GlioblastomaPhase 2NCT02179086
Dose-Escalated Photon IMRT or Proton Beam Radiation Therapy Versus Standard-Dose Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
A Phase 2 study testing Photon Beam Radiation Therapy, Proton Beam Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide in people with Glioblastoma, run by NRG Oncology at 237 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
This randomized phase II trial studies how well dose-escalated photon intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or proton beam radiation therapy works compared with standard-dose radiation therapy when given with temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Glioblastoma
- What is being tested?
- Photon Beam Radiation Therapy, Proton Beam Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 624 participants
- Where
- 237 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 4 Dec 2014to 7 Jul 2030
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- PRIOR TO STEP 1 REGISTRATION
- A diagnostic contrast-enhanced MRI (no other scan type allowed) of the brain must be performed postoperatively; the residual enhancing tumor and/or resection cavity must have a maximal diameter of 5 cm or less; the tumor diameter will be the greatest diameter as measured on the contrast-enhanced postoperative MRI and will include residual disease and/or the postoperative surgical cavity as appropriate
- The postoperative brain MRI should be obtained within 72 hours of resection; if it is not obtained within 72 hours post-resection, then an MRI obtained 2 weeks or longer after surgery is required and can be utilized to ensure maximal diameter of residual tumor and/or resection cavity is 5 cm or less
- For cases where a gross total resection of enhancing tumor is performed, but postoperative surgical cavity is NOT identifiable, the patient will be excluded from the trial
- Tumor tissue must be available for submission for central pathology review
- Timing requirements:
Show all 36Show fewer
- If MGMT has been assessed locally by LabCorps or MD Anderson Cancer Center Molecular Diagnostics Lab (MDACC-MDL):
- Tissue for central pathology review and central MGMT assessment and the official LabCorps or MDACC-MDL MGMT result must be received by the NRG Oncology Biospecimen Bank on or before postoperative calendar day 40
- The site's local MGMT report from LabCorp or MDACC-MDL will then be used to stratify the patient; a post-stratification MGMT central review will be performed, but step 2 registration and protocol treatment can proceed without central review of MGMT
- Patients whose tissue for central pathology review and official LabCorps or MDACC-MDL MGMT result cannot be received by NRG Oncology Biospecimen Bank on or before 40 calendar days after surgery may NOT enroll on this trial, as central pathology review and stratification will not be complete in time for the patient to start treatment within 49 calendar days following surgery
- If MGMT has not been assessed locally by LabCorps or MDACC-MDL:
- Tissue for central pathology review and central MGMT assessment must be received by the NRG Oncology Biospecimen Bank on or before postoperative calendar day 30
- Central MGMT analysis will be performed at MDACC-MDL and used for patient stratification; results will be conveyed to NRG Oncology within 10 business days of receipt of the tissue
- Patients who have not had local MGMT assessment by LabCorps or MDACC-MDL and whose tissue for central pathology review cannot be received by NRG Oncology Biospecimen Bank on or before 30 calendar days after surgery may NOT enroll on this trial, as central pathology review and stratification will not be complete in time for the patient to start treatment within 49 calendar days following surgery
- Tissue Requirements:
- Patients must have at least 1 block of tumor tissue; submission of 2 blocks is strongly encouraged to maximize the chances of eligibility; in total, at least 1 cubic centimeter of tissue composed primarily of tumor must be present
- Submission of an accompanying hematoxylin and eosin H\&E slide(s) is MANDATORY
- Diagnosis must be made by surgical excision, either partial or complete; stereotactic biopsy and cavitronic ultrasonic surgical (CUSA) techniques are not allowed
- The tumor must be located in the supratentorial compartment only (any component involving the brain stem or cerebellum is not allowed)
- Patients must provide study-specific informed consent prior to step 1 registration
- PRIOR TO STEP 2 REGISTRATION
- Histologically proven diagnosis of glioblastoma (World Health Organization [WHO] grade IV) confirmed by central review prior to step 2 registration
- Tumor tissue that is determined by central pathology review prior to step 2 registration to be of sufficient quantity for central analysis of MGMT status
- History/physical examination within 28 days prior to step 2 registration
- The patient must have recovered from effects of surgery, postoperative infection, and other complications within 28 days prior to step 2 registration
- Documentation of steroid doses within 28 days prior to step 2 registration
- Karnofsky performance status >= 70 within 28 days prior to step 2 registration
- Age >= 18
- Complete blood count (CBC)/differential obtained within 28 days prior to step 2 registration
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >= 1,500 cells/mm^3 (obtained within 28 days prior to step 2 registration)
- Platelets >= 100,000 cells/mm^3 (obtained within 28 days prior to step 2 registration)
- Hemoglobin >= 10.0 g/dl (obtained within 28 days prior to step 2 registration) (note: the use of transfusion or other intervention to achieve hemoglobin [Hgb] >= 10.0 g/dl is acceptable)
- Bilirubin =< 1.5 upper limit of normal (ULN) (within 28 days prior to step 2 registration)
- Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) =< 3 x ULN (within 28 days prior to step 2 registration)
- Negative serum pregnancy test obtained for females of child-bearing potential within 28 days prior to step 2 registration
- As of Amendment 2, if the registering site is a photon center (registering patients to group I), the patient must agree to participate in the advanced imaging sub-study
Who cannot join
- Prior invasive malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin cancer) unless disease-free for a minimum of 3 years; (for example, carcinoma in situ of the breast, oral cavity, or cervix are all permissible)
- Recurrent or multifocal malignant gliomas
- Any site of distant disease (for example, drop metastases from the GBM tumor site)
- Prior chemotherapy or radiosensitizers for cancers of the head and neck region; note that prior chemotherapy for a different cancer is allowable (except temozolomide)
- Prior use of Gliadel wafers or any other intratumoral or intracavitary treatment are not permitted
