AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple SclerosisPhase 3TERIKIDSNCT02201108

Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Teriflunomide in Pediatric Patients With Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis

A Phase 3 study testing Teriflunomide in people with Multiple Sclerosis, run by Genzyme, a Sanofi Company at 57 sites in 22 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Primary Objective: To assess the effect of teriflunomide in comparison to placebo on disease activity measured by time to first clinical relapse after randomization in children and adolescents 10 to 17 years of age with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 10 to 17 years
Conditions the study is for
Multiple Sclerosis
What is being tested?
Teriflunomide
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
166 participants
Where
57 sitesin 22 countries
Study dates
16 Jul 2014to 29 Jul 2024
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 10 to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

None listed.

Who cannot join

  • Expanded disability status scale score greater than 5.5 at screening or randomization visits.
  • Relapse within 30 days prior to randomization.
  • Treated with:
  • glatiramer acetate, interferons, or dimethyl fumarate within 1 month prior to randomization.
  • fingolimod, or intravenous immunoglobulins within 3 months prior to randomization.
  • natalizumab, other immunosuppressant or immunomodulatory agents such as cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, cyclosporine, methotrexate, mycophenolate, within 6 months prior to randomization.
Show all 13Show fewer
  • cladribine or mitoxantrone within 2 years prior to randomization.
  • Treated with alemtuzumab at any time.
  • History of human immunodeficiency virus infection.
  • Contraindication for MRI.
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding females or those who plan to become pregnant during the study.
  • Female participants of child-bearing potential not using highly effective contraceptive method (contraception in both female and male was required).
  • The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Trial locations and contacts

57 sites in 22 countries.

57 sites in 22 countries

China12 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 156001

    Beijing, 100034

  • Investigational Site Number : 156002

    Beijing, 100045

  • Investigational Site Number : 156010

    Beijing, 100730

  • Investigational Site Number : 156006

    Changchun, 130021

  • Investigational Site Number : 156007

    Changsha, 410011

  • Investigational Site Number : 156008

    Chengdu, 610041

  • Investigational Site Number : 156005

    Chongqing, 400014

  • Investigational Site Number : 156012

    Guangzhou, 510630

  • Investigational Site Number : 156003

    Shanghai, 200092

  • Investigational Site Number : 156004

    Shanghai, 201102

  • Investigational Site Number : 156011

    Shijiazhuang, 050000

  • Investigational Site Number : 156009

    Taiyuan, 030001

Other trials in China

Turkey (Türkiye)6 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 792002

    Ankara, 06100

  • Investigational Site Number : 792001

    Ankara, 06500

  • Investigational Site Number : 792006

    Istanbul, 34390

  • Investigational Site Number : 792003

    Istanbul, 34688

  • Investigational Site Number : 792008

    Izmir, 35210

  • Investigational Site Number : 792007

    Izmir

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

Russia5 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 643001

    Moscow, 127566

  • Investigational Site Number : 643003

    Nizhny Novgorod, 603155

  • Investigational Site Number : 643004

    Novosibirsk, 630087

  • Investigational Site Number : 643005

    Saint Petersburg, 197022

  • Investigational Site Number : 643002

    Saint Petersburg, 197110

Other trials in Russia

United States4 sites
  • Massachusetts General Hospital Site Number : 840002

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • North Central Neurology Associates, PC Site Number : 840003

