AzTrials
AzTrials

Wounds and InjuriesNCT02175862

Long-term Evaluation of Patients Treated by an Emergency Medical Helicopter

An observational study of Wounds and Injuries, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In May 2010 the first danish physician-staffed Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (PS-HEMS) was implemented in Region Zealand and the Capital Region (excluding Bornholm) of Denmark. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Wounds and Injuries
How many people
1,791 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
Dec 2009to May 2014
How long will I take part?
3 Years
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: All trauma patients treated in the catchment area of PS-HEMS in a 17-month period from 1 December 2009 to 30 April 2011 (1791 patients).

Who may be able to join

  • Patients treated by a trauma team in the catchment area of PS-HEMS.
  • For all labor market attachment analysis the investigators only include patients between 18 to 60 years of age. For all other analysis (mortality and quality of life) there are no age limits.

Who cannot join

  • Patients transported by private means or by the police.
  • Patients who at the emergency department were categorized as non-trauma patients.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Department Of Anesthesia, Center of Head and Orthopedics, section 4231, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet

    Copenhagen, 2100

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

In May 2010 the first danish physician-staffed Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (PS-HEMS) was implemented in Region Zealand and the Capital Region (excluding Bornholm) of Denmark.

In relation to the introduction of PS-HEMS, a team of collaborators lead by Rasmus Hesselfeldt, conducted an observational study to investigate the possible effects on time to definitive care, secondary transfers and 30-day mortality in a "before" and "after" design.

Read more

Results showed reduced time from first dispatch to arrival at the trauma centre from 218 min to 90 min. Secondary transfers to the trauma centre dropped from 50 % to 34 % and 30-day mortality significantly reduced from 29 % to 14 % in the year after implementation.

The present study is an observational cohort study with long-term follow-up of the same trauma population as mentioned above. Patients were followed until may 1st, 2014.

Primary outcome is early retirement and secondary outcomes are quality of life and mortality.

The investigators hypothesize that a greater proportion of trauma patients in the "after" period will remain in occupation after approx. 3 to 4.5 years compared with trauma patients treated in the "before" period.

Keywords
Helicopter Emergency Medical Service, Trauma, Early retirement, ISS, Quality of life
Medical subject headings
Wounds and Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02175862
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Trauma patients before PS-HEMSThe "before" period was between december 1 2009 to april 30 2010 (five months).
Traume patients after PS-HEMSThe "after" period was between may 1 2010 to april 30 2011 (12 months).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Labor market attachment

    Primary analysis: Risk of early retirement Secondary analysis: Risk of reduced work capability

    Measured: 3 - 4.5 years after trauma

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Health-related quality of life

    Health-related quality of life is measured using the Danish version of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionaire.

    Measured: 3 - 4.5 years after trauma

  2. All cause mortality

    Primary analysis: Risk of death. Secondary analysis: Predictors of death

    Measured: 3 - 4.5 years after trauma

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jun 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2009
  3. Primary completionMay 2014
  4. Study completionMay 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,791 participants (actual)
Target duration
3 Years
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02175862
Sponsor's protocol ID
ALH1-KF-2014
Status last verified
Oct 2015
First submitted
25 Jun 2014
Last updated
28 Oct 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Kuhlman MB, Lohse N, Sorensen AM, Larsen CF, Christensen KB, Steinmetz J. Impact of the severity of trauma on early retirement. Injury. 2014 Mar;45(3):618-23. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Sep 16.

    PubMed 24176678
  • Hesselfeldt R, Steinmetz J, Jans H, Jacobsson ML, Andersen DL, Buggeskov K, Kowalski M, Praest M, Ollgaard L, Hoiby P, Rasmussen LS. Impact of a physician-staffed helicopter on a regional trauma system: a prospective, controlled, observational study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013 May;57(5):660-8. doi: 10.1111/aas.12052. Epub 2013 Jan 7.

    PubMed 23289798
  • Overgaard M, Hoyer CB, Christensen EF. Long-term survival and health-related quality of life 6 to 9 years after trauma. J Trauma. 2011 Aug;71(2):435-41. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31820e7ec3.

    PubMed 21427614
  • Ringburg AN, Polinder S, Meulman TJ, Steyerberg EW, van Lieshout EM, Patka P, van Beeck EF, Schipper IB. Cost-effectiveness and quality-of-life analysis of physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical services. Br J Surg. 2009 Nov;96(11):1365-70. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6720.

    PubMed 19847879
  • MacKenzie EJ, Shapiro S, Smith RT, Siegel JH, Moody M, Pitt A. Factors influencing return to work following hospitalization for traumatic injury. Am J Public Health. 1987 Mar;77(3):329-34. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.3.329.

    PubMed 3812840
  • Baker SP, O'Neill B, Haddon W Jr, Long WB. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma. 1974 Mar;14(3):187-96. No abstract available.

    PubMed 4814394
  • Bjorner JB, Damsgaard MT, Watt T, Groenvold M. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the Danish SF-36. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1001-11. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00092-4.

    PubMed 9817118

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Wounds and Injuries, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Labor market attachment (time frame: 3 - 4.5 years after trauma). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02175862, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Oct 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in