Cardiorespiratory FitnessNCT02224248
Effect of Including Fitness Testing in Preventive Health Checks on Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Motivation
A study testing Health checks with fitness testing and Health checks without fitness testing in people with Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Physical Activity, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate if including fitness testing in preventive health checks increase cardiorespiratory fitness and motivation to change physical activity behavior compared with preventive health checks without fitness testing. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 49 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Physical Activity, Health Behavior
- What is being tested?
- Health checks with fitness testing and Health checks without fitness testing
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,201 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- Oct 2014to Jun 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 49 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Citizens in the municipality of Randers per 01.01.2012
- Randomized for the third group of five to be invited for a preventive health check as part of the health promotion program, Check your health prevention program, conducted in the years 2012 to 2017.
- Having received a preventive health check before November 30 2015.
- Having consented for data to be used scientifically.
Who cannot join
- Terminal illness as reported by the citizens general practitioner.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Denmark1 site
Institute of public health, section of general practice, Aarhus University
Aarhus C, Aarhus County, 8000
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Including Fitness Testing in Preventive Health Checks on Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Motivation to Change Physical Activity Behaviour
The purpose of this study is to investigate if including fitness testing in preventive health checks increase cardiorespiratory fitness and motivation to change physical activity behavior compared with preventive health checks without fitness testing.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND
Changing unhealthy lifestyle improves health and reduces morbidity. Motivation is a key component in initiation and maintenance of lifestyle changes. Identifying and motivating individuals with unhealthy lifestyle to change behaviour may be achieved through preventive health checks as already implemented in some countries. However, knowledge about the impact of individual components included in preventive health checks is lacking. Consequently, the most effective composition of preventive health checks remains unknown.
In a Danish municipality, the Check your Health Prevention Program (CHPP) was recently initiated, offering preventive health checks to all 30 to 49 year-old citizens. This program provides the unique opportunity to evaluate single components of a preventive health check in a real-life setting. Only a few previous studies have included cardiorespiratory fitness (fitness) testing in a preventive health check. Fitness is associated with multiple health benefits such as improved cardio-metabolic profile and reduced risk of cancer, diabetes, and depression.
The investigators aim to investigate the effect of including fitness testing in preventive health checks on fitness level, motivation for changing physical activity behaviour, physical inactivity prevalence and self-rated health. The investigators hypothesize that fitness testing as part of preventive health checks compared to preventive health checks without fitness testing 1) increases fitness level assessed after one year and the percentage of participants increasing motivation to change physical activity behaviour assessed after two weeks, and 2) reduces physical inactivity prevalence and improves self-rated health scores during the one-year study period.
METHODS
Nested-design
The present trial is embedded in the above mentioned health promotion program, CHPP, which is conducted during the years 2012 to 2017. In the CHPP, all citizens living in the municipality of Randers aged 30-49 years per 1st of January 2012 (n = 26,216) were identified in the Danish Civil Registration System.The identified population was randomized into five equal groups, one for each year of the CHPP. Invitations are dispatched continuously by mail and include information about the CHPP and a prefixed appointment for a health check. Health checks and health behavioural courses will take place at Randers Health Centre and health consultations at the citizen´s general practitioner.
The health check
Besides the addition of fitness testing in the intervention group, the preventive health checks will include assessments of the following: body weight and height, waist circumference, blood pressure, lipid profile (total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and triglycerides), HbA1c and lung function. Moreover, a baseline questionnaire regarding physical activity level, motivation for changing physical activity behaviour, self-rated health, smoking, and alcohol will be answered in connection with the health check. At the end of the health check, the results are presented in a personalized health profile leaflet, which includes recommendations for follow-up according to the risk-profile. The baseline questionnaire and the subsequent follow-up procedures are identical in the two study groups.
Standardization and education
The health check will be conducted by health professionals who have been trained in all measurement procedures as well as in risk communication to ensure standardization and quality. Execution of the health check is further standardized by a written protocol and adherence to the protocol is checked continuously. Furthermore, a process evaluation will be conducted.
Outcome assessment
Cardiorespiratory fitness will be assessed by submaximal cycle ergometer testing. Motivation for changing physical activity behavior will be assessed using the Transtheoretical Model´s Stages of Change, and secondary outcomes using a modified version of the questions developed by Saltin and Grimby and the Short-Form 12, Health Survey, version 2.
Follow up
All participants will receive a questionnaire regarding motivation for changing physical activity behaviour two weeks after the health check and will be invited for fitness testing after one year.
