AzTrials
AzTrials

Atopic DermatitisPhase 2NCT02211417

Oral DS107 in Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

A Phase 2 study testing Oral DS107 in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Dignity Sciences Ltd. at 14 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will compare the safety and efficacy of Oral DS107 (2 g) to placebo in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Oral DS107 (2 g) will be orally administered for 8 weeks, and will be compared against placebo. This study will enroll approximately 100 adult patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Atopic Dermatitis
What is being tested?
Oral DS107
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
102 participants
Where
14 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Jan 2015to Dec 2015
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female subject aged 18 years and older.
  • Moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.

Who cannot join

  • Clinically significant impairment of renal or hepatic function.
  • History of hypersensitivity to any substance in Oral DS107 or placebo capsules.
  • Treatment with any experimental drug within 30 days prior to Day 0 visit (baseline).
  • Excessive sun exposure, use of tanning booths or other ultraviolet (UV) light sources and/or is planning a trip to sunny climate.

Trial locations and contacts

14 sites in 2 countries.

14 sites in 2 countries

United States8 sites
  • Dignity Sciences investigational site

    Arlington Heights, Illinois

  • Dignity Sciences investigational site

    Hazleton, Pennsylvania

  • Dignity Sciences investigational site

    New York, New York

  • Dignity Sciences investigational site

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  • Dignity Sciences investigational site

    Rochester, New York

  • Dignity Sciences investigational site

    Verona, New Jersey

  • Dignity Sciences investigational site

    Warren, Michigan

  • Dignity Sciences investigational site

    West Dundee, Illinois

Other trials in United States

Canada6 sites
  • Dignity Sciences investigational site

    Calgary, Alberta

  • Dignity Sciences investigational site

    Drummondville, Quebec

  • Dignity Sciences investigational site

    Edmonton, Alberta

  • Dignity Sciences investigational site

    Markham, Ontario

  • Dignity Sciences investigational site

    Montreal, Quebec

  • Dignity Sciences investigational site

    Windsor, Ontario

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Orally Administered DS107G to Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

This study will compare the safety and efficacy of Oral DS107 (2 g) to placebo in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.

Oral DS107 (2 g) will be orally administered for 8 weeks, and will be compared against placebo.

This study will enroll approximately 100 adult patients.

Read the detailed description

Subjects will come to the clinic on 6 occasions: at screening, baseline, week 2, week 4, week 8 (end of treatment/early termination) and week 10 (follow-up). The primary efficacy variable will be the IGA. Secondary efficacy variables will include IGA (Investigator's Global Assessment), SCORAD (Scoring Atopic Dermatitis) Visual Analog Scale (VAS), EASI, BSA (Body Surface Area), POEM (Patient Orientated Eczema Measure), DLQI (Dermatology Life Quality Index).

Being tested
Oral DS107, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Dermatitis, Atopic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Oral DS107Drug

    Also called DGLA (Dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid) 500 mg gelatin capsule

  • PlaceboDrug

    Also called Liquid paraffin capsule to mimic Oral DS107 500 mg gelatin capsule

Study groups in NCT02211417
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Oral DS107 2gExperimentalOral DS1072g, 4 x 500mg capsules administered orally once a day
Receives: Drug: Oral DS107
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPlacebo capsules matching Oral DS107 capsules
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of Patients Achieving an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) and a Decrease of at Least 2 Points in IGA at Week 8.

    The IGA is a global assessment of the current state of the disease. It is a 6-point morphological assessment of overall disease severity and will be determined according to the following definitions: 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe) and 5 (very severe). The scale uses clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation and oozing/crusting as scoring guidelines for the overall severity assessment. A decrease in IGA indicates a positive outcome for the participant.

    Measured: Week 8

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Change From Baseline in IGA at Week 2, 4 and 8.

    The IGA is a global assessment of the current state of the disease. It is a 6-point morphological assessment of overall disease severity and will be determined according to the following definitions: 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe) and 5 (very severe). The scale uses clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation and oozing/crusting as scoring guidelines for the overall severity assessment. A decrease in IGA indicates a positive outcome for the participant.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4 and Week 8

  2. Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 2, 4 and 8.

    EASI quantifies the severity of a patient's AD based on both lesion severity and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI is a composite score ranging from 0-72 that takes into account the degree of erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each scored from 0 to 3 separately, half points are permitted) for each of four body regions, with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The severity of each sign is assessed using a 4-point scale (half points are permitted):

    • 0 = no symptoms
    • 1 = slight
    • 2 = moderate
    • 3 = marked

    A decrease in EASI score indicates a positive outcome for the participant.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4 and Week 8

  3. Proportion of Patients Achieving at Least a 1-point Decrease in IGA at Week 8.

    The IGA is a global assessment of the current state of the disease. It is a 6-point morphological assessment of overall disease severity and will be determined according to the following definitions: 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe) and 5 (very severe). The scale uses clinical characteristics of erythema, infiltration, papulation and oozing/crusting as scoring guidelines for the overall severity assessment. A decrease in IGA indicates a positive outcome for the participant.