- Prior radiotherapy to the head or neck (except for T1 glottic cancer), resulting in overlap of radiation fields
Show all 25Show fewer
- Severe, active co-morbidity, defined as follows:
- Unstable angina at step 2 registration
- Transmural myocardial infarction within the last 6 months prior to step 2 registration
- Evidence of recent myocardial infarction or ischemia by the findings of S-T elevations of >= 2 mm using the analysis of an electrocardiogram (EKG) performed within 28 days prior to step 2 registration (Note: EKG to be performed only if clinical suspicion of cardiac issue)
- New York Heart Association grade II or greater congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization within 12 months prior to step 2 registration
- Serious and inadequately controlled arrhythmia at step 2 registration
- Serious or non-healing wound, ulcer or bone fracture or history of abdominal fistula, intra-abdominal abscess requiring major surgical procedure, open biopsy or significant traumatic injury within 28 days prior to step 2 registration, with the exception of the craniotomy for surgical resection
- Acute bacterial or fungal infection requiring intravenous antibiotics at the time of step 2 registration
- Hepatic insufficiency resulting in clinical jaundice and/or coagulation defects; note, however, that laboratory tests for coagulation parameters are not required for entry into this protocol
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation or other respiratory illness requiring hospitalization or precluding study therapy at the time of step 2 registration
- Acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) based upon current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definition; note, however, that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing is not required for entry into this protocol; the need to exclude patients with AIDS from this protocol is because the treatments involved in this protocol may be significantly immunosuppressive with potentially fatal outcomes in patients already immunosuppressed
- Any other severe immunocompromised condition
- Active connective tissue disorders, such as lupus or scleroderma, that in the opinion of the treating physician may put the patient at high risk for radiation toxicity
- End-stage renal disease (ie, on dialysis or dialysis has been recommended)
- Any other major medical illnesses or psychiatric treatments that in the investigator's opinion will prevent administration or completion of protocol therapy
- Pregnancy or women of childbearing potential and men who are sexually active and not willing/able to use medically acceptable forms of contraception; this exclusion is necessary because the treatment involved in this study may be significantly teratogenic
- Patients treated on any other therapeutic clinical protocols within 30 days prior to step 2 registration
- Inability to undergo MRI (e.g., due to safety reasons, such as presence of a pacemaker, or severe claustrophobia)
- Postoperative tumor plus surgical bed size exceeds 5 cm in maximum diameter
Trial locations and contacts
237 sites in 2 countries.
237 sites in 2 countries
United States230 sites
Cleveland Clinic Akron General
Akron, Ohio, 44307
Trinity Health Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital Ann Arbor
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Langlade Hospital and Cancer Center
Antigo, Wisconsin, 54409
Mission Hospital
Asheville, North Carolina, 28801
Emory Proton Therapy Center
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308
Emory University Hospital Midtown
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308
Emory University Hospital/Winship Cancer Institute
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Sutter Cancer Centers Radiation Oncology Services-Auburn
Auburn, California, 95603
Dell Seton Medical Center at The University of Texas
Austin, Texas, 78701
Austin Cancer Centers-Central Austin
Austin, Texas, 78702
Texas Oncology-Austin Midtown
Austin, Texas, 78705
Texas Oncology - Central Austin Cancer Center
Austin, Texas, 78731
Texas Oncology - South Austin Cancer Center
Austin, Texas, 78745
Austin Cancer Centers-North
Austin, Texas, 78758
AIS Cancer Center at San Joaquin Community Hospital
Bakersfield, California, 93301
Maryland Proton Treatment Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
University of Maryland/Greenebaum Cancer Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Memorial Sloan Kettering Basking Ridge
Basking Ridge, New Jersey, 07920
McLaren Cancer Institute-Bay City
Bay City, Michigan, 48706
UHHS-Chagrin Highlands Medical Center
Beachwood, Ohio, 44122
UM Upper Chesapeake Medical Center
Bel Air, Maryland, 21014
Sanford Joe Lueken Cancer Center
Bemidji, Minnesota, 56601
Alta Bates Summit Medical Center-Herrick Campus
Berkeley, California, 94704
Central Vermont Medical Center/National Life Cancer Treatment
Berlin Corners, Vermont, 05602
Saint Luke's University Hospital-Bethlehem Campus
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18015
Billings Clinic Cancer Center
Billings, Montana, 59101
University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Center
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
Sanford Bismarck Medical Center
Bismarck, North Dakota, 58501
Boca Raton Regional Hospital
Boca Raton, Florida, 33486
Prisma Health Cancer Institute - Spartanburg
Boiling Springs, South Carolina, 29316
Saint Alphonsus Cancer Care Center-Boise
Boise, Idaho, 83706
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Boston Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118
New York-Presbyterian/Brooklyn Methodist Hospital
Brooklyn, New York, 11215
University of Vermont Medical Center
Burlington, Vermont, 05401
Sutter Cancer Centers Radiation Oncology Services-Cameron Park
Cameron Park, California, 95682
Eden Hospital Medical Center
Castro Valley, California, 94546
Mercy Hospital
Cedar Rapids, Iowa, 52403
Geauga Hospital
Chardon, Ohio, 44024
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
John H Stroger Jr Hospital of Cook County
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Rush MD Anderson Cancer Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
University of Cincinnati Cancer Center-UC Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Case Western Reserve University
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center/Fairview Hospital
Cleveland, Ohio, 44111
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
UCHealth Memorial Hospital Central
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80909
Central Maryland Radiation Oncology in Howard County
Columbia, Maryland, 21044
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Riverside Methodist Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43214
Memorial Sloan Kettering Commack
Commack, New York, 11725