Randomization and blinding
Randomization is handled by a data-manager with no scientific involvement. The eligible population for this trial was defined by the CHPP randomization. Citizens randomized for the third out of five years of the CHPP will be further randomized by household to either intervention or control in the present trial. The intervention, the outcomes, group assignment, and the future outcome assessments in this trial are unrevealed in the invitation for the CHPP. The health behavioural courses and the health consultations will be carried out un-blinded due to the real-life setting. At the one-year follow-up, the personnel assessing the outcomes will be independent and blinded to group allocation.
Sample size
An estimated sample size of 1,500 participants allows for a categorical analysis of fitness level and is calculated on the basis of the following assumptions: 1:1 randomization, false positive error rate of 0.05, power of 0.8, intracluster correlation coefficient of 0.05 and categorical analysis with a power to detect a difference of 10% in the prevalence of very low fitness between the study groups. The investigators determined this 10% difference to be clinically meaningful based on expert opinions and criteria employed in other research. The intracluster correlation coefficient was included to reflect a possible clustering effect of the general practitioners (n = 46), which is seldom greater than 0.05 in primary care settings. The estimated sample size accounts for a 30% loss to follow-up.
Statistics
Statistical analysis will be performed using STATA 12.0 software. Continuous variables are presented as mean ±standard deviation and categorical variables as absolute numbers and relative (%) frequencies. In the comparative analyses Student´s t-test will be used, when comparing means or changes in means of continuous variables and Chi2-test or Fisher's exact t-test, when comparing proportions for categorical variables. Analyses will be adjusted for baseline physical activity. Stratified analyses will be performed on sex and age groups and analysis of motivation will only be performed on the subgroup comprising precontemplaters, contemplaters, and preparators at baseline. All analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle. If appropriate, multiple imputation methods will be applied (using data from social and medical national registries coupled with health check data), and sensitivity analyses will be performed. Moreover, the potential effect of clustering by the general practitioners will be investigated. The statistical significance level is set at p < 0.05.
ETHICS AND LEGAL ASPECTS
The trial will comply with The Declaration of Helsinki and each participant will provide written informed consent for data to be used for research purposes in agreement with the Danish Health Law. Approval by The Danish Data Protection Agency is obtained (2013-41-2527).
- Being tested
- Health checks with fitness testing, Health checks without fitness testing
- Keywords
- cardiorespiratory fitness, exercise tolerance, exercise test, health behavior, motor activity, motivation, intention, self-rated health
- Medical subject headings
- Motor Activity, Health Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Health checks with fitness testingBehavioural
Fitness testing as part of a preventive health check compose the intervention in this trial. Thus, the intervention group will receive preventive health checks with fitness testing.
Health checks without fitness testingBehavioural
The active comparator will not receive fitness testing as part of the preventive health checks. With the exception of fitness testing, the preventive health checks in the active comparator group and the intervention group are identical.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Health checks with fitness testing | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Health checks with fitness testing |
| Health checks without fitness testing | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Health checks without fitness testing |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cardiorespiratory fitness
Mean cardiorespiratory fitness level and the percentage of participants with very low cardiorespiratory fitness level assessed at the one year follow up will be compared between the two study groups.
Measured: One-year follow up
Secondary outcomes (4)
Reported physical inactivity prevalence change
Change in reported physical inactivity prevalence from baseline to one-year follow up will be compared between the two study groups.
Measured: Between baseline and the one-year follow up.
Self-rated general health change
Change in self-rated general health from baseline to the one-year follow up will be compared between the two study groups.
Measured: From baseline to the one-year follow up.
Self-rated physical health score change
Change in self-rated physical health scores from baseline to the one-year follow up will be compared between the two study groups.
Measured: From baseline to the one-year follow up.
Self-rated mental health score change
Change in self-rated mental health scores from baseline to the one-year follow up will be compared between the two study groups.
Measured: From baseline to the one-year follow up.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Aug 2014 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2014
- Primary completionJun 2016
- Study completionJun 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cardiorespiratory FitnessStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of AarhusThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 2,201 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Aarhus
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Randers Municipality, Denmark, Central Denmark Region, TRYG Foundation
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Annelli Sandbæk, Professor, Study chair, Institute of public health, section of general practice, Aarhus University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02224248
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1-15-1-72-13-09
- Status last verified
- Dec 2015
- First submitted
- 8 Aug 2014
- Last updated
- 11 Nov 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
DISHMAN R, ICKES W, MORGAN W. Self-motivation and adherence to habitual physical-activity. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1980;10(2):115-132. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1980.tb00697.x.
