Gross Motor Development DelaysmallstepNCT02166801
Small Step Intervention for Infants With Cerebral Palsy and Other Neurodevelopmental Disorders
A study testing Early intervention for infants in people with Gross Motor Development Delay and Cerebral Palsy, run by Karolinska Institutet at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
Children with cerebral palsy (CP) have life-long motor disorders and are typically subjected to extensive treatment throughout childhood. Despite this there is a lack of evidence supporting the effectiveness of treatment aiming at improving motor function and activity in daily life. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 4 to 10 months
- Conditions the study is for
- Gross Motor Development Delay, Cerebral Palsy
- What is being tested?
- Early intervention for infants
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 39 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- Jan 2014to Dec 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 4 to 10 months
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- will be based on delayed psychomotor development, as assessed by Alberta Motor Infants Scale, using -2SD as a cut-off point. Neurological signs will be investigated by Hammersmith Infant Neurological examination (HINE) together with a clinical neurological examinations. Magnetic resonance imaging (MR) will be used if available to support the risk of development of CP, only MR done for clinical purpose will be used. The risk factors suggested for inclusion in the intervention program will be confirmed by a child neurologist.
Who cannot join
- is unstable health, uncontrolled epilepsy, progressive disorder, diagnosis with a specific syndrome. Parent's communication language should be Swedish or English with satisfactory skills in either language for simple conversation. If the children show a catch-up in development at the second assessment (after 12 weeks) and show no sign of neurodevelopmental disorder the program will be terminated
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Small-step Program for Development of New Treatment Principles for Children With Cerebral Palsy and Other Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Children with cerebral palsy (CP) have life-long motor disorders and are typically subjected to extensive treatment throughout childhood. Despite this there is a lack of evidence supporting the effectiveness of treatment aiming at improving motor function and activity in daily life. The primary area of interest of this research programme is to determine the effectiveness of an early intervention program in children younger than 12 months of age who are at risk of developing CP. A randomised control trial is planned, addressing hand use, mobility and communication in a home-based program. New treatment principles based on recent knowledge of brain plasticity will be employed.
The overarching goal of this research programme is to develop and evaluate new intervention principles for children with neurodevelopmental disorders based upon theories of early learning induced brain plasticity. Our overall aims can be formulated as follows:
Read more
To evaluate the effects of an early intervention programme on the overall development in children with risk of developing cerebral palsy and other neurodevelopmental disorders. The program includes intensive intervention towards the foci: hand use, mobility and communication in a home based program
The hypothesis is that the design of the Small-Step-Program intervention, with clear foci on specific areas of development during different time periods and conducted in the child's home environment, will facilitate development and be more effective than usual care.
The second hypothesis is that children learn what they practice, meaning that children will have a more rapid development within the focus of each specific step in the training, when compared to the, for the time being, untrained steps.
The third hypothesis is that children's ability to learn within the different steps of the intervention programme will be influenced by the specific characteristics of any underlying brain pathology.
The fourth hypothesis is that parents in the study group will be less stressed and can better cope with their child's situation than parents to children receiving usual care. Thus, the tools provided within the Small-Step-Program intervention, like education, supervision and feedback of how to practice communication and task performance will make parents more able to cope with the child's delayed development.
Read the detailed description
Rational for subject selection: Signs of CP may be visible already during the first months, but according to recommendations the diagnosis of CP should typically not be made until 2-4 years of age. The reason is that the individual developmental trajectories of muscle tone, postural control and motor function vary considerably during the first two years. A child with a late development may recover and atypical signs may disappear, and opposite, CP may develop although there have been no early signs. Thus, there is a dilemma in that it is too late to wait with early intervention until the CP diagnosis has been made. In this project we are addressing this problem by developing criteria for infants with high risk to develop CP based on early signs of atypical motor development and on perinatal risk factors. That means that we will include both infants who will get and infants who will not get the CP diagnosis. Children who are not meeting the criteria of CP at 2 years of age will be excluded from the analysis. The investigators assume that the intervention will influence the course of development and help the children to function at a higher level, but not that the intervention will "cure" CP and prevent later diagnosis. Infants with increased risk to develop CP will be recruited in this project.