UT Southwestern/Simmons Cancer Center-Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75390
Mass General/North Shore Cancer Center
Danvers, Massachusetts, 01923
Corewell Health Dearborn Hospital
Dearborn, Michigan, 48124
Decatur Memorial Hospital
Decatur, Illinois, 62526
Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center Kishwaukee
DeKalb, Illinois, 60115
Texas Oncology - Denison Cancer Center
Denison, Texas, 75020
Iowa Methodist Medical Center
Des Moines, Iowa, 50309
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Saint Luke's Hospital of Duluth
Duluth, Minnesota, 55805
Northeast Radiation Oncology Center
Dunmore, Pennsylvania, 18512
Mercy Cancer Center-Elyria
Elyria, Ohio, 44035
Ephrata Cancer Center
Ephrata, Pennsylvania, 17522
Willamette Valley Cancer Center
Eugene, Oregon, 97401
Sanford Roger Maris Cancer Center
Fargo, North Dakota, 58122
McLaren Cancer Institute-Flint
Flint, Michigan, 48532
Texas Oncology-Flower Mound
Flower Mound, Texas, 75028
Poudre Valley Hospital
Fort Collins, Colorado, 80524
Radiation Oncology Associates PC
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46804
Parkview Hospital Randallia
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46805
Parkview Regional Medical Center
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46845
Texas Oncology - Fort Worth Cancer Center
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
Fresno Cancer Center
Fresno, California, 93720
UF Health Cancer Institute - Gainesville
Gainesville, Florida, 32610
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, Texas, 77555-0565
Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center Delnor
Geneva, Illinois, 60134
Adams Cancer Center
Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, 17325
UM Baltimore Washington Medical Center/Tate Cancer Center
Glen Burnie, Maryland, 21061
Corewell Health Grand Rapids Hospitals - Butterworth Hospital
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503
Trinity Health Grand Rapids Hospital
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503
Marin General Hospital
Greenbrae, California, 94904
Prisma Health Cancer Institute - Faris
Greenville, South Carolina, 29605
Prisma Health Cancer Institute - Eastside
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615
Self Regional Healthcare
Greenwood, South Carolina, 29646
Prisma Health Cancer Institute - Greer
Greer, South Carolina, 29650
Legacy Mount Hood Medical Center
Gresham, Oregon, 97030
UPMC Pinnacle Cancer Center/Community Osteopathic Campus
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 17109
Memorial Sloan Kettering Westchester
Harrison, New York, 10604
Hartford Hospital
Hartford, Connecticut, 06102
Memorial Hermann Memorial City Medical Center
Houston, Texas, 77024
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center Independence
Independence, Ohio, 44131
IU Health Methodist Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Community Cancer Center East
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46219
Community Cancer Center South
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46227
Community Cancer Center North
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46256
University of Mississippi Medical Center
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216
Baptist MD Anderson Cancer Center
Jacksonville, Florida, 32207
University of Florida Health Science Center - Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, 32209
Baptist Medical Center South
Jacksonville, Florida, 32258
West Michigan Cancer Center
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49007
University of Kansas Cancer Center
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
North Kansas City Hospital
Kansas City, Missouri, 64116
University of Kansas Cancer Center - North
Kansas City, Missouri, 64154
Tennessee Cancer Specialists-Dowell Springs
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37909
Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center
La Crosse, Wisconsin, 54601
Northwell Health/Center for Advanced Medicine
Lake Success, New York, 11042
McLaren Cancer Institute-Lapeer Region
Lapeer, Michigan, 48446
Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89148
UTMB Cancer Center at Victory Lakes
League City, Texas, 77573
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center/Dartmouth Cancer Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756
Sechler Family Cancer Center
Lebanon, Pennsylvania, 17042
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
Trinity Health Saint Mary Mercy Livonia Hospital
Livonia, Michigan, 48154
Logan Regional Hospital
Logan, Utah, 84321
Loma Linda University Medical Center
Loma Linda, California, 92354
Los Angeles General Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90033
USC / Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, 90033
Cedars Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048
Norton Hospital Pavilion and Medical Campus
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Lowell General Hospital
Lowell, Massachusetts, 01854
Covenant Medical Center-Lakeside
Lubbock, Texas, 79410
University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center - University Hospital
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792
Fremont - Rideout Cancer Center
Marysville, California, 95901
Hillcrest Hospital Cancer Center
Mayfield Heights, Ohio, 44124
Froedtert Menomonee Falls Hospital
Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin, 53051
UH Seidman Cancer Center at Lake Health Mentor Campus
Mentor, Ohio, 44060
Miami Cancer Institute
Miami, Florida, 33176
UH Seidman Cancer Center at Southwest General Hospital
Middleburg Heights, Ohio, 44130
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Memorial Medical Center
Modesto, California, 95355
McLaren Cancer Institute-Macomb
Mount Clemens, Michigan, 48043
McLaren Cancer Institute-Central Michigan
Mount Pleasant, Michigan, 48858
IU Health Ball Memorial Hospital
Muncie, Indiana, 47303
Intermountain Medical Center
Murray, Utah, 84107
Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08903
Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08903
UC Comprehensive Cancer Center at Silver Cross
New Lenox, Illinois, 60451
Ochsner Medical Center Jefferson
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121
Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone
New York, New York, 10016
NYP/Columbia University Medical Center/Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10032
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10065
Kaiser Permanente Oakland-Broadway
Oakland, California, 94611
McKay-Dee Hospital Center
Ogden, Utah, 84403
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Saint Joseph Hospital - Orange
Orange, California, 92868
UC Irvine Health/Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
Orange, California, 92868