Dalton AR, Soljak M. The nationwide systematic prevention of cardiovascular disease: the UK's health check programme. J Ambul Care Manage. 2012 Jul-Sep;35(3):206-15. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e318240be9d.
PubMed 22668610Lauritzen T, Jensen MS, Thomsen JL, Christensen B, Engberg M. Health tests and health consultations reduced cardiovascular risk without psychological strain, increased healthcare utilization or increased costs. An overview of the results from a 5-year randomized trial in primary care. The Ebeltoft Health Promotion Project (EHPP). Scand J Public Health. 2008 Aug;36(6):650-61. doi: 10.1177/1403494807090165.
PubMed 18775821Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ. 2006 Mar 14;174(6):801-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.051351.
PubMed 16534088Textbook of work physiology. Åstrand & Rodahl. 3rd ed. McGraw Hill 1986.
Nigg CR. There is more to stages of exercise than just exercise. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2005 Jan;33(1):32-5.
PubMed 15640718Saltin B, Grimby G. Physiological analysis of middle-aged and old former athletes. Comparison with still active athletes of the same ages. Circulation. 1968 Dec;38(6):1104-15. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.38.6.1104. No abstract available.
PubMed 5721960Ware JE, Kosinski M, Turner-Bowker DM, Gandeck B, eds. User∩s manual for the SF-12v2TM health survey (with a supplement documenting the SF-12 health survey). Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated, 2007; 2007.
Waters L, Reeves M, Fjeldsoe B, Eakin E. Control group improvements in physical activity intervention trials and possible explanatory factors: a systematic review. J Phys Act Health. 2012 Aug;9(6):884-95. doi: 10.1123/jpah.9.6.884.
PubMed 22898467Adams G, Gulliford MC, Ukoumunne OC, Eldridge S, Chinn S, Campbell MJ. Patterns of intra-cluster correlation from primary care research to inform study design and analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Aug;57(8):785-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.12.013.
PubMed 15485730Sterne JA, White IR, Carlin JB, Spratt M, Royston P, Kenward MG, Wood AM, Carpenter JR. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ. 2009 Jun 29;338:b2393. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2393.
PubMed 19564179Hoj K, Skriver MV, Hansen AL, Christensen B, Maindal HT, Sandbaek A. Effect of including fitness testing in preventive health checks on cardiorespiratory fitness and motivation: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2014 Oct 10;14:1057. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1057.
PubMed 25300392
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Nov 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Including Fitness Testing in Preventive Health Checks on Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Motivation to Change Physical Activity Behaviour
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02224248
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1-15-1-72-13-09
- Keywords
- cardiorespiratory fitness, exercise tolerance, exercise test, health behavior, motor activity, motivation, intention, self-rated health
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,201 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AarhusUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Randers Municipality, Denmark, Central Denmark Region, TRYG Foundation
- Study start
- Oct 2014
- Primary completion
- Jun 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Aug 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to investigate if including fitness testing in preventive health checks increase cardiorespiratory fitness and motivation to change physical activity behavior compared with preventive health checks without fitness testing.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND
Changing unhealthy lifestyle improves health and reduces morbidity. Motivation is a key component in initiation and maintenance of lifestyle changes. Identifying and motivating individuals with unhealthy lifestyle to change behaviour may be achieved through preventive health checks as already implemented in some countries. However, knowledge about the impact of individual components included in preventive health checks is lacking. Consequently, the most effective composition of preventive health checks remains unknown.
In a Danish municipality, the Check your Health Prevention Program (CHPP) was recently initiated, offering preventive health checks to all 30 to 49 year-old citizens. This program provides the unique opportunity to evaluate single components of a preventive health check in a real-life setting. Only a few previous studies have included cardiorespiratory fitness (fitness) testing in a preventive health check. Fitness is associated with multiple health benefits such as improved cardio-metabolic profile and reduced risk of cancer, diabetes, and depression.
The investigators aim to investigate the effect of including fitness testing in preventive health checks on fitness level, motivation for changing physical activity behaviour, physical inactivity prevalence and self-rated health. The investigators hypothesize that fitness testing as part of preventive health checks compared to preventive health checks without fitness testing 1) increases fitness level assessed after one year and the percentage of participants increasing motivation to change physical activity behaviour assessed after two weeks, and 2) reduces physical inactivity prevalence and improves self-rated health scores during the one-year study period.
METHODS
Nested-design
The present trial is embedded in the above mentioned health promotion program, CHPP, which is conducted during the years 2012 to 2017. In the CHPP, all citizens living in the municipality of Randers aged 30-49 years per 1st of January 2012 (n = 26,216) were identified in the Danish Civil Registration System.The identified population was randomized into five equal groups, one for each year of the CHPP. Invitations are dispatched continuously by mail and include information about the CHPP and a prefixed appointment for a health check. Health checks and health behavioural courses will take place at Randers Health Centre and health consultations at the citizen´s general practitioner.
