ECG and/or elevated cardiac biomarkers (according to local standard hospital practice) have not returned within normal limits at the time of procedure
- Patient suffered from stroke/TIA during the last 6 months.
- LVEF <30%
- Platelet count <100,000 cells/mm3 or >400,000 cells/mm3, a WBC of <3,000 cells/mm3, or documented or suspected liver disease (including laboratory evidence of hepatitis)
- Known renal insufficiency (e.g. serum creatinine >2.5mg/dL, or creatinine clearance ≤30 mL/min), or subject on dialysis, or acute kidney failure (as per physician judgment).
Show all 13Show fewer
- Patient undergoing planned surgery within 6 months with the necessity to stop DAPT.
- Patient requiring oral anticoagulation (Coumadin, Novel Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC))
- History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
- The patient is a recipient of a heart transplant
- Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin, antiplatelet medication specified for use in the study, sirolimus, zotarolimus, or cobalt-chromium.
- Other medical illness (e.g. cancer, stroke with neurological deficiency) or known history of substance abuse (alcohol, cocaine, heroin etc.) as per physician judgment that may cause non-compliance with the protocol or confound the data interpretation or is associated with a limited life expectancy
- The patient is simultaneously participating in another investigational device or drug study
Trial locations and contacts
12 sites in 4 countries.
12 sites in 4 countries
Netherlands4 sites
AMC
Amsterdam
OLVG
Amsterdam
UMCG
Groningen
Maasstad Hospital
Rotterdam
Belgium3 sites
Imelda Hospital
Bonheiden
CHU Chaleroi
Chaleroi
Oost-limburg Hospital
Genk
Portugal3 sites
Hospita; Garcia de Orta
Almada
Santa Maria University Hospital
Lisbon
Gaia/Espinho Hospital Centers
Porto
About this study
Official title: Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized First-in-man Trial Examining the Safety and Efficacy of BuMA Supreme eG (Electro Grafting) Based Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-eluting Stent and Resolute Integrity Zotarolimus-eluting Durable Polymer Stent in Patients With de Novo Coronary Artery Stenosis.
Prospective, multi-center, randomized 1:1, single blind trial using BuMA Supreme versus Resolute Integrity conducted in approximately 14 interventional cardiology centers in The Netherlands, Belgium, Spain and Portugal.
Clinical follow-up will occur at 1, 9 and 12 months post-stent implantation. All patients will undergo repeat angiography at 9 months follow-up. QCA assessment will be performed at baseline (pre- and post-procedure) and at 9 months follow-up.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Being tested
- BuMA Supreme Biodegradable drug coating coronary stent system, Resolute Integrity durable polymer stent system
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BuMA Supreme Biodegradable drug coating coronary stent systemDevice
Resolute Integrity durable polymer stent systemDevice
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| BuMA Supreme Biodegradable drug coating coronary stent system | Experimental | Implant BuMA Supreme stent only Receives: Device: BuMA Supreme Biodegradable drug coating coronary stent system |
| Resolute Integrity durable polymer stent system | Active comparator | Implant Resolute stent Receives: Device: Resolute Integrity durable polymer stent system |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Late Lumen Loss
The primary endpoint is in-stent Late Lumen Loss (LLL) at 9 months after stent implantation as assessed by off-line QCA.
Measured: Up to 9 month
Secondary outcomes (9)
Angiographic endpoint
Acute Lumen Gain (mm);
Measured: 9 and 12 month
Angiographic endpoint
MLD (mm) post procedure and at 9 months;
Measured: 9 and 12 month
Angiographic endpoint
Diameter Stenosis (%) post procedure and at 9 months;
Measured: 9 and 12 month
Angiographic endpoint
Binary Restenosis (DS ≥50%) at 9 months
Measured: 9 and 12 month
Clinical endpoint
Acute success (device and procedural success)
Measured: 9 and 12 month
Cinical endpoint
Device-oriented Composite Endpoints (DoCE) at 1, 9 and 12 months and its individual components. (Device-oriented Composite Endpoint is defined as Cardiac Death, MI not clearly attributable to a non-intervention vessel, and clinically-indicated Target Lesion Revascularization).
Measured: 9 and 12 month
Clinical endpoint
Myocardial infarction (Q-wave, Non q-wave) at all time points.
Measured: 9 and 12 month
Clinical endpoint
Any revascularization at all time points.
Measured: 9 and 12 month
Clinical endpoint
Stent thrombosis according to the ARC definitions up to 12 months follow-up.