    Cullman, Alabama, 35058

  • Raleigh Neurology Associates Site Number : 840004

    Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607

  • Axiom Clinical Research of Florida Site Number : 840012

    Tampa, Florida, 33609-4052

Other trials in United States

France4 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 250001

    Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94270

  • Investigational Site Number : 250002

    Lyon, 69394

  • Investigational Site Number : 250003

    Rennes, 35033

  • Investigational Site Number : 250005

    Toulouse, 31059

Other trials in France

Tunisia3 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 788001

    Manouba, 2020

  • Investigational Site Number : 788002

    Sfax, 3029

  • Investigational Site Number : 788004

    Sfax, 3029

Other trials in Tunisia

Belgium2 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 056002

    Ghent, 9000

  • Investigational Site Number : 056001

    Leuven, 3000

Other trials in Belgium

Greece2 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 300002

    Athens, 115 27

  • Investigational Site Number : 300001

    Thessaloniki, 54642

Other trials in Greece

Israel2 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 376001

    Jerusalem, 91120

  • Investigational Site Number : 376003

    Tel HaShomer, 52621

Other trials in Israel

Morocco2 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 504004

    Fes

  • Investigational Site Number : 504005

    Marrakesh, 40000

Other trials in Morocco

North Macedonia2 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 807002

    Shtip, 2000

  • Investigational Site Number : 807001

    Skopje, 1000

Other trials in North Macedonia

Ukraine2 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 804001

    Kharkiv, 61068

  • Investigational Site Number : 804002

    Kharkiv, 61068

Other trials in Ukraine

United Kingdom2 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 826003

    Birmingham, B4 6NH

  • Investigational Site Number : 826001

    London, London, City of, SE1 7EH

Other trials in United Kingdom

Bulgaria1 site
  • Investigational Site Number : 100001

    Sofia, 1113

Other trials in Bulgaria

Canada1 site
  • Investigational Site Number : 124001

    Calgary, Alberta, T3B 6A8

Other trials in Canada

Estonia1 site
  • Investigational Site Number : 233001

    Tallinn, 10617

Other trials in Estonia

Lebanon1 site
  • Investigational Site Number : 422001

    Beirut, 11-0236

Other trials in Lebanon

Lithuania1 site
  • Investigational Site Number : 440001

    Kaunas, 50161

Other trials in Lithuania

Netherlands1 site
  • Investigational Site Number : 528001

    Rotterdam, 3015 CN

Other trials in Netherlands

Portugal1 site
  • Investigational Site Number : 620001

    Coimbra, 3000-075

Other trials in Portugal

Serbia1 site
  • Investigational Site Number : 688002

    Belgrade, 11000

Other trials in Serbia

Spain1 site
  • Investigational Site Number : 724002

    Murcia, 30120

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: A Two Year, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Trial to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Teriflunomide Administered Orally Once Daily in Pediatric Patients With Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis Followed by an Open-Label Extension

Primary Objective:

To assess the effect of teriflunomide in comparison to placebo on disease activity measured by time to first clinical relapse after randomization in children and adolescents 10 to 17 years of age with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS).

Secondary Objective:

  • To assess the effect of teriflunomide in comparison to placebo on disease activity/progression measured by brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and on cognitive function.
  • To evaluate the safety and tolerability of teriflunomide in comparison to placebo.
  • To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of teriflunomide.
Read the detailed description

The study duration included a screening period up to 4 weeks, a double-blind treatment period of up to 96 weeks, an open-label period which included the remainder of the initial 96 weeks, where applicable, and a 96-week extension, i.e., up to a maximum of 192 weeks after randomization. There was a follow-up period of 4 weeks for participants discontinuing treatment.

Within the 96 weeks double-blind treatment period, the first 4 weeks were PK run-in phase in which PK samples (blood samples) were collected from participants and then 4 weeks of analysis (no samples drawn). The PK run-in phase (total 8 weeks) was intended to provide individual PK parameters to allow the dose adjustment to the 14 milligrams (mg) adult-equivalent dose for the rest of the study.

Participants who experienced a relapse after the PK run-in phase (8 weeks) and confirmed by the Relapse Adjudication Panel and participants who fulfilled MRI criteria (high number of new lesions at weeks 36, 48 or 72 compared to previous images) had the option to continue in an open-label teriflunomide treatment arm up to 192 weeks from randomization.

An optional additional extension period was available for young participants with teriflunomide until the participants are 18 years old and/or able to switch to commercial product, whichever comes first.

Being tested
Teriflunomide, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Multiple Sclerosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TeriflunomideDrug

    Also called AUBAGIO, HMR1726

    Pharmaceutical form:film-coated tablet, Route of administration: oral

  • PlaceboDrug

    Pharmaceutical form:tablet, Route of administration: oral

Study groups in NCT02201108
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorMatching placebo tablets
Receives: Drug: Placebo
TeriflunomideExperimentalTeriflunomide oral tablet, three dosages (3.5, 7 or 14 mg) to reach 14 mg adult equivalent
Receives: Drug: Teriflunomide

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to First Confirmed Clinical Relapse

    Time to first clinical relapse was defined as the duration (in weeks) between randomization and first confirmed clinical relapse. Clinical relapses were defined as new or recurrent neurological symptoms not associated with fever or infection, lasting at least 24 hours, and accompanied by new objective neurological findings upon neurological examination and documented by a standardized, quantified functional system score (FSSs) which included 8 items and items were rated on different scales: brain stem, cerebellar and cerebral functions rated on a scale of 0 to 5; visual, pyramidal, sensory and bowel/bladder rated on a scale of 0 to 6 and ambulation on a scale of 0 to 12, where higher score in each scale indicated worsened neurological function. Confirmed clinical relapse were reviewed and confirmed by an independent Relapse Adjudication Panel (RAP). A participant without confirmed clinical relapse, was considered as clinical relapse free until the end of Week 96.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 96