University of Kansas Cancer Center-Overland Park
Overland Park, Kansas, 66210
McLaren Cancer Institute-Owosso
Owosso, Michigan, 48867
Palo Alto Medical Foundation Health Care
Palo Alto, California, 94301
Advocate Lutheran General Hospital
Park Ridge, Illinois, 60068
University Hospitals Parma Medical Center
Parma, Ohio, 44129
Capital Health Medical Center-Hopewell
Pennington, New Jersey, 08534
OSF Saint Francis Medical Center
Peoria, Illinois, 61637
McLaren Cancer Institute-Northern Michigan
Petoskey, Michigan, 49770
University of Pennsylvania/Abramson Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Jefferson Torresdale Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19114
Saint Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85013
Mayo Clinic Hospital in Arizona
Phoenix, Arizona, 85054
Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center
Pomona, California, 91767
Trinity Health Saint Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital
Pontiac, Michigan, 48341
Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center
Portland, Oregon, 97210
Utah Valley Regional Medical Center
Provo, Utah, 84604
Kaiser Permanente-Rancho Cordova Cancer Center
Rancho Cordova, California, 95670
Renown Regional Medical Center
Reno, Nevada, 89502
Saint Mary's Regional Medical Center
Reno, Nevada, 89503
VCU Massey Comprehensive Cancer Center
Richmond, Virginia, 23298
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Rohnert Park Cancer Center
Rohnert Park, California, 94928
Sutter Cancer Centers Radiation Oncology Services-Roseville
Roseville, California, 95661
The Permanente Medical Group-Roseville Radiation Oncology
Roseville, California, 95678
Texas Oncology-Seton Williamson
Round Rock, Texas, 78665
Texas Oncology - Round Rock Cancer Center
Round Rock, Texas, 78681
Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073
Sutter Medical Center Sacramento
Sacramento, California, 95816
University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center
Sacramento, California, 95817
South Sacramento Cancer Center
Sacramento, California, 95823
Coborn Cancer Center at Saint Cloud Hospital
Saint Cloud, Minnesota, 56303
Dartmouth Cancer Center - North
Saint Johnsbury, Vermont, 05819
Corewell Health Lakeland Hospitals - Saint Joseph Hospital
Saint Joseph, Michigan, 49085
Regions Hospital
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55101
Huntsman Cancer Institute/University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
California Pacific Medical Center-Pacific Campus
San Francisco, California, 94115
North Coast Cancer Care
Sandusky, Ohio, 44870
UH Seidman Cancer Center at Firelands Regional Medical Center
Sandusky, Ohio, 44870
Palo Alto Medical Foundation-Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz, California, 95065
Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion at Saint Joseph's/Candler
Savannah, Georgia, 31405
Mayo Clinic in Arizona
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259
FHCC at Northwest Hospital
Seattle, Washington, 98133
FHCC Proton Therapy Center
Seattle, Washington, 98133
University of Washington Medical Center - Montlake
Seattle, Washington, 98195
Prisma Health Cancer Institute - Seneca
Seneca, South Carolina, 29672
Willis-Knighton Medical and Cancer Center
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71103
Sanford USD Medical Center - Sioux Falls
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57117-5134
ProCure Proton Therapy Center-Somerset
Somerset, New Jersey, 08873
Kaiser Permanente Cancer Treatment Center
South San Francisco, California, 94080
Springfield Memorial Hospital
Springfield, Illinois, 62781
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Saint George Regional Medical Center
St. George, Utah, 84770
Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center Strongsville
Strongsville, Ohio, 44136
Texas Oncology Cancer Center Sugar Land
Sugar Land, Texas, 77479
Palo Alto Medical Foundation-Sunnyvale
Sunnyvale, California, 94086
Moffitt Cancer Center
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Montefiore Medical Center - Moses Campus
The Bronx, New York, 10467
University of Toledo
Toledo, Ohio, 43614
Corewell Health Beaumont Troy Hospital
Troy, Michigan, 48085
Arizona Oncology Associates-West Orange Grove
Tucson, Arizona, 85704
Banner University Medical Center - Tucson
Tucson, Arizona, 85719
Texas Oncology - Tyler
Tyler, Texas, 75702
Compass Oncology Vancouver
Vancouver, Washington, 98684
Legacy Salmon Creek Hospital
Vancouver, Washington, 98686
Virtua Voorhees
Voorhees Township, New Jersey, 08043
John Muir Medical Center-Walnut Creek
Walnut Creek, California, 94598
Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center Warrenville
Warrenville, Illinois, 60555
UW Cancer Center at ProHealth Care
Waukesha, Wisconsin, 53188
Aspirus Regional Cancer Center
Wausau, Wisconsin, 54401
University of Cincinnati Cancer Center-West Chester
West Chester, Ohio, 45069
Reading Hospital
West Reading, Pennsylvania, 19611
UHHS-Westlake Medical Center
Westlake, Ohio, 44145
Wheeling Hospital/Schiffler Cancer Center
Wheeling, West Virginia, 26003
Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
Cleveland Clinic Wooster Family Health and Surgery Center
Wooster, Ohio, 44691
WellSpan Health-York Cancer Center
York, Pennsylvania, 17403
Canada7 sites
CHUM - Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 3E4
The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC)
Montreal, Quebec, H3H 2R9
Ottawa Hospital and Cancer Center-General Campus
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6
CHU de Quebec-L'Hotel-Dieu de Quebec (HDQ)
Québec, Quebec, G1R 2J6
Saskatoon Cancer Centre
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 4H4
BCCA-Vancouver Island Cancer Centre
Victoria, British Columbia, V8R 6V5
Windsor Regional Cancer Centre
Windsor, Ontario, N8W 2X3
About this study
Official title: Randomized Phase II Trial of Hypofractionated Dose-Escalated Photon IMRT or Proton Beam Therapy Versus Conventional Photon Irradiation With Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
This randomized phase II trial studies how well dose-escalated photon intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or proton beam radiation therapy works compared with standard-dose radiation therapy when given with temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays and other types of radiation to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors. Specialized radiation therapy that delivers a high dose of radiation directly to the tumor may kill more tumor cells and cause less damage to normal tissue. Drugs, such as temozolomide, may make tumor cells more sensitive to radiation therapy. It is not yet known whether dose-escalated photon IMRT or proton beam radiation therapy is more effective than standard-dose radiation therapy with temozolomide in treating glioblastoma.