The health check
Besides the addition of fitness testing in the intervention group, the preventive health checks will include assessments of the following: body weight and height, waist circumference, blood pressure, lipid profile (total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and triglycerides), HbA1c and lung function. Moreover, a baseline questionnaire regarding physical activity level, motivation for changing physical activity behaviour, self-rated health, smoking, and alcohol will be answered in connection with the health check. At the end of the health check, the results are presented in a personalized health profile leaflet, which includes recommendations for follow-up according to the risk-profile. The baseline questionnaire and the subsequent follow-up procedures are identical in the two study groups.
Standardization and education
The health check will be conducted by health professionals who have been trained in all measurement procedures as well as in risk communication to ensure standardization and quality. Execution of the health check is further standardized by a written protocol and adherence to the protocol is checked continuously. Furthermore, a process evaluation will be conducted.
Outcome assessment
Cardiorespiratory fitness will be assessed by submaximal cycle ergometer testing. Motivation for changing physical activity behavior will be assessed using the Transtheoretical Model´s Stages of Change, and secondary outcomes using a modified version of the questions developed by Saltin and Grimby and the Short-Form 12, Health Survey, version 2.
Follow up
All participants will receive a questionnaire regarding motivation for changing physical activity behaviour two weeks after the health check and will be invited for fitness testing after one year.
Randomization and blinding
Randomization is handled by a data-manager with no scientific involvement. The eligible population for this trial was defined by the CHPP randomization. Citizens randomized for the third out of five years of the CHPP will be further randomized by household to either intervention or control in the present trial. The intervention, the outcomes, group assignment, and the future outcome assessments in this trial are unrevealed in the invitation for the CHPP. The health behavioural courses and the health consultations will be carried out un-blinded due to the real-life setting. At the one-year follow-up, the personnel assessing the outcomes will be independent and blinded to group allocation.
Sample size
An estimated sample size of 1,500 participants allows for a categorical analysis of fitness level and is calculated on the basis of the following assumptions: 1:1 randomization, false positive error rate of 0.05, power of 0.8, intracluster correlation coefficient of 0.05 and categorical analysis with a power to detect a difference of 10% in the prevalence of very low fitness between the study groups. The investigators determined this 10% difference to be clinically meaningful based on expert opinions and criteria employed in other research. The intracluster correlation coefficient was included to reflect a possible clustering effect of the general practitioners (n = 46), which is seldom greater than 0.05 in primary care settings. The estimated sample size accounts for a 30% loss to follow-up.
Statistics
Statistical analysis will be performed using STATA 12.0 software. Continuous variables are presented as mean ±standard deviation and categorical variables as absolute numbers and relative (%) frequencies. In the comparative analyses Student´s t-test will be used, when comparing means or changes in means of continuous variables and Chi2-test or Fisher's exact t-test, when comparing proportions for categorical variables. Analyses will be adjusted for baseline physical activity. Stratified analyses will be performed on sex and age groups and analysis of motivation will only be performed on the subgroup comprising precontemplaters, contemplaters, and preparators at baseline. All analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle. If appropriate, multiple imputation methods will be applied (using data from social and medical national registries coupled with health check data), and sensitivity analyses will be performed. Moreover, the potential effect of clustering by the general practitioners will be investigated. The statistical significance level is set at p < 0.05.
ETHICS AND LEGAL ASPECTS
The trial will comply with The Declaration of Helsinki and each participant will provide written informed consent for data to be used for research purposes in agreement with the Danish Health Law. Approval by The Danish Data Protection Agency is obtained (2013-41-2527).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Health checks with fitness testing | Experimental | Behavioral: Health checks with fitness testing |
| Health checks without fitness testing | Active comparator | Behavioral: Health checks without fitness testing |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 49 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Citizens in the municipality of Randers per 01.01.2012
- Randomized for the third group of five to be invited for a preventive health check as part of the health promotion program, Check your health prevention program, conducted in the years 2012 to 2017.
- Having received a preventive health check before November 30 2015.
