Ovarian Cancer RiskEarly Phase 1NCT02155777
Why do Oral Contraceptives Prevent Ovarian Cancer?
A Early Phase 1 study testing OrthoNovum 1/35 in people with Ovarian Cancer Risk and Risk-reducing Surgery, run by University of Michigan at 3 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Use of oral contraceptives (OCs) reduces a woman's risk of ovarian cancer very significantly and the protective effect continues for at least 25 years after use of OCs is stopped; the mechanisms of how this occurs are not understood. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 45 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Ovarian Cancer Risk, Risk-reducing Surgery, Fallopian Tube Fimbriae
- What is being tested?
- OrthoNovum 1/35
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 52 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 2014to Jun 2018
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 45 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Premenopausal
- 30 and 45 years of age
- Scheduled to undergo a laproscopically conducted RR-BSO, risk reducing salpingectomy, salpingectomy for sterilization, or salpingectomy with hysterectomy for non-cancer related conditions
- Have at least one ovary
Who cannot join
- Past hysterectomy
- Past diagnosis of ovarian cancer
- Use of Tamoxifen, Raloxifene or hormone replacement therapy in the past 3 months
- Use of Chemotherapy in the last 6 months
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 2 countries.
3 sites in 2 countries
United States2 sites
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
USC Keck School of Medicine
Los Angeles, California, 90089
About this study
Official title: Mechanisms of Prevention of Ovarian Cancer by Oral Contraceptives
Use of oral contraceptives (OCs) reduces a woman's risk of ovarian cancer very significantly and the protective effect continues for at least 25 years after use of OCs is stopped; the mechanisms of how this occurs are not understood. We are proposing here to directly study the effect of OCs on the fallopian tube and inclusion cysts within the ovary - sites from which most ovarian cancers are thought to arise - in order to better understand the mechanistic basis for OC protection against ovarian cancer. We think the protection results from reduced cell proliferation. It will lay the foundation for further studies to ensure that the protection against ovarian cancer afforded by 'traditional' OCs is not lost with alterations in OC formulation, and, if possible, to guide development of OC formations to improve further on the protection afforded by OCs.
Read the detailed description
Five-year survival for invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (ovarian cancer) is less than 50% because most women are diagnosed at an advanced stage. However, there is an effective chemoprevention strategy. Meta-analysis of epidemiological studies shows an approximately 40% reduction in risk of ovarian cancer with 5 years of oral contraceptive (OC) use. The protective effect increases significantly with duration of OC use and continues for at least 25 years after use of OCs is stopped. The mechanism(s) underlying this protective effect are not understood. One hypothesis is that protection is achieved by blocking ovulation, but growing evidence suggests that it may be related to promoting a favorable progestagenic environment. OC use would protect if the hormonal exposure while on OCs was less stimulatory to the possibly different types of cells of origin of ovarian cancer than the hormonal exposure in normal ovulatory cycles. Exposure to progestins is higher while on OCs than in normal cycling and this could explain the protective effect. We propose that a major source of the protection from OC use is due to their significantly reducing cell proliferation in the fallopian tube fimbriae (FTF) and in ovarian cortical inclusion cysts (CICs), two likely cells of origin for ovarian cancer. Proliferating cell populations are more susceptible to carcinogenic effects with the rise in cancer risk with cell proliferation being secondary to increased chances of mutation and progression. FTF proliferation has been reported to be almost confined to the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle with virtually no proliferation within a few days after ovulation and our preliminary data show the same pattern - OCs could thus protect against ovarian cancers arising in the FTF by mimicking the luteal phase of the cycle when progesterone exposure is high. Whether such changes occur in CICs is not known. Cell proliferation within different types of CICs during the menstrual cycle has not been studied. The effect of OCs on proliferation within the FTF and CICs has also not been studied. We are proposing to determine the effect of a 'traditional' high progestin dose OC on cell proliferation in the FTF and CICs in women undergoing a risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RR-BSO), and to compare these proliferation rates to the rates during the normal menstrual cycle of women also undergoing an RR-BSO. The results of this study will provide crucial information regarding the relationship between OC use and protection against ovarian cancer. It will lay the foundation for further studies examining the effects of lower progestin dose OCs and OCs with newer progestin formulations. Our long-term goal in studying the mechanism of OC protection is to determine whether it is likely that the protection against ovarian cancer afforded by OCs will be lost with alterations in OC formulation in terms of dose or type of progestin used, and, if possible, to guide development of OC formations to improve further on the protection afforded by OCs.