Read the detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
- To determine if dose-escalated and -intensified photon IMRT or proton beam therapy (using a dose-per-fraction escalation with simultaneous integrated boost) with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide improves overall survival, as compared to standard-dose photon irradiation with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- To indirectly compare dose-escalated and -intensified photon IMRT to dose-escalated and -intensified proton beam therapy in terms of overall survival.
II. To indirectly compare and record toxicities of dose-escalated and -intensified photon IMRT versus dose-escalated and -intensified proton beam therapy and directly compare the toxicities of these approaches versus standard-dose photon irradiation on the backbone of concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide.
III. To determine if dose-escalated and -intensified IMRT or proton beam therapy (using a dose-per-fraction escalation with simultaneous integrated boost) with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide improves perceived cognitive symptom severity, as compared to standard-dose photon irradiation with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide.
IV. To determine if dose-escalated and -intensified photon IMRT or proton beam therapy (using a dose-per-fraction escalation with simultaneous integrated boost) with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide improves neurocognitive function, as compared to standard-dose photon irradiation with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide.
- To indirectly determine if dose-escalated and -intensified proton beam therapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide improves perceived cognitive symptom severity, as compared to dose-escalated and -intensified photon IMRT, and to directly compare symptom burden with these approaches versus standard-dose photon irradiation on the backbone of concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide.
VI. To indirectly determine if dose-escalated and -intensified proton beam therapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide improves neurocognitive function, as compared to dose-escalated and -intensified photon IMRT, and to directly compare neurocognitive function with these approaches versus standard-dose photon irradiation on the backbone of concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
- Tissue banking for future translational science projects that will be determined based on the state of the science at the time the primary endpoint is reported and will be submitted to National Cancer Institute (NCI) for review and approval.
II. To prospectively compare CD4 lymphopenia between dose-escalated and intensified proton beam therapy, dose-escalated and -intensified photon IMRT, and standard-dose photon irradiation and determine whether CD4 lymphopenia impacts overall survival.
III. To explore the most appropriate and clinically relevant technological parameters to ensure quality and effectiveness throughout radiation therapy processes, including imaging, simulation, patient immobilization, target and critical structure definition, treatment planning, image guidance and delivery.
IIIa. To establish feasibility and clinical relevancy of quality assurance guidelines.
IIIb. To evaluate efficacy of quality assurance tools. IV. To explore the most appropriate and clinically relevant advanced and standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging parameters.
IVa. To evaluate the feasibility of differentiating pseudo-progression and true progression in a multi institutional setting using magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion and perfusion imaging.
IVb. To evaluate for early, imaging biomarkers of response and overall survival.
OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 groups depending on enrolling institution. Within each group, patients will be randomized 1:2 in favor of the experimental arms.
GROUP 1 = PHOTON IMRT CENTERS. GROUP 2 = PROTON CENTERS.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 1 year, every 4 months for 1 year, and then every 6 months thereafter.
- Conditions
- Glioblastoma
- Being tested
- Photon Beam Radiation Therapy, Proton Beam Radiation Therapy, Temozolomide
- Medical subject headings
- Glioblastoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Photon Beam Radiation TherapyRadiation
Also called External beam radiation therapy using photons (procedure), Photon, Photon EBRT, Photon External Beam Radiotherapy
daily fractions
Proton Beam Radiation TherapyRadiation
Also called External beam radiation therapy protons (procedure), External Beam Radiotherapy (protons), PBRT, Proton
Undergo dose-escalated and -intensified proton beam radiation therapy
TemozolomideDrug
Also called CCRG-81045, Gliotem, Imidazo[5,1-d]-1,2,3,5-tetrazine-8-carboxamide, 3, 4-dihydro-3-methyl-4-oxo-, M & B 39831
tablet
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 - Standard RT (Photon) (Arm A1) | Active comparator | Group 1 = Photon IMRT centers. Participants undergo standard-dose postoperative photon radiotherapy using 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) administered once daily, 5 days per week. Treatment consists of 46 Gy in 23 fractions followed by a sequential boost to a total dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. Participants receive concurrent temozolomide orally once daily during radiotherapy for up to 49 days and adjuvant temozolomide orally once daily on days 1-5 of each 28-day cycle for up to 12 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Receives: Radiation: Photon Beam Radiation Therapy; Drug: Temozolomide |
| Group 2 - Standard RT (Proton) (Arm A2) | Active comparator | Group 2 = Proton centers. Participants undergo the same standard-dose postoperative radiotherapy regimen described for Arm A1 but delivered using proton beam therapy. Participants receive concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide as described for Arm A1. Receives: Radiation: Photon Beam Radiation Therapy; Drug: Temozolomide |
| Group 1 - Intensified RT (Photon) (Arm B) | Experimental | Group 1 = Photon IMRT centers. Patients undergo dose-escalated and -intensified photon IMRT QD, 5 days a week for a total of 30 fractions.
In all treatment arms, patients receive temozolomide PO QD on days 1-49 of radiation therapy. Beginning 4 weeks later, patients receive temozolomide PO QD on days 1-5. Treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 12 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Receives: Radiation: Photon Beam Radiation Therapy; Drug: Temozolomide |
| Group 2 - Intensified RT (Proton) (Arm C) | Experimental | Group 2 = Proton centers. Participants undergo the same radiotherapy regimen described for Arm B but delivered using proton beam therapy. The elective target volume receives 50 Gy(RBE) in 30 fractions, and the boost target volume receives 75 Gy(RBE) in 30 fractions. Participants receive concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide as described for Arm A1. Receives: Radiation: Proton Beam Radiation Therapy; Drug: Temozolomide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Median Survival Time (Within Center Group)
Comparisons occur between standard vs. intensified RT arms within group (Group 1: photon IMRT centers; Group 2: proton centers). Median survival times were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, censoring participants alive at the time of analysis. Comparisons occur between standard vs. intensified RT arms within group (Group 1: photon IMRT centers; Group 2: proton centers)
Measured: Randomization to death or last follow-up. Median follow-up at time of analysis was 16.2 months for Group 1 and 18.3 months for Group 2.
