AzTrials
AzTrials

Ischemic StrokePhase 1SAVER-INCT02235558

Superselective Administration of VErapamil During Recanalization in Acute Ischemic Stroke

A Phase 1 study testing Verapamil in people with Ischemic Stroke, run by Justin Fraser at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether super-selective intra-arterial administration of verapamil immediately following successful intra-arterial thrombolysis is safe as a potential neuroprotective agent. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Ischemic Stroke
What is being tested?
Verapamil
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
11 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Feb 2013to 21 Mar 2016
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients 21-85 years old, male or female
  • Suspected acute ischemic stroke based on clinical and radiographic evidence as determined and documented by the Stroke Neurology team at University of Kentucky.
  • Patients must meet criteria for intra-arterial thrombolysis as determined and documented by Interventional Neuroradiology attending physician (JF or AA).
  • Patients must have an acute thromboembolus within an intracranial artery (internal carotid, anterior cerebral, middle cerebral, posterior cerebral, basilar, vertebral) which undergoes pharmacologic (tissue plasminogen activator - tPA) and/or mechanical (eg. Merci or Penumbra clot retrieval) thrombolysis.
  • Patients with impaired capacity may be included, as the pathology to be studied (stroke) may impair their capacity (please see attached required documentation regarding impaired capacity).
  • Patients must have a TICI 2A or better revascularization via intra-arterial thrombolysis.
Show all 11Show fewer
  • For reference, the TICI Scale is defined below:
  • 0 = No Perfusion
  • = Perfusion past the initial obstruction but limited distal branch filling with little or slow distal perfusion
  • A = Perfusion of less than 50% of the vascular distribution of the occluded artery
  • 2B = Perfusion of 50% or greater (but not complete) of the vascular distribution of the occluded artery 3 = Full perfusion with filling of all distal branches

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant women (would not qualify for intra-arterial thrombolysis as standard of care).
  • Patients who undergo intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute stroke, in whom only TICI 0 or 1 revascularization is obtained.
  • Patients with occlusion of the cervical common or internal carotid artery will be excluded from the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Kentucky Deparment of Neurosurgery, UK Chandler Hospital

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40536

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Super-Selective Intra-Arterial Administration of Verapamil for Neuroprotection After Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke Phase I Study

The purpose of this study is to determine whether super-selective intra-arterial administration of verapamil immediately following successful intra-arterial thrombolysis is safe as a potential neuroprotective agent. Standard procedures are cerebral angiography and intra-arterial thrombolysis (intra-arterial administration of tPA and/or mechanical thrombectomy). Experimental procedure is superselective injection of verapamil intra-arterially.

Read the detailed description

This trial represents the first time that verapamil will be evaluated in human subjects as a superselectively administered neuroprotective agent administered in an acute time frame as an adjunct to intra-arterial thrombolysis. The methods for administration, along with the routinized followup, will provide a paradigm for studying other potential neuroprotective agents. Subjects will undergo cerebral angiography with intra-arterial thrombolysis, which is standard of care. 'Intra-arterial thrombolysis will include possible intra-arterial administration of tPA, as well as possible mechanical thrombectomy with an accepted thrombectomy device. This includes the Mercí Retriever (Concentric Medical, Mountain View, CA), the Penumbra System (Penumbra, Alameda, CA), the Solitaire stent-triever (EV3, Covidien, Irvine, CA), and the Trevo stent-triever (Concentric Medical, Mountain View, CA). Immediately after the intra-arterial thrombolysis component of the angiographic procedure is completed, the microcatheter used during the procedure will be left in or guided into the vessel location of the clot. 10mg of verapamil in 20cc of normal saline will be administered over 20 minutes (1cc/minute) through the microcatheter and into the vessel previously obstructed by clot. At the conclusion of infusion, the microcatheter will be removed. Angiography through the guide catheter of the cerebral circulation in question will be performed to ensure no new thromboembolic event from the microcatheterization (standard of care). The catheters will be removed, and the arterial puncture site closed in the standard fashion. Patients will receive a noncontrast CT scan or MRI approximately 24 hours after intervention to determine the presence or absence of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) after intervention. This would be considered standard practice for intra-arterial thrombolysis. Both imaging studies can detect ICH, and the choice of one or the other will be determined by clinical criteria; CT or MRI may be preferable for different reasons depending upon the patient's clinical scenario. The determination of hemorrhage will be made by the official dictation of a diagnostic neuroradiologist not directly involved in the study. The hemorrhage will be considered an adverse event if it is deemed symptomatic in accordance with the criteria used in the International Management of Stroke (IMS) III study. Briefly, a hemorrhage is defined as symptomatic if occurring within 24+/-6 hours after study inclusion, temporally related to the intervention, and occurs with worsening neurological status as documented in the clinical exam. A 4 point or more increase in the NIHSS stroke scale would qualify as a significant worsening in status. Furthermore, hemorrhage that requires intervention surgically or endovascularly would be deemed significant.

Conditions
Ischemic Stroke
Being tested
Verapamil
Keywords
Acute Ischemic Stoke, Thrombectomy, Intraarterial Pharmacotherapy, Neuroprotection
Medical subject headings
Ischemic Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • VerapamilDrug

    Also called Isoptin, Verelan, Verelan PM, Calan

    Super-selective intra-arterial administration of 10mg verapamil in 20cc of normal saline will be administered over 20 minutes (1cc/minute) through the microcatheter and into the vessel previously obstructed by clot, immediately following successful intra-arterial thrombolysis. Half-life is 2.8-7.4 hrs.

Study groups in NCT02235558
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
VerapamilExperimentalSuper-selective intra-arterial administration of 10 mg verapamil immediately following successful intra-arterial thrombolysis
Receives: Drug: Verapamil

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The primary endpoint will be the presence or absence of intracranial hemorrhage

    Patients will receive a noncontrast CT scan or MRI approximately 24 hours after intervention to determine the presence or absence of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) after intervention.

    Measured: 24-48 hours after treatment

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Absence of intracranial hemorrhage

    Improved clinical outcomes at followup intervals as measured by the modified Rankin score.

    Measured: At follow-up intervals: Day 30 ± 14 days, 3 Months ± 30 days, 6 Months ± 30 days, 12 Months± 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Sep 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Feb 2013
  3. Primary completion21 Mar 2016
  4. Study completion21 Mar 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
11 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02235558
Sponsor's protocol ID
12-0975-F1V
Acronym
SAVER-I
Status last verified
Jan 2017
First submitted
7 Sep 2014
Last updated
23 Jan 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing Verapamil in people with Ischemic Stroke, run by Justin Fraser at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The primary endpoint will be the presence or absence of intracranial hemorrhage (time frame: 24-48 hours after treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jan 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in