Occupational HealthNCT02215239
Development of Workplace Physical Activity Promotion Models in Taiwan
A study testing Workplace intervention in people with Occupational Health, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of intervention applying WHO Healthy Workplace Framework and Model to enhance the level of physical activity on employees. This research is an experimental intervention study recruiting two working types in four workplaces. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Occupational Health
- What is being tested?
- Workplace intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 240 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- Jan 2014to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Workers tend to be seated or standing during work hours.
- Basic capability to read or verbal communication in Chinese.
Who cannot join
- No other critical diseases or unstable cardiopulmonary disease, diabetes, hypertension or neurological diseases.
- No pregnancy.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Taiwan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, 115
Meng-Yueh Chien, Doctor, 02-33668141, mychien@ntu.edu.tw
About this study
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of intervention applying WHO Healthy Workplace Framework and Model to enhance the level of physical activity on employees. This research is an experimental intervention study recruiting two working types in four workplaces. Two working types are: (1) Working type A: Workers tend to be seated during work hours. Two telecommunications enterprises will respectively stand for the experiment group and the control group. (2) Working type B: Workers tend to be standing during work hours. Likewise, two different enterprises will respectively stand for the experiment group and the control group. Purposive sampling method will be used to select the experiment group. The intervention plan is to implement a cyclic or iterative process recommended by WHO.
Read the detailed description
Several evidences have shown that regular physical activity could benefit not only to a healthy lifestyle, but also reduce mortality rate. However, the number of people who perform regular physical activity are still in a low proportion of world population. In Taiwan, people are mostly inactive and have low level of physical activity at their workplaces. Therefore, developing a healthy workplace could encourage employees to get into the habit of regular exercise, relieve stress, improve interaction of social activity and build a healthy life style. Meanwhile, regular exercise could improve coherence, morale and higher satisfaction, productive efficiency, corporate image and competitiveness. Previous studies have shown inconsistent effects in promoting physical activity in the workplace. Therefore, determining the effects of comprehensive model using in interventions at workplaces is needed. . The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of intervention applying WHO Healthy Workplace Framework and Model to enhance the level of physical activity on employees. This research is an experimental intervention study recruiting two working types in four workplaces. Two working types are: (1) Working type A: Workers tend to be seated during work hours. Two telecommunications enterprises will respectively stand for the experiment group and the control group. (2) Working type B: Workers tend to be standing during work hours. Likewise, two different enterprises will respectively stand for the experiment group and the control group. The intervention plan is to implement a cyclic or iterative process recommended by WHO. The process includes eight steps: (1) Mobilize; (2) Assemble; (3) Assess; (4) Prioritize; (5) Plan; (6) Do; (7) Evaluate; (8) Improve. By gaining the commitment from the highest authority in the enterprise and communicated to all workers and their representatives, we will be able to assemble a Healthy Workplace Team who will work on implementing change in the workplace. As well as assembling the Team, it is also essential to assemble other resources that will be required, such as locations, time, budgets or working supplies, to ensure the committee has the resources necessary to do the work. Assessments on both the present situation of the enterprise and the present situation with respect to the health of workers are required in order to set priorities among the many issues identified. When developing a health plan, we focus on different phases of exercise and prescribe individualized physical activity program., in the mean while, the power of social learning and environmental support are critical in making a sustainable improvement in the workplace. The details of the actions to be taken may contain educational workshop, pedometer using, setting fixed period of time for physical activities, providing excellent health and fitness improvement prize, email and text reminder about exercise information, holding outdoor physical activities on a regular time schedule for employee, and propagating internal and external resources. Re-evaluation and modification will be performed at the end of 16-weeks intervention, and then the second year's study will be planned and designed. In the present study, before intervention, we will require a confidential survey and health risk assessments about personal health condition base on employees will. The assessments include basic data and medical record, level of physical activity, health-related fitness, sleep quality and daytime sleepiness, depression scale, exercise stages, self-evaluation of fitness and exercise capacity, self-efficacy in exercise, SmartIn(SI) system, and working performance evaluation. The purpose of the study is to access the effect of implementing The WHO Healthy Workplace Framework and Model on different working types in different workplaces, by developing method that address the physical and psychosocial working environments, as well as promoting workers' health and creating health-promoting working environments, the result is expected to provide better information for the Health Promotion Administration in future policy-making.
