AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal SinusNCT02222298

Video Assisted Ablation of Pilonidal Sinus Versus Conventional Treatment

A study testing Video assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus and Bascom Cleft lift procedure in people with Chronic Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus, run by Federico II University at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Video assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus (VAAPS) is a new endoscopic minimally invasive treatment. In an attempt to validate the effectiveness of the VAAPS, the investigators have designed a comparative study between the conventional and the minimally invasive treatment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus
What is being tested?
Video assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus and Bascom Cleft lift procedure
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
300 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
Apr 2012to Nov 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Chronic sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus

Who cannot join

  • Absence of consent to the study
  • Acute abscess

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • University of Naples "Federico II"

    Naples, Italy, 80131

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Video Assisted Ablation of Pilonidal Sinus Versus Convention Off-midline Bas Com Cleft Lift Procedure

Video assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus (VAAPS) is a new endoscopic minimally invasive treatment. In an attempt to validate the effectiveness of the VAAPS, the investigators have designed a comparative study between the conventional and the minimally invasive treatment. Two surgical procedures were evaluated: VAAPS (Experimental group) and conventional excision with a Bascom out-midline closure (Control group).

Being tested
Video assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus, Bascom Cleft lift procedure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Video assisted ablation of pilonidal sinusProcedure or surgery

    A 5-phases' technique. The 1st phase is to insert the endoscope through the external opening (orifice). In the patients that had more than one opening the lower pit is used for access. The 2nd phase is to identify the sinus cavity and its lateral tracks. The endoscope is advanced along the pathway using slow movements, left/right and up/down. These manoeuvres and the saline solution, used as distension medium, allow the sinus cavity to accommodate the endoscope. Additionally mechanical adhesiolysis with the forceps grasping could be useful. The 3rd phase is to identify the presence of hair and its removal. The 4th phase phase is to obtain complete ablation of sinus cavity. The sinus cavity and its lateral tracks are destroyed with the electrode under continuous direct vision. The 5th phase is to obtain the accurate cleaning of sinus cavity. The saline solution flow allows the elimination of any necrotic material. A Volkmann spoon could be useful to complete the cleaning.

  • Bascom Cleft lift procedureProcedure or surgery

Study groups in NCT02222298
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
VAAPS groupExperimentalpatients undergoing video assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus
Receives: Procedure: Video assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus
conventional treatment groupActive comparatorpatients undergoing conventional off-midline Bascom cleft lift procedure
Receives: Procedure: Bascom Cleft lift procedure

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Infection

    Wound infection was defined as redness and/or oedema of the skin and/or discharge.

    Measured: at 30 days after surgery

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. recurrence

    recurrence was defined when symptoms of the disease recurred after an interval following complete wound healing.

    Measured: at 1 year after surgery

  2. return at work

    Measured: up to 30 days after surgery

  3. Pain

    A vas-score scale (0-10) will be used

    Measured: up to 30 days after surgery

  4. satisfaction

    a Vas-score scale (0-10) and a SF_36 model will be used

    Measured: up to six months after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Aug 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2012
  3. Primary completionNov 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
300 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02222298
Sponsor's protocol ID
framar
Status last verified
Nov 2015
First submitted
19 Aug 2014
Last updated
3 Nov 2015
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Video assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus and Bascom Cleft lift procedure in people with Chronic Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus, run by Federico II University at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Nov 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Infection (time frame: at 30 days after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Nov 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in