The study group will be recruited from infants exposed to increased perinatal risk factors, such as preterm birth, hypoxia, infections, retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) chronic lung disease and heart insufficiency, small for gestational age, hypoxic ischemic insult and morphological brain abnormalities. These children commonly participate in a clinical follow up programme at the children's hospital with regular examinations at 3months. The high-risk preterm infants that at follow up examinations exhibit a delayed psycho-motor development or display clinical signs of abnormal neurology will be recruited. Recruitment will also include children below 8 months, demonstrating delayed psycho-motor development or clinical signs of abnormal neurology referred to the physiotherapy department from child neurologists at the hospital.
Randomisation The aim is to include 40 children in the study group with neurodevelopmental disorder to reach sufficient power in the study. This number is high but the investigators expect that about 50% will not fulfil the diagnose criteria at 2 years of age based on previous experience from intervention studies. The aim is to include 20 children with CP, which is a reasonable approximation of study population size to reach sufficient power. The children will be allocated to group by block randomisation. The intervention group (n=20) will take part in a newly developed Small-Step-Program. The comparison group (n=20) will continue their ordinary follow up programme. Stratification will be used to control for gestational age (preterm<37 and term>37 week). Children in the Small-Step-Program" will be further randomised to start with the mobility step or hand use step.
Rational for second randomisation Our hypothesis is that the trained step will improve, while the non-trained step will result in minor changes and that children in the control group will have a continuous developmental pace. The randomised steps are hand use and mobility.
The children in both groups will be assessed at four occasions, at start (first examination), after 12 weeks (second examination) and after 30 weeks (third examination) as well as at 2 years of age (fourth examination). For children in the study group there will be 3 additional times for assessments in order to investigate the second hypothesis. Parents in both groups will be asked to fill in questionnaires' at all four examinations. Both parents will be asked to fill out the questionnaires.
- Conditions
- Gross Motor Development Delay, Cerebral Palsy
- Being tested
- Early intervention for infants, usual care
- Keywords
- Cerebral palsy, Children, Early Intervention, Communication, Gross motor function, Hand function
- Medical subject headings
- Cerebral Palsy, Communication
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Early intervention for infantsBehavioural
Three foci are included in the intervention: Communication, Hand function and Mobility/gross motor function. The Hand \& Cognition and Mobility steps will be conducted during two time-periods. Communication will have a separate one-time intervention at the start of the study (prior to step I) in addition to one intervention period during step III (figure 1). General principles for the small step program: Training will be conducted in the children's home by the parents on a daily basis. The families will get instructions and supervision in their home every week by the therapist responsible for each specific step of the intervention. For each focus there will be different steps using an adaptive logarithm for training, i.e., adapted to the functional level of the child aiming at the next small developmental step. The family will be actively involved in identifying new foci for practice.
usual careBehavioural
Children displaying delayed development and at risk of developing cerebral palsy are continuously followed-up at the children's hospital. There are no strict rules for the frequency of appointments within the usual care program but the families typically meet a physiotherapist every third week during the first 2-3 months, thereafter about once a month. The frequency depends on the family's needs and wishes. If there is a continuous need for therapeutic intervention and need of contact with different professions, the families will be referred to the Habilitation Services when the child is between 8-12 months. The control group will follow this customary procedure in the hospital. The only difference will be the assessment procedure, the sessions with the speech pathologist and that they will get feedback of the children's progress after each examination.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Early intervention for infants | Active comparator | A 30w intensive intervention according to the small step program, with daily practice sections conducted by parents at home, with weekly support by therapists. Receives: Behavioral: Early intervention for infants |
| Usual care | Active comparator | Usual care means that the Children in this arm of the study participate in the established follow up program that is established at the Astrid Lindgrens Children's Hospital and offered to all Children that displays a delayed early gross and fine motor development. Receives: Behavioral: usual care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Peabody Developmental Motor Scales (PDMS-2) is used to measure change over time
Assesses gross and fine motor skills in young children. It is designed to evaluate children from birth through age 5. The PDMS-2 is composed of six subtests that assess related motor abilities that develop early in life: Reflexes, Stationary (body control and equilibrium), Locomotion, Object Manipulation, Grasping, and Visual-Motor Integration. Results from these subtests are used to generate the three composite scores: Gross Motor Quotient, Fine Motor Quotient, and Total Motor Quotient. Scores are presented as percentiles, standard scores, and age equivalents. Norms, based on a nationally representative sample of more than 2,000 children, are stratified by age
Measured: Small Step group: at baseline, 6w, 12w,18w, 24w, 30w and 2 years. In the usual care group: at baseline, 12 w, 30w and at 2 years.
