Acute Spinal Cord InjuryMAPSNCT02232165
Mean Arterial Blood Pressure Treatment for Acute Spinal Cord Injury
A study testing Hypotension avoidance and Induced hypertension in people with Acute Spinal Cord Injury, run by University of Calgary at 2 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Current guidelines for the clinical management of acute spinal cord injury (SCI) recommend maintenance of mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) at 85 to 90 mmHg for the first seven days after SCI as a clinical option. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Spinal Cord Injury
- What is being tested?
- Hypotension avoidance and Induced hypertension
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 17 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Feb 2013to 20 Sep 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age greater than or equal to 16 years.
- Motor complete or incomplete (ASIA A, B, or C) acute traumatic SCI involving spinal levels between C0 and T12.
- Written and informed consent from patient or a legally acceptable representative.
- Randomization and initiation of management protocol within 24 hours of injury.
- Reasonable expectation of availability to receive the full 7-day course of therapy and be available for follow up evaluations.
Who cannot join
- Acute traumatic SCI > 24 hours old.
- Central cord syndrome, defined as ASIA C or D with mean lower extremity score greater than upper extremity score.
- Isolated sensory deficit, motor intact.
- Isolated radicular motor deficit, defined as a unilateral motor deficit restricted to a single myotome.
- Pregnancy.
- Associated conditions interfering with informed consent or outcome assessment including closed head injury and major orthopedic injuries.
Show all 17Show fewer
- Polytrauma: Abbreviated Injury Severity Score >3 in any area other than head.
- Known uncorrected severe coronary artery disease or evidence of active coronary ischemia (ECG changes, positive troponin) will be excluded.
- Advanced cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic or liver disease; the former will be operationally defined using NCI Toxicity Criteria (Grade 2 or higher).
- Allergy or other contraindication to norepinephrine.
- A known diagnosis of cancer (except basal cell cancer).
- Uncontrolled hypertension, defined as blood pressure persistently above 220 mmHg systolic or 120 mmHg diastolic, despite antihypertensive therapy.
- Any patients living in a nursing home or supervised living centre. Patients must be historically fully independent in all activities of daily living including banking, shopping, cooking, toileting, showering and dressing.
- Any other medical condition, in the investigator's opinion, for which the patient should not be included in the trial.
- Pre-existing and active major psychiatric or other chronic neurological disease.
- Patients who have a history of substance abuse or dependency within 12 months prior to the study.
- Currently participating in another interventional investigational study.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 2 countries.
2 sites in 2 countries
United States1 site
University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Canada1 site
University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Centre
Calgary, Alberta, T2N2T9
About this study
Official title: Mean Arterial Pressure in Spinal Cord Injury (MAPS): Determination of Non-inferiority of a Mean Arterial Pressure Goal of 65 mmHg Compared to a Mean Arterial Pressure Goal of 85 mmHg in Acute Human Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.
Current guidelines for the clinical management of acute spinal cord injury (SCI) recommend maintenance of mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) at 85 to 90 mmHg for the first seven days after SCI as a clinical option. Unfortunately, the medical evidence to support this recommendation exists only at the clinical case series level (Class III data). Furthermore, maintenance of sustained systemic hypertension, as per clinical guidelines, may be associated with risks to the patient via adverse medical events. Given this equivocal evidence, the investigators group has questioned the merit of sustained induced hypertension following acute SCI and has previously conducted a randomized, prospective controlled feasibility study to further examine this issue. This prior pilot study randomized patients with acute SCI to a spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP = MAP - intrathecal pressure (ITP)) target of ≥ 75 mmHg or to a control group (hypotension avoidance, MAP ≥ 65 mmHg). The primary endpoint measure was defined as the change in American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score from baseline. No difference in the primary outcome was noted at one-year post-SCI in this study.