    Measured: Up to 8 weeks.

  4. Change From Baseline in the Patient Orientated Eczema Measure (POEM) at Week 2, 4 and 8.

    The Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) is a self-assessment of disease severity by the patient. POEM has a maximum value of twenty-eight based on the patient's response to seven questions scored according to the following scale:

    • No Days = 0
    • 1-2 Days = 1
    • 3-4 Days = 2
    • 5-6 Days = 3
    • Everyday = 4

    POEM scale ranges from 0 to 28. 0 to 2 = clear or almost clear. 3 to 7 = mild eczema. 8 to 16 = moderate eczema. 17 to 24 = severe eczema. 25 to 28 = very severe eczema.

    Lower scores on the scale represent a better outcome for the patient.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4 and Week 8

  5. Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 2, 4 and 8.

    The DLQI is a simple 10-question validated questionnaire measuring the impact of a patients skin problem over a 1 week period, which was completed at each visit, except screening. The DLQI is calculated by summing the score of each question resulting in a maximum of 30 and a minimum of 0. The higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired. The DLQI can also be expressed as a percentage of the maximum possible score of 30.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4 and Week 8

  6. Change From Baseline in Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Week 2, 4 and 8.

    The SCORAD grading system was developed by the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis and has been a standard tool to assess the AD severity in clinical studies. Six items (erythema, edema/papulation, oozing/crusts, excoriation, lichenification, and dryness) was selected to evaluate the AD severity. The intensity of each item is graded using a 4-point scale:

    • 0 = No symptoms
    • 1 = Mild
    • 2 = Moderate
    • 3 = Severe The overall BSA affected by AD was evaluated (from 0 to 100%) and included in the SCORAD scores. Loss of sleep and pruritus were evaluated by patients on a visual analog scale (0-10). The sum of these measures represents the SCORAD which can vary from 0 to 103. A decrease in SCORAD indicates a positive outcome for the participant.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4 and Week 8

  7. Change From Baseline in the Patient's Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pruritus Score at Week 2, 4 and 8.

    The pruritus severity score was recorded with the SCORAD measurement and was evaluated as a separate endpoint. This was evaluated by asking subjects to indicate on the 10-cm scale (0-10) of the assessment form the point corresponding to the average value for the last three days/nights. A lower score represents a better outcome for the patient.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4 and Week 8

  8. Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 2, 4 and 8.

    One patient's palm represents 1% of his/her total BSA. For all study visits except at screening, the BSA of involved skin will be measured with the SCORAD measurement and evaluated as a separate endpoint.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4 and Week 8

  9. Number of Participants With TEAEs in Each Treatment Group

    Number of participants with at least 1 TEAE.

    Measured: Up to 14 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Aug 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2015
  3. Primary completionNov 2015
  4. Study completionDec 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
102 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02211417
Sponsor's protocol ID
DS107G-02
Status last verified
Sep 2022
First submitted
5 Aug 2014
Last updated
7 Oct 2022
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Scollan ND, Choi NJ, Kurt E, Fisher AV, Enser M, Wood JD. Manipulating the fatty acid composition of muscle and adipose tissue in beef cattle. Br J Nutr. 2001 Jan;85(1):115-24. doi: 10.1079/bjn2000223.

    PubMed 11227040
  • Kawashima H, Toyoda-Ono Y, Suwa Y, Kiso Y. Subchronic (13-week) oral toxicity study of dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid (DGLA) oil in rats. Food Chem Toxicol. 2009 Jun;47(6):1280-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2009.03.001. Epub 2009 Mar 9.

    PubMed 19275928
  • Makrides M, Simmer K, Neumann M, Gibson R. Changes in the polyunsaturated fatty acids of breast milk from mothers of full-term infants over 30 wk of lactation. Am J Clin Nutr. 1995 Jun;61(6):1231-3. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/61.6.1231.

    PubMed 7762522
  • Teraoka N, Kawashima H, Shiraishi-Tateishi A, Tanaka T, Nakamura J, Kakutani S, Kiso Y. Oral supplementation with dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid-enriched oil altered serum fatty acids in healthy men. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2009 Jun;73(6):1453-5. doi: 10.1271/bbb.90112. Epub 2009 Jun 7.

    PubMed 19502748
  • Tanaka T, Kakutani S, Horikawa C, Kawashima H, Kiso Y. Oral supplementation with dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid (DGLA)-enriched oil increases serum DGLA content in healthy adults. Lipids. 2012 Jun;47(6):643-6. doi: 10.1007/s11745-012-3664-3. Epub 2012 Mar 14.

    PubMed 22411689

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Oral DS107 in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Dignity Sciences Ltd. at 14 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 14 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Oct 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of Patients Achieving an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) and a Decrease of at Least 2 Points in IGA at Week 8. (time frame: Week 8). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02211417, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Oct 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in