Secondary outcomes (7)
Median Survival Time (Between Experimental Arms)
Per the protocol, this outcome measure would be addressed only if both experimental (intensified RT) arms were statistically significantly different from their respective control (standard RT) arms, as defined in the primary outcome measure. If that condition were satisfied, the experimental (intensified RT) arms from each group would be compared with each other. Median survival times would be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, censoring participants alive at the time of analysis.
Measured: Randomization to death or last follow-up. Median follow-up at time of analysis was 16.2 months for Group 1 and 18.3 months for Group 2.
Median Progression-free Survival Time
Progression is defined as any of the following: ≥25% increase in sum of the products of perpendicular diameters of enhancing lesions; any new lesion; or clinical deterioration, with the treating institution encouraged to differentiate progression from pseudoprogression and radionecrosis using surgical resection, biopsy, and alternative imaging accordingly. Median progression-free survival times were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, censoring participants alive at the time of analysis. Comparisons occur between standard vs. intensified RT arms within group (Group 1: photon IMRT centers; Group 2: proton centers).
Measured: Randomization to progression, death, or last follow-up, whichever occurs first. Median follow-up at time of analysis was 16.2 months for Group 1 and 18.3 months for Group 2.
Proportion of Participants With a Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Event
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0) grades adverse event severity as follows: 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = life-threatening, 5 = death related to adverse event. Proportions were estimated using an exact binomial distribution. Comparisons occur between standard vs. intensified RT arms within group (Group 1: photon IMRT centers; Group 2: proton centers)
Measured: Randomization to death or last follow-up. Median follow-up at time of analysis was 16.2 months for Group 1 and 18.3 months for Group 2.
Change From Baseline in the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) Cognitive Factor Score After Cycle 3
The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for brain tumor (MDASI-BT) is a 28-item multi-symptom patient-reported outcome measure assessing the severity of symptoms experienced by cancer patients and the interference with daily living caused by these symptoms, with 9 items specific to brain tumors. Each item ranges from 0 (best condition) to 10 (worst condition). A subscale score (Cognitive Factor) is the average of the subscale items, given that a specified minimum numbers of items were completed. A score worse than baseline by at least one is considered deterioration. Change is calculated as time point - baseline such that a positive change value indicates worse symptoms compared to baseline. Comparisons occur between standard vs. intensified RT arms within group (Group 1: photon IMRT centers; Group 2: proton centers).
Measured: Baseline and end of cycle 3 of adjuvant temozolomide (approximately 24 weeks after start of chemoradiation)
Change From Baseline in the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) Cognitive Factor Score After Cycle 12
The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for brain tumor (MDASI-BT) is a 28-item multi-symptom patient-reported outcome measure assessing the severity of symptoms experienced by cancer patients and the interference with daily living caused by these symptoms, with 9 items specific to brain tumors. Each item ranges from 0 (best condition) to 10 (worst condition). A subscale score (Cognitive Factor) is the average of the subscale items, given that a specified minimum numbers of items were completed. A score worse than baseline by at least one is considered deterioration. Change is calculated as time point - baseline such that a positive change value indicates worse symptoms compared to baseline. Comparisons occur between standard vs. intensified RT arms within group (Group 1: photon IMRT centers; Group 2: proton centers).
Measured: Baseline and end of cycle 12 of adjuvant temozolomide (approximately 60 weeks after start of chemoradiation)
Change From Baseline in the Clinical Trial Battery Composite Standardized Score at End of Cycle 3
The Clinical Trial Battery Composite Standardized Score is calculated as the arithmetic mean of multiple standardized neurocognitive test scores assessing memory, processing speed, executive function, and verbal fluency. Scores are standardized (z-scores) adjusted for age, education, and gender, with a mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1. A participant must have the majority of component scores available to calculate the composite. Possible scores are standardized z-scores that typically range from approximately -3 to +3, with higher scores indicating a better outcome. Change is calculated as time point minus baseline such that a positive change value indicates improvement and a negative change value indicates decline. Comparisons are made between standard-dose and intensified radiation therapy arms within group (Group 1: photon IMRT centers; Group 2: proton centers).
Measured: Baseline and end of cycle 3 of adjuvant temozolomide (approximately 24 weeks after start of chemoradiation)
Change From Baseline in the Clinical Trial Battery Composite Standardized Score at End of Cycle 12
The Clinical Trial Battery Composite Standardized Score is calculated as the arithmetic mean of multiple standardized neurocognitive test scores assessing memory, processing speed, executive function, and verbal fluency. Scores are standardized (z-scores) adjusted for age, education, and gender, with a mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1. A participant must have the majority of component scores available to calculate the composite. Possible scores are standardized z-scores that typically range from approximately -3 to +3, with higher scores indicating a better outcome. Change is calculated as time point minus baseline such that a positive change value indicates improvement and a negative change value indicates decline. Comparisons are made between standard-dose and intensified radiation therapy arms within group (Group 1: photon IMRT centers; Group 2: proton centers).
