AzTrials
AzTrials

Atopic DermatitisPhase 2NCT02210780

Study of Dupilumab and Immune Responses in Adults With Atopic Dermatitis (AD)

A Phase 2 study testing Dupilumab in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 42 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This was a 32-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study assessing immunization responses to vaccination in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis who are treated with subcutaneous dupilumab. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 64 years
Conditions the study is for
Atopic Dermatitis
What is being tested?
Dupilumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
194 participants
Where
42 sitesUnited States
Study dates
5 Aug 2014to 15 Sep 2015
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 64 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female adults ages 18 to 64 years with Chronic AD (according to the American Academy of Dermatology Consensus Criteria, [Eichenfeld 2004])that has been present for at least 3 years before the screening visit
  • Participants with documented recent history (within 6 months before the screening visit) of inadequate response to a sufficient course of outpatient treatment with topical AD medication(s), or for whom topical AD therapies are otherwise inadvisable (e.g., because of side effects or safety risks).
  • Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score ≥16 at the screening visit and the baseline visit
  • Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score ≥3 (on the 0-4 IGA scale) at the screening and baseline visits
  • ≥10% body surface area (BSA) of AD involvement at the screening and baseline visits

Who cannot join

  • Prior treatment with dupilumab (REGN668/ SAR231893)
  • Patients needing >10 mg of daily prednisone (including equivalent doses of other steroids) or high dose systemic corticosteroids (≥2 mg/kg) for 14 days or longer during the 16 week treatment period of the study
  • History of Guillain-Barre syndrome
  • History of severe allergic reaction to either vaccine or to vaccine components including alum, thimerosal, phenol
  • Patients with a severe reaction to natural rubber latex products (some packaging components of the vaccines contain rubber latex and may cause a reaction in susceptible individuals)
  • Treatment with biologics within 4 months of baseline visit
  • Chronic or acute infection requiring treatment with antibiotics, antivirals, antiparasitics, antifungals within 4 weeks before screening visit or superficial skin infections within 1 week of screening visit
  • The information listed above is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial and not all inclusion/ exclusion criteria are listed.

Trial locations and contacts

42 sites in 1 country.

42 sites in 1 country

United States42 sites
  • Study site

    Albuquerque, New Mexico

  • Study site

    Ann Arbor, Michigan

  • Study site

    Arlington, Texas

  • Study site

    Austin, Texas

  • Study site

    Birmingham, Alabama

  • Study site

    Boston, Massachusetts

  • Study site

    Buffalo, New York

  • Study site

    Charleston, South Carolina

  • Study site

    Chicago, Illinois

  • Study site

    Cleveland, Ohio

  • Study site

    Denver, Colorado

  • Study site

    Forest Hills, New York

  • Study site

    Fort Smith, Arkansas

  • Study site

    Greer, South Carolina

  • Study site

    Hackensack, New Jersey

  • Study site

    Houston, Texas

  • Study site

    Indianapolis, Indiana

  • Study site

    Jacksonville, Florida

  • Study site

    Long Beach, California

  • Study site

    Los Angeles, California

  • Study site

    Macon, Georgia

  • Study site

    Maywood, Illinois

  • Study site

    Medford, Oregon

  • Study site

    Miami, Florida

  • Study site

    Mission Viejo, California

  • Study site

    New York, New York

  • Study site

    Norman, Oklahoma

  • Study site

    Overland Park, Kansas

  • Study site

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Plainfield, Indiana

  • Study site

    Portland, Oregon

  • Study site

    Richmond, Virginia

  • Study site

    Rolling Hills Estates, California

  • Study site

    San Diego, California

  • Study site

    Santa Monica, California

  • Study site

    Seattle, Washington

  • Study site

    St Louis, Missouri

  • Study site

    Tampa, Florida

  • Study site

    Troy, Michigan

  • Study site

    Tulsa, Oklahoma

  • Study site

    Webster, Texas

  • Study site

    West Dundee, Illinois

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Study Investigating Vaccine Responses in Adults With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis Treated With Dupilumab

This was a 32-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study assessing immunization responses to vaccination in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis who are treated with subcutaneous dupilumab.

Being tested
Dupilumab, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Dermatitis, Atopic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • DupilumabDrug

    Also called REGN668, SAR231893, Dupixent

    Administered via subcutaneous injection.

  • PlaceboDrug

    An inactive substance containing no medicine administered via subcutaneous injection.

Study groups in NCT02210780
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Placebo qwExperimentalTwo subcutaneous injections of Placebo (for Dupilumab) as a loading dose on Day 1 followed by a single injection qw from Week 1 to Week 15.
Receives: Drug: Placebo
Dupilumab 300 mg qwExperimentalTwo subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 300 mg (for a total of 600 mg) as a loading dose on Day 1, followed by a single 300 mg injection qw from Week 1 to Week 15.
Receives: Drug: Dupilumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With a Positive Response (≥4-Fold Increase) to Tetanus Toxoid (the Adacel [Tdap] Vaccine) at Week 16

    A positive response was defined as a ≥ 4-fold increase from pre-vaccination at baseline in anti-tetanus immunoglobulin G (IgG) titer for participants with a pre-vaccination tetanus antibody titers ≥ 0.1 IU/ml or a titer of ≥ 0.2 IU/ml for participants with pre-vaccination titers of <0.1 IU/ml. There was no planned statistical hypothesis testing regarding the difference in immune response between the 2 treatment groups for this study, therefore no formal statistical hypothesis between groups was performed.