Secondary outcomes (13)
Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) is used to measure change over time
Identifies infants who are delayed or deviant in motor development. It can be used from birth through independent walking (0-18 months). It identifies the gross motor performance of an infant compared to norm- referenced sample. It is an observational assessment and is quick to administrate with limited handling. The focus is on milestones and quality of posture and movement.
Measured: Small Step group: at baseline, 6w, 12w,18w, 24w, 30w and 2 years. In the usual care group: at baseline, 12 w, 30w and at 2 years.
Hand Assessment for Infants, (HAI) is used to measure change over time
HAI is developed to identify and measure upper limb asymmetry and general manual development from 3-12 month in children at risk of developing cerebral palsy. During the test procedure, the aim is to elicit goal-directed functional use of the hands by introducing toys to be explored with both a uni-manual and a bimanual approach.
Measured: Small Step group: at baseline, 6w, 12w,18w, 24w, 30w and 2 years. In the usual care group: at baseline, 12 w, 30w and at 2 years.
Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66) is used to measure change over time
Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66), is an observational, standardized and criterion-referenced measure, developed to evaluate change in gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. The items cover gross motor capacity from lying and rolling, to walking, running and jumping.
Measured: Small Step group: at baseline, 6w, 12w,18w, 24w, 30w and 2 years. In the usual care group: at baseline, 12 w, 30w and at 2 years.
Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) is used to measure change over time
HINE is a method to estimate the neurological development of infants aged two-24 month. Using HINE, the risk of neural disorder can be assessed.
Measured: Small Step group: at baseline, 6w, 12w,18w, 24w, 30w and 2 years. In the usual care group: at baseline, 12 w, 30w and at 2 years.
Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID-III) is used to measure change over time
is a standard measurements to assess the motor (fine and gross), language (receptive and expressive), and cognitive development of infants and toddlers, ages 0-3. This measure consists of a series of developmental play tasks and takes between 45 - 60 minutes to administer. Raw scores of successfully completed items are converted to scale scores and to composite scores. These scores are used to determine the child's performance compared with norms taken from typically developing children of their age (in months).
Measured: Two occacions in both groups: 30w and 2 years.
Responsive Augmentative and Alternative Communication Style Scale (RAACS) is used to measure change over time
RAACS was developed for the purpose of assessing parents' communicative styles with children with communication difficulties. It is a video film of free communication between parents and children of maximum of 10 minutes. It is a criterion based assessment in which the films should be coded on 7 domains on a three grading scale. The results from the Responsive Augmentative and Alternative Communication Style Scale (RAACS) Version 3 can be used for planning and intervention as well as an outcome measure.
Measured: Small Step group: at baseline, 12w,18w, 30w and 2 years. In the usual care group: at baseline, 12 w, 30w and at 2 years.
Swedish Parenthood Stress Questionnaire (SPSQ) is used to measure change over time
SPSQ measures perceived parental stress and is a revised version of the parent domain of the Parenting Stress Index. The instrument contains 34 items within the five sub-areas: Incompetence regarding parenthood, Role restriction, Social isolation, Spouse relationship problems, and Health problems.