Measured: Baseline and end of cycle 3 of adjuvant temozolomide (approximately 24 weeks after start of chemoradiation)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Study start4 Dec 2014
- Primary completion7 Jul 2025
- Study completion7 Jul 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for GlioblastomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by NRG OncologyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants were randomized within each group in a 1:2 ratio to standard-dose and intensified radiation therapy arms.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 624 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- NRG Oncology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Minesh P Mehta, Principal investigator, NRG Oncology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02179086
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NRG-BN001
- Other IDs
- NCI-2014-01072, NRG-BN001, NRG-BN001, P50CA127001, U10CA180868
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 27 Jun 2014
- Last updated
- 1 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: NCI is committed to sharing data in accordance with NIH policy. For more details on how clinical trial data is shared, access the link to the NIH data sharing policy page.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Phase II Trial of Hypofractionated Dose-Escalated Photon IMRT or Proton Beam Therapy Versus Conventional Photon Irradiation With Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02179086
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NRG-BN001
- Conditions
- Glioblastoma
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 624 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NRG OncologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- 4 Dec 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Jul 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 28 Aug 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomized phase II trial studies how well dose-escalated photon intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or proton beam radiation therapy works compared with standard-dose radiation therapy when given with temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays and other types of radiation to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors. Specialized radiation therapy that delivers a high dose of radiation directly to the tumor may kill more tumor cells and cause less damage to normal tissue. Drugs, such as temozolomide, may make tumor cells more sensitive to radiation therapy. It is not yet known whether dose-escalated photon IMRT or proton beam radiation therapy is more effective than standard-dose radiation therapy with temozolomide in treating glioblastoma.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
- To determine if dose-escalated and -intensified photon IMRT or proton beam therapy (using a dose-per-fraction escalation with simultaneous integrated boost) with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide improves overall survival, as compared to standard-dose photon irradiation with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- To indirectly compare dose-escalated and -intensified photon IMRT to dose-escalated and -intensified proton beam therapy in terms of overall survival.
II. To indirectly compare and record toxicities of dose-escalated and -intensified photon IMRT versus dose-escalated and -intensified proton beam therapy and directly compare the toxicities of these approaches versus standard-dose photon irradiation on the backbone of concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide.
III. To determine if dose-escalated and -intensified IMRT or proton beam therapy (using a dose-per-fraction escalation with simultaneous integrated boost) with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide improves perceived cognitive symptom severity, as compared to standard-dose photon irradiation with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide.
IV. To determine if dose-escalated and -intensified photon IMRT or proton beam therapy (using a dose-per-fraction escalation with simultaneous integrated boost) with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide improves neurocognitive function, as compared to standard-dose photon irradiation with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide.
- To indirectly determine if dose-escalated and -intensified proton beam therapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide improves perceived cognitive symptom severity, as compared to dose-escalated and -intensified photon IMRT, and to directly compare symptom burden with these approaches versus standard-dose photon irradiation on the backbone of concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide.
VI. To indirectly determine if dose-escalated and -intensified proton beam therapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide improves neurocognitive function, as compared to dose-escalated and -intensified photon IMRT, and to directly compare neurocognitive function with these approaches versus standard-dose photon irradiation on the backbone of concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
- Tissue banking for future translational science projects that will be determined based on the state of the science at the time the primary endpoint is reported and will be submitted to National Cancer Institute (NCI) for review and approval.
II. To prospectively compare CD4 lymphopenia between dose-escalated and intensified proton beam therapy, dose-escalated and -intensified photon IMRT, and standard-dose photon irradiation and determine whether CD4 lymphopenia impacts overall survival.
III. To explore the most appropriate and clinically relevant technological parameters to ensure quality and effectiveness throughout radiation therapy processes, including imaging, simulation, patient immobilization, target and critical structure definition, treatment planning, image guidance and delivery.
IIIa. To establish feasibility and clinical relevancy of quality assurance guidelines.
IIIb. To evaluate efficacy of quality assurance tools. IV. To explore the most appropriate and clinically relevant advanced and standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging parameters.
IVa. To evaluate the feasibility of differentiating pseudo-progression and true progression in a multi institutional setting using magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion and perfusion imaging.
IVb. To evaluate for early, imaging biomarkers of response and overall survival.
OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 groups depending on enrolling institution. Within each group, patients will be randomized 1:2 in favor of the experimental arms.
GROUP 1 = PHOTON IMRT CENTERS. GROUP 2 = PROTON CENTERS.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 1 year, every 4 months for 1 year, and then every 6 months thereafter.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
- Model description
- Participants were randomized within each group in a 1:2 ratio to standard-dose and intensified radiation therapy arms.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 - Standard RT (Photon) (Arm A1) | Active comparator | Radiation: Photon Beam Radiation Therapy, Drug: TemozolomideGroup 1 = Photon IMRT centers. Participants undergo standard-dose postoperative photon radiotherapy using 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) administered once daily, 5 days per week. Treatment consists of 46 Gy in 23 fractions followed by a sequential boost to a total dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. Participants receive concurrent temozolomide orally once daily during radiotherapy for up to 49 days and adjuvant temozolomide orally once daily on days 1-5 of each 28-day cycle for up to 12 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. |
