AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiorespiratory FitnessNCT02224248

Effect of Including Fitness Testing in Preventive Health Checks on Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Motivation

A study testing Health checks with fitness testing and Health checks without fitness testing in people with Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Physical Activity, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate if including fitness testing in preventive health checks increase cardiorespiratory fitness and motivation to change physical activity behavior compared with preventive health checks without fitness testing. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 to 49 years
What is being tested?
Health checks with fitness testing and Health checks without fitness testing
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2,201 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
Oct 2014to Jun 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 to 49 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Citizens in the municipality of Randers per 01.01.2012
  • Randomized for the third group of five to be invited for a preventive health check as part of the health promotion program, Check your health prevention program, conducted in the years 2012 to 2017.
  • Having received a preventive health check before November 30 2015.
  • Having consented for data to be used scientifically.

Who cannot join

  • Terminal illness as reported by the citizens general practitioner.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Institute of public health, section of general practice, Aarhus University

    Aarhus C, Aarhus County, 8000

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Including Fitness Testing in Preventive Health Checks on Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Motivation to Change Physical Activity Behaviour

The purpose of this study is to investigate if including fitness testing in preventive health checks increase cardiorespiratory fitness and motivation to change physical activity behavior compared with preventive health checks without fitness testing.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND

Changing unhealthy lifestyle improves health and reduces morbidity. Motivation is a key component in initiation and maintenance of lifestyle changes. Identifying and motivating individuals with unhealthy lifestyle to change behaviour may be achieved through preventive health checks as already implemented in some countries. However, knowledge about the impact of individual components included in preventive health checks is lacking. Consequently, the most effective composition of preventive health checks remains unknown.

In a Danish municipality, the Check your Health Prevention Program (CHPP) was recently initiated, offering preventive health checks to all 30 to 49 year-old citizens. This program provides the unique opportunity to evaluate single components of a preventive health check in a real-life setting. Only a few previous studies have included cardiorespiratory fitness (fitness) testing in a preventive health check. Fitness is associated with multiple health benefits such as improved cardio-metabolic profile and reduced risk of cancer, diabetes, and depression.

The investigators aim to investigate the effect of including fitness testing in preventive health checks on fitness level, motivation for changing physical activity behaviour, physical inactivity prevalence and self-rated health. The investigators hypothesize that fitness testing as part of preventive health checks compared to preventive health checks without fitness testing 1) increases fitness level assessed after one year and the percentage of participants increasing motivation to change physical activity behaviour assessed after two weeks, and 2) reduces physical inactivity prevalence and improves self-rated health scores during the one-year study period.

METHODS

Nested-design

The present trial is embedded in the above mentioned health promotion program, CHPP, which is conducted during the years 2012 to 2017. In the CHPP, all citizens living in the municipality of Randers aged 30-49 years per 1st of January 2012 (n = 26,216) were identified in the Danish Civil Registration System.The identified population was randomized into five equal groups, one for each year of the CHPP. Invitations are dispatched continuously by mail and include information about the CHPP and a prefixed appointment for a health check. Health checks and health behavioural courses will take place at Randers Health Centre and health consultations at the citizen´s general practitioner.

The health check

Besides the addition of fitness testing in the intervention group, the preventive health checks will include assessments of the following: body weight and height, waist circumference, blood pressure, lipid profile (total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and triglycerides), HbA1c and lung function. Moreover, a baseline questionnaire regarding physical activity level, motivation for changing physical activity behaviour, self-rated health, smoking, and alcohol will be answered in connection with the health check. At the end of the health check, the results are presented in a personalized health profile leaflet, which includes recommendations for follow-up according to the risk-profile. The baseline questionnaire and the subsequent follow-up procedures are identical in the two study groups.

Standardization and education

The health check will be conducted by health professionals who have been trained in all measurement procedures as well as in risk communication to ensure standardization and quality. Execution of the health check is further standardized by a written protocol and adherence to the protocol is checked continuously. Furthermore, a process evaluation will be conducted.

Outcome assessment

Cardiorespiratory fitness will be assessed by submaximal cycle ergometer testing. Motivation for changing physical activity behavior will be assessed using the Transtheoretical Model´s Stages of Change, and secondary outcomes using a modified version of the questions developed by Saltin and Grimby and the Short-Form 12, Health Survey, version 2.

Follow up

All participants will receive a questionnaire regarding motivation for changing physical activity behaviour two weeks after the health check and will be invited for fitness testing after one year.

Randomization and blinding

Randomization is handled by a data-manager with no scientific involvement. The eligible population for this trial was defined by the CHPP randomization. Citizens randomized for the third out of five years of the CHPP will be further randomized by household to either intervention or control in the present trial. The intervention, the outcomes, group assignment, and the future outcome assessments in this trial are unrevealed in the invitation for the CHPP. The health behavioural courses and the health consultations will be carried out un-blinded due to the real-life setting. At the one-year follow-up, the personnel assessing the outcomes will be independent and blinded to group allocation.

Sample size

An estimated sample size of 1,500 participants allows for a categorical analysis of fitness level and is calculated on the basis of the following assumptions: 1:1 randomization, false positive error rate of 0.05, power of 0.8, intracluster correlation coefficient of 0.05 and categorical analysis with a power to detect a difference of 10% in the prevalence of very low fitness between the study groups. The investigators determined this 10% difference to be clinically meaningful based on expert opinions and criteria employed in other research. The intracluster correlation coefficient was included to reflect a possible clustering effect of the general practitioners (n = 46), which is seldom greater than 0.05 in primary care settings. The estimated sample size accounts for a 30% loss to follow-up.