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. Probability of Participants Who Were Clinical Relapse Free at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168 and 192

    Participant was considered free of clinical relapse if the participant had no confirmed clinical relapse before treatment discontinuation/completion in 192 weeks treatment period. Clinical relapses: new/recurrent neurological symptoms not associated with fever/infection, lasted at least 24 hours, and accompanied by new objective neurological findings upon neurological examination and documented by standardized, quantified FSSs which included 8 items: rated on different scales: brain stem, cerebellar and cerebral functions rated on scale of 0 to 5; visual, pyramidal, sensory and bowel/bladder rated on scale of 0 to 6 \& ambulation on scale of 0 to 12, where higher score in each scale indicated worsened neurological function. New/recurrent symptoms occurred less than 30 days following onset of relapse were considered part of same relapse. Probability of participants who were clinical relapse free at specified weeks were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and reported.

    Measured: Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168 and 192

  2. Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Number of New or Enlarged T2 Lesions Per MRI Scan

    Number of new or enlarged T2 lesions per scan was defined as the total number of new or enlarged T2 lesion that occurred during the 192 weeks treatment period divided by the total number of scans performed during 192 weeks. To account for the different numbers of scans performed among the participants, a negative binomial regression model with robust variance estimation was used. The model included the total number of new or enlarged T2-lesions as the response variable, with treatment group, region, pubertal status and age as covariates and log-transformed number of scans as an offset variable.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 192

  3. Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment: Number of T1 Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing T1 Lesions Per MRI Scan

    The number of T1 Gd-Enhancing lesions per scan was defined as the total number of Gd-enhancing lesions that occurred during the 192 weeks treatment period divided by the total number of scans performed during 192 weeks. To account for the different number of scans performed among the participants, a negative binomial regression model with robust variance estimation was used. The model included the total number of T1-lesions as the response variable, with treatment group, region, pubertal status and age as covariates and log-transformed number of scans as an offset variable.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 192

  4. Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment: Change From Baseline in Volume of T2 Lesions at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 144 and 192

    Volume of T2 lesions was measured by MRI scan.

    Measured: Baseline, DB period: Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96; OL period: Weeks 48, 96, 144 and 192

  5. Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment: Change From Baseline in Volume of T1 Hypointense Lesions

    Volume of T1 hypointense lesions was measured by MRI scan.

    Measured: Baseline, DB period: Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96; OL period: Weeks 48, 96, 144 and 192

  6. Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment: Number of New T1 Hypointense Lesions Per MRI Scan

    The number of new T1 hypointense lesions were obtained from MRI scans.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 192

  7. Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment: Percentage of Participants Free of New or Enlarged MRI T2-Lesions

    Percentage of participants who were free of new or enlarged T2 lesions at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 144 and 192 were reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 144 and 192

  8. Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment: Percent Change From Baseline in Brain Volume at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 144 and 192

    Percent change from baseline in brain volume (assessed using MRI scans of the Brain) at Weeks 24, 36, 48,72, 96, 144 and 192 was reported.

    Measured: Baseline, DB period: Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96; OL period: Weeks 48, 96, 144 and 192

  9. Cognitive Assessment: Change From Baseline in Total Number of Correct Substitutions Measured by Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168 and 192

    SDMT measures the time to pair abstract symbols with specific numbers. It is a simple substitution task that gives the examinee 90 seconds to pair specific numbers with given geometric figures as a measure for screening cognitive impairment. The SDMT score is the number of correct substitution and ranged from 0 (worst outcome) to 110 (best outcome), where higher score indicated better cognitive function.

    Measured: Baseline, DB period: Weeks 24, 48, 72 and 96; OL period: Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168 and 192

  10. Cognitive Assessment: Change From Baseline in Number of Completed Items Measured by Symbol Digit Modalities Test at Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168 and 192

    SDMT measures the time to pair abstract symbols with specific numbers. It is a simple substitution task that gives the examinee 90 seconds to pair specific numbers with given geometric figures as a measure for screening cognitive impairment. The SDMT score is the number of completed items and ranged from 0 (worst outcome) to 110 (best outcome), where higher score indicated better cognitive function.