- Conditions
- Ovarian Cancer Risk, Risk-reducing Surgery, Fallopian Tube Fimbriae, Ovarian Cortical Inclusion Cysts
- Being tested
- OrthoNovum 1/35
- Keywords
- BRCA1, BRCA2, Risk-reducing surgery, Oral Contraceptives
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OrthoNovum 1/35Drug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| No intervention | No intervention | No intervention. |
| OrthoNovum 1/35 | Active comparator | OrthoNovum 1/35 Receives: Drug: OrthoNovum 1/35 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Differences in cell proliferation as measured by Ki67 immunohistochemical analysis in the fallopian tube fimbriae of women on the OC arm compared to women on the no treatment arm.
Measured: Cell proliferation (Ki67) will be measured in the specimen that is removed as part of the patients surgery (the surgery is not a study procedure).
Secondary outcomes (1)
Cell proliferation as measured by Ki67 immunohistochemical analysis in ovarian cortical inclusion cysts of women on the OC arm compared to women on the no treatment arm.
Measured: Cell proliferation (Ki67) will be measured in the tissue removed as part of the surgery (the surgery is not a study procedure)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Jun 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2014
- Primary completionJun 2018
- Study completionJun 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Ovarian Cancer RiskStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of MichiganThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Michigan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Celeste Pearce, University of Michigan
- Investigators
- Celeste L Pearce, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Michigan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02155777
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OC Prevention
- Other IDs
- 1R21CA178571-01
- Status last verified
- Jun 2020
- First submitted
- 15 May 2014
- Last updated
- 25 Jun 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jun 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Mechanisms of Prevention of Ovarian Cancer by Oral Contraceptives
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02155777
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OC Prevention
- Conditions
- Ovarian Cancer Risk, Risk-reducing Surgery, Fallopian Tube Fimbriae, Ovarian Cortical Inclusion Cysts
- Keywords
- BRCA1, BRCA2, Risk-reducing surgery, Oral Contraceptives
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MichiganUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- Jun 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Jun 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Use of oral contraceptives (OCs) reduces a woman's risk of ovarian cancer very significantly and the protective effect continues for at least 25 years after use of OCs is stopped; the mechanisms of how this occurs are not understood. We are proposing here to directly study the effect of OCs on the fallopian tube and inclusion cysts within the ovary - sites from which most ovarian cancers are thought to arise - in order to better understand the mechanistic basis for OC protection against ovarian cancer. We think the protection results from reduced cell proliferation. It will lay the foundation for further studies to ensure that the protection against ovarian cancer afforded by 'traditional' OCs is not lost with alterations in OC formulation, and, if possible, to guide development of OC formations to improve further on the protection afforded by OCs.