Measured: 9 and 12 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Sep 2014 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2015
- Primary completionNov 2016
- Study completionMar 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 168 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sino Medical Sciences Technology Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clemens von.Birgelen, MD,Phd, Principal investigator, Medisch Spectrum Twente (MST), Enschede, the NetherlandsManel Sabate, MD,Phd, Principal investigator, Clinic university hospital Barcelona, SpainPatrick W.Serruys, MD,Phd, Study chair, Interventional Cardiology, Thorax center, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02236975
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PIONEER
- Status last verified
- Aug 2016
- First submitted
- 4 Sep 2014
- Last updated
- 28 Jul 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Wang R, Kawashima H, Hara H, Gao C, Ono M, Takahashi K, Tu S, Soliman O, Garg S, van Geuns RJ, Tao L, Wijns W, Onuma Y, Serruys PW. Comparison of Clinically Adjudicated Versus Flow-Based Adjudication of Revascularization Events in Randomized Controlled Trials. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Nov;14(11):e008055. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008055. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
PubMed 34666500
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jul 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized First-in-man Trial Examining the Safety and Efficacy of BuMA Supreme eG (Electro Grafting) Based Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-eluting Stent and Resolute Integrity Zotarolimus-eluting Durable Polymer Stent in Patients With de Novo Coronary Artery Stenosis.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02236975
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PIONEER
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 168 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sino Medical Sciences Technology Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Nov 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Sep 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Prospective, multi-center, randomized 1:1, single blind trial using BuMA Supreme versus Resolute Integrity conducted in approximately 14 interventional cardiology centers in The Netherlands, Belgium, Spain and Portugal.
Clinical follow-up will occur at 1, 9 and 12 months post-stent implantation. All patients will undergo repeat angiography at 9 months follow-up. QCA assessment will be performed at baseline (pre- and post-procedure) and at 9 months follow-up.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| BuMA Supreme Biodegradable drug coating coronary stent system | Experimental | Device: BuMA Supreme Biodegradable drug coating coronary stent systemImplant BuMA Supreme stent only |
| Resolute Integrity durable polymer stent system | Active comparator | Device: Resolute Integrity durable polymer stent systemImplant Resolute stent |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- The subject is at least 18 years of age.
- Clinical evidence of ischemic heart disease and/or a positive territorial functional study.
- Documented stable angina pectoris (Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Classification 1, 2, 3 or 4) or unstable angina pectoris with documented ischemia (Braunwald Class IB-C, IIB-C, or IIIB-C), or documented silent ischemia
- The patient has a planned intervention of a single de-novo lesion in one or two separate major epicardial territories (LAD, LCX or RCA).
- Diameter Stenosis≥50 and<100%.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Female of child bearing potential (age <50 years and last menstruation within the last 12 months). Subjects with age <50 who underwent tubal ligation, ovariectomy or hysterectomy can be included.
- Evidence of ongoing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in ECG and/or elevated cardiac biomarkers (according to local standard hospital practice) have not returned within normal limits at the time of procedure
- Patient suffered from stroke/TIA during the last 6 months.
- LVEF <30%
- Platelet count <100,000 cells/mm3 or >400,000 cells/mm3, a WBC of <3,000 cells/mm3, or documented or suspected liver disease (including laboratory evidence of hepatitis)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BuMA Supreme Biodegradable drug coating coronary stent system | Device | BuMA Supreme Biodegradable drug coating coronary stent system |
| Resolute Integrity durable polymer stent system | Device | Resolute Integrity durable polymer stent system |
Primary outcome
Late Lumen Loss
Time frame: Up to 9 month
The primary endpoint is in-stent Late Lumen Loss (LLL) at 9 months after stent implantation as assessed by off-line QCA.
9 secondary outcomes
Angiographic endpoint
Time frame: 9 and 12 month
Angiographic endpoint
Time frame: 9 and 12 month
Angiographic endpoint
Time frame: 9 and 12 month
Angiographic endpoint
Time frame: 9 and 12 month
Clinical endpoint
Time frame: 9 and 12 month
Cinical endpoint
Time frame: 9 and 12 month
Clinical endpoint
Time frame: 9 and 12 month
Clinical endpoint
Time frame: 9 and 12 month
Clinical endpoint
Time frame: 9 and 12 month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jul 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34666500Wang R, Kawashima H, Hara H, Gao C, Ono M, Takahashi K, Tu S, Soliman O, Garg S, van Geuns RJ, Tao L, Wijns W, Onuma Y, Serruys PW. Comparison of Clinically Adjudicated Versus Flow-Based Adjudication of Revascularization Events in Randomized Controlled Trials. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Nov;14(11):e008055. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008055. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
The OCTOBER Trial - European Trial on Optical Coherence Tomography Optimized Bifurcation Event Reduction (OCTOBER)
Ischaemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clemens von.Birgelen, MD,Phd principal investigator
Medisch Spectrum Twente (MST), Enschede, the Netherlands
Manel Sabate, MD,Phd principal investigator
Clinic university hospital Barcelona, Spain
Patrick W.Serruys, MD,Phd study chair
Interventional Cardiology, Thorax center, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam
12 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing BuMA Supreme Biodegradable drug coating coronary stent system and Resolute Integrity durable polymer stent system in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Sino Medical Sciences Technology Inc. at 12 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 12 sites in Netherlands, Belgium, Portugal, Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Late Lumen Loss (time frame: Up to 9 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02236975, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jul 2020.