AzTrials
AzTrials

Ovarian Cancer RiskEarly Phase 1NCT02155777

Why do Oral Contraceptives Prevent Ovarian Cancer?

A Early Phase 1 study testing OrthoNovum 1/35 in people with Ovarian Cancer Risk and Risk-reducing Surgery, run by University of Michigan at 3 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Use of oral contraceptives (OCs) reduces a woman's risk of ovarian cancer very significantly and the protective effect continues for at least 25 years after use of OCs is stopped; the mechanisms of how this occurs are not understood. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 to 45 years, women only
What is being tested?
OrthoNovum 1/35
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
52 participants
Where
3 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Jun 2014to Jun 2018
Phase
Early Phase 1
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 to 45 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Premenopausal
  • 30 and 45 years of age
  • Scheduled to undergo a laproscopically conducted RR-BSO, risk reducing salpingectomy, salpingectomy for sterilization, or salpingectomy with hysterectomy for non-cancer related conditions
  • Have at least one ovary

Who cannot join

  • Past hysterectomy
  • Past diagnosis of ovarian cancer
  • Use of Tamoxifen, Raloxifene or hormone replacement therapy in the past 3 months
  • Use of Chemotherapy in the last 6 months

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 2 countries.

3 sites in 2 countries

United States2 sites
  • University of Michigan

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

  • USC Keck School of Medicine

    Los Angeles, California, 90089

Other trials in United States

Canada1 site
  • UBC BC Cancer Agency

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Mechanisms of Prevention of Ovarian Cancer by Oral Contraceptives

Use of oral contraceptives (OCs) reduces a woman's risk of ovarian cancer very significantly and the protective effect continues for at least 25 years after use of OCs is stopped; the mechanisms of how this occurs are not understood. We are proposing here to directly study the effect of OCs on the fallopian tube and inclusion cysts within the ovary - sites from which most ovarian cancers are thought to arise - in order to better understand the mechanistic basis for OC protection against ovarian cancer. We think the protection results from reduced cell proliferation. It will lay the foundation for further studies to ensure that the protection against ovarian cancer afforded by 'traditional' OCs is not lost with alterations in OC formulation, and, if possible, to guide development of OC formations to improve further on the protection afforded by OCs.

Read the detailed description

Five-year survival for invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (ovarian cancer) is less than 50% because most women are diagnosed at an advanced stage. However, there is an effective chemoprevention strategy. Meta-analysis of epidemiological studies shows an approximately 40% reduction in risk of ovarian cancer with 5 years of oral contraceptive (OC) use. The protective effect increases significantly with duration of OC use and continues for at least 25 years after use of OCs is stopped. The mechanism(s) underlying this protective effect are not understood. One hypothesis is that protection is achieved by blocking ovulation, but growing evidence suggests that it may be related to promoting a favorable progestagenic environment. OC use would protect if the hormonal exposure while on OCs was less stimulatory to the possibly different types of cells of origin of ovarian cancer than the hormonal exposure in normal ovulatory cycles. Exposure to progestins is higher while on OCs than in normal cycling and this could explain the protective effect. We propose that a major source of the protection from OC use is due to their significantly reducing cell proliferation in the fallopian tube fimbriae (FTF) and in ovarian cortical inclusion cysts (CICs), two likely cells of origin for ovarian cancer. Proliferating cell populations are more susceptible to carcinogenic effects with the rise in cancer risk with cell proliferation being secondary to increased chances of mutation and progression. FTF proliferation has been reported to be almost confined to the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle with virtually no proliferation within a few days after ovulation and our preliminary data show the same pattern - OCs could thus protect against ovarian cancers arising in the FTF by mimicking the luteal phase of the cycle when progesterone exposure is high. Whether such changes occur in CICs is not known. Cell proliferation within different types of CICs during the menstrual cycle has not been studied. The effect of OCs on proliferation within the FTF and CICs has also not been studied. We are proposing to determine the effect of a 'traditional' high progestin dose OC on cell proliferation in the FTF and CICs in women undergoing a risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RR-BSO), and to compare these proliferation rates to the rates during the normal menstrual cycle of women also undergoing an RR-BSO. The results of this study will provide crucial information regarding the relationship between OC use and protection against ovarian cancer. It will lay the foundation for further studies examining the effects of lower progestin dose OCs and OCs with newer progestin formulations. Our long-term goal in studying the mechanism of OC protection is to determine whether it is likely that the protection against ovarian cancer afforded by OCs will be lost with alterations in OC formulation in terms of dose or type of progestin used, and, if possible, to guide development of OC formations to improve further on the protection afforded by OCs.

Being tested
OrthoNovum 1/35
Keywords
BRCA1, BRCA2, Risk-reducing surgery, Oral Contraceptives

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • OrthoNovum 1/35Drug

Study groups in NCT02155777
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
No interventionNo interventionNo intervention.
OrthoNovum 1/35Active comparatorOrthoNovum 1/35
Receives: Drug: OrthoNovum 1/35

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Differences in cell proliferation as measured by Ki67 immunohistochemical analysis in the fallopian tube fimbriae of women on the OC arm compared to women on the no treatment arm.

    Measured: Cell proliferation (Ki67) will be measured in the specimen that is removed as part of the patients surgery (the surgery is not a study procedure).

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Cell proliferation as measured by Ki67 immunohistochemical analysis in ovarian cortical inclusion cysts of women on the OC arm compared to women on the no treatment arm.

    Measured: Cell proliferation (Ki67) will be measured in the tissue removed as part of the surgery (the surgery is not a study procedure)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Jun 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2014
  3. Primary completionJun 2018
  4. Study completionJun 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
52 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02155777
Sponsor's protocol ID
OC Prevention
Other IDs
1R21CA178571-01
Status last verified
Jun 2020
First submitted
15 May 2014
Last updated
25 Jun 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Early Phase 1 study testing OrthoNovum 1/35 in people with Ovarian Cancer Risk and Risk-reducing Surgery, run by University of Michigan at 3 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Differences in cell proliferation as measured by Ki67 immunohistochemical analysis in the fallopian tube fimbriae of women on the OC arm compared to women on the no treatment arm. (time frame: Cell proliferation (Ki67) will be measured in the specimen that is removed as part of the patients surgery (the surgery is not a study procedure).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jun 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in