- Having consented for data to be used scientifically.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Terminal illness as reported by the citizens general practitioner.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Health checks with fitness testingFitness testing as part of a preventive health check compose the intervention in this trial. Thus, the intervention group will receive preventive health checks with fitness testing. | Behavioural | Health checks with fitness testing |
| Health checks without fitness testingThe active comparator will not receive fitness testing as part of the preventive health checks. With the exception of fitness testing, the preventive health checks in the active comparator group and the intervention group are identical. | Behavioural | Health checks without fitness testing |
Primary outcome
Cardiorespiratory fitness
Time frame: One-year follow up
Mean cardiorespiratory fitness level and the percentage of participants with very low cardiorespiratory fitness level assessed at the one year follow up will be compared between the two study groups.
4 secondary outcomes
Reported physical inactivity prevalence change
Time frame: Between baseline and the one-year follow up.
Self-rated general health change
Time frame: From baseline to the one-year follow up.
Self-rated physical health score change
Time frame: From baseline to the one-year follow up.
Self-rated mental health score change
Time frame: From baseline to the one-year follow up.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Nov 2016.
- BackgroundDISHMAN R, ICKES W, MORGAN W. Self-motivation and adherence to habitual physical-activity. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1980;10(2):115-132. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1980.tb00697.x.
- Background: PubMed 22668610Dalton AR, Soljak M. The nationwide systematic prevention of cardiovascular disease: the UK's health check programme. J Ambul Care Manage. 2012 Jul-Sep;35(3):206-15. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e318240be9d.
- Background: PubMed 18775821Lauritzen T, Jensen MS, Thomsen JL, Christensen B, Engberg M. Health tests and health consultations reduced cardiovascular risk without psychological strain, increased healthcare utilization or increased costs. An overview of the results from a 5-year randomized trial in primary care. The Ebeltoft Health Promotion Project (EHPP). Scand J Public Health. 2008 Aug;36(6):650-61. doi: 10.1177/1403494807090165.
- Background: PubMed 16534088Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ. 2006 Mar 14;174(6):801-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.051351.
- BackgroundTextbook of work physiology. Åstrand & Rodahl. 3rd ed. McGraw Hill 1986.
- Background: PubMed 15640718Nigg CR. There is more to stages of exercise than just exercise. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2005 Jan;33(1):32-5.
- Background: PubMed 5721960Saltin B, Grimby G. Physiological analysis of middle-aged and old former athletes. Comparison with still active athletes of the same ages. Circulation. 1968 Dec;38(6):1104-15. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.38.6.1104. No abstract available.
- BackgroundWare JE, Kosinski M, Turner-Bowker DM, Gandeck B, eds. User∩s manual for the SF-12v2TM health survey (with a supplement documenting the SF-12 health survey). Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated, 2007; 2007.
- Background: PubMed 22898467Waters L, Reeves M, Fjeldsoe B, Eakin E. Control group improvements in physical activity intervention trials and possible explanatory factors: a systematic review. J Phys Act Health. 2012 Aug;9(6):884-95. doi: 10.1123/jpah.9.6.884.
- Background: PubMed 15485730Adams G, Gulliford MC, Ukoumunne OC, Eldridge S, Chinn S, Campbell MJ. Patterns of intra-cluster correlation from primary care research to inform study design and analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Aug;57(8):785-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.12.013.
- Background: PubMed 19564179Sterne JA, White IR, Carlin JB, Spratt M, Royston P, Kenward MG, Wood AM, Carpenter JR. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ. 2009 Jun 29;338:b2393. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2393.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25300392Hoj K, Skriver MV, Hansen AL, Christensen B, Maindal HT, Sandbaek A. Effect of including fitness testing in preventive health checks on cardiorespiratory fitness and motivation: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2014 Oct 10;14:1057. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1057.
- World Health Organization. Global action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases 2013-2020Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Cardiorespiratory Fitness
Not yet recruiting
Threshold-Based Versus Range-Based Exercise Intensity Prescription in Cardiac Rehabilitation
Cardiovascular Diseases, Cardiac Rehabilitation
Recruiting
Effects of a Community-based Multicomponent Physical Exercise Program on Physical Function, Frailty, and Sarcopenia in Older Adults From the Municipality of Santoña: a Quasi-experimental Study.
Frailty/Sarcopenia, Frailty in Older Adults
Recruiting
EXercise-induced PhysioLogical Adaptations In Neurological Disorders
Epilepsy, Functional Neurological Disorder
Recruiting
Multimodal Prehabilitation in Patients With Lung Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Therapy
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Physiological and Performance Characteristics of HYROX Athletes
Physical Fitness, Athletic Performance
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Annelli Sandbæk, Professor study chair
Institute of public health, section of general practice, Aarhus University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Health checks with fitness testing and Health checks without fitness testing in people with Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Physical Activity, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cardiorespiratory fitness (time frame: One-year follow up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02224248, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Nov 2016.