    Measured: Baseline, DB period: Weeks 24, 48, 72 and 96; OL period: Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168 and 192

  11. Cognitive Assessment: Change From Baseline in Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R) Scores at Weeks 96 and 192

    The BVMT consists of three trials in which participants must recall shapes by drawing figures on a blank page (response booklet) after being given the opportunity to memorize the figures (given in BMVT-R form) for 10 seconds. BMVT-R form consists of six figures. Points are awarded based on the accuracy of the drawn figure and by correct placement on the blank page. A minimum of 0 to 12 points/scores are awarded per trial, so a participant can score between 0 and 36 points for all three trials (by adding the points/score from each trial), where higher score indicates better outcome.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 96 and 192

  12. Cognitive Assessment: Change From Baseline in Trail Making Test- Part A (TMT-A) Test Scores (in Seconds) at Week 96 and 192

    'Trail Making Test Part A' is a neuropsychological test of visual attention and task switching. The task requires a participant to 'connect-the-dots' of 25 consecutive numbers (1,2, 3, etc.) in sequential order on a sheet of paper or computer screen. The goal of the participant is to finish the test as quickly as possible, and the time taken to complete the test used as the primary performance metric (in seconds). This is a timed test and the number of seconds to complete the task is recorded. Maximum time allowed is 300 seconds. A lower score indicated better cognitive function.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 96 and 192

  13. Cognitive Assessment: Change From Baseline in Trail Making Test B (TMT-B) Test Scores (in Seconds) at Weeks 96 and 192

    TMT-B is a cognitive test that gives a measure of various aspects of cognitive performance. It is used to measure cognitive fatigue. The test consisted of 25 circles containing 13 sequential numbers (1 to 13) and 12 sequential letters (A to L) positioned. The test evaluates the time (in seconds) to correctly order letters and numbers in alternate order (1, A, 2, B etc.). Maximum time allowed is 300 seconds, where less time/lower score indicated better cognitive function/performance.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 96 and 192

  14. Cognitive Assessment: Change From Baseline in Beery Visual-motor Integration (BVMI) Scores at Weeks 96 and 192

    The Beery VMI is a non-verbal assessment that assessed the extent to which individuals can integrate their visual and motor abilities. The participants were provided with geometric designs ranging from simple line drawings to more complex figures and were asked to copy the designs. The test consisted of 24 figures. One point was scored for each successful copy of drawings and no scoring was given when the participant failed to copy the drawings properly. Each successful copying of drawings was summed up and the total was scored on a scale ranged from 0 to 24, where higher score indicated better visual construction skills/better visual and motor abilities and lower score indicated poor visual construction skills/poor visual and motor abilities.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 96 and 192

  15. Cognitive Assessment: Change From Baseline in Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence-II (WASI-II) Vocabulary Total Raw Scores at Weeks 96 and 192

    The WASI-II: Vocabulary test is a quick estimate of an individual's level of intellectual functioning which comprised of 31 total items that required the participant to orally define 3 images and 28 words presented both orally and visually. Items 1 to 3 rated on a score of 0 or 1, items 4 and 5 rated on a score of 0 or 2, items 6 to 31 rated on a scale of 0 to 2. Each item score was summed up to derive the total score which ranged from 0 (minimum score) to 59 (maximum score), where higher score indicated better level of intellectual functioning/higher level of intelligence.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 96 and 192

  16. Cognitive Assessment: Change From Baseline in Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Letter Fluency Total Correct Raw Score at Weeks 96 and 192

    Letter Fluency is a condition measured in the D-KEFS. Participants were asked to name as many words as they can, starting with a specified letter for 60 seconds. The words cannot be names, places, numbers or grammatical variants of previous answers. Repeated answers were not scored as a correct response. There were 3 trials, with 3 different letters. The total number of correct responses was totaled for all 3 trials and a letter fluency score was given. A higher score was considered better. There was no set range as the score depends on how many correct words the participant relays in the given time period.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 96 and 192

  17. Cognitive Assessment: Change From Baseline in Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Category Fluency Total Correct Raw Score at Weeks 96 and 192

    Category Fluency is a condition measured in the D-KEFS. It measured participant's ability to generate words from three different categories (e.g., fruits, vegetables and animals), within a minute for each category. Total score was number of correct words for each category with no points for repetitions or non-words. Score ranged from 0 to unlimited, where 0 = low score, higher score indicated better performance.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 96 and 192