- Conditions
- Occupational Health
- Being tested
- Workplace intervention
- Keywords
- health lifestyle, health promotion, occupational health, Work site health promotion
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Workplace interventionBehavioural
WHO Healthy Workplace Framework and Model. The intervention plan is to implement a cyclic or iterative process recommended by WHO. The process includes eight steps: (1) Mobilize; (2) Assemble; (3) Assess; (4) Prioritize; (5) Plan; (6) Do; (7) Evaluate; (8) Improve. We focus on different phases of exercise and prescribe individualized physical activity program.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Working type A & Workplace intervention | Experimental | Participants: Workers tend to be seated during work hours. Intervention: WHO Healthy Workplace Framework and Model. Duration: 16 weeks. Receives: Behavioral: Workplace intervention |
| Working type A & Usual care | No intervention | Participants: Workers tend to be standing during work hours. Intervention: Usual care. Duration: 16 weeks. |
| Working type B & Workplace intervention | Experimental | Participants: Workers tend to be standing during work hours. Intervention: WHO Healthy Workplace Framework and Model. Duration: 16 weeks. Receives: Behavioral: Workplace intervention |
| Working type B & Usual care | No intervention | Participants: Workers tend to be standing during work hours. Intervention: Usual care. Duration: 16 weeks. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change of health-related physical fitness from baseline to 16-week
Health-related physical fitness including:
- body composition (body weight, height, waist and hip circumferences)
- flexibility (sit-to-reach, cm)
- muscle strength (grip strength of dominant hand, kg)
- muscle endurance (sit-up in one minute, times/min)
- cardiopulmonary endurance (stepping in three minutes, heart rate and physical exercise index)
Measured: 16 weeks
Secondary outcomes (4)
Change of physical activity from baseline to 16-week
Using 7-Day Physical Activity Recall questionnaire and actigraph to investigate level of physical activity in the participants
Measured: 16 weeks
Change of sleep quality from baseline to 16-week
Using Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and actigraph to investigate sleep quality in the participants
Measured: 16 weeks
Change of depression symptoms from baseline to 16-week
Using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale to investigate level of depression in the participants
Measured: 16 weeks
Change of stress from baseline to 16-week
Using SmartIn system to investigate level of psychological stress in the participants
Measured: 16 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Aug 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2014
- Primary completionDec 2015 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2015 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Occupational HealthStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Taiwan University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 240 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Meng-Yueh Chien, Principal investigator, National Taiwan University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02215239
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 201310041RINA
- Status last verified
- Mar 2015
- First submitted
- 11 Aug 2014
- Last updated
- 17 Mar 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Mar 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Development of Workplace Physical Activity Promotion Models in Taiwan
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02215239
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 201310041RINA
- Conditions
- Occupational Health
- Keywords
- health lifestyle, health promotion, occupational health, Work site health promotion
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 240 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2014
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Aug 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of intervention applying WHO Healthy Workplace Framework and Model to enhance the level of physical activity on employees. This research is an experimental intervention study recruiting two working types in four workplaces. Two working types are: (1) Working type A: Workers tend to be seated during work hours. Two telecommunications enterprises will respectively stand for the experiment group and the control group. (2) Working type B: Workers tend to be standing during work hours. Likewise, two different enterprises will respectively stand for the experiment group and the control group. Purposive sampling method will be used to select the experiment group. The intervention plan is to implement a cyclic or iterative process recommended by WHO.
Detailed description
Several evidences have shown that regular physical activity could benefit not only to a healthy lifestyle, but also reduce mortality rate. However, the number of people who perform regular physical activity are still in a low proportion of world population. In Taiwan, people are mostly inactive and have low level of physical activity at their workplaces. Therefore, developing a healthy workplace could encourage employees to get into the habit of regular exercise, relieve stress, improve interaction of social activity and build a healthy life style. Meanwhile, regular exercise could improve coherence, morale and higher satisfaction, productive efficiency, corporate image and competitiveness. Previous studies have shown inconsistent effects in promoting physical activity in the workplace. Therefore, determining the effects of comprehensive model using in interventions at workplaces is needed. . The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of intervention applying WHO Healthy Workplace Framework and Model to enhance the level of physical activity on employees. This research is an experimental intervention study recruiting two working types in four workplaces. Two working types are: (1) Working type A: Workers tend to be seated during work hours. Two telecommunications enterprises will respectively stand for the experiment group and the control group. (2) Working type B: Workers tend to be standing during work hours. Likewise, two different enterprises will respectively stand for the experiment group and the control group. The intervention plan is to implement a cyclic or iterative process recommended by WHO. The