    Measured: Week 16

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Percentage of Participants With a Positive Response (≥2-Fold Increase) to Tetanus Toxoid (the Adacel [Tdap] Vaccine) at Week 16

    Participants with positive response defined as a ≥2-fold increase from pre-vaccination baseline in anti-tetanus IgG titer for participants with pre-vaccination tetanus antibody titers ≥0.1 IU/ml or a titer of ≥0.2 IU/ml for participants with pre-vaccination titers of <0.1 IU/ml.

    Measured: Week 16

  2. Percentage of Participants With a Positive Response (SBA Antibody Titer of ≥8 for Serogroup C) to Menomune Vaccine at Week 16

    A positive response to the Menomune vaccine was a serum bactericidal antibody (SBA) titer of ≥8 for serogroup C.

    Measured: Week 16

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of "0" or "1" at Week 16

    IGA was an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response was an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing IGA scores at Week 16 were counted as non-responders.

    Measured: Week 16

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving an Eczema Area and Severity Index-50 (EASI-50) (≥50% Improvement From Baseline) at Week 16

    The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of atopic dermatitis (AD) and measures erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. EASI-50 responders were the participants who achieved ≥50% overall improvement in EASI score from baseline to Week 16. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing EASI score at Week 16 were counted as non-responders.

    Measured: Week 16

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving an Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (EASI-75) (≥75% Improvement From Baseline) at Week 16

    The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of atopic dermatitis (AD) and measures erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. EASI-75 responders were the participants who achieved ≥75% overall improvement in EASI score from baseline to Week 16. Values after first rescue treatment use were set to missing and participants with missing EASI score at Week 16 were considered as non-responders.

    Measured: Week 16

  6. Change From Baseline in Peak Weekly Averaged Pruritis Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores at Week 16

    Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: how would a participant rate his itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Weekly average obtained in the 7-day period prior to the baseline visit. Values after first rescue medication use were set to missing and missing values were imputed by Last observation carried forward (LOCF).

    Measured: Baseline to Week 16

  7. Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected by AD at Week 16

    BSA affected by AD was assessed for each section of the body (the possible highest score for each region was: head and neck [9%], anterior trunk [18%], back [18%], upper limbs [18%], lower limbs [36%], and genitals [1%]). It was reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined. Values after first rescue medication use were set to missing and missing values were imputed by LOCF.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 16

  8. Change From Baseline in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) Components (Erythema, Infiltration/Papulation, Excoriations and Lichenification) at Week 16

    Individual components of the AD lesions (erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriations, and lichenification) were rated globally (each assessed for the whole body, not by anatomical region) on a 4-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe) using the EASI severity grading criteria. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 12 (severe disease). Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing. Analysis was completed using MMRM model which includes treatment, randomization strata, visit, baseline value, treatment-by-visit interaction, and baseline-by-visit interaction as covariates. These results are observed results without imputation.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 16

  9. Changes From Baseline in GISS Cumulative Score to Week 16

    Individual components of the AD lesions (erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriations, and lichenification) were rated globally (each assessed for the whole body, not by anatomical region) on a 4-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe) using the EASI severity grading criteria. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 12 (severe disease). Values after first rescue medication use were set to missing and missing values were imputed by LOCF.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 16

  10. Change in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Score From Baseline to Week 16

    The POEM was a 7-item questionnaire that assesses disease symptoms (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) with a scoring system of 0 (absent disease) to 28 (severe disease) (high score indicative of poor quality of life [QOL]). Values after first rescue medication use were set to missing and missing values were imputed by LOCF.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 16

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Aug 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start5 Aug 2014
  3. Primary completion15 Sep 2015
  4. Study completion15 Sep 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
194 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02210780
Sponsor's protocol ID
R668-AD-1314
Status last verified
Apr 2020
First submitted
5 Aug 2014
Last updated
7 May 2020
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Mickevicius T, Pink AE, Bhogal M, O'Brart D, Robbie SJ. Dupilumab-Induced, Tralokinumab-Induced, and Belantamab Mafodotin-Induced Adverse Ocular Events-Incidence, Etiology, and Management. Cornea. 2023 Apr 1;42(4):507-519. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003162. Epub 2022 Dec 15.

    PubMed 36525340

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Dupilumab in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 42 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 42 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 May 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With a Positive Response (≥4-Fold Increase) to Tetanus Toxoid (the Adacel [Tdap] Vaccine) at Week 16 (time frame: Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02210780, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 May 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in