  18. Cognitive Assessment - Selective Reminding Test (SRT): Change From Baseline in Total Number of Words on Delayed Recall at Weeks 96 and 192

    SRT is a test to assess verbal learning and memory. During the administration of the SRT only the examiner and the participant should be in the testing room. A list of twelve words was read aloud by the examiner at a rate of one word per two seconds. The participant is asked to recall all twelve words after a 30 minute delay. Only the words that were missed on the preceding trial were given in the consecutive trial. The total score represented a sum score of total 6 trials, therefore the score range was from 0 to 72. The lower the score the worse the outcome, higher score indicated better recall.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 96 and 192

  19. DB: Pharmacokinetics: Steady-state Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Teriflunomide

    Ctrough was defined as the concentration reached by the drug before the next dose administered. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed separately for each dose of Teriflunomide. PK samples for teriflunomide 3.5 mg were collected during the first 8 weeks but all participants were switched to teriflunomide 7 mg after Week 8. Hence, plasma concentration of teriflunomide 7 mg and 14 mg were reported.

    Measured: Predose on Week 36

  20. OL: Time to First Confirmed Clinical Relapse

    Time to first clinical relapse was defined as duration (in weeks) after enrollment in OL period and first confirmed clinical relapse. Clinical relapses were defined as new or recurrent neurological symptoms not associated with fever or infection, lasted at least 24 hours and accompanied by new objective neurological findings upon neurological examination and documented by standardized, quantified FSSs which included 8 items and items were rated on different scales: brain stem, cerebellar \& cerebral functions rated on scale of 0 to 5; visual, pyramidal, sensory and bowel/bladder rated on scale of 0 to 6 and ambulation on scale of 0 to 12 where higher score in each scale indicated worsened neurological function. Confirmed clinical relapse were reviewed and confirmed by independent RAP. Participant without confirmed clinical relapse, was considered as clinical relapse free until end of Week 192.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 192

  21. OL: Pharmacokinetics: Steady-state Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Teriflunomide

    Ctrough was defined as the concentration reached by the drug before the next dose is administered. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed separately for each dose of teriflunomide. PK samples for teriflunomide 3.5 mg were collected during the first 8 weeks but all participants were switched to teriflunomide 7 mg after Week 8. Hence, plasma concentration of teriflunomide 7 mg and 14 mg were reported.

    Measured: Pre-dose at Week 36

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Jul 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start16 Jul 2014
  3. Primary completion25 Oct 2019
  4. Study completion29 Jul 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
166 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02201108
Sponsor's protocol ID
EFC11759
Other IDs
U1111-1124-0983, 2011-005249-12
Acronym
TERIKIDS
Status last verified
Jan 2025
First submitted
17 Jul 2014
Last updated
6 Feb 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org

Publications

  • Chitnis T, Banwell B, Kappos L, Arnold DL, Gucuyener K, Deiva K, Saubadu S, Hu W, Benamor M, Le-Halpere A, Truffinet P, Tardieu M. Teriflunomide in pediatric patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: Open-label extension of TERIKIDS. Mult Scler. 2024 Jun;30(7):833-842. doi: 10.1177/13524585241242050. Epub 2024 Apr 15.

    PubMed 38619037
  • Kuhle J, Chitnis T, Banwell B, Tardieu M, Arnold DL, Rawlings AM, Geertsen SS, Lublin AL, Saubadu S, Truffinet P, Kappos L. Plasma neurofilament light chain in children with relapsing MS receiving teriflunomide or placebo: A post hoc analysis of the randomized TERIKIDS trial. Mult Scler. 2023 Mar;29(3):385-394. doi: 10.1177/13524585221144742. Epub 2023 Jan 12.

    PubMed 36632983
  • Chitnis T, Banwell B, Kappos L, Arnold DL, Gucuyener K, Deiva K, Skripchenko N, Cui LY, Saubadu S, Hu W, Benamor M, Le-Halpere A, Truffinet P, Tardieu M; TERIKIDS Investigators. Safety and efficacy of teriflunomide in paediatric multiple sclerosis (TERIKIDS): a multicentre, double-blind, phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2021 Dec;20(12):1001-1011. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00364-1.

    PubMed 34800398

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Teriflunomide in people with Multiple Sclerosis, run by Genzyme, a Sanofi Company at 57 sites in 22 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 57 sites in China, Turkey (Türkiye), Russia, United States, France and 17 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Nov 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time to First Confirmed Clinical Relapse (time frame: Baseline up to Week 96). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02201108, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Feb 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in