AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Stress Ulcer and Acute Gastric Mucosal LesionsNCT02170207

Takepron Intravenous 30 mg Specified Drug-use Survey [Acute Stress Ulcer and Acute Gastric Mucosal Lesions]

An observational study of Acute Stress Ulcer and Acute Gastric Mucosal Lesions, run by Takeda.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this survey is to evaluate the safety (that is, frequency of adverse events) and efficacy (that is, hemostatic effect, rate of rebleeding after confirmation of hemostasis) of administration of lansoprazole intravenous 30 milligram (mg) (Takepron Intravenous 30 mg ) to a large number of participants with… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
What is being tested?
Lansoprazole
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
How many people
63 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2007to Mar 2010
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Acute stress ulcer and acute gastric mucosal lesions

Who may be able to join

  • Participants with the following diseases for whom oral administration is not feasible:
  • Acute stress ulcer, and acute gastric mucosal lesions (both of which should be accompanied by bleeding).

Who cannot join

  • -

About this study

Official title: Lansoprazole Intravenous 30 mg Specified Drug-use Survey [Acute Stress Ulcer and Acute Gastric Mucosal Lesions]

The purpose of this survey is to evaluate the safety (that is, frequency of adverse events) and efficacy (that is, hemostatic effect, rate of rebleeding after confirmation of hemostasis) of administration of lansoprazole intravenous 30 milligram (mg) (Takepron Intravenous 30 mg ) to a large number of participants with acute stress ulcer or acute gastric mucosal lesion in daily medical practice.

Read the detailed description

This survey was designed to evaluate the safety (that is, frequency of adverse events) and efficacy (i.e., hemostatic effect, rate of rebleeding after confirmation of hemostasis) of administration of lansoprazole intravenous 30 mg (Takepron Intravenous 30 mg) to a large number of participants with acute stress ulcer or acute gastric mucosal lesion in daily medical practice.

For adults, 30 mg of lansoprazole is typically mixed in physiological saline (JP) or 5 percent (%) glucose solution for injection (JP) and administered twice daily by drip infusion or dissolved in 20 mL of physiological saline (JP) or 5% glucose solution for injection (JP) and administered twice daily by direct slow intravenous injection.

Being tested
Lansoprazole
Keywords
Pharmacological therapy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • LansoprazoleDrug

    Also called Takepron 30 mg Injection

    Lansoprazole 30 mg injection

Study groups in NCT02170207
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
30 mg of lansoprazole30 mg of lansoprazole is mixed in physiological saline (JP) or 5% glucose solution for injection (JP) and administered twice daily by drip infusion or dissolved in 20 mL of physiological saline (JP) or 5% glucose solution for injection (JP) and administered twice daily by direct slow intravenous injection.
Receives: Drug: Lansoprazole

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Drug Reactions

    Adverse drug reactions are defined as adverse events (AEs) which are in the investigator's opinion of causal relationship to the study treatment. AEs are defined as any unfavorable and unintended signs, symptoms or diseases temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product reported from the first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 9

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Percentage of Participants With Observed Hemostatic Effect

    Hemostatic effect was categorized on the basis of degree of improvement as: markedly improved, moderately improved, slightly improved and poor in the participants with observed hemostatic effect. Efficacy rate was reported as percentage of participants showing efficacy and was calculated as the sum of percentage of number of participants reporting markedly improved + moderately improved + slightly improved divided by the percentage of total number of participants with observed hemostatic effect.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 9

  2. Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Hemostatic Effect

    Hemostatic effect was categorized on the basis of degree of improvement as: markedly improved, moderately improved, slightly improved and poor in the participants with confirmed hemostatic effect by endoscopy. Efficacy rate was reported as percentage of participants showing efficacy and was calculated as the sum of percentage of number of participants reporting markedly improved + moderately improved + slightly improved divided by the percentage of total number of participants with confirmed hemostatic effect.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 9

  3. Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Hemostatic Effect Who Experienced Rebleeding During Treatment

    Rebleeding rate was reported as percentage of participants who experienced rebleeding after confirmed hemostasis by endoscopy during treatment with lansoprazole. It was calculated by dividing the percentage of the number of participants who experienced rebleeding after hemostasis divided by the total number of participants with confirmed hemostasis.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 9

  4. Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Hemostatic Effect Who Experienced Rebleeding After the Completion of Treatment

    Rebleeding rate was reported as percentage of participants who experienced rebleeding after confirmed hemostasis by endoscopy and was calculated at 8 weeks after the completion of treatment with lansoprazole. It was calculated by dividing the percentage of the number of participants who experienced rebleeding after hemostasis divided by the total number of participants with confirmed hemostasis.

    Measured: Week 17 (8 weeks after the last dose of study drug)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jun 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2007
  3. Primary completionMar 2010
  4. Study completionMar 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
63 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02170207
Sponsor's protocol ID
254-012
Other IDs
JapicCTI-142542, JapicCTI-R160830
Status last verified
Feb 2016
First submitted
19 Jun 2014
Last updated
8 Mar 2016
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Acute Stress Ulcer and Acute Gastric Mucosal Lesions, run by Takeda.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Mar 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Drug Reactions (time frame: Baseline up to Week 9). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Mar 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in