Statistics

Statistical analysis will be performed using STATA 12.0 software. Continuous variables are presented as mean ±standard deviation and categorical variables as absolute numbers and relative (%) frequencies. In the comparative analyses Student´s t-test will be used, when comparing means or changes in means of continuous variables and Chi2-test or Fisher's exact t-test, when comparing proportions for categorical variables. Analyses will be adjusted for baseline physical activity. Stratified analyses will be performed on sex and age groups and analysis of motivation will only be performed on the subgroup comprising precontemplaters, contemplaters, and preparators at baseline. All analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle. If appropriate, multiple imputation methods will be applied (using data from social and medical national registries coupled with health check data), and sensitivity analyses will be performed. Moreover, the potential effect of clustering by the general practitioners will be investigated. The statistical significance level is set at p < 0.05.

ETHICS AND LEGAL ASPECTS

The trial will comply with The Declaration of Helsinki and each participant will provide written informed consent for data to be used for research purposes in agreement with the Danish Health Law. Approval by The Danish Data Protection Agency is obtained (2013-41-2527).

Being tested
Health checks with fitness testing, Health checks without fitness testing
Keywords
cardiorespiratory fitness, exercise tolerance, exercise test, health behavior, motor activity, motivation, intention, self-rated health
Medical subject headings
Motor Activity, Health Behavior

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Health checks with fitness testingBehavioural

    Fitness testing as part of a preventive health check compose the intervention in this trial. Thus, the intervention group will receive preventive health checks with fitness testing.

  • Health checks without fitness testingBehavioural

    The active comparator will not receive fitness testing as part of the preventive health checks. With the exception of fitness testing, the preventive health checks in the active comparator group and the intervention group are identical.

Study groups in NCT02224248
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Health checks with fitness testingExperimentalNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Health checks with fitness testing
Health checks without fitness testingActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Health checks without fitness testing

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cardiorespiratory fitness

    Mean cardiorespiratory fitness level and the percentage of participants with very low cardiorespiratory fitness level assessed at the one year follow up will be compared between the two study groups.

    Measured: One-year follow up

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Reported physical inactivity prevalence change

    Change in reported physical inactivity prevalence from baseline to one-year follow up will be compared between the two study groups.

    Measured: Between baseline and the one-year follow up.

  2. Self-rated general health change

    Change in self-rated general health from baseline to the one-year follow up will be compared between the two study groups.

    Measured: From baseline to the one-year follow up.

  3. Self-rated physical health score change

    Change in self-rated physical health scores from baseline to the one-year follow up will be compared between the two study groups.

    Measured: From baseline to the one-year follow up.

  4. Self-rated mental health score change

    Change in self-rated mental health scores from baseline to the one-year follow up will be compared between the two study groups.

    Measured: From baseline to the one-year follow up.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Aug 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2014
  3. Primary completionJun 2016
  4. Study completionJun 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
2,201 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02224248
Sponsor's protocol ID
1-15-1-72-13-09
Status last verified
Dec 2015
First submitted
8 Aug 2014
Last updated
11 Nov 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • DISHMAN R, ICKES W, MORGAN W. Self-motivation and adherence to habitual physical-activity. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1980;10(2):115-132. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1980.tb00697.x.

  • Dalton AR, Soljak M. The nationwide systematic prevention of cardiovascular disease: the UK's health check programme. J Ambul Care Manage. 2012 Jul-Sep;35(3):206-15. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e318240be9d.

    PubMed 22668610
  • Lauritzen T, Jensen MS, Thomsen JL, Christensen B, Engberg M. Health tests and health consultations reduced cardiovascular risk without psychological strain, increased healthcare utilization or increased costs. An overview of the results from a 5-year randomized trial in primary care. The Ebeltoft Health Promotion Project (EHPP). Scand J Public Health. 2008 Aug;36(6):650-61. doi: 10.1177/1403494807090165.

    PubMed 18775821
  • Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ. 2006 Mar 14;174(6):801-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.051351.

    PubMed 16534088
  • Textbook of work physiology. Åstrand & Rodahl. 3rd ed. McGraw Hill 1986.

  • Nigg CR. There is more to stages of exercise than just exercise. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2005 Jan;33(1):32-5.

    PubMed 15640718
  • Saltin B, Grimby G. Physiological analysis of middle-aged and old former athletes. Comparison with still active athletes of the same ages. Circulation. 1968 Dec;38(6):1104-15. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.38.6.1104. No abstract available.

    PubMed 5721960
  • Ware JE, Kosinski M, Turner-Bowker DM, Gandeck B, eds. User∩s manual for the SF-12v2TM health survey (with a supplement documenting the SF-12 health survey). Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated, 2007; 2007.

  • Waters L, Reeves M, Fjeldsoe B, Eakin E. Control group improvements in physical activity intervention trials and possible explanatory factors: a systematic review. J Phys Act Health. 2012 Aug;9(6):884-95. doi: 10.1123/jpah.9.6.884.

    PubMed 22898467
  • Adams G, Gulliford MC, Ukoumunne OC, Eldridge S, Chinn S, Campbell MJ. Patterns of intra-cluster correlation from primary care research to inform study design and analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Aug;57(8):785-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.12.013.

    PubMed 15485730
  • Sterne JA, White IR, Carlin JB, Spratt M, Royston P, Kenward MG, Wood AM, Carpenter JR. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ. 2009 Jun 29;338:b2393. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2393.

    PubMed 19564179
  • Hoj K, Skriver MV, Hansen AL, Christensen B, Maindal HT, Sandbaek A. Effect of including fitness testing in preventive health checks on cardiorespiratory fitness and motivation: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2014 Oct 10;14:1057. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1057.

    PubMed 25300392

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Health checks with fitness testing and Health checks without fitness testing in people with Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Physical Activity, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cardiorespiratory fitness (time frame: One-year follow up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02224248, which also lists 12 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Nov 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in