In light of this pilot data, the investigators hypothesize that maintenance of normotension (MAP ≥ 65mmHg) is not inferior to induced hypertension (MAP ≥ 85mmHg) for 7 days following acute SCI. As such, the investigators propose to conduct a Phase III non-inferiority prospective, randomized clinical trial in acute SCI patients. Subjects will be randomized into one of two MAP management groups for 7 days; Group 1 will be managed with a target MAP ≥ 65 mmHg, while Group 2 will be managed with a target MAP ≥ 85 mmHg. The primary endpoint will be change in ASIA motor score from baseline at 12 months post injury. A difference of ≤10 ASIA motor points change from baseline between groups will be considered as non-inferiority. Secondary endpoints will include ASIA sensory score, proportion of patients achieving a one grade improvement in ASIA impairment scale, quality of life assessment (as measured by Short-Form-36 [SF-36]) and functional outcome (as measured by the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM). These will be measured at baseline, 72 hours and 3, 6 and 12 months from injury. Adverse events will be meticulously recorded. The information gleaned from this trial will provide valuable information for the acute treatment of traumatic SCI and will serve the objective of optimizing current clinical practice and thus maximizing medical and neurological outcome for individuals following acute traumatic SCI.
- Conditions
- Acute Spinal Cord Injury
- Being tested
- Hypotension avoidance, Induced hypertension
- Keywords
- acute spinal cord injury, hemodynamic therapy, functional outcome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Hypotension avoidanceOther
Induced hypertension with MAP >= 85 mmHg for 7 days following SCI is the current recommended clinical option guideline. Our intervention tests whether hypotension avoidance and maintenance of MAP >= 65 mmHg is not inferior to induced hypertension.
Induced hypertensionOther
Induced hypertension with MAP >= 85 mmHg for 7 days following SCI is the current recommended clinical option guideline.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Hypotension avoidance (MAP >= 65 mmHg) | Experimental | Mean arterial blood pressure is maintained >= 65 mmHg for 7 days following acute SCI. Receives: Other: Hypotension avoidance |
| Induced hypertension (MAP >= 85 mmHg) | Active comparator | Induced hypertension with mean arterial blood pressure >= 85 mmHg for 7 days following acute SCI. Receives: Other: Induced hypertension |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in ASIA motor score from baseline
A difference of ≤10 ASIA motor points change from baseline between groups will be considered as non-inferiority.
Measured: 1 year post-injury
Secondary outcomes (4)
ASIA sensory score
Measured: 1 year post-injury
Proportion of patients achieving a one-grade improvement in ASIA impairment scale (AIS)
Measured: 1 year post-injury
Quality of life assessment with Short-Form-36 (SF-36)
Measured: 1 year post-injury
Functional outcome assessment with FIM and SCIM
Measured: 1 year post-injury
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Sep 2014 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2013
- Primary completion20 Sep 2019
- Study completion20 Sep 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute Spinal Cord InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of CalgaryThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 17 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Calgary
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, AANS/CNS Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr W. Bradley Jacobs, University of Calgary
- Investigators
- W. Bradley Jacobs, MD, Principal investigator, University of Calgary
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02232165
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- E-24927
- Acronym
- MAPS
- Status last verified
- Sep 2019
- First submitted
- 2 Sep 2014
- Last updated
- 25 Sep 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Sep 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Mean Arterial Pressure in Spinal Cord Injury (MAPS): Determination of Non-inferiority of a Mean Arterial Pressure Goal of 65 mmHg Compared to a Mean Arterial Pressure Goal of 85 mmHg in Acute Human Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02232165
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MAPS / E-24927
- Conditions
- Acute Spinal Cord Injury
- Keywords
- acute spinal cord injury, hemodynamic therapy, functional outcome
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Terminated
- Enrolment
- 17 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of CalgaryUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, AANS/CNS Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves
- Study start
- Feb 2013
- Primary completion
- 20 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Sep 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Sep 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Current guidelines for the clinical management of acute spinal cord injury (SCI) recommend maintenance of mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) at 85 to 90 mmHg for the first seven days after SCI as a clinical option. Unfortunately, the medical evidence to support this recommendation exists only at the clinical case series level (Class III data). Furthermore, maintenance of sustained systemic hypertension, as per clinical guidelines, may be associated with risks to the patient via adverse medical events. Given this equivocal evidence, the investigators group has questioned the merit of sustained induced hypertension following acute SCI and has previously conducted a randomized, prospective controlled feasibility study to further examine this issue. This prior pilot study randomized patients with acute SCI to a spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP = MAP - intrathecal pressure (ITP)) target of ≥ 75 mmHg or to a control group (hypotension avoidance, MAP ≥ 65 mmHg). The primary endpoint measure was defined as the change in American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score from baseline. No difference in the primary outcome was noted at one-year post-SCI in this study.