Measured: Both groups: baseline, 12w, 30w and at 2 years
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is used to measure change over time
HADS is a self-assessment scale, was developed to detect states of depression, anxiety and emotional distress amongst patients who were being treated for a variety of clinical problems. The Swedish version of the instrument will be used.
Measured: Both groups: baseline, 12w, 30w and at 2 years
The Working Model of the Child Interview, (WMCI) is used to measure change over time
The WMCI is semi-structured, open-ended interview designed to assess parent´s representations of their infant/ child and their relationship with their infant/ child. The interview is video-taped and takes approximately one hour. The WMCI is coded and summarized in classification types reflecting the parents´ overall state of mind with respect to the relationship with the infant /child. WMCI has been found to be both a reliable and valid approach to scoring representational aspects of parent-child-relationships.
Measured: Both groups: 30w and 2 years
Swedish Early Communicative Development Inventory, SECDI is used to measure change over time
parent questionnaire. SECDI is the Swedish version of The MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories, CDI. CDI is an internationally recognized parent report instrument for assessing early language development of children. The reliability and validity of The Swedish version of CDI, Swedish Early Communication Development Inventory (SECDI) have been investigated thoroughly and have been found to be satisfying. The instrument consists of two separate inventories: Words and gestures (CDI/WG) for children eight to 16 months and Words and Sentences (CDI/WS) for children 16 to 30 months. The SECDI inventories involve questions about communication and language capacities corresponding to the child's ability to comprehend and use communication and language.
Measured: Both groups: 30w and 2 years
Parent-Child Early Relational Assessment, PC-ERA is used to measure change over time
Parent-Child Early Relational Assessment, PC-ERA. The PC-ERA measures parent´s and child´s affect and behavioral characteristics using parent items, child items as well as dyadic items. Ratings are based on observations of videotaped parent-child interactions in three types of situations; free play, feeding and structured task. The purpose of the method is to capture the child´s experience of the parent, the parents 'experience of the child, the affective and behavioral characteristics that each bring into the interaction, and the quality or tone of the relationship. PC-ERA has been used internationally, and reliability and validity of the method have been addressed in both high-risk and normative populations with positive outcomes.
Measured: Both groups: 30w and 2 years
Pediatric Evaluation of the Disability Inventory (PEDI) is used to measure change over time
is a norm and criterion-referenced measure which evaluates functional skills and caregiver assistance in the domains self-care, mobility, and social function(17). The child is assessed by structured interviews with the parents. The summary scores can be converted to normative standard scores and scaled scores. The normative score are available for children 6 month to 7.5 years. The scaled scores range on a continuum from 0 to 100, where 0 represents no ability and 100 represents full capability to perform the functional skill items in a particular domain. PEDI is available in a Swedish version.
Measured: Both groups: 30w and 2 years
Parent Development Interview, PDI-R is used to measure change over time
is a semi-structured clinical interview intended to examine parents' representations of their children, themselves as parents, and their relationships with their children. The reliability and validity of the method has been considered good
Measured: 2 occacions in both groups, after intervention and at 2 year follow up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jun 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2014
- Primary completionDec 2017
- Study completionDec 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Gross Motor Development DelayStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Karolinska InstitutetThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 39 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Karolinska Institutet
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Swedish Research Council
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ann-Christin Eliasson, Karolinska Institutet
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02166801
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Smallstep
- Acronym
- smallstep
- Status last verified
- Aug 2018
- First submitted
- 12 Jun 2014
- Last updated
- 13 Aug 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Eliasson AC, Holmstrom L, Aarne P, Nakeva von Mentzer C, Weiland AL, Sjostrand L, Forssberg H, Tedroff K, Lowing K. Efficacy of the small step program in a randomised controlled trial for infants below age 12 months with clinical signs of CP; a study protocol. BMC Pediatr. 2016 Nov 3;16(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12887-016-0711-x.