| Group 2 - Standard RT (Proton) (Arm A2) | Active comparator | Radiation: Photon Beam Radiation Therapy, Drug: TemozolomideGroup 2 = Proton centers. Participants undergo the same standard-dose postoperative radiotherapy regimen described for Arm A1 but delivered using proton beam therapy. Participants receive concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide as described for Arm A1. |
| Group 1 - Intensified RT (Photon) (Arm B) | Experimental | Radiation: Photon Beam Radiation Therapy, Drug: TemozolomideGroup 1 = Photon IMRT centers. Patients undergo dose-escalated and -intensified photon IMRT QD, 5 days a week for a total of 30 fractions. In all treatment arms, patients receive temozolomide PO QD on days 1-49 of radiation therapy. Beginning 4 weeks later, patients receive temozolomide PO QD on days 1-5. Treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 12 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. |
| Group 2 - Intensified RT (Proton) (Arm C) | Experimental | Radiation: Proton Beam Radiation Therapy, Drug: TemozolomideGroup 2 = Proton centers. Participants undergo the same radiotherapy regimen described for Arm B but delivered using proton beam therapy. The elective target volume receives 50 Gy(RBE) in 30 fractions, and the boost target volume receives 75 Gy(RBE) in 30 fractions. Participants receive concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide as described for Arm A1. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (36 listed)
- PRIOR TO STEP 1 REGISTRATION
- A diagnostic contrast-enhanced MRI (no other scan type allowed) of the brain must be performed postoperatively; the residual enhancing tumor and/or resection cavity must have a maximal diameter of 5 cm or less; the tumor diameter will be the greatest diameter as measured on the contrast-enhanced postoperative MRI and will include residual disease and/or the postoperative surgical cavity as appropriate
- Tumor tissue must be available for submission for central pathology review
- The tumor must be located in the supratentorial compartment only (any component involving the brain stem or cerebellum is not allowed)
- Patients must provide study-specific informed consent prior to step 1 registration
Key exclusion criteria (25 listed)
- Prior invasive malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin cancer) unless disease-free for a minimum of 3 years; (for example, carcinoma in situ of the breast, oral cavity, or cervix are all permissible)
- Recurrent or multifocal malignant gliomas
- Any site of distant disease (for example, drop metastases from the GBM tumor site)
- Prior chemotherapy or radiosensitizers for cancers of the head and neck region; note that prior chemotherapy for a different cancer is allowable (except temozolomide)
- Prior use of Gliadel wafers or any other intratumoral or intracavitary treatment are not permitted
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Photon Beam Radiation TherapyAlso: External beam radiation therapy using photons (procedure), Photon, Photon EBRT, Photon External Beam Radiotherapydaily fractions | Radiation | Group 1 - Intensified RT (Photon) (Arm B), Group 1 - Standard RT (Photon) (Arm A1), Group 2 - Standard RT (Proton) (Arm A2) |
| Proton Beam Radiation TherapyAlso: External beam radiation therapy protons (procedure), External Beam Radiotherapy (protons), PBRT, ProtonUndergo dose-escalated and -intensified proton beam radiation therapy | Radiation | Group 2 - Intensified RT (Proton) (Arm C) |
| TemozolomideAlso: CCRG-81045, Gliotem, Imidazo[5,1-d]-1,2,3,5-tetrazine-8-carboxamide, 3, 4-dihydro-3-methyl-4-oxo-, M & B 39831tablet | Drug | Group 1 - Intensified RT (Photon) (Arm B), Group 1 - Standard RT (Photon) (Arm A1), Group 2 - Intensified RT (Proton) (Arm C), Group 2 - Standard RT (Proton) (Arm A2) |
Primary outcome
Median Survival Time (Within Center Group)
Time frame: Randomization to death or last follow-up. Median follow-up at time of analysis was 16.2 months for Group 1 and 18.3 months for Group 2.
Comparisons occur between standard vs. intensified RT arms within group (Group 1: photon IMRT centers; Group 2: proton centers). Median survival times were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, censoring participants alive at the time of analysis. Comparisons occur between standard vs. intensified RT arms within group (Group 1: photon IMRT centers; Group 2: proton centers)
7 secondary outcomes
Median Survival Time (Between Experimental Arms)
Time frame: Randomization to death or last follow-up. Median follow-up at time of analysis was 16.2 months for Group 1 and 18.3 months for Group 2.
Median Progression-free Survival Time
Time frame: Randomization to progression, death, or last follow-up, whichever occurs first. Median follow-up at time of analysis was 16.2 months for Group 1 and 18.3 months for Group 2.
Proportion of Participants With a Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Event
Time frame: Randomization to death or last follow-up. Median follow-up at time of analysis was 16.2 months for Group 1 and 18.3 months for Group 2.
Change From Baseline in the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) Cognitive Factor Score After Cycle 3
Time frame: Baseline and end of cycle 3 of adjuvant temozolomide (approximately 24 weeks after start of chemoradiation)
Change From Baseline in the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) Cognitive Factor Score After Cycle 12
Time frame: Baseline and end of cycle 12 of adjuvant temozolomide (approximately 60 weeks after start of chemoradiation)
Change From Baseline in the Clinical Trial Battery Composite Standardized Score at End of Cycle 3
Time frame: Baseline and end of cycle 3 of adjuvant temozolomide (approximately 24 weeks after start of chemoradiation)
Change From Baseline in the Clinical Trial Battery Composite Standardized Score at End of Cycle 12
Time frame: Baseline and end of cycle 3 of adjuvant temozolomide (approximately 24 weeks after start of chemoradiation)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Oct 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. NCI is committed to sharing data in accordance with NIH policy. For more details on how clinical trial data is shared, access the link to the NIH data sharing policy page.
Related trials for Glioblastoma
Not yet recruiting
A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Multicenter Clinical Study of Teniposide Combined With Temozolomide for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma (nGBM) With MGMT Promotor Region Unmethylated
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma, MGMT-Unmethylated Glioblastoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Ultrasound-based Blood-brain Barrier Opening and Albumin-bound Paclitaxel and Carboplatin for Recurrent Glioblastoma
Glioblastoma, Gliosarcoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Temozolomide, With or Without WSD0922-FU, for the Treatment of EGFR-Mutant, IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma
Glioblastoma, IDH-Wildtype
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Safety and Efficacy Study of Anti-B7-H3 CAR-T Cell Therapy for Recurrent Glioblastoma
Glioblastoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Testing the Effect of Immunotherapy (Ipilimumab and Nivolumab) in Patients With Recurrent Glioma With Elevated Mutational Burden
Astrocytoma, IDH-Mutant, Grade 4, Diffuse Glioma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Minesh P Mehta principal investigator
NRG Oncology
237 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Photon Beam Radiation Therapy, Proton Beam Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide in people with Glioblastoma, run by NRG Oncology at 237 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 36 inclusion and 25 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 237 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Aug 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Median Survival Time (Within Center Group) (time frame: Randomization to death or last follow-up. Median follow-up at time of analysis was 16.2 months for Group 1 and 18.3 months for Group 2.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2026.