In light of this pilot data, the investigators hypothesize that maintenance of normotension (MAP ≥ 65mmHg) is not inferior to induced hypertension (MAP ≥ 85mmHg) for 7 days following acute SCI. As such, the investigators propose to conduct a Phase III non-inferiority prospective, randomized clinical trial in acute SCI patients. Subjects will be randomized into one of two MAP management groups for 7 days; Group 1 will be managed with a target MAP ≥ 65 mmHg, while Group 2 will be managed with a target MAP ≥ 85 mmHg. The primary endpoint will be change in ASIA motor score from baseline at 12 months post injury. A difference of ≤10 ASIA motor points change from baseline between groups will be considered as non-inferiority. Secondary endpoints will include ASIA sensory score, proportion of patients achieving a one grade improvement in ASIA impairment scale, quality of life assessment (as measured by Short-Form-36 [SF-36]) and functional outcome (as measured by the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM). These will be measured at baseline, 72 hours and 3, 6 and 12 months from injury. Adverse events will be meticulously recorded. The information gleaned from this trial will provide valuable information for the acute treatment of traumatic SCI and will serve the objective of optimizing current clinical practice and thus maximizing medical and neurological outcome for individuals following acute traumatic SCI.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Hypotension avoidance (MAP >= 65 mmHg) | Experimental | Other: Hypotension avoidanceMean arterial blood pressure is maintained >= 65 mmHg for 7 days following acute SCI. |
| Induced hypertension (MAP >= 85 mmHg) | Active comparator | Other: Induced hypertensionInduced hypertension with mean arterial blood pressure >= 85 mmHg for 7 days following acute SCI. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age greater than or equal to 16 years.
- Motor complete or incomplete (ASIA A, B, or C) acute traumatic SCI involving spinal levels between C0 and T12.
- Written and informed consent from patient or a legally acceptable representative.
- Randomization and initiation of management protocol within 24 hours of injury.
- Reasonable expectation of availability to receive the full 7-day course of therapy and be available for follow up evaluations.
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Acute traumatic SCI > 24 hours old.
- Central cord syndrome, defined as ASIA C or D with mean lower extremity score greater than upper extremity score.
- Isolated sensory deficit, motor intact.
- Isolated radicular motor deficit, defined as a unilateral motor deficit restricted to a single myotome.
- Pregnancy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Hypotension avoidanceInduced hypertension with MAP >= 85 mmHg for 7 days following SCI is the current recommended clinical option guideline. Our intervention tests whether hypotension avoidance and maintenance of MAP >= 65 mmHg is not inferior to induced hypertension. | Other | Hypotension avoidance (MAP >= 65 mmHg) |
| Induced hypertensionInduced hypertension with MAP >= 85 mmHg for 7 days following SCI is the current recommended clinical option guideline. | Other | Induced hypertension (MAP >= 85 mmHg) |
Primary outcome
Change in ASIA motor score from baseline
Time frame: 1 year post-injury
A difference of ≤10 ASIA motor points change from baseline between groups will be considered as non-inferiority.
4 secondary outcomes
ASIA sensory score
Time frame: 1 year post-injury
Proportion of patients achieving a one-grade improvement in ASIA impairment scale (AIS)
Time frame: 1 year post-injury
Quality of life assessment with Short-Form-36 (SF-36)
Time frame: 1 year post-injury
Functional outcome assessment with FIM and SCIM
Time frame: 1 year post-injury
Results and safety
The study was stopped early. Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Sep 2019.
Related trials for Acute Spinal Cord Injury
Recruiting
Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Acute Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injury, Acute
Recruiting
Acute Genital Nerve Stimulation for Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction in Individuals Living With Spinal Cord Injury
Fecal Incontinence
Recruiting
Functional Electrical Stimulation vs Transcutaneous Stimulation in Patients With Subacute Spinal Cord Injury
Non Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury, Sub-Acute Rehabilitation
RecruitingPhase 1
NG004 in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Patients
Acute Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), Spinal Cord Diseases
Recruiting
Protocol for Rapid Onset of Mobilization in Patients With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury II (PROMPT-SCI II) Trial
Spinal Cord Injuries, Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), Initial Encounter
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
W. Bradley Jacobs, MD principal investigator
University of Calgary
2 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Hypotension avoidance and Induced hypertension in people with Acute Spinal Cord Injury, run by University of Calgary at 2 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early. Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in ASIA motor score from baseline (time frame: 1 year post-injury). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Sep 2019.