PubMed 27809886
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Aug 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Small-step Program for Development of New Treatment Principles for Children With Cerebral Palsy and Other Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02166801
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- smallstep / Smallstep
- Conditions
- Gross Motor Development Delay, Cerebral Palsy
- Keywords
- Cerebral palsy, Children, Early Intervention, Communication, Gross motor function, Hand function
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 39 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Karolinska InstitutetUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Swedish Research Council
- Study start
- Jan 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Jun 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Children with cerebral palsy (CP) have life-long motor disorders and are typically subjected to extensive treatment throughout childhood. Despite this there is a lack of evidence supporting the effectiveness of treatment aiming at improving motor function and activity in daily life. The primary area of interest of this research programme is to determine the effectiveness of an early intervention program in children younger than 12 months of age who are at risk of developing CP. A randomised control trial is planned, addressing hand use, mobility and communication in a home-based program. New treatment principles based on recent knowledge of brain plasticity will be employed.
The overarching goal of this research programme is to develop and evaluate new intervention principles for children with neurodevelopmental disorders based upon theories of early learning induced brain plasticity. Our overall aims can be formulated as follows:
To evaluate the effects of an early intervention programme on the overall development in children with risk of developing cerebral palsy and other neurodevelopmental disorders. The program includes intensive intervention towards the foci: hand use, mobility and communication in a home based program
The hypothesis is that the design of the Small-Step-Program intervention, with clear foci on specific areas of development during different time periods and conducted in the child's home environment, will facilitate development and be more effective than usual care.
The second hypothesis is that children learn what they practice, meaning that children will have a more rapid development within the focus of each specific step in the training, when compared to the, for the time being, untrained steps.
The third hypothesis is that children's ability to learn within the different steps of the intervention programme will be influenced by the specific characteristics of any underlying brain pathology.
The fourth hypothesis is that parents in the study group will be less stressed and can better cope with their child's situation than parents to children receiving usual care. Thus, the tools provided within the Small-Step-Program intervention, like education, supervision and feedback of how to practice communication and task performance will make parents more able to cope with the child's delayed development.
Detailed description
Rational for subject selection: Signs of CP may be visible already during the first months, but according to recommendations the diagnosis of CP should typically not be made until 2-4 years of age. The reason is that the individual developmental trajectories of muscle tone, postural control and motor function vary considerably during the first two years. A child with a late development may recover and atypical signs may disappear, and opposite, CP may develop although there have been no early signs. Thus, there is a dilemma in that it is too late to wait with early intervention until the CP diagnosis has been made. In this project we are addressing this problem by developing criteria for infants with high risk to develop CP based on early signs of atypical motor development and on perinatal risk factors. That means that we will include both infants who will get and infants who will not get the CP diagnosis. Children who are not meeting the criteria of CP at 2 years of age will be excluded from the analysis. The investigators assume that the intervention will influence the course of development and help the children to function at a higher level, but not that the intervention will "cure" CP and prevent later diagnosis. Infants with increased risk to develop CP will be recruited in this project.
The study group will be recruited from infants exposed to increased perinatal risk factors, such as preterm birth, hypoxia, infections, retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) chronic lung disease and heart insufficiency, small for gestational age, hypoxic ischemic insult and morphological brain abnormalities. These children commonly participate in a clinical follow up programme at the children's hospital with regular examinations at 3months. The high-risk preterm infants that at follow up examinations exhibit a delayed psycho-motor development or display clinical signs of abnormal neurology will be recruited. Recruitment will also include children below 8 months, demonstrating delayed psycho-motor development or clinical signs of abnormal neurology referred to the physiotherapy department from child neurologists at the hospital.