process includes eight steps: (1) Mobilize; (2) Assemble; (3) Assess; (4) Prioritize; (5) Plan; (6) Do; (7) Evaluate; (8) Improve. By gaining the commitment from the highest authority in the enterprise and communicated to all workers and their representatives, we will be able to assemble a Healthy Workplace Team who will work on implementing change in the workplace. As well as assembling the Team, it is also essential to assemble other resources that will be required, such as locations, time, budgets or working supplies, to ensure the committee has the resources necessary to do the work. Assessments on both the present situation of the enterprise and the present situation with respect to the health of workers are required in order to set priorities among the many issues identified. When developing a health plan, we focus on different phases of exercise and prescribe individualized physical activity program., in the mean while, the power of social learning and environmental support are critical in making a sustainable improvement in the workplace. The details of the actions to be taken may contain educational workshop, pedometer using, setting fixed period of time for physical activities, providing excellent health and fitness improvement prize, email and text reminder about exercise information, holding outdoor physical activities on a regular time schedule for employee, and propagating internal and external resources. Re-evaluation and modification will be performed at the end of 16-weeks intervention, and then the second year's study will be planned and designed. In the present study, before intervention, we will require a confidential survey and health risk assessments about personal health condition base on employees will. The assessments include basic data and medical record, level of physical activity, health-related fitness, sleep quality and daytime sleepiness, depression scale, exercise stages, self-evaluation of fitness and exercise capacity, self-efficacy in exercise, SmartIn(SI) system, and working performance evaluation. The purpose of the study is to access the effect of implementing The WHO Healthy Workplace Framework and Model on different working types in different workplaces, by developing method that address the physical and psychosocial working environments, as well as promoting workers' health and creating health-promoting working environments, the result is expected to provide better information for the Health Promotion Administration in future policy-making.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Working type A & Workplace intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: Workplace interventionParticipants: Workers tend to be seated during work hours. Intervention: WHO Healthy Workplace Framework and Model. Duration: 16 weeks. |
| Working type A & Usual care | No intervention | –Participants: Workers tend to be standing during work hours. Intervention: Usual care. Duration: 16 weeks. |
| Working type B & Workplace intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: Workplace interventionParticipants: Workers tend to be standing during work hours. Intervention: WHO Healthy Workplace Framework and Model. Duration: 16 weeks. |
| Working type B & Usual care | No intervention | –Participants: Workers tend to be standing during work hours. Intervention: Usual care. Duration: 16 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Workers tend to be seated or standing during work hours.
- Basic capability to read or verbal communication in Chinese.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- No other critical diseases or unstable cardiopulmonary disease, diabetes, hypertension or neurological diseases.
- No pregnancy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Workplace interventionWHO Healthy Workplace Framework and Model. The intervention plan is to implement a cyclic or iterative process recommended by WHO. The process includes eight steps: (1) Mobilize; (2) Assemble; (3) Assess; (4) Prioritize; (5) Plan; (6) Do; (7) Evaluate; (8) Improve. We focus on different phases of exercise and prescribe individualized physical activity program. | Behavioural | Working type A & Workplace intervention, Working type B & Workplace intervention |
Primary outcome
Change of health-related physical fitness from baseline to 16-week
Time frame: 16 weeks
Health-related physical fitness including: 1. body composition (body weight, height, waist and hip circumferences) 2. flexibility (sit-to-reach, cm) 3. muscle strength (grip strength of dominant hand, kg) 4. muscle endurance (sit-up in one minute, times/min) 5. cardiopulmonary endurance (stepping in three minutes, heart rate and physical exercise index)
4 secondary outcomes
Change of physical activity from baseline to 16-week
Time frame: 16 weeks
Change of sleep quality from baseline to 16-week
Time frame: 16 weeks
Change of depression symptoms from baseline to 16-week
Time frame: 16 weeks
Change of stress from baseline to 16-week
Time frame: 16 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Mar 2015.
Related trials for Occupational Health
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Collection and Distribution of Samples From Healthy Donors for In Vitro Research at the NCI-Frederick
Healthy Donors
Active, not recruiting
Online Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for the Mental Health of Healthcare Professionals
Occupational Stress or Workplace Stress, Burnout, Professionals
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Circadian Clock Proteins in Gingival Crevicular Fluid of Individuals With and Without Circadian Rhythm Disruption
Gingivitis, Circadian Rhythm Disruption
Recruiting
Development & Validation of a Life Balance Program for Parents of Preschoolers: A Pilot Study
Parenting Stress, Mental Health
Not yet recruiting
The Health Literacy for Healthier Mind Study
Health Literacy, Occupational Health
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Meng-Yueh Chien principal investigator
National Taiwan University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Workplace intervention in people with Occupational Health, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Mar 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Meng-Yueh Chien, Doctor (+886-2-33668141, mychien@ntu.edu.tw), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change of health-related physical fitness from baseline to 16-week (time frame: 16 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Mar 2015.