Detailed description
Five-year survival for invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (ovarian cancer) is less than 50% because most women are diagnosed at an advanced stage. However, there is an effective chemoprevention strategy. Meta-analysis of epidemiological studies shows an approximately 40% reduction in risk of ovarian cancer with 5 years of oral contraceptive (OC) use. The protective effect increases significantly with duration of OC use and continues for at least 25 years after use of OCs is stopped. The mechanism(s) underlying this protective effect are not understood. One hypothesis is that protection is achieved by blocking ovulation, but growing evidence suggests that it may be related to promoting a favorable progestagenic environment. OC use would protect if the hormonal exposure while on OCs was less stimulatory to the possibly different types of cells of origin of ovarian cancer than the hormonal exposure in normal ovulatory cycles. Exposure to progestins is higher while on OCs than in normal cycling and this could explain the protective effect. We propose that a major source of the protection from OC use is due to their significantly reducing cell proliferation in the fallopian tube fimbriae (FTF) and in ovarian cortical inclusion cysts (CICs), two likely cells of origin for ovarian cancer. Proliferating cell populations are more susceptible to carcinogenic effects with the rise in cancer risk with cell proliferation being secondary to increased chances of mutation and progression. FTF proliferation has been reported to be almost confined to the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle with virtually no proliferation within a few days after ovulation and our preliminary data show the same pattern - OCs could thus protect against ovarian cancers arising in the FTF by mimicking the luteal phase of the cycle when progesterone exposure is high. Whether such changes occur in CICs is not known. Cell proliferation within different types of CICs during the menstrual cycle has not been studied. The effect of OCs on proliferation within the FTF and CICs has also not been studied. We are proposing to determine the effect of a 'traditional' high progestin dose OC on cell proliferation in the FTF and CICs in women undergoing a risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RR-BSO), and to compare these proliferation rates to the rates during the normal menstrual cycle of women also undergoing an RR-BSO. The results of this study will provide crucial information regarding the relationship between OC use and protection against ovarian cancer. It will lay the foundation for further studies examining the effects of lower progestin dose OCs and OCs with newer progestin formulations. Our long-term goal in studying the mechanism of OC protection is to determine whether it is likely that the protection against ovarian cancer afforded by OCs will be lost with alterations in OC formulation in terms of dose or type of progestin used, and, if possible, to guide development of OC formations to improve further on the protection afforded by OCs.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| No intervention | No intervention | –No intervention. |
| OrthoNovum 1/35 | Active comparator | Drug: OrthoNovum 1/35OrthoNovum 1/35 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 45 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Premenopausal
- 30 and 45 years of age
- Scheduled to undergo a laproscopically conducted RR-BSO, risk reducing salpingectomy, salpingectomy for sterilization, or salpingectomy with hysterectomy for non-cancer related conditions
- Have at least one ovary
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Past hysterectomy
- Past diagnosis of ovarian cancer
- Use of Tamoxifen, Raloxifene or hormone replacement therapy in the past 3 months
- Use of Chemotherapy in the last 6 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| OrthoNovum 1/35 | Drug | OrthoNovum 1/35 |
Primary outcome
Differences in cell proliferation as measured by Ki67 immunohistochemical analysis in the fallopian tube fimbriae of women on the OC arm compared to women on the no treatment arm.
Time frame: Cell proliferation (Ki67) will be measured in the specimen that is removed as part of the patients surgery (the surgery is not a study procedure).
1 secondary outcome
Cell proliferation as measured by Ki67 immunohistochemical analysis in ovarian cortical inclusion cysts of women on the OC arm compared to women on the no treatment arm.
Time frame: Cell proliferation (Ki67) will be measured in the tissue removed as part of the surgery (the surgery is not a study procedure)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jun 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Ovarian Cancer Risk
Recruiting
A Study to Compare Two Surgical Procedures in Individuals With BRCA1 Mutations to Assess Reduced Risk of Ovarian Cancer
Ovarian Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Polygenic Risk Scores and Multi-cancer Early Detection for Ovarian Cancer
Ovarian Cancer, BRCA Mutation
RecruitingObservational study
Avera Cancer Sequencing and Analytics Protocol (ASAP)
Cancer, Cancer Diagnosis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Diagnostic Test to Evaluate Cancer Risk Before Surgery in Women With an Ovarian Mass
Ovarian Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Culturally-Informed Counseling in Latinas at High Risk for Hereditary Breast or Ovarian Cancer
No Evidence of Disease, BRCA1 Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Celeste L Pearce, PhD principal investigator
University of Michigan
3 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing OrthoNovum 1/35 in people with Ovarian Cancer Risk and Risk-reducing Surgery, run by University of Michigan at 3 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Differences in cell proliferation as measured by Ki67 immunohistochemical analysis in the fallopian tube fimbriae of women on the OC arm compared to women on the no treatment arm. (time frame: Cell proliferation (Ki67) will be measured in the specimen that is removed as part of the patients surgery (the surgery is not a study procedure).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jun 2020.