Randomisation The aim is to include 40 children in the study group with neurodevelopmental disorder to reach sufficient power in the study. This number is high but the investigators expect that about 50% will not fulfil the diagnose criteria at 2 years of age based on previous experience from intervention studies. The aim is to include 20 children with CP, which is a reasonable approximation of study population size to reach sufficient power. The children will be allocated to group by block randomisation. The intervention group (n=20) will take part in a newly developed Small-Step-Program. The comparison group (n=20) will continue their ordinary follow up programme. Stratification will be used to control for gestational age (preterm<37 and term>37 week). Children in the Small-Step-Program" will be further randomised to start with the mobility step or hand use step.
Rational for second randomisation Our hypothesis is that the trained step will improve, while the non-trained step will result in minor changes and that children in the control group will have a continuous developmental pace. The randomised steps are hand use and mobility.
The children in both groups will be assessed at four occasions, at start (first examination), after 12 weeks (second examination) and after 30 weeks (third examination) as well as at 2 years of age (fourth examination). For children in the study group there will be 3 additional times for assessments in order to investigate the second hypothesis. Parents in both groups will be asked to fill in questionnaires' at all four examinations. Both parents will be asked to fill out the questionnaires.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Early intervention for infants | Active comparator | Behavioral: Early intervention for infantsA 30w intensive intervention according to the small step program, with daily practice sections conducted by parents at home, with weekly support by therapists. |
| Usual care | Active comparator | Behavioral: usual careUsual care means that the Children in this arm of the study participate in the established follow up program that is established at the Astrid Lindgrens Children's Hospital and offered to all Children that displays a delayed early gross and fine motor development. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 4 to 10 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- will be based on delayed psychomotor development, as assessed by Alberta Motor Infants Scale, using -2SD as a cut-off point. Neurological signs will be investigated by Hammersmith Infant Neurological examination (HINE) together with a clinical neurological examinations. Magnetic resonance imaging (MR) will be used if available to support the risk of development of CP, only MR done for clinical purpose will be used. The risk factors suggested for inclusion in the intervention program will be confirmed by a child neurologist.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- is unstable health, uncontrolled epilepsy, progressive disorder, diagnosis with a specific syndrome. Parent's communication language should be Swedish or English with satisfactory skills in either language for simple conversation. If the children show a catch-up in development at the second assessment (after 12 weeks) and show no sign of neurodevelopmental disorder the program will be terminated
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Early intervention for infantsThree foci are included in the intervention: Communication, Hand function and Mobility/gross motor function. The Hand \& Cognition and Mobility steps will be conducted during two time-periods. Communication will have a separate one-time intervention at the start of the study (prior to step I) in addition to one intervention period during step III (figure 1). General principles for the small step program: Training will be conducted in the children's home by the parents on a daily basis. The families will get instructions and supervision in their home every week by the therapist responsible for each specific step of the intervention. For each focus there will be different steps using an adaptive logarithm for training, i.e., adapted to the functional level of the child aiming at the next small developmental step. The family will be actively involved in identifying new foci for practice. | Behavioural | Early intervention for infants |
| usual careChildren displaying delayed development and at risk of developing cerebral palsy are continuously followed-up at the children's hospital. There are no strict rules for the frequency of appointments within the usual care program but the families typically meet a physiotherapist every third week during the first 2-3 months, thereafter about once a month. The frequency depends on the family's needs and wishes. If there is a continuous need for therapeutic intervention and need of contact with different professions, the families will be referred to the Habilitation Services when the child is between 8-12 months. The control group will follow this customary procedure in the hospital. The only difference will be the assessment procedure, the sessions with the speech pathologist and that they will get feedback of the children's progress after each examination. | Behavioural | Usual care |
Primary outcome
Peabody Developmental Motor Scales (PDMS-2) is used to measure change over time
Time frame: Small Step group: at baseline, 6w, 12w,18w, 24w, 30w and 2 years. In the usual care group: at baseline, 12 w, 30w and at 2 years.
Assesses gross and fine motor skills in young children. It is designed to evaluate children from birth through age 5. The PDMS-2 is composed of six subtests that assess related motor abilities that develop early in life: Reflexes, Stationary (body control and equilibrium), Locomotion, Object Manipulation, Grasping, and Visual-Motor Integration. Results from these subtests are used to generate the three composite scores: Gross Motor Quotient, Fine Motor Quotient, and Total Motor Quotient. Scores are presented as percentiles, standard scores, and age equivalents. Norms, based on a nationally representative sample of more than 2,000 children, are stratified by age
13 secondary outcomes
Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) is used to measure change over time
Time frame: Small Step group: at baseline, 6w, 12w,18w, 24w, 30w and 2 years. In the usual care group: at baseline, 12 w, 30w and at 2 years.
Hand Assessment for Infants, (HAI) is used to measure change over time
Time frame: Small Step group: at baseline, 6w, 12w,18w, 24w, 30w and 2 years. In the usual care group: at baseline, 12 w, 30w and at 2 years.
Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66) is used to measure change over time
Time frame: Small Step group: at baseline, 6w, 12w,18w, 24w, 30w and 2 years. In the usual care group: at baseline, 12 w, 30w and at 2 years.
Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) is used to measure change over time
Time frame: Small Step group: at baseline, 6w, 12w,18w, 24w, 30w and 2 years. In the usual care group: at baseline, 12 w, 30w and at 2 years.
Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID-III) is used to measure change over time
Time frame: Two occacions in both groups: 30w and 2 years.
Responsive Augmentative and Alternative Communication Style Scale (RAACS) is used to measure change over time
Time frame: Small Step group: at baseline, 12w,18w, 30w and 2 years. In the usual care group: at baseline, 12 w, 30w and at 2 years.
Swedish Parenthood Stress Questionnaire (SPSQ) is used to measure change over time
Time frame: Both groups: baseline, 12w, 30w and at 2 years
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is used to measure change over time
Time frame: Both groups: baseline, 12w, 30w and at 2 years
The Working Model of the Child Interview, (WMCI) is used to measure change over time
Time frame: Both groups: 30w and 2 years
Swedish Early Communicative Development Inventory, SECDI is used to measure change over time
Time frame: Both groups: 30w and 2 years
Parent-Child Early Relational Assessment, PC-ERA is used to measure change over time
Time frame: Both groups: 30w and 2 years
Pediatric Evaluation of the Disability Inventory (PEDI) is used to measure change over time
Time frame: Both groups: 30w and 2 years
Parent Development Interview, PDI-R is used to measure change over time
Time frame: 2 occacions in both groups, after intervention and at 2 year follow up
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Aug 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27809886Eliasson AC, Holmstrom L, Aarne P, Nakeva von Mentzer C, Weiland AL, Sjostrand L, Forssberg H, Tedroff K, Lowing K. Efficacy of the small step program in a randomised controlled trial for infants below age 12 months with clinical signs of CP; a study protocol. BMC Pediatr. 2016 Nov 3;16(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12887-016-0711-x.
Related trials for Gross Motor Development Delay
RecruitingObservational study
Vestibular and Postural Function in Children Suspected of Balance Disorders
Children, Only, Vestibular Disorder
Enrolling by invitation
Ready, Set, Go! A Physical Fitness Intervention for Children With Mobility Challenges
Cerebral Palsy, Myelomeningocele
Recruiting
Effect of Task Specific Electrical Stimulation on Upper Limb Gross Motor Skills in Children With Spastic Quadriplegia
Cerebral Palsy (CP), Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Active, not recruiting
Grand Valley State University (GVSU) Skills on Wheels
Spina Bifida, Cerebral Palsy
RecruitingObservational study
Video-based Assessment of Preschool Children's Gross Motor Development
Gross Motor Development Delay
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Early intervention for infants in people with Gross Motor Development Delay and Cerebral Palsy, run by Karolinska Institutet at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Peabody Developmental Motor Scales (PDMS-2) is used to measure change over time (time frame: Small Step group: at baseline, 6w, 12w,18w, 24w, 30w and 2 years. In the usual care group: at baseline, 12 w, 30w and at 2 years.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02166801, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Aug 2018.